Sharplink CEO: Ethereum's Future Is Playing Out Now

链捕手Published on 2026-05-30Last updated on 2026-05-30

Abstract

This article presents a perspective from Joseph Chalom, CEO of Sharplink and a former BlackRock executive. He argues that current controversies surrounding the Ethereum Foundation (EF) and ETH's price miss the bigger picture for institutional adoption. Chalom asserts that Ethereum is decisively winning in the three key attributes institutions value most: trust, security, and liquidity. He cites its dominance in stablecoin settlement, tokenized real-world assets (RWA), and high-value DeFi as evidence. This success is attributed to the EF's consistent, long-term protocol development over a decade, including major upgrades like The Merge and a robust future roadmap. He defends Ethereum's decentralization as a core strength, not a weakness, stating institutions require a neutral infrastructure not controlled by any single entity. Comparing ETH to Amazon, Chalom suggests critics focusing on short-term price are missing its potential to become the foundational settlement layer for the entire global financial system. The article encourages a contrarian "be greedy when others are fearful" investment approach, drawing parallels to Warren Buffett's strategy and BlackRock's continued investment during crypto winters. Chalom concludes that while the EF correctly focuses on core protocol attributes (CROPS: Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, Security), a leadership gap exists in market-facing narrative and institutional adoption. He calls for ecosystem part...

Author: Joseph Chalom

Compiled by: Jiahuan, ChainCatcher

The current drama surrounding the Ethereum Foundation (EF), and the noise about the ETH price, are missing the real big picture. I fully understand this debate, but it won't determine who leads the financial infrastructure for the next decade.

This is just the perspective of one stakeholder. Before leading Sharplink, I spent two decades as an executive at BlackRock, overseeing fintech business and digital asset strategy.

That experience taught me what institutions truly value before committing capital to a new set of infrastructure.

I want to step back, away from the noise, and offer a different assessment of Ethereum's current state and where it's headed.

The Ethereum Foundation Is Doing Its Job

Take a step back and look at the results delivered over the past decade. On the three attributes institutions care most about for adoption—trust, security, and liquidity—Ethereum is already qualified to win. It is winning, and by a large margin.

Look at the track record. The settlement of the majority of global stablecoin value occurs on Ethereum. Its scale of tokenized real-world assets (RWA) far exceeds any other blockchain, and it is also the default venue for high-value DeFi transactions.

No competing chain comes close on these dimensions.

This is not accidental; it is the result of years of rigorous protocol development by the Ethereum Foundation. Ethereum is the only blockchain with a decade-long record of major upgrades shipped at the base layer.

The Merge, EIP-1559, Dencun, Pectra, Fusaka—all delivered. The upcoming Glamsterdam upgrade will bring a step-change in scaling, and the Foundation is also pioneering the path to quantum resistance. This is the most ambitious technical roadmap in the industry.

Decentralization Is a Strength, Not a Flaw

Some of the fiercest criticisms of the Foundation treat decentralization as a weakness. This gets institutional logic completely backwards. The Ethereum ecosystem has the largest number of developers of any chain, and the vast majority of them do not work inside the Foundation.

No single foundation should control a chain. Institutions will not abandon their current systems just to lock themselves into another proprietary one.

They need confidence that the underlying properties they rely on cannot be arbitrarily changed by a few controllers. In fact, no chain should be dependent on any single actor.

Ethereum's credible neutrality and decentralization are precisely why it can become the settlement layer for future finance. These are not flaws.

Given the choice between a foundation focused on security, privacy, quantum resistance, and the core protocol, and one that exists only for short-term marketing, I would choose the former every single time.

Analogizing ETH's Value with Amazon

History is full of examples where foundational innovation was dismissed by critics, had its thunder stolen by flashier newcomers, only for the critics to be proven wrong later. Amazon is the clearest case study.

Early on, the market consensus on Amazon was that of an unprofitable online bookseller propped up by the dot-com bubble. Bears focused on the P&L, unable to see Bezos's long-term ambition.

He was building a fundamentally new market structure for online commerce. Its total addressable market wasn't books; it was the entire retail economy, later expanding to cloud computing and media. Analysts who focused solely on short-term price missed the bigger opportunity.

Today's Ethereum and ETH are in the same position. Its potential market is not crypto trading; it is the entire global financial system. ETH's intrinsic value is tightly bound to the network's expansion.

And this network stands on the cusp of a step-change in transaction volume, covering stablecoins, tokenized real-world assets, DeFi, and the emerging wave of agent-driven finance.

To provide security for transaction volumes of that magnitude, ETH will become a highly demanded incentive layer, the ultimate bearer of trust, and its monetary premium will rise accordingly.

There is no Ethereum without ETH. The asset and the network are inseparable.

Be Fearful When Others Are Greedy, Be Greedy When Others Are Fearful

In almost every market cycle, the moment when retail capitulates and sentiment bottoms out is precisely the opportunity for disciplined capital to enter.

Warren Buffett built Berkshire by buying quality assets at the worst times in the market: from GEICO in the '70s to Bank of America and Goldman Sachs during the 2008 financial crisis.

For most of the past year, fear and greed indices have shown extreme fear in the market. The smartest investors buy quality assets during maximum panic. They act counter-cyclically, not pro-cyclically.

During the crypto winter following FTX, most institutions chose to avoid exposure to Bitcoin and ETH or shelved product launches. At BlackRock, we did the opposite.

We doubled down, investing in infrastructure, building ecosystem partnerships, and launching products that bridge TradFi with crypto. The lessons from Buffett and BlackRock are ones we should all learn.

Raising New Voices for Ethereum

The Ethereum Foundation is doing its job. Going forward, it will focus even more on CROPS—the core properties of Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Openness, Privacy, and Security.

For most, the issue is clear: at a time when institutions are eager to embrace Ethereum, a leadership gap has emerged in the market promotion piece.

I have a strong feeling: stakeholders and participants within the ecosystem need to play a more significant role in Ethereum's narrative and its institutional adoption.

Since last summer, the Digital Asset Treasury Company and key Ethereum stewards have already played a major part in this effort.

This includes ecosystem participants like Sharplink, Tom Lee of BitMine, Joe Lubin of Consensys, Etherealize, Nethermind, Aave, Morpho, the EEA, and others. We also work closely with the small team within the Foundation focused on institutional education and adoption.

Sharplink is also investing in this ecosystem. We were among the first to stake billions in ETH, and have deployed hundreds of millions into quality DeFi protocols; we recently co-launched a $125 million DeFi yield fund with Galaxy Digital to support both existing and emerging protocols.

Even so, we can do more, and we will do more: become vocal advocates for Ethereum and actively support the coming supercycle of institutional adoption.

Ethereum's future is playing out now.

Related Questions

QAccording to the Sharplink CEO, what are the three key attributes for institutional adoption that Ethereum has already excelled in?

AThe three key attributes are trust, security, and liquidity.

QWhy does the author argue that Ethereum's decentralization is an advantage for institutional adoption, not a flaw?

AHe argues that institutions need assurance that the fundamental properties of the infrastructure they rely on cannot be arbitrarily changed by a few controllers. Ethereum's reliable neutrality and decentralization ensure this, making it suitable as a future financial settlement layer. Institutions are not looking to abandon one proprietary system for another.

QWhat historical company does the author use as an analogy for Ethereum's current situation and potential?

AThe author uses Amazon as an analogy. He compares early doubters focusing on Amazon's short-term losses to those overlooking Ethereum's long-term potential to serve the entire global financial system, not just crypto trading.

QWhat investment strategy does the author advocate for during market downturns, citing examples from Warren Buffett and BlackRock?

AHe advocates for the strategy of buying high-quality assets when market fear is at its peak, being contrarian rather than following the crowd. He cites Warren Buffett's investments during crises and BlackRock's decision to double down on crypto infrastructure after the FTX collapse.

QWhat does the acronym CROPS stand for, and what role does the author see the Ethereum Foundation playing regarding it?

ACROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. The author states that the Ethereum Foundation will increasingly focus on these core protocol attributes as part of its core work, while other ecosystem participants need to step up in marketing and institutional adoption.

Related Reads

How the CLARITY Act Reshapes the Stablecoin Yield Economy

The CLARITY Act, recently advanced by the U.S. Senate Banking Committee, fundamentally reshapes the stablecoin yield economy by closing loopholes left by the earlier GENIUS Act. Its Section 404 expands the ban on "hold-to-earn" rewards to all Digital Asset Service Providers (DASPs) and their affiliates, prohibiting any passive, interest-like yield. Crucially, it introduces a legal distinction, permitting "use-to-earn" rewards based on actual activities like spending, trading, or staking. In anticipation of this regulatory shift, major Wall Street asset managers—Morgan Stanley, BlackRock, and JPMorgan—have launched a series of tokenized money market funds (e.g., BlackRock's BRSRV, JPMorgan's JLTXX) designed explicitly for stablecoin reserve assets. These products represent a new, compliant yield layer: the stablecoin issuer earns interest from the underlying tokenized fund, which can then be passed to users through redesigned activity-based rewards. This marks a paradigm shift from a "hold-to-earn" to a "use-to-earn" market. While pathways remain for exchanges to redesign rewards (Path A) and for DeFi protocols to offer yield (Path B), the tokenized reserve asset layer (Path C) emerges as the most robust and strategically positioned infrastructure. However, this concentration—exemplified by BlackRock's BUIDL fund backing over 90% of USDtb's reserves—introduces new systemic risks. The final outcome hinges on regulatory decisions, particularly the OCC's proposed 20% cap on tokenized assets in reserves, which will determine the scalability of this new financial infrastructure layer.

marsbit17m ago

How the CLARITY Act Reshapes the Stablecoin Yield Economy

marsbit17m ago

Kalshi and Coinbase Receive CFTC Approval, Ushering in the Most Regulation-Friendly Era for the Crypto Industry?

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) took two landmark actions on May 29. It approved Kalshi's application to list a Bitcoin perpetual futures contract and issued a no-action letter to Coinbase Financial Markets. This allows Coinbase to offer certain perpetual futures products to U.S. customers through a subsidiary, with digital assets permitted as collateral. These moves, coupled with a new CFTC policy statement, provide a clearer regulatory pathway for perpetual contracts in the U.S., moving them from a regulatory gray area. CFTC Chair Mike Selig stated this is a key step for U.S. crypto leadership but noted the policy is not yet permanent. The article explains that CFTC's previous reluctance stemmed from legal ambiguities, as perpetual contracts lack an expiration date. However, such contracts dominate global crypto derivatives, accounting for ~78% of centralized exchange volume in 2025, forcing U.S. regulators to adapt to competition from offshore platforms like Hyperliquid. The approvals offer two compliance paths: Kalshi's direct listing and Coinbase's model using foreign futures. This is expected to attract institutional capital back to regulated U.S. venues, stimulate the launch of more products like ETH perpetuals, and enhance U.S. competitiveness in the global crypto derivatives market. The author suggests this may signal a "regulatorily friendly" era for crypto.

marsbit3h ago

Kalshi and Coinbase Receive CFTC Approval, Ushering in the Most Regulation-Friendly Era for the Crypto Industry?

marsbit3h ago

Deconstructing the Investment Methodology of the 'Stock God Serenity' in One Article

"Serenity's Bottleneck Investment Methodology: A Deep Dive" This article dissects the "bottleneck point investment" strategy of the pseudonymous investor Serenity, known for exceptional returns (YTD 4502.45%). The core methodology involves identifying a major technological trend (e.g., AI compute expansion), mapping its supply chain, and investing early in the most irreplaceable, supply-constrained upstream component before the market fully values it. The framework is broken down into a five-factor model: 1. **Deterministic Demand**: Anchored in a large, validated trend. 2. **Constrained Supply**: The component must be difficult to replicate or scale quickly. 3. **Low Market Attention**: Opportunities exist where coverage is sparse. 4. **Value Capture**: The company must have pricing power, high margins, and customer lock-in. 5. **Catalyst**: A near-term event to trigger price discovery (earnings, customer ramp, etc.). The article provides illustrative examples like $AXTI (InP substrates for photonics), $RPI (edge hardware for AI agents), and $AAOI/$LITE (components for cloud ASICs). To apply this method, a six-step process is outlined: identify the macro trend, map the supply chain, pinpoint the true bottleneck, gather evidence (client wins, certifications), assess risks ("anti-thesis table"), and size the position according to research depth. Crucially, the article notes significant limitations: risk of overfitting inferences from sparse data, valuation challenges for pre-revenue companies, liquidity/reflexivity risks due to Serenity's own market influence, and survivor bias amplified by a strong AI bull market. The key takeaway is to emulate the rigorous research process—finding the trend, the bottleneck, the evidence—rather than blindly copying specific stock picks, emphasizing the discipline of "walking through the narrow gate."

marsbit4h ago

Deconstructing the Investment Methodology of the 'Stock God Serenity' in One Article

marsbit4h ago

One Article Deconstructs the Investment Methodology of 'Stock God Serenity'

This article deconstructs the "bottleneck point" investment methodology of the renowned investor known as "Serenity" (aleabitoreddit). Characterized by a YTD return of over 4500%, the strategy involves identifying a major, confirmed trend (e.g., AI data center expansion), mapping its supply chain, and then pinpointing a critical, hard-to-replace upstream bottleneck that the market has yet to fully price in. The core framework is a five-factor model: 1) **Certain Demand** from a clear megatrend; 2) **Constrained Supply** with high barriers to entry and slow replication; 3) **Low Market Attention**, where the company is overlooked; 4) **Value Capture** potential through pricing power and market share; and 5) a near-term **Catalyst** to trigger re-evaluation. Case studies include **$AXTI** (InP substrates for photonics), **$RPI** (edge hardware for AI agents), and companies like **$AAOI** and **$LITE** tied to hyperscaler-specific ASIC demand (e.g., Microsoft Maia, Amazon Trainium). The article provides a six-step guide for applying this approach: 1) Identify a validated macro trend; 2) Map the entire supply chain; 3) Find the true bottleneck; 4) Gather concrete evidence (e.g., filings, customer contracts); 5) Perform rigorous risk assessment ("anti-thesis"); 6) Match position size to depth of research. Key limitations are also noted: the risk of narrative overfitting, difficulty in valuing early-stage companies, Serenity's own market-moving influence creating reflexivity, and potential survivorship bias due to the AI bull market. The essence of the method is not to copy picks but to adopt the research process: find the trend, locate the bottleneck, verify with evidence, assess valuation, await a catalyst, and then invest with discipline. The philosophy is summarized as "walking through the narrow gate"—seeking non-consensus, structurally vital points within booming industries before they become widely recognized.

链捕手4h ago

One Article Deconstructs the Investment Methodology of 'Stock God Serenity'

链捕手4h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片