# Cloud Related Articles

HTX News Center provides the latest articles and in-depth analysis on "Cloud", covering market trends, project updates, tech developments, and regulatory policies in the crypto industry.

Suzerain State: Anthropic

Anthropic, a five-year-old AI lab dubbed a "suzerain," has rapidly gained unprecedented influence by securing massive financial and computational commitments from tech giants, positioning itself at the center of AI infrastructure power dynamics. In May 2026, it announced securing over 300 MW of computing power from SpaceX's Colossus 1 data center, on top of earlier multi-billion dollar deals with Amazon and Google, effectively locking in over 20 GW of future compute. These investments are tied to reciprocal spending commitments on the investors' cloud platforms, resembling infrastructure pre-sales. This "suzerain" status is fueled by explosive growth. By May 2026, Anthropic's annualized revenue reportedly surged to over $44 billion, with Claude surpassing OpenAI in LLM market share. Its high-revenue-per-user efficiency and flagship product Claude Code have secured a strong enterprise foothold. However, its pre-IPO status faces scrutiny. OpenAI challenged Anthropic's accounting, alleging its reported revenue includes gross payments shared with cloud partners, unlike OpenAI's net revenue reporting. The resolution of this debate is critical as both companies approach public listings. Currently, Anthropic holds unique leverage as the only top-tier model available across AWS, Google Cloud, and Microsoft Azure, inverting traditional vendor-customer dynamics. Yet, its suzerainty is considered a time-limited game, dependent on converting its current advantages into sustainable, audited profitability and navigating the complex web of strategic dependencies with its powerful patrons.

marsbitYesterday 00:41

Suzerain State: Anthropic

marsbitYesterday 00:41

IREN's Insanity: Selling Miners, Buying GPUs, Stock Price Up 16%

IREN, a Bitcoin mining company, saw its stock price surge 16% after releasing its quarterly earnings on May 8th. The surge was not driven by Bitcoin's price, but by the company's radical strategic shift away from cryptocurrency mining and towards AI infrastructure. The company reported a $140 million impairment charge after decommissioning and listing for sale 5,800 of its Bitmain S21 Pro mining rigs. It also maintains a policy of selling all mined Bitcoin daily, holding zero crypto assets. Despite this dismantling of its core business, investor sentiment was positive due to IREN's aggressive pivot into AI. This shift is backed by massive, long-term contracts. IREN announced a new 5-year, $3.4 billion collaboration with NVIDIA, which includes an equity investment commitment. This follows a previously secured 5-year, $9.7 billion GPU cloud services agreement with Microsoft. To support these deals, IREN acquired European data center capacity and cloud software capabilities. Management targets 480 megawatts of AI capacity, 150,000 GPUs, and $3.7 billion in annual recurring revenue by late 2026. While other North American miners are exploring hybrid "mining + AI" models, IREN is making a clean break, betting entirely on the booming demand for AI compute power. The move highlights a broader industry trend where the value of mining hardware is declining while GPU-based AI infrastructure is in critically short supply.

marsbit05/11 15:00

IREN's Insanity: Selling Miners, Buying GPUs, Stock Price Up 16%

marsbit05/11 15:00

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

In a span of four days, Amazon announced an additional $25 billion investment, and Google pledged up to $40 billion—both direct competitors pouring over $65 billion into the same AI startup, Anthropic. Rather than a typical venture capital move, this signals the latest escalation in the cloud wars. The core of the deal is not equity but compute pre-orders: Anthropic must spend the majority of these funds on AWS and Google Cloud services and chips, effectively locking in massive future compute consumption. This reflects a shift in cloud market dynamics—enterprises now choose cloud providers based on which hosts the best AI models, not just price or stability. With OpenAI deeply tied to Microsoft, Anthropic’s Claude has become the only viable strategic asset for Google and Amazon to remain competitive. Anthropic’s annualized revenue has surged to $30 billion, and it is expanding into verticals like biotech, positioning itself as a cross-industry AI infrastructure layer. However, this funding comes with constraints: Anthropic’s independence is challenged as it balances two rival investors, its safety-first narrative faces pressure from regulatory scrutiny, and its path to IPO introduces new financial pressures. Globally, this accelerates a "tri-polar" closed-loop structure in AI infrastructure, with Microsoft-OpenAI, Google-Anthropic, and Amazon-Anthropic forming exclusive model-cloud alliances. In contrast, China’s landscape differs—investments like Alibaba and Tencent backing open-source model firm DeepSeek reflect a more decoupled approach, though closed-source models from major cloud providers still dominate. The $65 billion bet is ultimately about securing a seat at the table in an AI-defined future—where missing the model layer means losing the cloud war.

marsbit04/26 01:04

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

marsbit04/26 01:04

More and More 'Model Supermarkets' Are Opening: ByteDance, Alibaba, and Tencent Compete to Integrate

Chinese tech giants like ByteDance, Alibaba, and Tencent are accelerating the rollout of integrated AI model subscription services—dubbed “model supermarkets”—to provide developers with bundled access to multiple leading domestic large language models (LLMs). ByteDance’s Volcengine recently upgraded its "Coding Plan" by adding newer models like GLM-5.1, Minimax M2.7, and Kimi k2.6, allowing subscribers to use various top models under a single monthly fee starting at ¥40. However, user feedback reveals significant issues, including rapid consumption of usage limits (e.g., hitting caps within hours), frequent server errors (like HTTP 429), and slow response times during peak hours. Complaints about misleading deduction rates—where calls to advanced models consume more quota—are also common. The trend is industry-wide: Alibaba, Tencent, and Baidu have all launched similar multi-model coding plans. While these platforms reduce trial costs for developers, they also expose challenges in balancing affordability with service quality and computational stability. Amid this shift, independent AI companies like Zhipu, MiniMax, and Moonlight Face (Kimi) are developing strategies to avoid becoming mere “pipes” in this ecosystem—focusing on vertical applications, autonomous agents, and long-context models to retain competitiveness. Analysts suggest that, while platform aggregation may pressure model firms in the short term, specialized and vertical AI capabilities will remain differentiated in the long run.

marsbit04/24 04:07

More and More 'Model Supermarkets' Are Opening: ByteDance, Alibaba, and Tencent Compete to Integrate

marsbit04/24 04:07

The First Year of Computing Power Inflation: The Cheaper DeepSeek Gets, the Harder It Is to Stop This Round of Price Hikes

The year 2026 marks the beginning of "computing power inflation." While AI inference costs have dropped by over 80% in 18 months globally, China's three major cloud providers—Alibaba Cloud, Baidu AI Cloud, and Tencent Cloud—simultaneously announced price hikes of 20–30%. This reflects a deeper structural shift driven by Jevons Paradox: as unit costs fall (e.g., via models like DeepSeek-R1), demand explodes, especially with the rise of reasoning models and AI agents that consume 10–50x more tokens per task. Although DeepSeek open-sourced its model weights, it did not release its inference optimization stack, leaving a significant engineering efficiency gap between cloud providers and smaller players. The big three are leveraging this advantage to reposition: Alibaba focuses on high-margin premium clients, Baidu filters out low-value users, and Tencent capitalizes on ecosystem lock-in. Meanwhile, ByteDance’s Volcano Engine adopts a more moderate pricing strategy to capture displaced customers. Unexpectedly, the price surge is pushing large enterprises toward self-built computing solutions once their cloud bills exceed a certain threshold. While cloud providers aim to boost profitability, they risk driving away innovative startups and accelerating competition from GPU leasing and domestic hardware providers like Huawei. The涨价 trend is expected to persist for 2–3 years, fueled by rising token consumption from reasoning models, AI agent adoption, and NVIDIA export restrictions. The inflection point depends on whether domestic chips can match NVIDIA’s efficiency, likely around 2027–2028. Until then, cloud providers will maintain pricing power, and the key for AI companies is to optimize token usage—the real moat in this era.

marsbit04/17 01:16

The First Year of Computing Power Inflation: The Cheaper DeepSeek Gets, the Harder It Is to Stop This Round of Price Hikes

marsbit04/17 01:16

A Four-Page Internal Letter: What Card Is OpenAI Playing?

OpenAI's internal memo, revealed by The Information, outlines a strategic narrative against Anthropic across three key areas: revenue accounting, enterprise competition, and compute capacity. First, OpenAI CRO Denise Dresser challenged Anthropic’s reported $30B annualized revenue, claiming the actual net figure—using OpenAI’s accounting method—is $22B. The discrepancy stems from differing GAAP interpretations: Anthropic books gross revenue (including cloud partner shares), while OpenAI records net revenue after partner deductions. Second, enterprise adoption data from Ramp shows Anthropic rapidly closing the gap with OpenAI, narrowing from an 11% to a 4.6% difference within months. Anthropic already leads in high-value sectors like tech, finance, and professional services. Dresser acknowledged Anthropic’s edge in coding capabilities but warned against being a "single-product company" in a platform war. Third, while current compute capacity is comparable (OpenAI ~1.9 GW vs. Anthropic ~1.4 GW), OpenAI’s long-term plans aim for 30 GW by 2030—four times Anthropic’s projected 7-8 GW by 2027. Anthropic’s growth depends on sustaining enterprise revenue to cover rising cloud costs, estimated to reach $6.4B by 2027. The memo also highlighted OpenAI’s strategic shift: reducing reliance on Microsoft (which “limited customer reach”) and partnering with Amazon, which invests in both OpenAI and Anthropic. This places Amazon’s Bedrock platform as a battleground where both models compete for the same enterprise clients.

marsbit04/14 08:44

A Four-Page Internal Letter: What Card Is OpenAI Playing?

marsbit04/14 08:44

活动图片