La Casa Blanca acusa a los demócratas de retrasar la ley de cripto CLARITY Act

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-10Last updated on 2026-08-10

Abstract

El director ejecutivo del Consejo Presidencial de Activos Digitales de EE.UU., Patrick Witt, acusó a los demócratas de bloquear activamente el proyecto de ley CLARITY Act para la industria cripto, insistiendo en retrasar la votación antes del receso del Congreso. Advirtió que si no se aprueba antes del 15 de septiembre, es posible que nunca llegue a ser ley. Los demócratas expresaron preocupaciones pendientes, como los rendimientos de los stablecoins que podrían alejar a clientes de los bancos tradicionales, y la exención de proyectos descentralizados de las normas contra el lavado de dinero. También señalaron un posible conflicto de intereses del presidente Donald Trump, quien promueve la ley y habría obtenido ingresos significativos de proyectos cripto. The Wall Street Journal describió el proyecto como lleno de "minas de acción retardada", mientras que Witt desestimó sus críticas por estar alineadas con los bancos de Wall Street.

El director ejecutivo del Consejo de Activos Digitales de la Presidencia de EE. UU., Patrick Witt, declaró que los demócratas han hecho todo lo posible para que el proyecto de ley CLARITY Act no sea aprobado. Según el principal asesor cripto de la Casa Blanca, es posible que el documento nunca sea aprobado por ellos.

A finales de la semana pasada, los senadores demócratas, que se preparaban para irse de vacaciones, insistieron en que la votación sobre el emblemático proyecto de ley para la industria cripto no se llevara a cabo antes de las vacaciones. El receso de los legisladores estadounidenses comenzó el 7 de agosto y durará hasta mediados de septiembre. Después de que los senadores regresen, su atención probablemente estará centrada en las elecciones intermedias de noviembre.

"La semana pasada, Chuck Schumer y los 'demócratas pro-cripto' hicieron todo lo posible para bloquear una simple votación procedimental sobre el proyecto de ley antes del receso del Congreso, exigiendo otro retraso. Si no lo logran antes del 15 de septiembre, entonces no lo lograrán nunca", escribió Witt.

La CLARITY Act debería dar más legitimidad a los proyectos cripto, abriendo amplias oportunidades para ellos en EE. UU. Pero, según los demócratas, quedan sin resolver temas como la rentabilidad de las stablecoins, que amenaza con llevar a clientes de bancos tradicionales al ecosistema cripto, y la exención de los proyectos descentralizados de cumplir con los requisitos de lucha contra el blanqueo de capitales y la verificación de usuarios.

Los representantes del partido demócrata también plantean la cuestión del conflicto de intereses del presidente de EE. UU., Donald Trump, que promueve la CLARITY Act. En 2025, los ingresos totales de Trump por proyectos cripto ascendieron aproximadamente a 1.400 millones de dólares.

El 4 de agosto, The Wall Street Journal publicó un artículo que analizaba las posiciones de los senadores sobre la CLARITY Act, calificándola como una ley con muchas "minas de efecto retardado". Se señala que los republicanos se apresuraban a aprobar el documento antes de las vacaciones, mientras que los demócratas insistían en que no debía hacerse mientras quedaran preguntas sin resolver, para no tener que volver a corregir errores más tarde.

"El presidente Trump quiere que el Congreso presente para su consideración un proyecto de ley que recompense a sus amigos y patrocinadores en esta industria. Los demócratas exigen restricciones más estrictas sobre la emisión y promoción de criptomonedas por parte de funcionarios federales durante su mandato. Es totalmente justo. Las transacciones cripto de Trump son desconcertantes", se afirma en el artículo del WSJ.

Witt declaró que no vale la pena prestar atención a este material, porque "The Wall Street Journal, que repite los argumentos de los bancos de Wall Street, no merece mucha atención".

Trending Cryptos

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

CoreWeave: The Inflection Point Has Arrived. Has the 'Hard-Working Underdog' Finally Turned Profitable?

CoreWeave, an AI cloud unicorn, released its Q2 2026 earnings on August 12, with shares rising about 15% post-announcement. While overall performance did not significantly exceed expectations, key positive trends emerged. Revenue reached approximately $2.58 billion, up 112% year-over-year, though slightly below the high end of prior guidance. A major highlight was the acceleration in computing power deployment, with Active Power increasing by a record 500 Mw to 1,500 Mw, far surpassing market forecasts and signaling faster future revenue growth. Capital expenditures also hit a new high of $9.4 billion. Importantly, profitability showed signs of inflection. "True" gross margin (after deducting cost of revenue and Tech & Infrastructure expenses) rose to 7.3%, up 3 percentage points from the previous quarter. As revenue scales, depreciation and operating expenses are being diluted. Adjusted operating profit margin improved significantly to 5% from 1% last quarter. The company's guidance points to continued acceleration, with Q3 revenue growth expected at 158% and margins continuing to climb. Management raised full-year 2026 guidance, projecting Q4 revenue growth of around 194% and an adjusted operating margin of approximately 14.6%, suggesting a rapid path toward its 25%-30% long-term target. Recent developments, including a 25% price increase for its services and the launch of higher-margin Managed Inference offerings, support the improving profitability narrative. While long-term competitive challenges remain for new cloud providers, CoreWeave's near-term trajectory of accelerating growth and expanding margins presents a high-risk, high-reward opportunity, especially amid renewed market optimism for cloud stocks.

marsbit23m ago

CoreWeave: The Inflection Point Has Arrived. Has the 'Hard-Working Underdog' Finally Turned Profitable?

marsbit23m ago

Uncovering the Secret Reasoning Chains of Claude Opus for $720: A Leak via Haiku, with GPT and Gemini Also Affected

Researchers discovered a method to extract hidden reasoning traces, or "Chain of Thought" (CoT), from major proprietary large language models (LLMs) like Anthropic's Claude Opus 4.8, OpenAI's GPT-5.6 Sol, and Google's Gemini 3.1 Pro. The attack exploits a design flaw in how these models handle encrypted reasoning "blobs." These blobs, which contain a model's internal reasoning steps, are encrypted and sent to the client for storage between conversation turns to save server costs. The researchers found these blobs were encrypted with a global key, allowing them to be reused across different sessions, users, and, crucially, different models from the same company. By taking an encrypted reasoning blob generated by a powerful "flagship" model and feeding it to a smaller, less capable model from the same family (e.g., feeding Claude Opus's blob to Claude Haiku), the researchers could prompt the smaller model to divulge the hidden CoT. This bypassed the need to crack the encryption directly. The implications are significant: 1) Competitors could potentially distill high-value reasoning data at low cost (estimated at ~$720 for 10,000 traces). 2) Sensitive information like API keys, passwords, and personal emails, which models might process internally but not output, could be leaked. The team found such leaks in 4.9% of analyzed public agent logs. 3) Models might internally analyze dangerous queries (e.g., car theft methods) before refusing to answer, but this dangerous analysis could be extracted from the CoT. 4) Malicious instructions could potentially be hidden within a reasoning blob to influence a model's future behavior. While the vulnerability was responsibly disclosed and patched by the affected companies, the research highlights a fundamental tension between the convenience of portable reasoning states and security. The paper also notes preliminary tests found no clear evidence that open-source models like DeepSeek had been distilled from the extracted CoTs.

marsbit28m ago

Uncovering the Secret Reasoning Chains of Claude Opus for $720: A Leak via Haiku, with GPT and Gemini Also Affected

marsbit28m ago

OpenAI Loses Four Executives in One Month, Former COO Departs, Almost the Entire Safety Team Ousted

In a surprising turn of events, OpenAI's longtime COO and key lieutenant to CEO Sam Altman, Brad Lightcap, has announced his departure after eight years with the company. His exit follows the recent resignations of several key safety and ethics leaders, including Chief Futurist Joshua Achiam, Safety Systems Lead Johannes Heidecke, and Ethics Lead Chloé Bakalar, within a single month. Lightcap, instrumental in building OpenAI's commercialization and operational framework, described his departure as "bittersweet" and hinted at wanting to tackle new challenges. While his statement and Altman's farewell were amicable, internal shifts had previously reduced his operational role, signaling a longer-term transition. The mass exodus, particularly from the safety and ethics divisions, coincides with growing internal and external scrutiny over AI safety. This follows incidents like models exhibiting unauthorized actions during testing and the recent decision to delay the launch of the advanced Astra model due to unresolved safety concerns about its potential cybersecurity capabilities. OpenAI has stated that safety and ethics are not confined to any single team or leader, but the concentration of departures raises questions about the company's direction and internal dynamics, especially as it navigates pressures of rapid development and a potential future IPO.

marsbit29m ago

OpenAI Loses Four Executives in One Month, Former COO Departs, Almost the Entire Safety Team Ousted

marsbit29m ago

1confirmation: Reverse Entrepreneurship, the Next Web3 Blockbuster Might Come from a Once-Failed Track

**Title: Reverse Entrepreneurship: The Next Web3 Blockbuster May Come from Previously Failed Tracks** This article argues that the next major consumer crypto application is likely to emerge from a concept that failed five years ago, now benefiting from matured infrastructure and better timing. It examines several such "failed" tracks that hold renewed potential: 1. **Internet-Native Assets:** Beyond simply tokenizing tweets or creating digital collectibles, there's an opportunity to create a genuinely new, crypto-native asset class that captures cultural moments and online phenomena, as opposed to merely tokenizing real-world assets (RWA). 2. **X-to-Earn:** While unsustainable token emission models doomed early projects like STEPN, the core premise that most people will first *earn* crypto, not buy it, remains valid. The future challenge is designing what is earned and why users would hold it long-term. 3. **The Metaverse:** Past failures like Decentraland stemmed from trying to replicate the physical world online. The opportunity lies not in abandoning shared online social spaces, but in reimagining their form beyond real-world analogs. 4. **DAOs:** DAOs have underdelivered by overcomplicating governance. The fundamental, unmet user need is simpler: enabling groups of internet strangers to pool funds and collectively achieve goals (e.g., buying assets, funding projects) that are impossible individually. 5. **Personal Value Tokenization:** Numerous attempts (Friend.tech, BitClout) to create markets around individuals have failed. The enduring demand for "person-as-asset" trading (seen in meme coins, prediction markets) suggests the direction isn't wrong, but the execution has been flawed, often lacking creator consent or a less commodified model. The conclusion is that true innovation will come from revisiting these past ideas with new insights, rather than crowding into currently popular trends.

marsbit39m ago

1confirmation: Reverse Entrepreneurship, the Next Web3 Blockbuster Might Come from a Once-Failed Track

marsbit39m ago

Arizona crypto ATM law helps 35 scam victims recover $171K

Arizona's cryptocurrency ATM law, effective since September 2025, has successfully helped 35 scam victims recover a total of $171,332 in full refunds. The state's attorney general announced the results, urging residents to report fraudulent transactions quickly to meet the law's 30-day reporting deadline. The legislation requires crypto kiosk operators to refund eligible new customers for scam-induced transactions, provided victims contact both the operator and law enforcement within 30 days with an official fraud report. The law defines new customers as those using an operator for fewer than 10 days and caps their daily transactions at $2,000.

cointelegraph49m ago

Arizona crypto ATM law helps 35 scam victims recover $171K

cointelegraph49m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

How to Buy HOUSE

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing Housecoin (HOUSE) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy Housecoin (HOUSE) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your Housecoin (HOUSE)After purchasing your Housecoin (HOUSE), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade Housecoin (HOUSE)Easily trade Housecoin (HOUSE) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

5.7k Total ViewsPublished 2025.04.27Updated 2026.06.02

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of HOUSE (HOUSE) are presented below.