Cardano Dan $67,5 Juta Dalam Bitcoin, Apa Yang Terjadi Dengan 1.090 BTC?

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-06-10Last updated on 2026-06-10

Abstract

Pakar litigasi Thomas Braziel mempertanyakan Cardano Foundation tentang 1.090 BTC yang diduga diterimanya setelah yayasan pendahulunya di Isle of Man dibubarkan. Catatan menunjukkan alokasi Bitcoin tersebut terjadi sekitar ICO Cardano, yang dikatakan berhasil mengumpulkan sekitar 108.000 BTC. Braziel menyoroti bahwa satu-satunya yayasan yang ada saat ICO berlangsung adalah yayasan Isle of Man, dan dokumen historis yayasan Swiss mengakui keberadaan pendahulunya ini. Pertanyaan tata kelola mengemuka terkait alokasi mayoritas pasokan ADA dan hasil Bitcoin kepada entitas pengembang yang berafiliasi. Braziel menekankan pentingnya kejelasan mengenai siapa yang menegosiasikan pengaturan tersebut demi peserta ICO, serta bagaimana keadilan dievaluasi ketika individu yang sama mengelola yayasan sekaligus mengendalikan entitas penerima manfaat utama. Ia meminta jawaban atas apakah dilakukan tinjauan independen, konflik kepentingan diungkapkan, dan apa yang terjadi pada 1.090 BTC yang diterima yayasan.

Ahli litigasi Thomas Braziel telah mempertanyakan Cardano Foundation mengenai 1.090 BTC yang diklaim diterimanya setelah pendahulunya, yayasan Isle of Man, dibubarkan. Hal ini dikatakan terjadi sekitar ICO Cardano, dengan 108.000 BTC dikatakan terkumpul di sekitar acara ICO tersebut.

Ahli Pertanyakan Cardano Foundation Atas 1.090 BTC

Dalam sebuah postingan X, Braziel mengungkapkan dokumen-dokumen terkait struktur awal Cardano Foundation, di mana tampaknya beroperasi sebagai Yayasan Isle of Man. Ahli tersebut mencatat bahwa Yayasan Isle of Man akhirnya dibubarkan pada Desember 2025, sementara catatan menunjukkan hampir 1.090 BTC dialokasikan kepada Yayasan tersebut. Oleh karena itu, ia mendesak Foundation untuk memberikan penjelasan tentang apa yang terjadi dengan Bitcoin tersebut.

Braziel mengungkapkan bahwa catatan menunjukkan Yayasan Isle of Man asli melibatkan pendiri Cardano Charles Hoskinson, Jeremy Wood, Ken Kodama, dan penyedia layanan korporat. Dokumen selanjutnya dikatakan menunjukkan Hoskinson menjabat sebagai "Enforcer" Foundation. Enforcer dikatakan sebagai salah satu posisi pengawasan kunci dalam struktur tersebut.

Braziel mencatat bahwa ini penting karena ICO Cardano sudah berlangsung sebelum Cardano Foundation Swiss didirikan. Ia lebih lanjut menyatakan bahwa Syarat Layanan Attain dan pengungkapan risiko berulang kali menyebut "Foundation" sebagai penerbit atau entitas sponsor. Sementara itu, pada saat itu, satu-satunya Cardano Foundation yang ada adalah Yayasan Isle of Man.

Ahli litigasi tersebut menegaskan kembali bahwa ini bukan spekulasi, karena bahan-bahan sejarah Cardano Foundation Swiss sendiri merujuk pada pendahulu Yayasan Isle of Man yang lebih awal. Itu juga menunjukkan bahwa Yayasan menerima Bitcoin yang dimaksud.

Ahli Mengangkat Pertanyaan Tata Kelola

Braziel mencatat bahwa pertanyaan tata kelola menjadi lebih signifikan jika dilihat bersama struktur alokasi yang lebih luas. Ia mengatakan bahwa, berdasarkan angka yang tersedia untuk publik, sekitar 108.000 BTC dikumpulkan, sementara sebagian besar pasokan ADA dan hasil Bitcoin dialokasikan ke entitas pengembang yang berafiliasi dan berorientasi laba.

Ahli tersebut menyatakan bahwa pertanyaannya bukanlah apakah perusahaan pengembang harus diberi kompensasi, melainkan siapa yang menegosiasikan pengaturan tersebut atas nama peserta ICO dan Yayasan Isle of Man. Ia mempertanyakan bagaimana keadilan dievaluasi dan didokumentasikan ketika individu yang sama mengelola Yayasan sementara juga mengendalikan entitas yang menerima manfaat ekonomi paling besar.

Braziel menyatakan bahwa ia tidak menuduh adanya kesalahan apa pun, tetapi hanya ingin jawaban tentang apakah tinjauan independen dilakukan, apakah konflik kepentingan diungkapkan, dan perlindungan apa yang ditawarkan kepada peserta ICO. Ia juga mempertanyakan apa yang terjadi dengan 1.090 BTC yang diterima Foundation.

Pada saat penulisan, harga Cardano diperdagangkan di sekitar $0,16, turun lebih dari 4% dalam 24 jam terakhir, menurut data dari CoinMarketCap.

ADA diperdagangkan di $0,16 pada grafik 1D | Sumber: ADAUSDT di Tradingview.com

Related Questions

QApa yang dipertanyakan oleh ahli litigasi Thomas Braziel mengenai Cardano Foundation?

AThomas Braziel mempertanyakan penjelasan Cardano Foundation mengenai 1.090 BTC yang diduga diterima Foundation setelah pendahulunya, Isle of Man Foundation, dibubarkan. Ia mendesak Foundation memberikan penjelasan tentang apa yang terjadi dengan Bitcoin tersebut.

QBerapa jumlah BTC yang disebut-sebut terkait dengan Isle of Man Foundation, pendahulu Cardano Foundation?

ACatatan yang diungkapkan menunjukkan bahwa hampir 1.090 BTC dialokasikan kepada Isle of Man Foundation.

QSiapa saja individu yang terlibat dalam struktur awal Isle of Man Foundation menurut catatan yang diungkapkan?

AMenurut catatan, Isle of Man Foundation melibatkan pendiri Cardano Charles Hoskinson, Jeremy Wood, Ken Kodama, dan sebuah penyedia layanan perusahaan.

QApa pertanyaan tata kelola yang diajukan Braziel terkait alokasi dana dari ICO Cardano?

ABraziel mempertanyakan siapa yang menegosiasikan pengaturan alokasi dana (seperti mayoritas pasokan ADA dan hasil Bitcoin ke entitas pengembang afiliasi) atas nama peserta ICO dan Isle of Man Foundation. Ia juga mempertanyakan bagaimana keadilan dievaluasi ketika individu yang sama mengelola Foundation sekaligus mengendalikan entitas yang menerima manfaat ekonomi terbesar.

QMenurut artikel, berapa total perkiraan BTC yang dikumpulkan selama acara ICO Cardano, dan pada harga berapa ADA diperdagangkan saat artikel ditulis?

ABerdasarkan angka yang tersedia untuk publik, sekitar 108.000 BTC dikumpulkan selama ICO Cardano. Pada saat artikel ditulis, harga Cardano (ADA) diperdagangkan sekitar $0,16, turun lebih dari 4% dalam 24 jam terakhir.

Related Reads

Google TPU Shipments Revised Up by 50%

Recent industry research indicates a significant upward revision in the shipments of Google's TPU (Tensor Processing Unit) chips. Previous expectations for 2027 were set at around 10 million units, but new estimates now point to 15 million units, a 50% increase. This substantial boost directly translates to higher demand across the entire supporting supply chain. Google's TPU clusters utilize a standardized all-optical interconnect architecture. Consequently, key hardware components are deeply integrated and scaled in fixed ratios with the chips. The 15 million TPU target will drive corresponding demand increases for NPO optical engines (roughly a 1:1 match), 1.6T optical modules, OCS optical switches, high-end server power supplies, fiber optics & MPO connectors, and liquid cooling solutions. Among these, liquid cooling is highlighted as the sector experiencing the most significant transformation and offering the most stable potential for excess returns. As next-generation TPU chips reach power levels where traditional air cooling is insufficient, liquid cooling becomes essential. 2026 is forecasted as the first year of substantial adoption for Google's liquid cooling solutions. This shift, coupled with delivery and capacity bottlenecks faced by incumbent overseas manufacturers, is creating a prime window for domestic Chinese suppliers to enter and secure Google's core supply chain. The market size for Google-specific liquid cooling is projected to potentially triple from a baseline of hundreds of billions to around 300 billion units by 2028. The logic for the fiber optic sector is also being rewritten. Once considered a cyclical commodity tied to telecom operator procurement, fiber is now a strategic and scarce resource for AI Data Centers (AIDC). A severe supply-demand imbalance, driven by the long lead time for preform production (18-24 months) and surging demand from cloud giants, is supporting strong performance. Chinese fiber manufacturers are well-positioned to capture a significant share of global AIDC demand, with exports potentially reaching 200-300 million core kilometers in 2026. Overall, the investment focus within the AI computing industry is shifting from pure "chip performance speculation" towards the more certain incremental growth in computing infrastructure and its supporting ecosystem. The upward revision in Google TPU shipments, along with the potential for further doubling by 2028, is seen as solidifying performance visibility for the entire supporting supply chain over the next two years.

marsbit43m ago

Google TPU Shipments Revised Up by 50%

marsbit43m ago

What Wall Street Really Wants After the Crypto Story Recedes

The tide of speculative crypto narratives has receded, revealing Wall Street's true objective: building a controlled, yield-generating, and compliant financial pipeline on distributed ledgers. They are migrating core functions onto blockchains, not for decentralization, but for efficiency and new revenue streams. Key developments include BlackRock's BUIDL fund, a tokenized treasury fund acting as a foundational reserve asset, and the rise of Securitize, which is going public and partnering with the NYSE to build a 24/7 digital securities trading and settlement system. This signals a major shift of securities clearing to blockchain technology. To make volatile assets like Bitcoin palatable for institutional investors, firms like BlackRock and Goldman Sachs are creating "covered call" ETFs (e.g., BITA). These products systematically sell options on Bitcoin holdings, transforming price volatility into stable monthly income, effectively repackaging crypto as a yield-bearing asset. Stablecoins are being positioned not as speculative tools but as efficient payment rails. Companies like Stripe and Mastercard are integrating them for instant, low-cost merchant settlements and cross-border card payments, respectively. Critically, new legislation like the GENIUS Act shapes them as non-interest-bearing, heavily regulated extensions of the US dollar system. In summary, Wall Street is quietly constructing a parallel, blockchain-based financial infrastructure featuring tokenized traditional assets, structured crypto yields, and programmable dollar pipelines—all under its control and fully integrated with existing regulatory and credit frameworks.

marsbit1h ago

What Wall Street Really Wants After the Crypto Story Recedes

marsbit1h ago

Tying Itself to SpaceX: Cursor's $60 Billion Rise

This article recounts the rapid rise of AI-powered coding startup Cursor and its 25-year-old MIT graduate CEO, Michael Truell. Launched in 2023, Cursor achieved explosive growth, reaching over 10 billion USD in revenue by late 2025. However, its journey highlights a central dilemma for AI application companies: dependence on foundational model providers. Cursor initially relied heavily on Anthropic's models but faced an existential threat when Anthropic launched its own competing coding tool, Claude Code. In response, Cursor declared an internal emergency in early 2026 and accelerated development of its own model, Composer. To secure the immense computing power needed, Truell struck a pivotal deal with Elon Musk's SpaceX in April 2026. The collaboration grants Cursor access to SpaceX's supercomputing resources for Composer, while SpaceX's Grok model benefits from Cursor's programming data. The agreement includes a potential 600 billion USD acquisition of Cursor by SpaceX later in the year, though a substantial termination fee is in place if the deal falls through. The story explores Cursor's intense, sometimes controversial hiring practices involving lengthy unpaid "work trials," its complex partnership-turned-rivalry with Anthropic, and its high-stakes gamble to ensure independence through the SpaceX alliance. The core question remains: will Cursor evolve into a defining, independent "generational" software company, or become a key piece in a tech giant's AI arsenal?

marsbit1h ago

Tying Itself to SpaceX: Cursor's $60 Billion Rise

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

376 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片