Crypto 和 AI,需要女高管

比推Pubblicato 2026-01-21Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-21

Introduzione

最近AI圈出现一个现象:女性高管日益活跃。Meta收购Manus后,90后COO CZ Chen进入公众视野;MiniMax上市时,31岁COO贠烨祎身价达48亿港元,她几乎包办公司除技术外的所有事务。全球范围内,Anthropic联合创始人Daniela Amodei、DeepMind的Lila Ibrahim等女性高管也扮演关键角色。 这一现象曾在2017-2021年加密行业出现,如何一、Lisa Loud等女性CMO/COO推动交易所成长。Crypto和AI行业相似:技术前沿但创始人多偏技术背景,缺乏市场与公关能力。女性高管成为技术与外界的桥梁,擅长共情、叙事和商业化,推动产品从实验室走向大众。 行业成熟需要女性高管实现技术产品化。AI已进入这一阶段,而加密行业若留不住此类人才,可能难以实现大规模应用。人才流向标志行业价值所在,女性高管的崛起往往意味着行业商业化成熟。

作者:Alice,深潮 TechFlow

原标题:Crypto 和 AI,需要女高管


最近注意到 AI 圈一个有趣的现象,越来越多的女性高管开始站到舞台前。

12 月 30 号,Meta 宣布将以 20 亿美元的高价收购 Manus, 90 后 COO CZ Chen 开始进入大众视野,本科上财,哥大硕士,18 年开始工作,先后供职于万科,FA 机构,2024 年最后一跳进入 Manus,直接财务自由。

1 月 9 日,MiniMax 上市敲钟仪式上,与 36 岁创始人闫俊杰一同站在台上的,是一位 94 年出生的女生,贠烨祎。

这位年仅 31 岁的 COO,如今身价已达 48 亿港元。

贠烨祎什么背景?

约翰霍普金斯大学电子工程,辅修经济学和数学;2017 年毕业就进商汤,从融资经理做到 CEO 徐立的助理,再到创新业务部总监,亲历了商汤从独角兽到港股上市的全过程。

2022 年,闫俊杰决定离开商汤创办 MiniMax,贠烨祎几乎没犹豫就跟了过去。

她的价值不只是跟随。

MiniMax 招股书显示,贠烨祎几乎包办了公司除技术研发外的所有事务:产品、商业化、董事会、运营、管理......她的年薪是 147.9 万美元,比其他所有执行董事加起来还多,这个金额足以说明一切。

不只是中国,放眼全球 AI 圈,女性力量都不容小觑。

Daniela Amodei,英文文学专业出身,在 Stripe 和 OpenAI 打拼之后,在 2021 年与哥哥 Dario 联合创立 Anthropic,担任总裁,专注日常运营和商业化,推动 Claude 产品的市场化。

Lila Ibrahim,前 Intel 高管,2018 年加入 DeepMind 成为首任 COO ,负责日常运营、合作伙伴关系、社会影响、外部事务与政府关系。

Mira Murati,这位阿尔巴尼亚裔的前 OpenAI CTO,16 岁获奖学金来美国,从特斯拉 Model X 团队到 OpenAI,最终离职创立 Thinking Machines Lab,估值 90 亿美元......

这个场景似曾相识。

2017-2021 年,加密黄金时代里群星荟萃,其中一道靓丽的风景就是,女性 CMO 和 COO。

最让人熟知的当属币安联合创始人兼 CMO 何一(现在已经是联席 CEO),从上海到东京,再从马耳他到巴黎再到迪拜,每一次战略转移都有她的身影,帮助公司成为全球最大的加密货币交易所。

Lisa Loud,从苹果工程师到 PayPal 加拿大市场负责人,2017 年跳槽 BitMEX 担任 CMO,此后 BitMEX 一度成为全球最大的加密衍生品交易平台。

Cynthia Wu,Matrixport 的 COO,前港交所产品开发副总裁,将传统金融的经验带到了加密金融服务中,帮助公司成为亚洲最大的数字资产服务平台之一。

......

曾经,加密就是全世界的资产焦点,聚光灯自然也打在了这些站在舞台中央的女性高管身上。

但潮水退了,主角更换。

如今,AI 才是聚光灯的焦点,于是我们看到了 Daniela Amodei 登上福布斯富豪榜,看到了贠烨祎在 MiniMax 上市敲钟现场意气风发。

从本质来看,Crypto 和 AI 有着惊人的相似性,“又前沿又土”。

前沿体现在技术本身,区块链重构信任机制,AI 重构生产力,都是能改变世界的底层技术。

土则体现在创始人画像上,大多技术背景,对代码如数家珍,但对市场营销,特别是政府关系、公关关系感到陌生。

这就是女性 COO/CMO 的价值所在,她们是技术天才与外部世界之间的桥梁,能跟技术团队深度对话,也能向投资人和用户讲出动人故事。

Daniela Amodei 将 AI 安全哲学转化为可执行的商业战略,让 Claude 在 ChatGPT 的阴影下杀出重围;贠烨祎让 MiniMax 从实验室走向 C 端市场;何一长期担任首席客户,亲自为用户解答疑惑,建立信任。

当一个产品脱离纯技术阶段,越需要面向 C 端,女性高管的优势就越明显。

毕竟,公关和产品需要的不是对抗思维,而是共情能力。

从另外一个角度出发,有能力的女性高管会用脚投票,她们去那些能让自己施展才华、创造价值的地方。如果当她们开始离开某个行业时,说明这个行业的商业确定性在消失。

加密行业现在的问题很明显,缺少能把技术转化为大众接受的产品的人才,Mass adoption 和正外部性依然是空谈。观察任何新兴行业都能发现这个规律,当那些兼具技术理解力、商业敏感度和叙事能力的女性高管开始崛起时,行业才真正从技术驱动转向商业化和大众化。

她们的出现,标志着行业的真正成熟。

AI 圈已经经历这个转折,像 Daniela Amodei 和贠烨祎这样的女性高管正在推动技术产品化,让 AI 从实验室算法走进日常生活和商业世界。

而加密行业,如果留不住“能讲人话的精英”,那就活该继续在泥潭里 PVP。

人才的流向就是行业的风向标。

她们去哪里,价值就在哪里被创造;她们离开的地方,往往就是泡沫破裂的地方。


原文链接:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7604790

Crypto di tendenza

Domande pertinenti

Q文章中提到Crypto和AI行业需要女性高管的原因是什么?

A文章指出Crypto和AI行业技术性较强,创始人多为技术背景,但在市场营销、政府关系和公共关系方面较为薄弱。女性高管(如COO/CMO)能够作为技术团队与外部世界的桥梁,既理解技术细节,又能向投资人和用户讲述动人故事,推动技术产品化和商业化。

Q文中提到的AI圈女性高管有哪些?请列举两位并简述她们的成就。

A文中提到的AI圈女性高管包括:1. Daniela Amodei,Anthropic联合创始人兼总裁,专注于日常运营和商业化,推动Claude产品的市场化;2. 贠烨祎,MiniMax的COO,负责产品、商业化、运营等事务,帮助公司从实验室走向C端市场,身价达48亿港元。

Q加密黄金时代中提到的女性高管有哪些?请举例说明。

A加密黄金时代的女性高管包括:1. 何一,币安联合创始人兼CMO(现联席CEO),帮助币安成为全球最大加密货币交易所;2. Lisa Loud,BitMEX的CMO,推动其成为全球最大加密衍生品交易平台;3. Cynthia Wu,Matrixport的COO,将传统金融经验带入加密金融服务。

Q文章认为女性高管在哪些方面具有优势?

A文章认为女性高管在公关和产品方面具有共情能力优势,能够与技术团队深度对话,同时向外部世界有效传递价值。她们擅长将技术转化为大众接受的产品,推动行业从技术驱动转向商业化和大众化。

Q文章最后对加密行业提出了什么批评或建议?

A文章批评加密行业缺乏能将技术转化为大众产品的人才,导致Mass adoption和正外部性难以实现。建议行业留住“能讲人话的精英”,否则可能继续陷入内部竞争(PVP)而无法成熟。人才的流向被视为行业价值创造的风向标。

Letture associate

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手1 h fa

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手1 h fa

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbit4 h fa

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbit4 h fa

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手5 h fa

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手5 h fa

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbit6 h fa

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbit6 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare ALICE

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di My Neighbor Alice (ALICE) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente My Neighbor AliceALICE.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva My Neighbor Alice (ALICE)Dopo aver acquistato My Neighbor Alice (ALICE), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia My Neighbor Alice (ALICE)Scambia facilmente My Neighbor Alice (ALICE) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

144 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.11Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Come comprare ALICE

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di ALICE ALICE sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片