巨鲸平仓BTC多头并将USDC存入Hyperliquid,意欲何为?

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-01-07Last updated on 2026-01-07

Abstract

一条鲸鱼钱包近期将比特币多头头寸转为空头,并同时向Hyperliquid存入USDC,引发市场关注。该鲸鱼在两个月后行动,存入约190万美元USDC,并将价值约1295万美元的比特币多头头寸转为3倍空头。另一鲸鱼昨日向Hyperliquid存入1250万美元USDC后购买了27万美元的HYPE。 此举发生在贝莱德从Coinbase撤出3948枚比特币(约3.68亿美元)和1737枚以太坊(约565万美元)后不久。过去两天,贝莱德总计撤出7146枚比特币和6851枚以太坊。 HYPE近24小时上涨1.05%至27.36美元,周涨幅6.32%;比特币同期下跌1.27%至92648.91美元,但周内仍上涨4.84%。短期预测显示比特币可能上涨10.59%至102615美元,而HYPE预计在未来30个月内可能回调25.25%至20.86美元,三个月内或下跌23.5%至21.35美元。市场分析认为,比特币可能短期获利,而HYPE面临调整压力。

某巨鲸钱包刚刚平仓了BTC多头头寸,同时将USDC存入Hyperliquid。此举引发了加密货币爱好者的关注,引发了对未来价格走势的期待。虽然BTC可能获得短期收益,但HYPE预计将在长期内产生潜在回报。

平仓BTC并存入USDC

某巨鲸钱包在两个月后行动,向Hyperliquid存入了价值约190万美元的USDC。与此同时,该巨鲸将其BTC多头头寸转为3倍空头头寸,当前价值约为1295万美元。值得注意的是,另一个巨鲸钱包昨日向Hyperliquid存入1250万美元USDC后,以27万美元购入了HYPE。

此举发生在贝莱德撤出3948枚比特币和1737枚以太坊数小时后。按交易时价格计算,这些资产分别价值约3.6793亿美元和565万美元。据报道,贝莱德在过去两天内已从Coinbase累计撤出7146枚BTC和6851枚ETH。

HYPE与BTC的盈亏情况

增持HYPE和平仓BTC头寸可能与近期收益相关。首先,HYPE在过去24小时内上涨1.05%,现报27.36美元,周线涨幅达6.32%。

另一方面,BTC在过去24小时内下跌1.27%,本文撰写时报价92,648.91美元。该旗舰加密货币周线涨幅为4.84%。

2026年的HYPE与BTC展望

BTC短期走势显示可能获得高达10.59%的收益。BTC价格预测显示,在2.12%的中等波动率下,该代币未来三个月可能交易于102,615美元附近,期间将测试89,75美元和94,853美元的关键支撑与阻力位。

HYPE价格预测表明未来30个月内可能出现25.25%的月度回调,换算交易价格约为20.86美元。三个月时间线上,HYPE预计将从当前价值下跌23.50%至21.35美元,波动率高达6.88%。

可以断言,HYPE的空头头寸预示回调可能性,而BTC空头则暗示收益潜力。

今日加密要闻

币安创始人CZ宣布完成opBNB傅立叶主网硬分叉

标签BTCHYPEHyperliquidUSDC巨鲸

Related Questions

Q鲸鱼钱包在Hyperliquid上进行了哪两项主要操作?

A该鲸鱼钱包将比特币(BTC)的多头头寸翻转为3倍空头头寸,价值约1295万美元;同时向Hyperliquid存入了价值约190万美元的USDC。

Q除了这个鲸鱼,还有哪个实体近期有大规模资金流动?

A在鲸鱼操作前几小时,贝莱德(BlackRock)从Coinbase撤回了3948枚比特币(价值约3.6793亿美元)和1737枚以太坊(价值约565万美元)。过去两天,贝莱德总计撤回了7146枚BTC和6851枚ETH。

Q根据文章,HYPE和BTC的短期价格表现如何?

AHYPE在过去24小时内上涨1.05%,报27.36美元,周涨幅为6.32%。BTC在过去24小时内下跌1.27%,报92,648.91美元,但周涨幅为4.84%。

Q文章中对BTC和HYPE未来3个月的价格预测分别是多少?

A预测BTC可能在3个月内上涨至约102,615美元(涨幅约10.59%);而HYPE可能在3个月内下跌至21.35美元(跌幅约23.50%)。

Q鲸鱼的操作和贝莱德的撤资可能暗示了市场对哪种资产的何种看法?

A鲸鱼做空BTC并存入稳定币USDC,以及贝莱德大规模撤资,可能暗示大资金对加密货币(尤其是BTC)短期走势持谨慎或看空态度,同时将资金转向更稳定的资产或准备在其他机会(如HYPE)上进行部署。

Related Reads

MACD Real Backtest: Can Technical Indicators Lead You to Profit?

Based on a comprehensive 5-year backtest of the MACD trading strategy on BTC and ETH, this analysis delivers a sobering reality check for traders. The key finding is that 90% of short-term trading activity, particularly lower timeframes (15m, 30m, 1h), underperforms a simple "buy and hold" strategy due to transaction costs, noise, and psychological strain. The "benchmark" returns for simply holding the assets were +48.86% for BTC and +53.00% for ETH. The data reveals that MACD strategy performance is highly dependent on timeframe and leverage: * **Short Timeframes (15m, 30m, 1h):** Nearly all configurations resulted in significant losses or complete liquidation (-100%), severely underperforming the buy-and-hold benchmark. * **4-Hour Timeframe:** This was the only timeframe where the MACD strategy consistently generated alpha. * **BTC 4h (1x leverage):** ~+96% return, successfully outperforming buy-and-hold by avoiding major bear markets. * **ETH 4h (1x leverage):** ~+205% return, dramatically outperforming its buy-and-hold benchmark due to ETH's strong trend-following characteristics. * **Leverage Impact:** Leverage (2x, 3x) on the 4h timeframe amplified these gains effectively (e.g., ETH 4h 3x leverage yielded +552%). However, higher leverage (5x) often led to diminished returns due to funding fees and volatility decay, despite increased risk. The "Death Matrix" of results shows that short-term, high-leverage trading is akin to gambling" with a near-certain outcome of failure. The final recommendation is clear: for most investors, a buy-and-hold strategy is superior to active trading on low timeframes. For those seeking to outperform, the only viable approach is applying moderate leverage (2x-3x) exclusively on the 4-hour timeframe, with ETH presenting the best opportunity for significant excess returns.

marsbit45m ago

MACD Real Backtest: Can Technical Indicators Lead You to Profit?

marsbit45m ago

Tracing the Entrepreneurial Journey of X's Product Lead: Why Did Nikita Bier Clash with Infofi?

**Summary: Nikita Bier's Product Philosophy and Clash with Infofi** Nikita Bier, a product leader known for his viral social apps, has built a career on leveraging human psychology to drive growth. His journey began with Politify, a policy simulation tool that gained 4 million users during the 2012 U.S. elections by revealing how political choices impact personal finances. He later co-founded TBH, an anonymous positive feedback app for teens, which grew to 5 million users and was acquired by Facebook. In 2022, he launched Gas, a TBH-like app with monetization features, which reached 10 million users and was acquired by Discord for $50 million. Bier’s product philosophy centers on "emotional leverage" — targeting innate human desires like social validation and financial gain. He believes products should serve the entire network, not just individual users, and must create addictive feedback loops to succeed. In 2025, Bier joined X (formerly Twitter) as Head of Product. He quickly implemented changes to boost engagement, including algorithm adjustments to prioritize content from connections and the introduction of Smart Cashtags for real-time financial discussions. These efforts contributed to a 60% increase in app downloads and over 1 billion subscriptions. Recently, Bier took a strong stance against "infofi" apps — platforms that reward users with crypto or points for posting content. He revoked their API access, arguing they generate low-quality, AI-spammed content that degrades the user experience and undermines X’s network health. This move aligns with his focus on sustainable growth and supports X’s broader ambition to become a reliable platform for financial and crypto discourse, clearing the way for higher-quality interactions.

marsbit56m ago

Tracing the Entrepreneurial Journey of X's Product Lead: Why Did Nikita Bier Clash with Infofi?

marsbit56m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

252 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片