Maple denies stealing Core’s lstBTC – ‘Will be pursuing all available remedies’

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-11-19Last updated on 2025-11-20

Key Takeaways

What triggered the feud? 

Core believes that Maple has breached a 24-month exclusivity period agreement by unveiling a rival yield product. 

How are lenders affected? 

The yield product, lstBTC, was initially funded by $150M BTC from lenders, yet it was not clear whether they would be reimbursed. 


Institutional-focused DeFi lending firm Maple Finance has made headlines today for allegedly breaching a contract and stealing its partner, Core Foundation’s Bitcoin [BTC] yield product. 

On X (formerly Twitter), Maple Finance distanced itself from the claims and blamed the Core Foundation for “directly going against lender interests.” 

The firm added

“Maple denies any allegations of wrongdoing on its part and will be pursuing all available remedies aggressively to ensure Core Foundation is held responsible for the consequences of their actions.” 

Maple FinanceMaple Finance

Source: X

Core Foundation claims

Core Foundation has been a partner in the Maple Finance ecosystem, developing a BTC yield product, LstBTC.

The ERC-20 token enables holders to maintain liquidity across various DeFi platforms while earning a yield. The product was co-developed in early 2025 and officially rolled out in April. 

Per the Core team, they had a 24-month exclusivity agreement with Maple. However, Maple Finance has reportedly prepared a similar product, syrupBTC, a move Core Foundation claimed breached the agreement and misused their confidential data. 

Notably, the Core Foundation stated that it had successfully obtained a restraining order against Maple Finance for the alleged breach. 

The team further slammed the DeFi lending protocol for failing to reimburse lenders the initial $150 million BTC, adding that, 

“It is unclear why Maple maintains that they are unable to return the Bitcoin to their lenders at this time. This is another example of concerning behavior and business practices by Maple.”

Bitcoin DeFi, or BTCFi has picked up traction lately, primarily dominated by Babylon [BABY] and Lombard.

However, other Bitcoin Layer 2 players, such as Core, have also emerged. As of the time of writing, Babylon holds a 66% market share. 

Maple Finance BitcoinMaple Finance Bitcoin

Source: Bitcoin Yield

However, the yield has dropped in line with the broader market rout, from 3.19% to 3.0% over the past week. 

That being said, SYRUP, the native token of Maple Finance, dropped 3% to $0.35 following the update. The Core ecosystem also experienced a 2% drop in its TVL (total value locked) to $50 million over the past 24 hours.

It remains to be seen how the case will be resolved and whether initial BTC lenders will be made whole again.  

Share

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Upbit is Anxious: A Hasty Counterattack Aimed at Regaining Stablecoin Market Share

Title: Upbit's Rushed Counterattack to Reclaim Stablecoin Market Share Facing a dramatic shift in South Korea's stablecoin market, leading exchange Upbit launched a promotional campaign from July 26 to August 9, waiving the 0.05% trading fee for stablecoins paired with the Korean Won (KRW) and rapidly listing new stablecoins like RLUSD and USDG. This move is a direct response to its plummeting market share in this sector. Historically a duopoly with Bithumb, the market has been reshaped since October 2025 when Coinone permanently removed fees for USDC trading. By June 2026, Coinone led with 34.8% of stablecoin volume, followed by Bithumb (31.1%) and Upbit (30.1%). This contrasts sharply with the overall crypto market, where Upbit commands 60%. The data shows stablecoin demand is highly sensitive to fees, as users primarily buy them to transfer capital overseas for derivatives trading or forex arbitrage. South Korean exchanges have seen a net outflow of stablecoins for 18 consecutive months, totaling approximately 14.9 trillion KRW, underscoring their role as a cross-border capital conduit. Upbit's limited-time promotion initially boosted its daily stablecoin volume by 162%, but the surge was almost entirely in USDT (98.1% of volume). The newly listed stablecoins saw negligible, fleeting interest. Furthermore, the promotional effect quickly waned in the second week, with volume dropping 33% on weekdays. A concurrent weakening of the KRW also contributed to the trading spike, independent of the fee waiver. The analysis suggests that once the promotion ends, Upbit is unlikely to retain its temporary gains unless it matches Coinone's permanent zero-fee policy, forcing a choice between market share and fee revenue. Upbit's strategic push may be less about immediate profit and more about preparing for future regulatory shifts. With South Korea's *Digital Asset Basic Act* on the horizon, which will regulate KRW-backed stablecoins, and following Dunamu's (Upbit's parent) integration into Naver Financial to build a payment ecosystem, securing a dominant position in the dollar stablecoin distribution channel holds long-term strategic value. However, potential regulatory conflicts could prevent Upbit from listing a future Naver-issued KRW stablecoin, making the current fight for dollar stablecoin flow even more critical.

marsbit4h ago

Upbit is Anxious: A Hasty Counterattack Aimed at Regaining Stablecoin Market Share

marsbit4h ago

Michael Saylor Compares Bitcoin and Gold!

Michael Saylor, founder of MicroStrategy, argues that Bitcoin fundamentally changes how wealth is stored and transferred by transforming digital scarcity into economic value. He describes Bitcoin as the first digital monetary network, combining computers, digital networks, and cryptography. It digitizes monetary assets, allowing their supply to be controlled by public protocols rather than institutions, thus converting economic value into information transmissible over global networks. Comparing Bitcoin to gold, Saylor states that while increasing Bitcoin's supply is harder, its integration with software and transfer is easier. He highlights Bitcoin's proof-of-work mechanism, which ties it to the physical world by consuming real energy to secure the ledger, making past transactions immutable. This creates a shared security system involving miners, energy companies, and investors. Saylor suggests "digital monetary energy" is a more accurate term than "digital gold." He emphasizes that the Bitcoin network is an adaptive ecosystem of miners, nodes, developers, and users. Its core design is intentionally simple, focused on maintaining a secure ledger for scarce digital assets, with complex functionalities built in higher-layer applications. This architecture allows Bitcoin to serve as a foundation for transmitting value and fostering innovation in payments and financial services. Saylor notes Bitcoin's deeper impact lies in creating digital sovereignty, where private keys give individuals permissionless control over their economic power, with ownership verified mathematically, not by institutions. He concludes that while gold's physical scarcity makes it money, Bitcoin's digital scarcity does the same, characterizing Bitcoin as the monetary energy of the digital age.

cryptonews.ru5h ago

Michael Saylor Compares Bitcoin and Gold!

cryptonews.ru5h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片