Ethereum needs to ‘stop changing,’ Vitalik Buterin suggests – Here’s why

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-11-19Last updated on 2025-11-20

Key Takeaways

Why does Ethereum want to ossify its base layer?

To reduce protocol risk as it secures hundreds of billions in assets.

Why are companies adding ETH to their treasuries now?

A more predictable, fixed Ethereum core supports greater yields.


For a network famous for reinventing itself every few years, Ethereum [ETH] might finally settle down.

Wall Street firms are buying ETH, as Vitalik Buterin pushes for a network that can grow up without losing its spark. If the core stays fixed and new ideas move to the edges, the chain could become far more stable.

Ironically, that newfound stability could be the very thing that keeps the excitement going.

Ethereum’s “stop changing” moment

At Devconnect in Buenos Aires, Vitalik Buterin delivered one of his clearest indications yet that Ethereum’s rapid-change era is ending. Speaking to more than 500 attendees, he argued that,

“More and more ossification over time is good for Ethereum…”

Buterin also noted that the protocol now sees “a much lower rate of surprises.”

This is a turning point for a network built on constant iteration. Ethereum’s early roadmap relied on major upgrades every few years, each affecting performance or economics.

But why does this matter?

Ossification — the point where a blockchain’s base rules stop changing — is becoming a practical requirement for Ethereum’s scale.

The network now secures hundreds of billions of dollars in assets and processes trillions each year, which makes sudden protocol changes far riskier.

Buterin is proposing locking down the consensus layer while keeping the Ethereum Virtual Machine more adaptable, so developers can keep building without touching the chain’s core rules.

ethereumethereum

Source: X

The idea is to shrink the attack surface on L1 while keeping flexibility in the layers above it. He also noted that the era of wide-open experimentation has narrowed.

As more institutional money arrives and memecoins dominate retail activity, the ecosystem takes fewer risks and repeats more existing patterns. Ossification, in his view, sets clearer boundaries.

The core stays stable and predictable, while new ideas shift to rollups, wallets, and application layers instead of the base protocol.

Enter… corporate treasuries

This push toward stability comes as public companies and funds treat ETH as a strong balance-sheet holding.

Data from disclosed treasuries shows BitMine Immersion Technologies at the top, holding 1,713,899 ETH worth more than $5.27 billion.

SharpLink Gaming follows with 797,704 ETH, while The Ether Machine controls 345,362 ETH.

Even the Ethereum Foundation maintains 244,481 ETH.

Major listed entities are also accumulating: Coinbase holds 137,334 ETH, Bit Digital owns 120,306 ETH, and 180 Life Sciences reports 82,186 ETH.

Below them, firms such as Fundamental Global (47,331 ETH), Ether Capital (46,274 ETH), and BTCS (70,028 ETH) round out a widening base of corporate holders.

Source: Ethereumtreasuries.net

Institutions are building large, long-term positions just as Ethereum begins talk of locking down its core design.

Predictability is essential

Large holders with hundreds of thousands of ETH don’t want a chain that changes its base rules every few years.

Long-term holding and staking rewards already make ETH behave more like a yield-bearing asset, and L2 scaling now handles most everyday activity. This eases pressure on the main chain.

Ossification supports this shift by reducing protocol surprises, shrinking the attack surface, and creating a steadier environment for staking and settlement.

Early Ethereum moved fast, rolling out major upgrades that changed fees, issuance, and consensus.

Today’s institutional players expect fewer disruptions, clearer timelines, and infrastructure that stays consistent across market cycles.

A fixed core supports all this directly.

The quantum deadline, and the reset

However, this doesn’t remove the need for one last major upgrade.

Ethereum still relies on elliptic curve cryptography, which he said could be broken by quantum computers within four years.

That means the network must switch to quantum-resistant cryptography before 2028, requiring coordination across validators, developers, institutions, and users.

With millions of ETH now on corporate balance sheets, big holders need to know Ethereum can still handle a security overhaul even as its base layer becomes more fixed.

The first test of that balance comes on the 3rd of December with the much-awaited Fusaka upgrade going live.

Share

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Upbit is Anxious: A Hasty Counterattack Aimed at Regaining Stablecoin Market Share

Title: Upbit's Rushed Counterattack to Reclaim Stablecoin Market Share Facing a dramatic shift in South Korea's stablecoin market, leading exchange Upbit launched a promotional campaign from July 26 to August 9, waiving the 0.05% trading fee for stablecoins paired with the Korean Won (KRW) and rapidly listing new stablecoins like RLUSD and USDG. This move is a direct response to its plummeting market share in this sector. Historically a duopoly with Bithumb, the market has been reshaped since October 2025 when Coinone permanently removed fees for USDC trading. By June 2026, Coinone led with 34.8% of stablecoin volume, followed by Bithumb (31.1%) and Upbit (30.1%). This contrasts sharply with the overall crypto market, where Upbit commands 60%. The data shows stablecoin demand is highly sensitive to fees, as users primarily buy them to transfer capital overseas for derivatives trading or forex arbitrage. South Korean exchanges have seen a net outflow of stablecoins for 18 consecutive months, totaling approximately 14.9 trillion KRW, underscoring their role as a cross-border capital conduit. Upbit's limited-time promotion initially boosted its daily stablecoin volume by 162%, but the surge was almost entirely in USDT (98.1% of volume). The newly listed stablecoins saw negligible, fleeting interest. Furthermore, the promotional effect quickly waned in the second week, with volume dropping 33% on weekdays. A concurrent weakening of the KRW also contributed to the trading spike, independent of the fee waiver. The analysis suggests that once the promotion ends, Upbit is unlikely to retain its temporary gains unless it matches Coinone's permanent zero-fee policy, forcing a choice between market share and fee revenue. Upbit's strategic push may be less about immediate profit and more about preparing for future regulatory shifts. With South Korea's *Digital Asset Basic Act* on the horizon, which will regulate KRW-backed stablecoins, and following Dunamu's (Upbit's parent) integration into Naver Financial to build a payment ecosystem, securing a dominant position in the dollar stablecoin distribution channel holds long-term strategic value. However, potential regulatory conflicts could prevent Upbit from listing a future Naver-issued KRW stablecoin, making the current fight for dollar stablecoin flow even more critical.

marsbit4h ago

Upbit is Anxious: A Hasty Counterattack Aimed at Regaining Stablecoin Market Share

marsbit4h ago

Michael Saylor Compares Bitcoin and Gold!

Michael Saylor, founder of MicroStrategy, argues that Bitcoin fundamentally changes how wealth is stored and transferred by transforming digital scarcity into economic value. He describes Bitcoin as the first digital monetary network, combining computers, digital networks, and cryptography. It digitizes monetary assets, allowing their supply to be controlled by public protocols rather than institutions, thus converting economic value into information transmissible over global networks. Comparing Bitcoin to gold, Saylor states that while increasing Bitcoin's supply is harder, its integration with software and transfer is easier. He highlights Bitcoin's proof-of-work mechanism, which ties it to the physical world by consuming real energy to secure the ledger, making past transactions immutable. This creates a shared security system involving miners, energy companies, and investors. Saylor suggests "digital monetary energy" is a more accurate term than "digital gold." He emphasizes that the Bitcoin network is an adaptive ecosystem of miners, nodes, developers, and users. Its core design is intentionally simple, focused on maintaining a secure ledger for scarce digital assets, with complex functionalities built in higher-layer applications. This architecture allows Bitcoin to serve as a foundation for transmitting value and fostering innovation in payments and financial services. Saylor notes Bitcoin's deeper impact lies in creating digital sovereignty, where private keys give individuals permissionless control over their economic power, with ownership verified mathematically, not by institutions. He concludes that while gold's physical scarcity makes it money, Bitcoin's digital scarcity does the same, characterizing Bitcoin as the monetary energy of the digital age.

cryptonews.ru5h ago

Michael Saylor Compares Bitcoin and Gold!

cryptonews.ru5h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片