U.S. crypto bill back on track! – Senate vote expected ‘early next year’

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-11-18Last updated on 2025-11-19

Key Takeaways 

Why is the new timeline crucial? 

Getting it done by early next year would “unlock crypto,” per Coinbase CEO. 

Can it get final passage as planned? 

DeFi regulation remains a sticky concern, alongside another likely holdout from Democrats. 


Senate Banking Committee Chair Senator Tim Scott said that they plan to mark up the crypto market structure bill next month. 

During an interview with Fox Business on the 18th of November, Scott added, 

“Next month, we believe that we can mark up, in both committees, and get this to the floor of the Senate early next year.” 

Crypto billCrypto bill

Source: X

Scott had previously set a September deadline for the markup, but he blamed the Democrats for “stalling” the legislation.

This was a reference to the holdout by a section of Democrats, led by Reuben Gallego, that proposed a controversial DeFi regulation that triggered an industry-wide backlash and nearly killed the bill’s momentum. 

But Jane Garza, Gallego spokesperson, rebuffed Scott’s comments, 

“Taking the time necessary to produce a strong, bipartisan product is not the same thing as stalling, and implying that Democrats don’t want to get this done isn’t productive.”

Later in October, however, the different factions in Congress got back on track after intense lobbying from crypto leaders.

Fast forward to November, the Senate Agriculture Committee, tasked with the CFTC’s side of the bill, released a draft discussion paper that left the entire DeFi section for further feedback.

This is a pre-markup process that will help combine drafts from both committees into a final, coherent legislation. 

What’s next after the mark-up?

In the legislative process, markups play a crucial role in shaping bills. During this stage, committees collaborate to review the proposed legislation. They discuss, amend, and refine the text to ensure clarity and alignment with policy goals. 

Once the revisions are complete, the committee votes to advance the bill for final debate and voting on the chamber floor.

For the Senate Banking Committee, its draft covers the SEC’s side of the mandate, including securities and investor protections, among others.

And as of writing, the Senate Banking draft only captures Republicans’ input, with Democrats’ contribution yet to be accommodated. 

It remains to be seen whether the DeFi regulation will become another stumbling block during the planned markup process. 

For his part, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong noted that there was a “good chance” of getting it done by December and that President Donald Trump would likely sign it off soon afterward. He added

“This would be a big milestone to get crypto unlocked with clear rules in the U.S., which would benefit all companies.” 

However, the mark-up process will not be a smooth ride, warned Cody Carbone, CEO of Digital Chamber, a blockchain trade association. He noted

“This bill only works if these committees get together and they make one product.”

Share

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Upbit is Anxious: A Hasty Counterattack Aimed at Regaining Stablecoin Market Share

Title: Upbit's Rushed Counterattack to Reclaim Stablecoin Market Share Facing a dramatic shift in South Korea's stablecoin market, leading exchange Upbit launched a promotional campaign from July 26 to August 9, waiving the 0.05% trading fee for stablecoins paired with the Korean Won (KRW) and rapidly listing new stablecoins like RLUSD and USDG. This move is a direct response to its plummeting market share in this sector. Historically a duopoly with Bithumb, the market has been reshaped since October 2025 when Coinone permanently removed fees for USDC trading. By June 2026, Coinone led with 34.8% of stablecoin volume, followed by Bithumb (31.1%) and Upbit (30.1%). This contrasts sharply with the overall crypto market, where Upbit commands 60%. The data shows stablecoin demand is highly sensitive to fees, as users primarily buy them to transfer capital overseas for derivatives trading or forex arbitrage. South Korean exchanges have seen a net outflow of stablecoins for 18 consecutive months, totaling approximately 14.9 trillion KRW, underscoring their role as a cross-border capital conduit. Upbit's limited-time promotion initially boosted its daily stablecoin volume by 162%, but the surge was almost entirely in USDT (98.1% of volume). The newly listed stablecoins saw negligible, fleeting interest. Furthermore, the promotional effect quickly waned in the second week, with volume dropping 33% on weekdays. A concurrent weakening of the KRW also contributed to the trading spike, independent of the fee waiver. The analysis suggests that once the promotion ends, Upbit is unlikely to retain its temporary gains unless it matches Coinone's permanent zero-fee policy, forcing a choice between market share and fee revenue. Upbit's strategic push may be less about immediate profit and more about preparing for future regulatory shifts. With South Korea's *Digital Asset Basic Act* on the horizon, which will regulate KRW-backed stablecoins, and following Dunamu's (Upbit's parent) integration into Naver Financial to build a payment ecosystem, securing a dominant position in the dollar stablecoin distribution channel holds long-term strategic value. However, potential regulatory conflicts could prevent Upbit from listing a future Naver-issued KRW stablecoin, making the current fight for dollar stablecoin flow even more critical.

marsbit5h ago

Upbit is Anxious: A Hasty Counterattack Aimed at Regaining Stablecoin Market Share

marsbit5h ago

Michael Saylor Compares Bitcoin and Gold!

Michael Saylor, founder of MicroStrategy, argues that Bitcoin fundamentally changes how wealth is stored and transferred by transforming digital scarcity into economic value. He describes Bitcoin as the first digital monetary network, combining computers, digital networks, and cryptography. It digitizes monetary assets, allowing their supply to be controlled by public protocols rather than institutions, thus converting economic value into information transmissible over global networks. Comparing Bitcoin to gold, Saylor states that while increasing Bitcoin's supply is harder, its integration with software and transfer is easier. He highlights Bitcoin's proof-of-work mechanism, which ties it to the physical world by consuming real energy to secure the ledger, making past transactions immutable. This creates a shared security system involving miners, energy companies, and investors. Saylor suggests "digital monetary energy" is a more accurate term than "digital gold." He emphasizes that the Bitcoin network is an adaptive ecosystem of miners, nodes, developers, and users. Its core design is intentionally simple, focused on maintaining a secure ledger for scarce digital assets, with complex functionalities built in higher-layer applications. This architecture allows Bitcoin to serve as a foundation for transmitting value and fostering innovation in payments and financial services. Saylor notes Bitcoin's deeper impact lies in creating digital sovereignty, where private keys give individuals permissionless control over their economic power, with ownership verified mathematically, not by institutions. He concludes that while gold's physical scarcity makes it money, Bitcoin's digital scarcity does the same, characterizing Bitcoin as the monetary energy of the digital age.

cryptonews.ru6h ago

Michael Saylor Compares Bitcoin and Gold!

cryptonews.ru6h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片