White House Explores New Pro-Crypto CFTC Candidates Amid Quintenz’s Confirmation Delay – Report

bitcoinistPublished on 2025-09-20Last updated on 2025-09-20

Abstract

The White House is reportedly exploring new pro-crypto candidates to lead the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) as the confirmation...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

The White House is reportedly exploring new pro-crypto candidates to lead the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) as the confirmation of President Donald Trump’s initial pick, Brian Quintenz, has stalled.

White House Eyes More Crypto-Friendly Candidates

On Thursday, Bloomberg reported that the Trump administration is allegedly weighing additional candidates to chair the CFTC following the delay in Brian Quintenz’s confirmation process, according to people familiar with the matter.

Although the White House has not announced that it’s shifting away from Trump’s original chairman pick, a new list of potential picks has emerged over the past few weeks, the report revealed.

Among the CFTC chair contenders, the White House is considering Michael Selig, chief counsel to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) Crypto Task Force, and Tyler Williams, counselor to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on digital asset policy.

Notably, the highly anticipated market structure is expected to shift most of the crypto market supervision to the CFTC, increasing the regulator’s responsibilities. However, the agency, which is intended to be a five-person, bipartisan commission, is down to only acting Chairman Caroline Pham, who is also expected to depart from the agency once a permanent leader is appointed.

With the personnel shortage and Quintenz confirmation stalling, it has been difficult to carry out critical agency business, previous reports claim. “Turmoil continues as the agency’s responsibilities, and the potential market risks, are multiplying,” Bloomberg stated in August.

At the time, a White House spokesperson denied that there’s chaos at the agency, affirming that “President Trump has made it a priority to make America the crypto capital of the world, and in doing so has called for the revitalization of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to play a larger role in securing this promise.”

Quintenz-Winklevoss Clash Stalls CFTC Leadership

The CFTC has been in leadership limbo since July, after the US Senate Agriculture Committee delayed the vote on President Trump’s nominee days before the August recess. Reports claimed that the committee stalled Quintenz’s confirmation process following a request from the White House.

The request came after Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss, Gemini co-founders, allegedly pressed President Trump to reconsider Quintenz’s nomination, arguing that he wouldn’t “shake up the CFTC enough” and was not aligned with Trump’s agenda.

In August, a group of crypto organizations sent a letter to the US President in support of the CFTC chair candidate. They highlighted Quintenz’s extensive experience in the private sector and his knowledge and foresight in digital asset regulation.

“Mr. Quintenz is uniquely prepared to lead the CFTC in establishing fair, transparent, and trusted markets that will safeguard America’s leadership in digital assets,” the letter affirmed, emphasizing that installing a permanent leader is “absolutely critical” to achieve the Commission’s goals and accomplish Trump’s crypto mission.

Last week, Quintenz seemingly confirmed the rumors after sharing private messages with the Winklevoss twins. He suggested the US president “might have been misled” by the crypto exchange co-founders, which led to the delay.

As reported by Bitcoinist, Tyler Winklevoss asked Quintenz’s opinion on the crypto exchange’s 13-page complaint letter, which raised multiple concerns and complaints about the CFTC’s Division of Enforcement (DOE) conduct against the crypto exchange over the years. However, Winklevoss was ultimately “disappointed and surprised” with the CFTC nominee response.

“It’s my understanding that after this exchange, they contacted the President and asked that my confirmation be paused for reasons other than what is reflected in these texts,” Quintenz wrote on X.

Ultimately, he pledged to continue to support Trump’s vision “in whatever capacity” he can, as “protecting the President and his agenda are more important than any job.”

crypto, bitcoin, btc, btcusdt

Bitcoin (BTC) trades at $116,313 in the one-week chart. Source: BTCUSDT on TradingView
Featured Image from Unsplash.com, Chart from TradingView.com
Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Rubmar is a crypto enthusiast who likes learning and improving constantly. She enjoys reporting on the latest news and developments in the crypto industry. Rubmar also enjoys scrapbooking, crafting, simulation games, and watching football.

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

You'll Be Surprised How Much WeChat's Architecture Differs from Telegram's

An article compares the core architectural philosophies of WeChat and Telegram, highlighting fundamental differences in data storage, monetization, and developer ecosystems. **Data Storage:** Telegram offers unlimited, synchronized cloud storage for seamless access across all devices. In contrast, WeChat stores chat history locally on each device, requiring a manual migration process for transfer and tethering desktop sessions to an active smartphone. **Features & Ecosystem:** Telegram's open Bot API allows for easy, free bot creation, while WeChat's massive ecosystem of over 4.8 million "mini-programs" operates within a closed, curated, and more regulated platform. Commenting also differs: Telegram uses integrated discussion threads for channels, whereas WeChat relies on pre-moderated comments for official accounts and separate chats for interaction. **File Sharing & Payments:** Telegram supports large file transfers (up to 4GB for Premium), while WeChat limits most files to 200MB. A key divergence is in payments: WeChat Pay is deeply integrated into daily life and commerce in China, whereas Telegram lacks a comparable built-in fiat payment system, focusing instead on third-party bots and crypto. **Analysis:** The comparison reveals two distinct models: WeChat is a tightly integrated, closed ecosystem deeply embedded in the real economy, while Telegram prioritizes open protocols, flexible data handling, and low barriers for developers. An added perspective notes that WeChat's fusion of messaging and payments in a single interface without end-to-end encryption for chats potentially broadens the attack surface, raising security questions as more functions converge.

cryptonews.ru2h ago

You'll Be Surprised How Much WeChat's Architecture Differs from Telegram's

cryptonews.ru2h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片