Bitcoin As ‘Everyday Money’: Jack Dorsey’s Block Reveals Roadmap

bitcoinistPublished on 2025-07-22Last updated on 2025-07-22

Abstract

Jack Dorsey’s payments company Block has laid out a policy agenda that it argues could unlock Bitcoin’s evolution from reserve...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

Jack Dorsey’s payments company Block has laid out a policy agenda that it argues could unlock Bitcoin’s evolution from reserve asset to routine means of payment in the United States. “A path towards Bitcoin as everyday money,” Dorsey posted on X today, amplifying a detailed blog post and earlier thread by Thomas Templeton, the company’s lead for Bitcoin hardware and mining initiatives.

Templeton wrote that Block is “building toward a world where Bitcoin is everyday money — not just a store of value,” stressing that congressional action is now the decisive variable. “To realize this vision, we need Congress to modernize the regulatory frameworks to support this,” he told his followers, linking to the firm’s memorandum Policies to Unlock Bitcoin as Everyday Money.

3 Changes To Make Bitcoin Money

In that document, Block revisits the founding premise of Bitcoin as set out by Satoshi Nakamoto in 2008: “A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System.” It argues that the network’s open, permissionless design is “not about speculation—it’s about access,” and positions BTC’s architecture as a model for “resilience and innovation” in national payments infrastructure. Block says it is investing across the stack—mining rigs, self-custody wallets, and Square-branded point-of-sale integrations—to lower barriers for “people and small businesses” who wish to transact natively on Bitcoin.

Yet the company contends that federal law has not kept pace with technical progress. It urges lawmakers to take three steps it sees as prerequisites for mass-market use.

First, Block underscores the urgency of comprehensive market-structure reform now embodied by the Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act. Re-quoting Block’s own brief, the company maintains that Bitcoin’s “decentralized, permissionless, and open-source architecture makes it one of the most transparent and democratically governed forms of money ever created.”

Second, the company seeks statutory protection for “participants that do not custody customer funds—like software developers, node operators, miners, and wallet providers.” This language mirrors the bipartisan Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act, which would encode the principle that money-transmitter rules apply only to intermediaries with control over customer funds.

Third, Block presses for a de minimis capital-gains exemption on small retail transactions, likening Bitcoin’s tax treatment to that of foreign currency. Under current rules, buying a cup of coffee with appreciated BTC triggers a taxable event, a friction Block believes “disincentivizes everyday use.” The firm notes that Square plans to enable direct BTC payments “later this year” and says a tax safe harbour is “essential to ensuring bitcoin can be more widely adopted as a medium of exchange.”

Throughout the policy paper, Block differentiates Bitcoin from the broader digital-asset sector by emphasizing its fixed supply of 21 million coins, its “fungibility,” and its decade-plus operational history. “Whether it’s sending value across borders, or seamlessly transacting with small businesses, bitcoin has the real-world potential of modernizing payments and addressing everyday financial needs,” the memo states.

While Dorsey’s personal advocacy for Bitcoin is well-known—he once called it “the native currency of the internet”—Block’s new roadmap still represents the company’s most detailed policy blueprint to date. Since its release, the legislative chessboard has shifted: the Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act passed the House on 17 July by 294–134 and now awaits action on the Senate calendar.

By contrast, the narrower Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act has only been re-introduced and remains bottled up at the House Financial Services Committee, with no Senate companion yet filed. Capitol-hill watchers are therefore focused on whether Senate Banking Chair Tim Scott will grant CLARITY a markup following the committee’s 9 July hearing on digital-asset market structure and on whether tax writers will graft a de minimis capital-gains exemption onto the next must-pass vehicle, now that President Trump has already signed the GENIUS stablecoin law on 21 July.

Absent those reforms, Block warns, the United States risks ceding ground to jurisdictions where Bitcoin payments already operate at retail scale. With Square’s merchant network preparing to accept Bitcoin alongside credit cards and Tap-to-Pay, the company’s message to lawmakers is unambiguous: “It’s time for Congress to pass a comprehensive federal licensing framework and unlock a tax barrier for small-dollar BTC transactions to be a viable medium of exchange.”

At press time, BTC traded at $117,152.

Bitcoin price
BTC stalls below the 1.272 Fib, 1-day chart | Source: BTCUSDT on TradingView.com
Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Jake Simmons has been a Bitcoin enthusiast since 2016. Ever since he heard about Bitcoin, he has been studying the topic every day and trying to share his knowledge with others. His goal is to contribute to Bitcoin's financial revolution, which will replace the fiat money system. Besides BTC and crypto, Jake studied Business Informatics at a university. After graduation in 2017, he has been working in the blockchain and crypto sector. You can follow Jake on Twitter at @realJakeSimmons.

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Li Fei-Fei's Latest Long-Form Article: When Video Generation, Robotics, and NVIDIA All Call Themselves World Models, We Need a Taxonomy

In a new article, Dr. Fei-Fei Li addresses the widespread and often inconsistent use of the term "world model" in AI. She proposes a clear, functional taxonomy rooted in the classic Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP) loop (agent → action → state → observation → agent). According to this framework, current systems called "world models" are different projections of this loop, categorized by their primary output: 1. **Renderers**: Output observations (pixels). Their goal is visual fidelity for human consumption (e.g., video generation models like Sora). They are the most commercially mature but are limited by a focus on appearance over physical accuracy. 2. **Simulators**: Output states (geometric, physical, dynamic representations). They provide a structurally accurate world for both human professionals (e.g., architects) and computational agents (e.g., robots for training). Li argues simulators are the crucial, underappreciated bridge, as they can underpin both rendering and planning. 3. **Planners**: Output actions. Given an observation and a goal, they decide what an agent should do next (e.g., robotic action models). This area is highly promising but remains the least mature for real-world deployment. Li highlights a key trend: the boundaries between these three categories are beginning to blur, as they all rely on a shared underlying understanding of geometry, physics, and dynamics. The logical endpoint is a unified world foundation model capable of switching between rendering, simulation, and planning based on downstream needs. This convergence, she concludes, is central to advancing spatial intelligence—enabling machines not just to talk about the world, but to truly understand, imagine, and interact with it.

marsbit3h ago

Li Fei-Fei's Latest Long-Form Article: When Video Generation, Robotics, and NVIDIA All Call Themselves World Models, We Need a Taxonomy

marsbit3h ago

Forbes Feature: Stablecoin Cross-Border Payments Are Faster, But Not Yet Cheaper

A Forbes feature delves into the state of stablecoin-based cross-border payments, noting rapid growth but a key shortfall: while faster and more accessible, they are not yet cheaper. At a recent industry conference in Mexico City, optimism about technology, regulation, and volume was tempered by discussions with practitioners. The core issue is liquidity. Traditional FX brokers charge 60-70 basis points, and stablecoins promise to slash this to 2-5 basis points. However, this theoretical cost advantage cannot be realized until deep liquidity pools are established at scale, requiring significant institutional capital inflow. A major adoption barrier is trust. Businesses often rely on long-standing relationships with traditional brokers, valuing reliability over marginal cost savings. This shift will be gradual. Furthermore, successful companies in the space are not positioning themselves as replacements for legacy systems like SWIFT, but as complements. They leverage stablecoins for speed while using traditional rails for their standardization and reliability in ensuring accurate payment details—a critical factor for supplier payments to avoid customs issues. Companies like Caliza, experiencing high monthly growth, exemplify this hybrid approach. The industry anticipates consolidation, as long-term viability will depend on securing the essential trifecta: proper licensing, robust fiat on/off-ramps, and deep liquidity. Without these, firms risk being mere intermediaries rather than building sustainable businesses.

marsbit3h ago

Forbes Feature: Stablecoin Cross-Border Payments Are Faster, But Not Yet Cheaper

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片