【降息倒计时】“特朗普系”美联储副主席放话:最快7月动手!

华尔街见闻Published on 2025-06-24Last updated on 2026-08-24

Abstract

继美联储理事沃勒表态支持 7 月降息后,另一位理事鲍曼最新指出,若通胀压力保持受控,她将支持最早在 7 月下调利率。

继沃勒之后,又一位美联储官员表态支持下个月降息。值得一提的是,这两位理事都是特朗普在第一任期内任命的。

周一,美联储理事鲍曼在谈及经济与货币政策时表示,若通胀压力保持受控,她将支持最早在7月下调利率,因为劳动力市场的风险可能上升,而通胀似乎正稳定朝着美联储2%的目标前进:

如果通胀压力依然受控,我会支持在下次会议上就将政策利率下调,使其更接近中性水平,并维持健康的劳动力市场。

随着美国政府政策、经济和金融市场不断演变,她将继续密切关注经济状况。

上周五,美联储理事克里斯托弗·沃勒在接受 CNBC 采访时表示,他可能支持下个月降息,因为他担心劳动力市场过于疲软。

有“美联储通讯社”之称的华尔街日报记者Nick Timiraos在最新文章中表示,这是自美国总统特朗普在今年春季任命鲍曼、并得到参议院批准担任监管副主席以来,鲍曼首次就经济前景发表实质性评论。鲍曼之前高度关注通胀担忧,她的最新表态是一个有意义的转变。

文章称,自上周会议以来发表讲话的美联储官员中,率先表示有意在 7 月底美联储下次会议上降息的是特朗普第一任期内任命的两位官员。

第二位美联储高官为降息铺路

上周的6月会议上,美联储维持基准利率在4.25%至4.5%的区间,这一水平普遍被认为高于既不刺激也不抑制经济活动的中性利率。会议结束后,美联储主席鲍威尔重申,政策制定者可以在利率调整方面采取耐心态度,等待更多关于特朗普总统经济政策、尤其是贸易政策变化的细节。

鲍曼表示她支持美联储6月决议。她提到,会后声明中体现了政策立场的转变,当前政策不确定性已经减少,关注点正在转向劳动力市场可能的疲软。

经济学家们原本担心特朗普的关税会推高通胀,但当前,特朗普政府扩大关税使用的影响尚未在经济数据中显现,劳动力市场和通胀数据依然强劲。与此同时,特朗普已经缓和了言辞,并向与主要贸易伙伴的谈判敞开了大门。

鲍曼最新指出:

数据显示,关税和其他政策尚未对经济造成明显影响。我认为关税对通胀的影响可能会出现更大的延迟,程度也比最初预期更小,尤其是因为许多企业已提前储备库存。贸易和关税谈判的持续进展令经济环境的风险显著降低。

贸易政策的变化对美联储偏好的通胀指标“可能只有极小的影响”。

美联储的职责是维持物价稳定与实现最大就业目标。鲍曼指出,由于近期消费支出疲软及劳动力市场出现脆弱迹象,美联储在就业目标方面面临的下行风险可能很快变得更加突出。“在我看来,现在承认风险平衡已发生变化是适当的。在思考未来的政策路径时,是时候考虑调整政策利率了。”

美联储下次FOMC会议将于7月29日至30日举行。根据CME集团的FedWatch工具,交易员们目前仅认为该次会议采取行动的可能性为23%,而9月降息的可能性约为78%。

在美联储理事鲍曼谈及降息前景之后:

标普500指数涨0.57%刷新日高,道指涨0.42%,纳指涨0.55%。

美国10年期国债收益率跌超5.5个基点,刷新日低至4.32%下方。两年期美债收益率短线下挫将近4个基点,刷新日低,逼近3.85%,北京时间19:35以来从3.92%一线持续走低、出现两波显著的下滑行情。

鲍曼提到,特朗普的关税政策可能对物价的影响是暂时且有限的,这令其成为近期第二位表达类似观点的美联储高级官员,这为最早7月降息铺平了道路。

另一位美联储理事沃勒上周五在接受CNBC采访时也表示,他认为美联储7月可以考虑降息。

特朗普一直在施压美联储降低利率,以减少不断膨胀的美国国家债务的融资成本。由于美联储上周决定按兵不动,特朗普不断加码怒斥鲍威尔和美联储理事会。

特朗普曾表示,他认为美联储应至少降息两个百分点。鲍曼的讲话中没有提及她认为应降息的幅度,而沃勒则表示没有必要进行如此激进的降息。

鲍曼谈及监管

鲍曼是美联储负责监管的副主席。她同日警告称,目前的杠杆率监管方式已在市场上带来了意想不到的后果。现在是时候重新审视这项关键的资本缓冲机制,因为有担忧称该规则限制了银行在29万亿美元的美国国债市场中的交易活动。鲍曼表示:

杠杆率对银行附属券商的影响可能会带来更广泛的市场影响,包括像国债市场中介活动中观察到的市场波动。一旦我们识别出那些未在制定监管方式时考虑到的意外后果,就必须考虑重新审视早期的监管和政策决定。

鲍曼本月早些时候概述了一项雄心勃勃的议程——从审查被称为“补充杠杆率”的资本缓冲机制,到让社区银行免受针对大型金融机构的监管要求的影响。

据媒体此前报道,美联储和其他监管机构本周将公布对杠杆率规则的潜在修改建议,拟调整整体比率,而非像部分观察人士预测的那样,将美国国债等特定资产排除在外。

她还表示,美联储将在7月22日召开会议,讨论银行资本问题,并指出“简单的改革”就能改善国债市场在压力事件下的运行韧性。鲍曼此前曾批评监管机构要求美国最大银行大幅增加资本金以应对潜在危机的计划。

人们普遍预计鲍曼将支持大幅放宽这一被称为“巴塞尔协议III终局”的提案。该计划最初于2023年公布,拟将大型银行的资本要求提高19%。美联储在行业反对声中随后有所收回。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

The 'Saving U.S. Treasuries' Baton Pass: Bessent Fumbled Last Week, This Week It's Wash's Turn

"Rescuing US Treasuries" Relay: After Bessent's Miss, All Eyes Are on Walsh Last week, US Treasury Secretary Bessent's announcement to at least double long-term Treasury buybacks failed to sustainably lower yields, which quickly rebounded. The market response saw a drop in the dollar alongside surges in gold and Bitcoin, interpreted as a "pressure release valve" for anxiety. The focus now shifts to Fed Chairman Walsh's upcoming Jackson Hole speech. Markets are highly sensitive to his message, seeking clarity on the Fed's policy response to stubborn inflation and worsening fiscal conditions. Analysts warn that a lack of new guidance could disappoint markets and worsen the sell-off in long-dated bonds. Analysts question the scale of Bessent's operations, noting they are too small relative to the overall debt market and do not constitute quantitative easing. A key issue is the Fed's massive holdings of long-term bonds, which distorts the market. With the Fed holding low-yielding short-term bonds that are losing money relative to its policy rate, discussion is growing around a potential Fed-led "Operation Twist." This would involve selling short-term bonds to buy long-term ones, aiming to lower long-end yields without expanding the balance sheet. The upcoming PCE inflation data will set the stage for Walsh's speech. However, the window for action is narrowing amid political pressures. A critical threshold is the 30-year yield at 5%; holding above it could increase stress on the dollar and leveraged sectors. Overall, the article suggests that without coordinated Fed action to anchor inflation expectations, Treasury interventions may ultimately fail, with investors increasingly looking to assets like gold as hedges.

marsbitJust now

The 'Saving U.S. Treasuries' Baton Pass: Bessent Fumbled Last Week, This Week It's Wash's Turn

marsbitJust now

Hyperliquid's Compliance Journey: From Permissionless to Permissioned via HIP-3

Hyperliquid’s Compliance Path: From Permissionless to Permissioned HIP-3 Hyperliquid currently blocks U.S. access because its permissionless, on-chain infrastructure conflicts with U.S. market structure laws, which restrict futures trading to registered exchanges, clearinghouses, and brokers. Through its Hyperliquid Policy Center (HPC), the project is advocating for regulatory modernization, proposing that regulated entities be allowed to build products on HyperCore (its exchange and clearing layer) while fulfilling their compliance obligations. The platform’s modular stack separates roles like a traditional exchange (DCM), clearinghouse (DCO), and broker (FCM), but reconstructs them on-chain with code. This enables permissionless access, self-custody, and 24/7 global trading, but clashes with U.S. rules requiring KYC, specific margin models, and custodial arrangements. To resolve this, HPC is engaging with U.S. regulators (CFTC, SEC) to seek clarity that deploying on-chain software does not itself trigger licensing, and to establish exemptions allowing non-custodial wallets to route users to regulated derivatives. Recent political signals suggest openness to this approach. On the technical side, Hyperliquid Labs has introduced permissioned HIP-3 deployers on testnet. These allow regulated entities to launch markets, perform KYC, and whitelist compliant users. While these create separate order books, whitelisted market makers can bridge liquidity between them, ensuring deep, shared liquidity across the same L1. Features like payload-based “PA” permissions enable DEX-level account controls (e.g., reduce-only orders), mirroring traditional broker authorities. The strategy is not to open the native, permissionless front-end to U.S. users, but to position Hyperliquid as neutral infrastructure that U.S. regulated firms can use while meeting their legal duties. This paves a compliant path for U.S. investor access while preserving the protocol’s core, permissionless nature.

marsbit24m ago

Hyperliquid's Compliance Journey: From Permissionless to Permissioned via HIP-3

marsbit24m ago

Two Funding Rounds in Three Months: The Chinese Version of Palantir is on Fire

Investment Community AI has learned that Beijing Zhongshu Ruizhi Technology Co., Ltd., a domestic industrial-grade causal intelligence and high-reliability decision-making AI company, has recently completed a strategic financing round worth hundreds of millions of RMB. This round saw participation from China Internet Investment Fund, Suzhou Chuangtou National Social Security Fund, Financial Street Capital, ICBC Capital, Kunlun Capital, among others, with existing shareholders also increasing their investment. This follows a Series B funding round in the hundreds of millions completed just three months prior. The rapid succession of two major funding rounds signifies strong market recognition of the company's underlying original technology and scaled commercial implementation. Often referred to as the "Chinese version of Palantir," Zhongshu Ruizhi is entering a new phase of accelerated technological iteration, widespread scenario replication, and scaled performance release, mirroring the explosive growth of China's AI market. Founded in April 2020 by Dr. Han Han, a Tsinghua University Ph.D. and former core drafter of national AI policies, the company is mission-driven to "move AI from the digital world to the physical world." It focuses on the high-reliability, strong-decision industrial AI track and enterprise-grade AI Agent full-stack infrastructure. The team tackles the challenge of applying AI to China's vast and complex industrial and energy systems by developing a new intelligent operating system from scratch. Its core technological breakthrough lies in three proprietary底层 technologies: meta-causal cognitive theory, causal models, and a dynamic ontology engine. These address critical pain points of generative large models in industrial settings—such as AI hallucinations, insufficient reasoning, lack of temporal logic, unverifiable decisions, and multi-source rule conflicts—thereby providing trustworthy, explainable, and executable智能决策 capabilities. Commercially, Zhongshu Ruizhi has achieved scaled deployment, serving over 50 central state-owned enterprises and industrial groups in sectors like power, petroleum, and aerospace, with implementations in more than 800 highly complex production scenarios. The company reported doubled revenue in 2025, demonstrating strong self-sufficiency and a viable business model—a rarity among new-generation AI firms. The latest funds will be allocated towards advancing foundational theoretical research, replicating successful application models to expand market presence (including overseas), and attracting top-tier talent. Lead investor China Internet Investment Fund highlighted that in the current shift from general AI capability contests to deep industrial empowerment, industrial-grade causal intelligence is crucial for building China's modern digital foundation and fostering new quality productive forces. They expressed support for the company's efforts to define decision-making paradigms and trustworthy standards for industrial intelligence, aiming to secure a rule-making voice in the global physical AI arena.

marsbit35m ago

Two Funding Rounds in Three Months: The Chinese Version of Palantir is on Fire

marsbit35m ago

The Biggest Political Economy Question in the AI Era: As Robots Become More Capable, How Do Humans Share the Value?

In the AI era, the most pressing political economy question is: as machines become increasingly capable, how can humanity share in the value they create? An article originally critiquing China's tech focus has sparked a deeper debate on this global challenge. Historically, industrial progress improved efficiency but still relied on human labor for wealth creation and distribution. AI is fundamentally different—it is now replacing cognitive and knowledge work. As AI and robots take over more tasks, economic growth may continue while direct human participation in value creation shrinks, creating a core tension between productivity gains and widespread income generation. The issue is not unique to China. While leading tech companies amass enormous wealth, labor's share of income is declining globally. The core problem is a broken link: technological innovation and corporate profits are not translating into sufficient consumer income and demand. Three potential paths forward are outlined: a traditional capitalist model where profits primarily go to capital owners; a state-capitalist approach with public investment in AI; and more innovative models like digital sovereign wealth funds, universal shareholding, or AI-era basic income schemes to directly distribute AI-generated value. The future competitive advantage may lie not just in technological supremacy, but in which society can build a new, inclusive distribution system for the intelligent economy. The ultimate challenge is ensuring that as AI creates value, humans have a means to obtain income and share in the resulting widespread social benefits.

marsbit45m ago

The Biggest Political Economy Question in the AI Era: As Robots Become More Capable, How Do Humans Share the Value?

marsbit45m ago

Generating Profits for Seven Consecutive Quarters, Emerging Markets Carry Trade Outperforms Everything

For the seventh consecutive quarter, dollar-funded emerging market carry trades have delivered positive returns, marking the longest winning streak since 2008. According to Bloomberg's index, this strategy has gained approximately 22% since late 2024, outperforming U.S. Treasuries, emerging market sovereign, and corporate dollar debt. The core of the trade involves borrowing low-interest currencies like the U.S. dollar, euro, or yen to invest in high-yielding emerging market assets, such as Turkish lira bonds offering over 40% returns. Returns were amplified by favorable currency moves, with the dollar weakening against most emerging market currencies and other traditional funding currencies. For instance, the trade gained 48% on the Colombian peso in the past year. A key test came in August 2024 with a historic joint U.S.-Japan currency intervention, which caused only a modest 1% dip in the carry trade risk premium as investors shifted funding from the yen to the euro and Swiss franc. Looking ahead, the primary risk is the timing of Federal Reserve policy changes. While persistent inflation allows the Fed to hold rates, a rapid rise in long-term U.S. yields could threaten the trade. Another concern is crowding, as massive inflows increase vulnerability to a sudden reversal. High interest rates in regions like Latin America and Eastern Europe, supported by external factors like Middle East tensions and energy prices, continue to sustain the opportunity. Major investors remain engaged, favoring currencies like the Mexican peso, South African rand, and Turkish lira.

marsbit1h ago

Generating Profits for Seven Consecutive Quarters, Emerging Markets Carry Trade Outperforms Everything

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

2.1k Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片