Top Web3 Games To Play On PS5 in 2025

ccn.comPublished on 2025-04-14Last updated on 2025-04-14

Key Takeaways
  • Off The Grid is likely to see a full launch at some point in 2025.
  • Moonray and Paradise Tycoon will have no Web3 features when they launch on PS5, but may reinstate them over time.
  • PlayStation 5 Web3 titles may struggle to implement all their blockchain and crypto features under Sony’s strict policies.

Web3 games are going mainstream in 2025, and some are coming to Sony’s wildly successful and powerful gaming console, the PlayStation 5.

Here’s a look at some of this year’s upcoming Web3 titles.

Web3 PS5 Games

Off the Grid

Launched in October 2024, Gunzilla’s dystopian cybernetic battle-royale shooter “Off The Grid” is the first and only Web3 title playable on the PlayStation 5 right now in early access.

It’s built on a custom L1 network called the GUNZ Network, which is based on the Avalanche (AVAX) blockchain. Notably, the GUNZ mainnet is set to launch nodes on April 17, 2025, sparking hope that the game’s full launch is happening this year.

Following in the footsteps of PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds (PUBG), Fortnite, Apex, and Escape from Tarkov, Off The Grid drops you into intense player-vs-player and player-vs-environment game modes where players duke it out to be the last one standing.

The blockchain side of the game comes as an optional extra. You can play the game and its story in its entirety without ever engaging with the non-fungible tokens (NFTs) or the marketplace available.

If players decide they wish to engage with the Web3 elements, they can convert specific items collected in-game and then mint weapons, armor, and upgrades as NFTs, which will be unique to their character and tied to their account.

These can then be sold on the platform’s marketplace.

2025 Launches

Moonray

Developed by Moonray Studios and launched in 2024, Moonray is a battle arena featuring some pretty awesome-looking ranged and melee combat with a number of game modes to play.

It’s built on the Ethereum blockchain and is integrated with Coinbase’s Base network, offering optional Web3 features such as NFTs, which represent in-game assets like character skins, as well as the MNRY token, which can be used for in-game purchases, rewards, and other interactions.

It’s currently in ‘alpha’ mode as a free-to-play title on the Epic Game Store, and has plans to launch on the PS5 this year. At present, the porting process is underway, and playtests have been scheduled for H2 2025.

Interestingly, the game’s PS5 version will reportedly be stripped of its Web3 features at launch due to Sony’s strict policies. It’s unknown if this is a permanent decision, as Off The Grid is seemingly able to offer optional Web3 features and operate in a gray area with its custom blockchain and ‘early access’ status.

This could change depending on market trends, regulatory concerns, and overall development in the Web3 gaming space. If Off the Grid can succeed and launch fully on PlayStation 5 with optional Web3 features, Moonray could do the same.

Paradise Tycoon

Paradise Tycoon is a multiplayer simulation and tycoon game akin to the wildly popular Animal Crossing and Stardew Valley titles. Set in a beautiful tropical metaverse, players are invited to manage and build up an uninhabited island and turn it into their own personalized paradise.

It’s currently available in Beta form on Windows, iOS, and Android, and it features Web3 features, such as NFT requirements have not yet been implemented.

It’s built on the Avalanche blockchain, and when fully launched, invites players to hire NFT-based crew members to increase their output through automated tasks, collaborate and trade with other players, as well as participate in regular events and quests.

Through such activities, players can earn the game’s native MOANI tokens and use them for various in-game interactions.

Similar to Moonray, this game may also drop its Web3 features for its PS5 launch. However, also similarly to Moonray, its blockchain and crypto features have always been optional, suggesting that over time, it could reintroduce Web3 mechanics.

KOMPETE (Unconfirmed)

KOMPETE is a free-to-play multiplayer game and currently has two game modes, a fast-paced battle-royale shooter, and a Mario Kart-style racing mode featuring bazookas. At present, it’s developing a basketball game with plans to add many more games.

It’s built on the Ethereum blockchain and is integrated with Coinbase’s Base network.

This cross-platform title is currently in early access on Windows, Epic Game Store, iOS, and Android. According to its website, it’s coming to PlayStation, and that could be at some point this year.

Players can own and trade cosmetics in the form of NFTs, and the game features a native crypto token, $KOMPETE, which is used for in-game transactions, tournament participation, and ultimately distributed as a reward to players.

As it’s cross-platform and part of an ever-expanding ecosystem of games, KOMPETE may be one of the more important Web3 titles to launch on the PlayStation 5, when it does.

Was this Article helpful? Yes No

Related Reads

Six Complaints from an Ethereum Developer

A disgruntled early Ethereum developer and token holder presents six core criticisms of the project's trajectory, contrasting it with Solana's rise. 1. **Premature Complacency**: The Ethereum Foundation shifted from a "building" to an "infrastructure" mindset too soon, adopting a passive, "retired chairman" posture before securing market dominance, reflected in ETH's ~65% decline against BTC post-Merge. 2. **Misguided Messaging**: The Merge was marketed primarily on ESG (99.95% energy reduction) rather than user benefits like speed or yield, appealing to internal ideals instead of market demands. 3. **Delayed Execution**: Proof-of-Stake, on the roadmap since 2015, took seven years to launch, ceding critical narrative and development windows. Competitors like Solana built entire ecosystems in that time. 4. **Poor Native Staking UX**: Years after the Merge, there is still no first-party, user-friendly staking application, forcing reliance on centralized services like Lido and undermining ETH's "sound money" narrative. 5. **Managed Decline**: The rollup-centric roadmap deliberately weakens the base layer's fee capture, outsourcing value and profitability to L2s like Arbitrum and Base, which issue their own tokens and fragment capital. 6. **Ideology Over Product**: Ethereum culture prioritizes philosophical purity ("credible neutrality," "public goods") over competitive product delivery that meets user demands (e.g., financialization), while Solana's ecosystem focuses on coordinated execution. The diagnosis is accumulated execution debt, not a coordination failure. Ethereum possessed a structural advantage in 2021 but spent years in governance debates, while Solana efficiently executed. The current market cap reflects these specific strategic failures, not abstract theory.

marsbit1h ago

Six Complaints from an Ethereum Developer

marsbit1h ago

Six Complaints from an Ethereum Developer

Six Grievances from an Ethereum Developer The author, an early investor and developer still building on Ethereum, expresses deep frustration with its trajectory and declining ETH/BTC price since the merge. The core argument is that Ethereum's current market position stems from concrete failures in execution and strategy, not abstract coordination problems. The first grievance targets a shift in the Ethereum Foundation's mentality from builders to "infrastructure," adopting a premature posture of a retired victor. Second, marketing the Merge around ESG (99.95% energy reduction) is seen as talking to its own conscience rather than the market, which prioritizes user experience and yield. Third, the seven-year delay in delivering Proof-of-Stake (PoS) ceded critical narrative and development time to competitors like Solana. Fourth, three years post-merge, there is still no user-friendly first-party staking application, forcing reliance on centralized services like Lido and undermining ETH's monetary narrative. Fifth, the rollup-centric roadmap has strategically surrendered base-layer fee capture to L2s, fragmenting value within the ecosystem while Solana demonstrates an integrated L1's value accrual. Finally, the author criticizes an institutional culture that prioritizes philosophical ideals (credible neutrality, pluralism) over competitive product delivery focused on what users actually want. The diagnosis is "accumulated execution debt." Ethereum possessed a structural advantage in 2021 but spent years in governance debates, while Solana's ecosystem coordinated efficiently to deliver and capture the next wave of value. The conclusion is that Ethereum's market cap reflects its abandonment of the fight for asset appreciation.

链捕手1h ago

Six Complaints from an Ethereum Developer

链捕手1h ago

Token Budget Wars: Enterprise AI Enters the 'Accounting Era'

Token Budget Wars: Enterprise AI Enters the "Accounting Era" Enterprise AI is shifting from the question of "whether to adopt" to "how to account for it." As AI inference costs evolve from experimental budgets into ongoing operational expenses, CEOs and CFOs are demanding proof of value: what tangible results does each dollar spent on tokens deliver? The core of "Token Budget Wars" is not simply about reducing AI bills, but about intelligently allocating compute resources. It involves determining which business processes warrant more computational power, which tasks can use cheaper models, which can be outsourced or handled manually, and which are merely inefficient consumption. A key insight is that AI usage (token consumption) does not equal value. While SaaS usage indicated software adoption, AI token usage only indicates the "meter is running." The same workflow can cost vastly different amounts due to factors like prompt quality, context, model choice, and retries. The critical metric for scaling is "marginal token utility"—the business value created per additional dollar of inference cost. However, this is difficult to measure due to challenges like the long tail of retries, context inflation (where costs can scale quadratically with context length), and inefficient model routing (defaulting to the most powerful model for all tasks). The competition for token allocation is intensifying because, in the AI era, influence is tied to how much intelligence one can command, not just team size. AI spending is essentially competing with labor costs, whether for replacing external BPOs, internal staff, or generating new revenue. BPO contracts provide a clearer benchmark as they are priced per completed unit. The missing layer is attribution from tokens to business outcomes. Companies need a system that connects inference spending to completed work and results, capturing the agent's decision trajectory—what it saw, retrieved, tried, and why it succeeded or failed. This recorded rationale becomes a valuable asset. Ultimately, those who master token-to-outcome attribution will control the allocation of AI resources within enterprises, deciding which workflows get more compute, which are capped, or which revert to humans. The first phase of enterprise AI proved models could do the work. The next phase will determine how much of that work is worth paying for.

marsbit1h ago

Token Budget Wars: Enterprise AI Enters the 'Accounting Era'

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片