Solana price unlikely to bounce back quickly: Here’s why

CointelegraphPublished on 2025-02-24Last updated on 2025-02-26

Abstract

SOL is likely to take longer to regain bullish momentum due to the decline in onchain activity, inflationary pressure, weak demand for leveraged long positions, and reduced likelihood of a Solana ETF approval.

Solana's native token, SOL (SOL), dropped to $131.90 on Feb. 25, marking its lowest point in five months. The unexpected correction triggered more than $129 million in leveraged long SOL futures positions. Despite briefly recovering to the $140 level, SOL is down 17% since Feb. 22, while the broader altcoin market has declined by 10%.

SOL/USD (blue) vs. altcoin market cap (magenta). Source: TradingView / CointelegraphSeveral factors, including reduced onchain activity, derivatives metrics, and equivalent inflation, suggest that SOL may continue to underperform in the short term. Decentralized exchange (DEX) volumes on the Solana network have dropped by 30% over the past seven days, reaching their lowest level since October 2024.

Top blockchains ranked by 7-day DEX volumes, USD. Source: DefiLlamaMeteora was the worst performer, down 48% compared to the previous week, followed by Raydium with a 28% decline in activity. The Pump.fun memecoin launchpad also saw a 35% drop in onchain volume. In contrast, DEX volumes on Ethereum increased by 40% week-over-week, according to DefiLlama data. 
Pendle experienced a 76% rise in onchain volumes during the same period. The recently launched Hyperliquid chain, focused on perpetual futures trading, recorded a 25% volume increase. Similarly, volumes on SUI, a layer-1 blockchain focused on scalability, rose by 15%. Meanwhile, DEX activity on the BNB Chain dropped by 40% compared to the previous week. 


SOL correction was not driven by memecoin decline


Some analysts attribute SOL's negative performance to the burst of the memecoin launch bubble. However, the decline in activity on Solana's decentralized applications (DApps) also affected areas like liquid staking, yield strategies, gambling, NFT lending, and Web3 infrastructure. Notable examples include Jito, which saw a 49% drop in unique active addresses, while Fragmetic saw  30% fewer users, and Save was down by 28%.


The scalability of the Solana network relies on economic incentives for its validators, as the cost of running a validator can exceed $72,000 per year, according to the JPOOL liquid staking calculator. In addition to server expenses, there is a “voting cost” of approximately 1 SOL per day, which significantly impacts profitability, even when factoring in maximal extractable value (MEV).


Currently, SOL native staking offers a 9.5% yield, according to StakingRewards. However, when adjusted for equivalent inflation, the net gains are much lower. Over 16.1 million SOL tokens are set to be unlocked between February and May 2024, representing a 10% annualized inflation rate. This effectively creates a negative return for SOL staking during this period.

Derivatives demand slumps as spot Solana ETF odds waver


Demand for leveraged long positions (buy) on SOL futures has dropped to its lowest levels in over 12 months, according to derivatives markets data.

SOL 2-month futures annualized premium vs. spot market. Source: Laevitas.ch

Monthly futures contracts generally trade at a 5% to 10% premium compared to spot markets to account for the longer settlement period. However, SOL futures entered backwardation on Feb. 24, indicating that demand for short positions (sell) has significantly increased.


The total open interest on SOL futures fell by 8.5%, dropping from 31.6 million SOL on Feb. 24 to 28.9 million SOL on Feb. 25, according to CoinGlass data. This shift may reflect traders’ reduced expectations for the imminent approval of a spot Solana exchange-traded fund (ETF) in the United States, especially considering the negative effects of the Bybit exchange hack and OKX’s settlement with the US Department of Justice.


SOL is likely to take longer to regain bullish momentum due to the decline in onchain activity, inflationary pressure, weak demand for leveraged long positions, and reduced likelihood of a Solana ETF approval.

This article is for general information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal or investment advice. The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed here are the author’s alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

The Impact of OUSD on Circle, Tether, and Paxos: Not a Simple Negative, but a More Complex Competitive Landscape

OUSD's Impact on Circle, Tether, and Paxos: A Nuanced Competitive Reshuffle The launch of OUSD, a new stablecoin initiative, has complex implications for the stablecoin market. For Circle (CRCL), the initial 15-20% stock drop reflects legitimate competitive concerns but is not a "death sentence." Circle retains deep liquidity, existing integrations, and first-mover advantages. A potential restructuring or termination of its Coinbase partnership could even double its net revenue in the short term, providing more competitive freedom. However, OUSD, backed by Stripe's engineering and product strengths, could become the default stablecoin within the Stripe ecosystem for new adopters, challenging USDC's position. OUSD does not solve the core barrier for corporate adoption: it remains a credit exposure to its issuer (likely a Bridge-related entity), which, like Circle, is not an investment-grade entity. Large banks and asset managers could still capture the most lucrative enterprise use cases. Circle must accelerate its payment/fintech product development and consider defensive M&A. For Tether, OUSD targets a different market segment. Tether will continue focusing on distribution channels not prioritized by Stripe or Circle. Its market share may decline over time, but within a significantly growing total market. Paxos faces the greatest pressure. OUSD undermines the key selling points of its USDG stablecoin, and Paxos's regulatory advantages may diminish as frameworks mature. This poses a more existential challenge, explaining Paxos's recent shift back to its brokerage-as-a-service business.

marsbit2h ago

The Impact of OUSD on Circle, Tether, and Paxos: Not a Simple Negative, but a More Complex Competitive Landscape

marsbit2h ago

OUSD's Impact on Circle, Tether, and Paxos: Not a Simple Negative, but a More Complex Competitive Reshuffle

This article analyzes the impact of the newly announced stablecoin OUSD, backed by a consortium including Stripe, on major incumbents like Circle (USDC), Tether (USDT), and Paxos (USDG). For Circle, the announcement is not a simple negative. While the initial market reaction was rational, it's not a "death sentence." Circle retains deep liquidity, existing integrations, and first-mover advantage. A potential restructuring or termination of its exclusive revenue-sharing deal with Coinbase could even near-double its net income in the short term, providing more competitive flexibility. However, within the Stripe ecosystem, OUSD, with its strong engineering and product focus, could become the default choice, displacing USDC for new integrations. Circle must accelerate its own fintech product development and consider defensive M&A. OUSD does not directly threaten Tether's core markets, which focus on different distribution channels. Tether's market share may decline over time but within a significantly growing overall market. Paxos faces the greatest pressure. OUSD undermines the primary value proposition of its USDG stablecoin, and Paxos's regulatory advantages may erode as frameworks mature, posing a more existential challenge. This explains Paxos's recent strategic pivot towards brokerage-as-a-service. A fundamental unresolved issue for enterprise adoption remains: if issued by a Bridge-related entity, OUSD, like USDC, still represents a credit exposure to a non-investment-grade issuer, unless a parent company guarantee is provided. Large banks and asset managers entering the space later could still compete for the most lucrative enterprise use cases.

链捕手2h ago

OUSD's Impact on Circle, Tether, and Paxos: Not a Simple Negative, but a More Complex Competitive Reshuffle

链捕手2h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片