与Arbitrum基金会合推动漫链AnimeChain,Azuki发币在即?

Odaily星球日报Published on 2024-03-28Last updated on 2024-03-28

Abstract

当下再布局Azuki是“价值洼地”还是“无底深渊”?

原创 | Odaily星球日报

作者 | Asher

与Arbitrum基金会合推动漫链AnimeChain,Azuki发币在即?

AnimeChain 推出

为了进一步扩大生态发展,3 月 27 日晚上,Arbitrum Foundation 宣布将与流行的 NFT 品牌 Azuki 和 Weeb3 Foundation 合作,共同创建一个吸引动漫迷的 Web3 网络 AnimeChain。一时间社区中充斥着“Azuki 发链就是为了日后的发币,持有 NFT 的小伙伴有福了”的 FOMO 情绪。受此消息影响,Azuki 地板价短时突破 6 ETH,最高涨幅近 14%。

与Arbitrum基金会合推动漫链AnimeChain,Azuki发币在即?

图源:AnimeCoin 推出

但随后在 X 平台负面言论也扑面而来,认为“目前 Azuki 选择牛市的节点通过发链进行发币就是为了套现”、“Arbitrum 竟帮助 Azuki 项目方收割散户”等,地板价也随之下跌。

与Arbitrum基金会合推动漫链AnimeChain,Azuki发币在即?

二级市场

根据 Blur.io 数据,当 Arbitrum 基金会、Azuki 和 Weeb3 基金会将联手推出一个由区块链驱动的动漫网络的消息时,Azuki 的地板价从 5.25 ETH 开始迅速上涨,最高突破 6 ETH,短时最高涨幅近 14%,但随后开始出现砸盘,并且砸盘的力度更大,地板价甚至低于消息发布前,目前地板价维持在 4.91 ETH 附近。

与Arbitrum基金会合推动漫链AnimeChain,Azuki发币在即?

Azuki 地板价 K 线

Beanz 短时也出现了一波快速上涨,地板价从 0.25 ETH 涨到 0.30 ETH,短时最高涨幅近 20%,随后出现一定程度的回落,目前地板价格维持在 0.26 ETH,与上涨前的地板价基本持平。

与Arbitrum基金会合推动漫链AnimeChain,Azuki发币在即?

Beanz 地板价 K 线

总的来说,如此重磅的消息虽短时间刺激了对 Azuki 系列 NFT 的购买需求,但随后就被更强有力的抛压盖过,甚至给人一种“什么都没发生”的感觉。

未来发展

根据 Azuki 创始人 Zagabond 表述,目前团队的主要重点仍是将 Azuki 打造成全球动漫 IP、创造数字和实体体验并奖励收藏家。展望未来将 Azuki 角色扩展至 AnimeChain 作为首要启动伙伴,将证明 IP 产品和体验上链是可行的。

值得一提的是,Zagabond 在近日出席的 Azuki 上海活动,其表示自己是中国人,出生于哈尔滨,这是其自疫情后 5 年多来首次回到中国,并希望能更好地连接起东西方社区,或许 AnimeChain 的推广会在国内加大宣传力度。

与Arbitrum基金会合推动漫链AnimeChain,Azuki发币在即?

图源:Azuki 创始人 Zagabond 推文

但截止到目前, AnimeChain 公布的信息少之又少。一方面,从 AnimeChain 官网信息来看,目前仅有连接钱包、绑定推特等功能让用户为项目进行宣传,其他内容暂未公布,处于“敬请期待”状态。

与Arbitrum基金会合推动漫链AnimeChain,Azuki发币在即?

图源:AnimeChain 官网

另一方面,官方推文中,除了强调 AnimeChain 将为动漫文化运动和生态系统提供动力外,并没有看到项目的后续发展甚至路线图。

与Arbitrum基金会合推动漫链AnimeChain,Azuki发币在即?

图源:官推

或许信息披露的不足是 Azuki NFT 系列上涨后快速下跌的另一个原因。

综述

虽然当下整体市场处于牛市,但以太坊链上 NFT 市场依旧冷清。因此,即便是 Azuki 这样的昔日头部 NFT 项目,配上“发链”的消息,也无法带动市场的热情。那么,面对未来潜在的发币机会增大,当下布局 Azuki 系列 NFT 依然存在较大不确定性。

Related Reads

Mid-Year Review of U.S. Crypto Policy: CLARITY Gains Momentum for a Comeback, Who Will Lead the Second Half?

Mid-Point Review of U.S. Crypto Policy: CLARITY Act Gains Momentum, Who Will Lead the Second Half? The U.S. crypto industry is hopeful for a breakthrough as the Senate advances the CLARITY Act, but securing the necessary 60 votes requires bipartisan compromise. With only about 40 legislative days left, the path is tight. The policy agenda is crowded. Alongside CLARITY, multiple crypto tax proposals spun off from the new PARITY Act seek attachment to larger bills. The Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act aims to codify developer protections, and key rules under GENUIS remain under negotiation. The CFTC operates with four vacant commissioner seats, creating uncertainty. A major unresolved battle is over which regulator—state authorities, the CFTC, or the SEC—will gain jurisdiction over prediction markets. The sector also faces the impending departure of two key advocates: SEC Commissioner Hester M. Peirce and Senator Cynthia Lummis. Industry leaders provided cautious perspectives. Sara K. Weed doubts CLARITY will pass this Congress, expecting agencies like the SEC to provide guidance instead. Sulolit "Raj" Mukherjee believes targeted crypto tax provisions have a real chance if attached to must-pass year-end legislation. Rashan Colbert highlights the CFTC's recent efforts to build a regulatory framework for the growing prediction markets sector, warning against an overly broad "gambling" classification that could stifle innovation. The second half of the policy year has begun. The window for action is narrow, but opportunities remain. Sustained bipartisan engagement is crucial for achieving substantive results.

Foresight News8m ago

Mid-Year Review of U.S. Crypto Policy: CLARITY Gains Momentum for a Comeback, Who Will Lead the Second Half?

Foresight News8m ago

Will the STRC Issue Price Determined by ChatGPT Lead to a Death Spiral?

A "death spiral" concerns surround the "STRC" preferred shares from MicroStrategy, a financial instrument designed by CEO Michael Saylor with significant AI consultation to trade near a $100 face value. Since its July 2025 launch alongside a ~40% Bitcoin (BTC) decline, STRC has traded at a discount, hitting a low of $82.53 and pushing its effective dividend yield above 12.9%. The debate centers on whether STRC's structure—which relies on MicroStrategy issuing more shares to fund Bitcoin purchases and dividends—is sustainable or a "centralized Ponzi scheme," as economist Peter Schiff claims. Skepticism grew after Saylor revealed the product's design involved extensive AI dialogue to create a legally viable, monthly-dividend, price-stable preferred share—a novel concept. MicroStrategy's recent sale of 32 BTC to cover dividends, coupled with a sharp slowdown in its weekly Bitcoin buys (from billions to ~$100 million in June), has intensified fears. The "at-the-market" equity issuance, a key funding mechanism, is paused while STRC trades below par. This raises the "death spiral" risk: a lower STRC price triggers automatic dividend rate hikes, increasing cash obligations and potentially forcing more share sales or Bitcoin divestments. Bullish analysts like Jesse Myers argue the sell-off stems from leveraged positions unwinding, not fundamental failure, noting the company can cover dividends for decades if BTC appreciates modestly. The shift to semi-monthly dividends and the high yield at discounted prices may attract new buyers. Major AI models (ChatGPT, Grok, Claude) suggest a return to $100 is possible but conditional on restored market confidence, sustainable dividend coverage without asset sales, and a Bitcoin price recovery. The critical test arrives as new dividend rules take effect June 30, likely raising rates again with STRC below $95. The central question remains: Can MicroStrategy fulfill its obligations without selling Bitcoin, or will the mechanism accelerate its own decline?

marsbit15m ago

Will the STRC Issue Price Determined by ChatGPT Lead to a Death Spiral?

marsbit15m ago

Why Did NVIDIA's Bond Issue Go Unnoticed While SpaceX's Caused a Plunge?

The article analyzes the contrasting market reactions to recent bond issuances by SpaceX and NVIDIA. While NVIDIA's $25 billion bond offering was met with strong demand and seen as securing long-term capital for its already profitable AI business, SpaceX's move to raise at least $20 billion in bonds (primarily to refinance bridge loans) triggered a sell-off in its stock (SPCX). The key difference lies in the stage of cash flow validation for their respective core narratives. For NVIDIA, the AI boom is generating substantial, visible revenue and profits, making debt a tool to amplify a proven growth curve. For SpaceX, despite a strong cash position post-IPO and a revenue-generating business in Starlink, its valuation is heavily tied to future, capital-intensive projects like Starship, global satellite networks, and potential AI infrastructure. The bond issuance acted as a trigger, shifting market focus from SpaceX's long-term vision to the pressing question of whether Starlink's profits can fund these ambitious, unproven ventures before they generate their own returns. Thus, the market penalizes not the act of borrowing itself, but the perceived gap between high capital expenditure and the speed of cash flow realization. SpaceX's valuation recovery hinges on demonstrating that Starlink's profitability can outpace the burn rate of its futuristic projects or that those projects (like Starship achieving reliable, low-cost reusability) can soon transition from costly visions to commercial realities.

marsbit20m ago

Why Did NVIDIA's Bond Issue Go Unnoticed While SpaceX's Caused a Plunge?

marsbit20m ago

Will the STRC Issue Price Determined by ChatGPT Really Fall into a Death Spiral?

"Strategy's" (STRC) preferred share, a financial instrument designed by CEO Michael Saylor in consultation with AI to trade steadily at $100, faces mounting pressure. Since its July 2025 launch alongside a ~40% Bitcoin price drop, STRC has traded at a steep discount, hitting a low of $82.53. This discount pushes its effective dividend yield above 12.9%. The core debate revolves around whether STRC's structure is sustainable or a "centralized Ponzi scheme," as economist Peter Schiff claims. The mechanism relies on issuing new shares ("at-the-market" offerings) to fund Bitcoin purchases and dividend payments. However, the deep discount has paused these ATM offerings, slowing Bitcoin accumulation and forcing a minor sale of 32 BTC to cover obligations. Proponents, like The Smarter Web Company's Jesse Myers, argue the sell-off is a leveraged unwinding, not a fundamental failure. They note Strategy has ample resources to cover dividends for years if Bitcoin appreciates modestly. The deep discount also makes STRC attractive for yield-seeking buyers, as dividends are calculated on the $100 face value. The key test is whether Strategy can maintain dividends without sustained Bitcoin sales. A critical watchpoint is June 30th, when STRC switches to semi-monthly dividends. An automatic rule will likely raise the dividend rate further because the price remains below $95$, potentially creating a "death spiral": lower prices trigger higher yields, increasing the cash burden and forcing more dilution or asset sales. The question of whether this AI-designed "flywheel" is a stable instrument or a flawed accelerator will be answered by its price action and Strategy's funding choices in the coming months.

链捕手20m ago

Will the STRC Issue Price Determined by ChatGPT Really Fall into a Death Spiral?

链捕手20m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片