Trump: Bitcoin Has Taken on 'a Life of its Own,' Will Probably Need Some Regulation

CoinDeskPolicyPublished on 2024-02-22Last updated on 2024-02-23

Abstract

The former U.S. president has previously called central bank digital currencies dangerous and vowed not to allow them if elected.

Former U.S. president and Republican front-runner Donald Trump said bitcoin (BTC) has "taken a life of its own" and will probably need some regulation.

Trump was speaking to Fox News during a town hall event in South Carolina on Tuesday ahead of the state's Republican primary. Nikki Haley, the former South Carolina governor, remains the only other contender and has vowed to remain in the race even if she loses the Saturday primary.

"A lot of people are doing it (Bitcoin)," Trump responded to Fox News anchor Laura Inghram's question about whether the next logical step for the U.S. is to embrace bitcoin. "I always liked one currency ... I like the dollar."

Advertisement
Advertisement

Regarding bitcoin, he said: "It's taken a life of its own. You probably have to do some regulation. But many people are embracing it. More and more I'm seeing people wanting to pay bitcoin. And you are seeing something that's interesting. I can live with it one way or the other."

Trump has previously called central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) dangerous and vowed not to allow them if elected.

Edited by Sheldon Reback.

Related Reads

Fantasy's Closing Notes: After Two and a Half Years of Trial and Error in SocialFi, What Have We Learned?

"Fantasy Shutdown Notes: Two and a Half Years of SocialFi Trial, What Have We Learned?" Fantasy, a SocialFi/crypto card game, is shutting down. The team is refunding 100% of investments to angel/seed round backers, as operational costs were fully covered by revenue. Over 2.5 years, the project returned approximately $20M to its community. The core reason for failure was building crypto economics on a foundation not designed for it. Traditional card games (Magic, Pokémon) succeed by prioritizing gameplay; financial value is a secondary outcome. Crypto card games invert this, attracting speculators first, not genuine players. This financialization trapped the team into managing a financial instrument instead of developing a game. This is a sector-wide issue. Embedding tokenomics into social products or creator-fan relationships often attracts short-term traders over genuine users, undermining the core value. The article also critiques premature token launches. Most tokens fail because they're issued before product-market fit is proven, diverting team and community focus to price speculation instead of building. Successful examples like Hyperliquid or Jupiter built sustainable businesses first. Fantasy's journey highlights key crypto pitfalls: the distorting effect of upfront financialization in gaming/social apps, and the dangers of launching tokens too early. The team hopes sharing these lessons helps future builders avoid the same traps.

marsbit36m ago

Fantasy's Closing Notes: After Two and a Half Years of Trial and Error in SocialFi, What Have We Learned?

marsbit36m ago

Two Companies Capture 90% of AI Startup's $80 Billion ARR

The AI startup landscape is highly concentrated, with OpenAI and Anthropic capturing 89% of an estimated $80 billion in annualized revenue among 34 leading companies. OpenAI, with $24-25B in revenue, primarily drives growth through ChatGPT's consumer subscriptions, while Anthropic, exceeding $30B, focuses on enterprise API integration and has rapidly grown its U.S. enterprise market share from under 1% to 34.4% in under two years. The remaining 32 companies share just 11% of the revenue, facing intense pressure as resources, talent, and market attention consolidate around the two giants. This creates a self-reinforcing cycle where higher revenue fuels greater compute investment and model improvement. Despite their dominance, both leaders face challenges. OpenAI is navigating significant legal disputes and partnership tensions, while Anthropic operates under the high expectations of its massive backers like Amazon. Historical parallels in tech infrastructure (e.g., search engines, mobile OS) suggest such oligopolistic tendencies are common due to scale, network effects, and high switching costs, indicating the market could become even more concentrated. However, the rapid pace of AI innovation leaves room for disruption. For other players, the strategic path forward is not direct competition with the giants but specialization in vertical domains where general-purpose models fall short—such as legal, medical, or industrial applications—building indispensable, niche solutions.

marsbit45m ago

Two Companies Capture 90% of AI Startup's $80 Billion ARR

marsbit45m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片