$1 Million Per Bitcoin? Bitwise’s CIO Says It Is Not A “Moonboy” Prediction

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-03-13Last updated on 2026-03-13

Abstract

Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan argues that Bitcoin reaching $1 million is a plausible, mathematically-grounded prediction rather than speculative hype. He bases this on the growth trajectory of the global store-of-value market, which includes assets like gold and real estate and is currently valued at $38 trillion. This market has compounded at 13% annually over 20 years and could reach $121 trillion in a decade. For Bitcoin to hit $1 million, it would need to capture 17% of that market, up from its current 4% share. Institutional adoption, evidenced by record inflows into Bitcoin ETFs and involvement from major funds, supports this momentum. However, the thesis depends on continued market growth and Bitcoin’s ability to gain market share.

Despite being volatile, Bitcoin, the leading cryptocurrency asset, is still believed to hit a whopping $1 million value in the upcoming years. After a period of quiet, a Bitwise executive has reignited discussion regarding this matter after predicting that the asset hitting this level is not as crazy as it seems.

Institutional Case For $1 Million Bitcoin Grows

A popular Bitcoin discussion has been rekindled in the community, and it appears to be taking the spotlight. Matt Hougan, the Chief Information Officer (CIO) of Bitwise, has predicted that the flagship crypto asset could reach the $1 million milestone, a forecast akin to several predictions from major corporate firms.

As reported by Milk Road, a macro analyst and crypto investor, the Bitwise CIO made this audacious forecast in a recently published memo. In the memo, the $1 million per Bitcoin estimate is far from the kind of inflated “moonboy” forecast frequently associated with cryptocurrency mania.

According to Hougan, this thesis is a simple math rather than a moonboy take. The executive claims that most people are getting this thesis wrong by evaluating BTC against a static market. In a market that has been compounding for 20 years, applying a static value is likely to be unsuccessful. However, because the market is weak, most participants are content to do so at the moment.

Instead of characterizing the goal as speculative optimism, Hougan describes how the flow of capital into Bitcoin is gradually changing its long-term perspective. Currently, there is around $38 trillion in the global store-of-value market, which is the pool of money invested in hard assets like gold and real estate with the express purpose of preserving wealth.

Meanwhile, BTC controls a share of 4%, valued at around $1.4 trillion, and that market does not sit still. Over the past 20 years, increased debt, lax monetary policy, and geopolitical tensions have caused gold to rise from $2.5 trillion to $40 trillion. Today, each one of these tailwinds is still active across the broader financial sector.

If the store-of-value market compounds at its average yearly rate of 13%, Milk Road predicts a surge to $121 trillion in the next decade. As a result, Bitcoin needs to grow from 4% to 17% of that market value to reach the $1 million level. “That’s the whole argument, and the momentum is real,” Milk Road added.

Adoption Is Set To Play A Part

During the process, institutional adoption is likely to play a crucial role in BTC’s journey to the $1 million mark. Milk Road highlighted that institutional adoption is not coming; it is already here, which is indicated by the record inflows into the US Spot Bitcoin ETFs. Other indications include the decline in BTC’s volatility, Harvard’s endowment owning BTC, and Abu Dhabi’s Mubadala sovereign wealth fund purchasing it.

After analyzing Hougan’s thesis, Milk Road noted that the executive is being transparent about the risks involved. If the store-of-value market loses steam or Bitcoin does not capture the expected share, the math fails. Therefore, there is no guarantee of the thesis.

BTC trading at $69,992 on the 1D chart | Source: BTCUSDT on Tradingview.com

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, what is the main argument made by Bitwise's CIO for Bitcoin reaching $1 million?

AThe main argument is based on the growth of the global store-of-value market, which is expected to compound at 13% annually to $121 trillion in a decade. Bitcoin would need to capture 17% of this market, up from its current 4%, to reach a $1 million valuation.

QWhat current market trend does the article cite as evidence that institutional adoption of Bitcoin is already happening?

AThe article cites the record inflows into US Spot Bitcoin ETFs, the decline in Bitcoin's volatility, Harvard's endowment owning BTC, and Abu Dhabi's Mubadala sovereign wealth fund purchasing it as evidence of current institutional adoption.

QWhat are the two main risks to Matt Hougan's $1 million Bitcoin prediction, as mentioned in the article?

AThe two main risks are: 1) The store-of-value market losing its growth momentum and not compounding as expected, and 2) Bitcoin failing to capture the projected 17% share of that market.

QHow does the article describe the nature of the $1 million Bitcoin prediction? Is it characterized as a 'moonboy' forecast?

ANo, the article explicitly states that the $1 million prediction is "far from the kind of inflated 'moonboy' forecast" and is instead presented as a thesis based on "simple math" and the changing flow of capital into Bitcoin.

QWhat is the current estimated size of the global store-of-value market and Bitcoin's share of it, according to the article?

AThe global store-of-value market is currently estimated at $38 trillion, and Bitcoin controls a 4% share of it, valued at approximately $1.4 trillion.

Related Reads

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

Podcast Summary: Dialogue with GSR's Head of Asset Management: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Check Lending Rates on Aave Andy Baehr, Managing Director of Asset Management at GSR, discusses the current crypto market, characterizing it as stuck in a state of "ambivalence" with short-lived, unsustainable rallies. He outlines a simple framework: the market moves between "ambivalence" and "conviction" (sustained upward momentum). Currently, every rally resembles a single-stage rocket booster that quickly fizzles out. Baehr identifies three key signals to watch: 1) DeFi lending rates, 2) the potential passage of the CLARITY Act, and 3) the market forming a consensus on the "Fed hawkish peak." He emphasizes that the most immediate indicator for the sustainability of the recent CPI-triggered rally is the USDC borrowing rate on Aave, currently around 3.75%—close to U.S. Treasury yields. The absence of a credit spread indicates low leverage demand and a lack of market energy. He explains that a healthy, sustained rally requires layered buying pressure. Last year's rally progressed from an ETH short squeeze to crypto-native trader influx and finally to ETF inflows. Currently, this structure is missing. Other potential structural buyers like Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) companies are absent, and ETF flows have proven transient. Baehr notes that while small-cap crypto tokens outperformed large caps in Q2—a potential sign of capitation in major assets—capital is also flowing to more exciting opportunities like AI stocks and tech IPOs, leaving crypto sidelined. Regarding DeFi, he highlights that platforms like Aave provide a clear, real-time signal of leverage demand through their supply/demand-driven interest rates. A significant, sustained rate increase would signal genuine market conviction. He also observes the quiet emergence of fixed-income-like products and vaults in DeFi. On regulation, the probability of the CLARITY Act passing before the August 7th deadline has dropped linearly from 75% to below 40% on Polymarket. Baehr suggests its passage would be treated as a bullish surprise, a potent driver for price movement. However, political hurdles, including ethical clause debates and disclosures about the First Family's crypto profits, remain significant obstacles. Ultimately, the market awaits clarity on the Fed's terminal rate under Chair Warsh. Until the "Fed Solstice"—the point where the market collectively understands the peak of hawkish policy—sustained conviction will be difficult to achieve.

marsbit31m ago

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

marsbit31m ago

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报1h ago

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片