# Artikel Terkait Scam

Pusat Berita HTX menyediakan artikel terbaru dan analisis mendalam mengenai "Scam", mencakup tren pasar, pembaruan proyek, perkembangan teknologi, dan kebijakan regulasi di industri kripto.

How Collector Crypt Uses 'Recirculating Buybacks' to Create an Illusion of Growth

Title: How Collector Crypt Creates a Growth Illusion with "Buyback Loops" Key Findings: Collector Crypt's (CC) net take rate has halved from 11.2% in Q3 2025 to 5.6% in Q2 2026, while GMV grew 4.7x. This growth is driven by higher-tier card packs ($250, $1,000, $2,500) which have lower platform dollar retention rates. The newly launched $2,500 Mythic tier captured 36.7% of June GMV within 13 days. Growth is fueled by a small cohort of high-spending, high-frequency wallets rather than broad user base expansion. The economic model faces pressure from three key areas: 1) **Shifting GMV Mix**: Pushing users towards larger, lower-retention card packs increases GMV but reduces overall profitability. 2) **Physical Redemptions**: Card redemptions for physical items remove reusable inventory from the system, creating costly replenishment needs. In May, redemptions consumed 41.6% of pre-redemption net income. Only 75 wallets drove redemptions in June. 3) **B2B/API Strategy**: Partner revenue remains negligible (cumulatively $1.83M) and dependent on CC for inventory, vaulting, and buyback services, failing to create a scalable, asset-light recurring revenue stream. The core product is a repetitive pack-buyback loop with limited secondary market activity and token value accrual. Sensitive modeling shows CC's economics turn negative when any two of the following pressures coincide: replenishment costs near market price, redemption rates exceeding 9%, or high-tier buyback rates around 93%. While CC operates in a large and growing collectibles market, its current growth levers—bigger packs, high buyback rates, and capital recycling by a few wallets—create a volume illusion without demonstrating sustainable collector engagement, deep secondary markets, or a viable path to improved margins. Future proof points include broadening collector participation, deepening secondary trading, and developing true asset-light B2B revenue channels.

Foresight News07/01 11:03

How Collector Crypt Uses 'Recirculating Buybacks' to Create an Illusion of Growth

Foresight News07/01 11:03

One Year After the Crash of Crypto Treasury Companies, Copycats Are Already Making a Comeback

One year after the collapse of digital asset treasury (DAT) companies, which wiped out up to 99% for early investors, the scheme has returned in a new guise. Recently, Triller Group announced it would become a "SpaceX treasury company," causing its market cap to surge. This follows the rebranding of another firm, LGHL, now targeting a token called HYPE. The original model, popularized by MicroStrategy (MSTR) and its "Bitcoin yield" narrative, saw companies trading at massive premiums to their underlying crypto holdings. However, most followers like TwentyOne, Metaplanet, and Nakamoto have crashed 80-95%+ from their peaks, erasing nearly all value for late investors. The author argues these structures have no fundamental reason to trade at premiums when low-fee Bitcoin ETFs or direct ownership exist. The cycle persists due to speculative demand driven by FOMO, gamification, and a belief the system is rigged, met by insiders and promoters who profit from the pump-and-dump dynamics. Drawing a parallel to the 1637 Tulip Mania, the piece concludes that such frenzies are not a bug but a recurring product of markets, where greater fools provide demand and insiders supply the schemes. Despite holding Bitcoin personally, the author condemns this specific packaging of assets into leveraged corporate vehicles marketed as innovation, a cycle seemingly unstoppable until a major crash.

marsbit06/29 03:42

One Year After the Crash of Crypto Treasury Companies, Copycats Are Already Making a Comeback

marsbit06/29 03:42

Why Do Crypto Projects Always Love Changing Names?

This article explores why cryptocurrency projects frequently change their names, a practice uncommon in traditional businesses where brand equity is a core asset. Over 16% of crypto projects have reportedly rebranded, often for strategic, marketing, or defensive reasons. The primary explanation is the weak user loyalty in crypto; many users are investors, airdrop hunters, or narrative traders, not traditional consumers. When a project's token price falls, its narrative fades, or it faces scandals/hacks, its old name becomes a liability laden with negative history rather than brand value. Therefore, frequent rebranding aims to shed this historical baggage. Name changes can be a marketing strategy to align with new business directions (e.g., Matic to Polygon), capitalize on trending narratives (e.g., adding "AI" or "Multiverse"), or distance from past failures like security breaches (e.g., Anyswap to Multichain). However, the most concerning aspect often involves a simultaneous token migration or swap. This process can serve as a "liquidity reset": it wipes historical price charts, potentially eases market manipulation, and is sometimes used to introduce new tokenomics that dilute existing holders' value through hidden inflation. The article concludes that while legitimate strategic pivots can justify a rebrand, many crypto name changes are less about building a new future and more about escaping the past—erasing bad memories, failed narratives, and dissatisfied communities. The key questions for any rebranding project are: what genuine new value or strategy does it bring, how has the tokenomics changed, and what part of its history is it trying to make users forget?

链捕手06/26 02:41

Why Do Crypto Projects Always Love Changing Names?

链捕手06/26 02:41

During the World Cup, USDT becomes the preferred chip for illegal gambling? Beware of three typical scams

During the 2026 FIFA World Cup, USDT has become the preferred payment method for illegal online gambling due to its price stability, anonymity, and fast cross-border transfers. This article analyzes how USDT facilitates this activity and outlines three major scams targeting users. **Why USDT is the "Chip of Choice"**: It solves bettors' anxiety over crypto volatility, enables instant cross-border transfers without traditional banking, and shows significant abnormal transaction spikes during major events. **The Fund Flow**: Gambling platforms use a complex laundering chain involving multi-layer address hopping, cross-chain transfers (e.g., Polygon to Tron), mixers like Tornado Cash, and final cash-out via exchanges. **Three Typical Scams**: 1. **"USDT Betting Evades Regulation"**: Fake platforms promising anonymous, high-odds betting but manipulating outcomes. 2. **Fake Sportsbooks**: High-quality replica sites that allow small initial withdrawals to build trust before freezing accounts with larger funds. 3. **"Insider Tips / Guaranteed Wins"**: Schemes selling fabricated "AI predictions" or "fixed match" models to exploit information anxiety. **Identifying Suspicious Addresses**: Key chain-based indicators include a "fast-in, fast-out" transaction pattern, clustered addresses with consistent behavior, uniform Gas fee patterns, and frequent cross-chain jumps. **User Protection Advice**: * Avoid any project promoting "USDT betting," "Web3 predictions," or "anonymous high returns." * Be skeptical of promises like "guaranteed wins" or "insider models." * Do not trust platforms just because they allow small withdrawals—this is a common trust-building tactic. * If scammed, preserve all evidence: transaction hashes, wallet addresses, chat logs, and platform URLs. **Conclusion**: USDT provides unprecedented liquidity for illicit activities. The most effective protection for users is complete non-participation in any form of online crypto gambling.

marsbit06/22 10:48

During the World Cup, USDT becomes the preferred chip for illegal gambling? Beware of three typical scams

marsbit06/22 10:48

活动图片