12 Brokerages Laying the Groundwork, 34 Brokerages Participating in the IPO: Did You Get Allotted Shares in Unitree Robotics?

marsbitDipublikasikan tanggal 2026-08-14Terakhir diperbarui pada 2026-08-14

Abstrak

Yushu Technology is going public with a market valuation of 60.9 billion yuan and a P/E ratio of 219x, raising over 6 billion yuan. At least 12 securities firms had indirectly invested before the IPO via limited partner (LP) models, primarily through top-tier PE funds. During the subscription phase, 34 securities firms participated in the offline share placement. As the lead underwriter, CITIC Securities played four roles: an early-stage investor (achieving ~1300% return), a mandatory co-investor in the科创板 listing, the underwriter earning fees (~145 million yuan), and the manager of the employee strategic placement plan. This represents deep, multi-layered involvement. For retail investors, the article highlights three key points: 1) "Indirect investment" through LPs is standard practice for many securities firms. 2) The total exposure of the securities sector to Yushu is significant, combining both pre-IPO stakes and IPO subscriptions. 3) With a 219x P/E ratio, underwriters, their investment arms, and clients are all heavily exposed, creating shared risk. The performance in 2026, with projected H1 revenue of 1.05-1.13 billion yuan, will be crucial to validate the high valuation and the humanoid robotics narrative.

Unitree Robotics is going public.

With a market cap of 60.9 billion yuan and a P/E ratio of 219 times, it aims to raise over 6 billion yuan, oversubscribing by 45%. The online subscription was overwhelming, resulting in a pitifully low allotment rate.

We previously discussed that Meituan is Unitree's largest external shareholder ('Wang Xing Becomes Wang Xingxing's Largest External Shareholder'), and Meituan is likely to reap huge profits.

Today, IT桔子 talks about those who act as both referees and players behind the scenes – the brokerages.

What you might not know is that for this Unitree IPO, at least 12 brokerages quietly "laid the groundwork" by investing before the listing. During the subscription phase, another 34 brokerages queued up to participate in the IPO.

And CITIC Securities, the lead underwriter for the listing, alone made money four times over on this single project.

12 Brokerages: They Bought In Long Ago

Unitree had 46 shareholders before going public. Peeling back the layers of these shareholders reveals the shadows of at least 12 brokerages.

How did they get in? Mostly not through direct purchases, but by taking detours.

For example, the fund Jinshi Growth is under CITIC Securities.

Before Unitree's listing, Jinshi Growth held 4.15%, making it the fifth-largest shareholder.

But the Jinshi Growth fund doesn't just contain CITIC's own money – Hualong Securities invested a bit, Huaan Securities invested a bit, and Hongta Securities also invested a bit. Everyone pools money together, hands it to CITIC's fund to invest – this is the so-called LP (Limited Partner) model.

You chip in a little, I chip in a little, we invest in star projects together, and share the profits upon listing.

Besides the Jinshi Growth route, there are other paths: Soochow Securities holds indirectly through Shenzhen Capital Group's fund, Guotai Junan and Haitong hold indirectly through the Shanghai Science and Technology Innovation Fund, CICC holds indirectly through CICC Capital...

With all these twists and turns, the core logic is one: the alternative investment subsidiaries of brokerages give money to top-tier PE funds, using them as a conduit to acquire Unitree shares.

This kind of operation isn't new in the industry, but it's quite rare to see 12 brokerages simultaneously appear on a single project's shareholder list.

CITIC Securities: One Dish, Eaten Four Times

If other brokerages are hitching a ride, then CITIC Securities is "driving the car, selling the tickets, and collecting the toll."

On the Unitree project, CITIC did four things simultaneously:

First, it was an early-stage investor. Through two Pre-IPO investments by Jinshi Growth and China Securities Investment, it invested roughly over 33 million yuan. Calculated at the issue price, this investment is now worth nearly 500 million yuan, with a return rate of around 1300%.

Second, it was a co-investor. The STAR Market has a rule: the sponsor must buy a bit too. CITIC, through CITIC Investment, bought over 800,000 shares for 122 million yuan, locked up for 24 months.

Third, it was the sponsor and lead underwriter. Unitree raised over 6 billion yuan this time. The sponsor fee plus underwriting fee add up to roughly 145 million yuan. This is CITIC's most direct "service fee" income.

Fourth, it was also the manager of the employee strategic placement asset management plan. Unitree's senior executives and core employees participated in the strategic placement, and their money is managed by CITIC's asset management plan, locked up for 36 months. Founder Wang Xingxing himself put in 15 million yuan.

Let's do the math: equity investment earned a 1300% return, co-investment locked for 24 months waiting for the lock-up to lift, sponsor/underwriting fees securely pocketed 145 million yuan, plus managing the employees' strategic placement funds.

One dish, eaten four times.

This model has a benefit: CITIC's own money is also locked in, so it has the incentive to do the project well and not just muddle through. But the question is: when you are both the largest institutional shareholder and the pricing sponsor, how much independence do you have left?

There's no standard answer to this question, but it's worth thinking about.

34 Brokerages Queued Up for the IPO

On the subscription day, it was another scene of excitement.

For Unitree's offline IPO subscription, 34 brokerages and their asset management subsidiaries participated. From top players like CITIC, Huatai, Guotai Junan, and Haitong, to mid-sized ones like Guoyuan, Zheshang, and Caitong, even foreign brokerages' China subsidiaries like JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs showed up.

These 34 firms together were allotted over 650,000 shares, amounting to roughly 98 million yuan.

Interestingly, some of these brokerages already indirectly held Unitree shares in the primary market through LPs, and now directly participated in the IPO through asset management products in the secondary market. That means adding another layer on top of their existing position.

Why are they still scrambling to buy even with a 219 times P/E ratio?

Simply put, brokerages judge that Unitree still has room to rise after listing. Offline IPO participation is not charity; it's based on calculated accounts.

These institutions believe that even at such a high P/E, there's still short-term profit to be made.

Three Things Worth Remembering for Ordinary Investors

First, "taking detours" is the norm. Most small and medium-sized brokerages don't hold shares directly but hold them indirectly through the LP model. This means a stable profit-sharing relationship has formed between the brokerage system and top-tier PE funds. You provide the money, I provide the project, and we share the profits.

Second, primary + secondary: brokerages' total exposure is larger than you think. 12 brokerages hold shares in the primary market, 34 participate in the secondary market IPO, with overlapping lists. Some brokerages both indirectly hold shares in the primary market and directly participate in the IPO in the secondary market. Combined, the brokerage system's actual exposure on Unitree is much larger than the direct shareholding ratio seen in the prospectus.

Third, at 219 times P/E, everyone is in the same boat. Unitree's estimated non-GAAP net profit for 2025 is about 590 million yuan. At 219 times P/E, the market cap is over 60 billion yuan. Is this valuation high? High. But the brokerage system, as a whole, is both the largest camp of institutional shareholders and the most core participant in pricing.

When the sponsor's own funds, employee strategic placement funds, and underwriting income are all locked in the same ultra-high valuation project, this is no longer just "aligned interests" – this is shared risk.

Is shared risk good? Yes. But the premise is that Unitree's post-listing performance can deliver.

In the first half of 2026, Unitree expects revenue of 1.05 to 1.13 billion yuan. Whether it can maintain high growth for the full year is a crucial test for the humanoid robot sector, moving from storytelling to performance scrutiny.

The brokerages have bet on Unitree with more than just underwriting fees.

In the first half of 2026, Unitree expects revenue of 1.05 to 1.13 billion yuan.

Whether it can maintain high growth for the full year is the key verification window for the humanoid robot sector to move from concept to performance. 12 brokerages laying groundwork in the primary market, 34 brokerages participating in the IPO in the secondary market, CITIC Securities eating one dish four times – under the high valuation of 219 times P/E, this is both aligned interests and shared risk.

This article is from the WeChat public account "IT桔子" (ID: itjuzi521), author: Judy

Kripto yang Sedang Tren

Pertanyaan Terkait

QAccording to the article, how many securities companies are involved in the pre-IPO investment (through indirect holdings) of Unitree Robotics?

AAccording to the article, at least 12 securities companies are involved in the pre-IPO investment of Unitree Robotics, primarily through indirect holdings by acting as Limited Partners (LPs) in top private equity funds.

QWhat four roles does CITIC Securities play in the Unitree Robotics IPO, and what are the associated financial benefits or actions?

ACITIC Securities plays four roles: 1) Early-stage investor (via funds like Jinshi Growth), with a potential return of around 1300%. 2) Co-investor, purchasing over 800,000 shares locked for 24 months. 3) Sponsor and underwriter, earning an estimated 145 million RMB in fees. 4) Manager of the employee strategic placement asset management plan, managing funds from executives and core employees locked for 36 months.

QWhy did the 34 securities companies participate in the offline subscription of Unitree's shares despite the high P/E ratio of 219 times?

AThe 34 securities companies participated in the offline subscription because they calculated that there was still short-term profit potential, believing Unitree's stock price had room to rise even at a P/E ratio of 219 times.

QWhat does the article imply about the potential conflict of interest when a securities firm acts as both a major institutional shareholder and the IPO sponsor?

AThe article implies a potential conflict of interest, questioning the independence of the sponsor when it is also a major institutional shareholder. It asks how much independence remains when the firm responsible for pricing is also heavily invested in the company's success.

QWhat is the significance of 2026 for Unitree Robotics and the humanoid robot sector, according to the article's conclusion?

AAccording to the article, 2026 is a critical validation year for Unitree Robotics and the humanoid robot sector. Unitree's projected full-year performance will be key in determining whether the sector can transition from hype to demonstrating solid financial results, which affects all invested parties, including the securities firms.

Bacaan Terkait

Tanpa DeFi, Apakah RWA Masih Bermakna?

Pembahasan industri RWA seringkali dimulai dengan visi sederhana: tokenisasi aset seperti obligasi, saham, atau komputasi. Namun, tokenisasi saja ibarat memberi kode batang pada kontainer—ini berguna tetapi bukan solusi transformatif. Token hanyalah representasi hak yang dapat dialamatkan, sedangkan DeFi adalah sistem operasi pasar yang memberikan utilitas nyata. Nilai RWA terletak pada kemampuannya untuk dinilai, dibiayai, dilindung nilai, diperdagangkan, dan diselesaikan dalam lingkungan yang menekan, tanpa memerlukan koordinasi manual setiap kali. Tokenisasi adalah langkah pertama, tetapi untuk menjadi komponen keuangan yang matang, RWA memerlukan enam lapisan: hak hukum yang dapat ditegakkan, orakel data yang andal, aturan transfer/penebusan yang jelas, likuiditas pasar sekunder, parameter kolateral yang realistis, dan jalur penyelesaian kerugian yang kredibel. Tantangan mendasar adalah RWA berjalan pada beberapa "jam" waktu yang berbeda—penyelesaian blockchain yang instan versus waktu penyelesaian dunia nyata yang lambat—yang menciptakan kesenjangan risiko likuidasi dan likuidasi. Likuiditas sejati bukan tentang TVL, tetapi tentang kemampuan untuk keluar dari posisi dalam jendela waktu yang diperlukan. Leverage membuka utilitas ekonomi tetapi juga memperkenalkan kerapuhan; tingkat kolateral harus memperhitungkan faktor-faktor seperti penundaan penebusan dan kemampuan market maker, bukan hanya volatilitas historis. Risiko RWA harus dipetakan sebagai grafik hubungan dari berbagai node yang saling bergantung. Pemantauan harus proaktif, mendeteksi sinyal risiko off-chain sebelum tercermin pada harga. Sementara tokenisasi obligasi pemerintah adalah titik masuk yang baik, batas depan yang lebih menarik adalah aset seperti daya komputasi dan energi, yang memerlukan model risiko khusus. Tokenisasi saham dan kontrak *perpetual* akan menghubungkan dua sistem besar, tetapi memerlukan arsitektur yang kuat untuk mengelola risiko yang saling terkait. Kesimpulannya, tanpa DeFi, RWA memiliki nilai terbatas—terutama untuk distribusi dan transparansi yang lebih baik. Nilai transformatif sejati muncul ketika RWA terintegrasi ke dalam pasar modal yang dapat diprogram, di mana aset dapat digunakan sebagai kolateral dan dikelola dengan ketahanan yang diuji. Token hanyalah kode batang; pasar adalah mesin yang sebenarnya beroperasi. Tahap selanjutnya bukanlah lebih banyak token, tetapi membangun lapisan operasional yang mengubah kepemilikan hukum menjadi strategi keuangan yang tangguh.

marsbit19m yang lalu

Tanpa DeFi, Apakah RWA Masih Bermakna?

marsbit19m yang lalu

Pemerintah Turun Tangan Campur Tangan di Pasar Obligasi, Apa Artinya?

Tanggal 19 Agustus 2026, Departemen Keuangan AS mengumumkan peningkatan skala operasi pembelian kembali obligasi pemerintah jangka panjang menjadi setidaknya dua kali lipat, dari $20 miliar menjadi $40 miliar, efektif 9 September hingga 4 November 2026. Pengumuman ini langsung menurunkan imbal hasil obligasi 30-tahun sebesar 9 basis poin dan mendorong pasar saham serta emas naik. Langkah ini merupakan respons taktis terhadap tekanan naiknya imbal hasil obligasi, yang mencapai level tertinggi sejak 2007 (5.34%) sehari sebelumnya, didorong oleh inflasi yang bandel, tekanan geopolitik, utang publik AS yang melampaui $40 triliun, dan berkurangnya permintaan dari pembeli tradisional seperti bank sentral asing. Operasi pembelian kembali (repo) bertujuan meningkatkan likuiditas di pasar obligasi "off-the-run" yang kurang aktif, mirip dengan buyback saham perusahaan. Namun, langkah ini tidak mengurangi total utang AS, hanya mengubah struktur jatuh tempo, karena dibiayai dengan penerbitan utang baru jangka pendek. Ini berbeda dari pelonggaran kuantitatif (QE) yang menciptakan uang baru. Meski memberi dukungan psikologis dan teknis jangka pendek, intervensi ini tidak mengatasi masalah struktural mendasar: defisit fiskal besar, persaingan modal global, dan penurunan permintaan terhadap surat utang AS. Analis memperingatkan bahwa tanpa perubahan kebijakan fiskal mendasar, tekanan naiknya imbal hasil jangka panjang kemungkinan akan berlanjut. Bagi investor, langkah ini mungkin mendukung harga ETF obligasi jangka panjang dan aset safe-haven seperti emas dalam jangka pendek, tetapi tidak cukup signifikan untuk menurunkan suku bunga hipotek atau mengubah lingkungan investasi yang menantang.

marsbit21m yang lalu

Pemerintah Turun Tangan Campur Tangan di Pasar Obligasi, Apa Artinya?

marsbit21m yang lalu

Apakah Pembayaran Lintas Batas Benar-benar Membutuhkan Stablecoin?

Semua orang bilang stablecoin lebih cocok untuk pembayaran lintas batas, tetapi benarkah? Artikel ini membahas skenario penukaran mata uang: mengirim dolar AS dari satu sisi dan menerima peso Meksiko di sisi lain. Banyak yang berpendapat stablecoin bisa mengurangi biaya dan waktu transfer, namun mereka sering mengabaikan fakta bahwa perusahaan fintech seperti Wise sudah memberikan layanan serupa yang efisien dan murah tanpa melibatkan stablecoin. Sistem perbankan tradisional menggunakan bank koresponden dan jaringan SWIFT, yang melibatkan banyak perantara dan menyebabkan biaya tinggi (sekitar 15%) serta waktu penyelesaian 1-5 hari kerja. Solusi fintech modern seperti Wise mengatasi ini dengan "pembersihan internal" – dolar yang diterima di AS digunakan untuk membayar peso di Meksiko tanpa transfer dana lintas batas yang sebenarnya, sehingga biaya turun drastis (sekitar 0,52%) dan penyelesaian hampir instan. Lalu, apa nilai tambah stablecoin? Model "sandwich stablecoin" memungkinkan pengguna menukar dolar AS ke USDC, mengirimnya via blockchain (murah dan cepat), lalu menukarnya ke mata uang lokal. Pada saluran utama seperti AS-Meksiko, biaya akhirnya mungkin sebanding dengan Wise. Keunggulan sebenarnya stablecoin adalah mendemokratisasi sistem: ia memisahkan (decouple) proses pembayaran. Dengan stablecoin, siapa pun bisa masuk ke bisnis transfer tanpa harus membangun jaringan global lengkap seperti Wise. Cukup memiliki akses deposit dan penarikan yang andal di kedua ujungnya. Ini membuka pasar yang terfragmentasi dan meningkatkan persaingan, terutama di rute lintas batas yang kurang umum (misalnya AS-Afrika), di mana penyedia lokal dapat bersaing menawarkan layanan penukaran dengan biaya lebih rendah. Landasan transfer yang terbuka ini pada akhirnya akan menekan biaya secara keseluruhan, mengalihkan keuntungan dari perantara ke konsumen dan bisnis.

marsbit28m yang lalu

Apakah Pembayaran Lintas Batas Benar-benar Membutuhkan Stablecoin?

marsbit28m yang lalu

Trading

Spot

Artikel Populer

Cara Membeli CAP

Selamat datang di HTX.com! Kami telah membuat pembelian Cap (CAP) menjadi mudah dan nyaman. Ikuti panduan langkah demi langkah kami untuk memulai perjalanan kripto Anda.Langkah 1: Buat Akun HTX AndaGunakan alamat email atau nomor ponsel Anda untuk mendaftar akun gratis di HTX. Rasakan perjalanan pendaftaran yang mudah dan buka semua fitur.Dapatkan Akun SayaLangkah 2: Buka Beli Kripto, lalu Pilih Metode Pembayaran AndaKartu Kredit/Debit: Gunakan Visa atau Mastercard Anda untuk membeli Cap (CAP) secara instan.Saldo: Gunakan dana dari saldo akun HTX Anda untuk melakukan trading dengan lancar.Pihak Ketiga: Kami telah menambahkan metode pembayaran populer seperti Google Pay dan Apple Pay untuk meningkatkan kenyamanan.P2P: Lakukan trading langsung dengan pengguna lain di HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Kami menawarkan layanan yang dibuat khusus dan kurs yang kompetitif bagi para trader.Langkah 3: Simpan Cap (CAP) AndaSetelah melakukan pembelian, simpan Cap (CAP) di akun HTX Anda. Selain itu, Anda dapat mengirimkannya ke tempat lain melalui transfer blockchain atau menggunakannya untuk memperdagangkan mata uang kripto lainnya.Langkah 4: Lakukan trading Cap (CAP)Lakukan trading Cap (CAP) dengan mudah di pasar spot HTX. Cukup akses akun Anda, pilih pasangan perdagangan, jalankan trading, lalu pantau secara real-time. Kami menawarkan pengalaman yang ramah pengguna baik untuk pemula maupun trader berpengalaman.

519 Total TayanganDipublikasikan pada 2026.06.26Diperbarui pada 2026.06.26

Cara Membeli CAP

Diskusi

Selamat datang di Komunitas HTX. Di sini, Anda bisa terus mendapatkan informasi terbaru tentang perkembangan platform terkini dan mendapatkan akses ke wawasan pasar profesional. Pendapat pengguna mengenai harga CAP (CAP) disajikan di bawah ini.

活动图片