The Launch Event Became a Make-up Ceremony? Why Hasn't Pools.trade Spawned a High-Market-Cap Meme Coin Yet?

marsbitDipublikasikan tanggal 2026-08-07Terakhir diperbarui pada 2026-08-07

Abstrak

Uniswap's new token launchpad, Pools.trade, debuted on Robinhood Chain but was overshadowed by pre-launch trading, raising fairness concerns. Despite generating over $150M in pre-launch volume and becoming a top platform by daily trade volume, it has failed to produce a high-market-cap meme coin. Key features include Instant and Crowd Launch modes, with a low 0.25% transaction fee (vs 1% on rivals), most of which is auto-reinvested into liquidity. However, its top two tokens by market cap, FRONG (~$7M) and POOLS (~$1.8M), were both minted days before the official announcement, leading to accusations of insider advantage ("sniping") and dampening community enthusiasm. The article concludes that while Pools.trade has Uniswap's infrastructure and Robinhood Chain's hype, a perceived lack of a fair launch has prevented a breakout meme coin. Success may hinge on the next token with a compelling narrative and a clean, uncontested launch.

Author | Asher(@Asher_ 0210)

The 'P Army' had already memed hard even before the Pools.trade frontend officially opened.

At 00:00 on August 5th, with a 24-hour countdown to the official launch of Uniswap's Pools.trade beginning. During this countdown period, the community found the platform's early-deployed contracts ahead of time, directly trading the already-issued tokens on-chain. By the time the Pools.trade frontend officially opened, these early contracts had already accumulated over $150 million in trading volume.

Regarding this, Uniswap founder Hayden Adams stated that the massive volume of early transactions forced the team to re-adjust the website and data indexing, simultaneously making it compatible with both test and final version contracts, which disrupted the originally planned launch schedule.

This sense of disarray shown by a DeFi veteran like Uniswap felt somewhat 'amateurish,' yet the trading data was undeniably high. Dune data shows that on August 5th alone (the frontend didn't officially open until the morning of August 6th Beijing time, with most of this volume generated pre-launch), Pools.trade trading volume reached $99.1 million, accounting for approximately 54.2% of the total trading volume on the Robinhood Chain token launch platform that day, far exceeding the previously top-ranked Pons for two weeks.

Pools.trade: The Token Launch Platform Introduced by Uniswap Itself

Project Overview

Pools.trade is a token launch platform launched by Uniswap Labs on Robinhood Chain. Officially positioned as a Meme coin launchpad, users can create new tokens, discover new coins, and trade—all on the same page. Each token has a fixed total supply of 1 billion tokens, ultimately entering Uniswap v4 with liquidity permanently locked.

Tokens launched on Pools.trade are immediately integrated into the Uniswap web interface, wallet, Launches page, and Trading API, reaching MetaMask, Ledger, and multiple DEX aggregators. Compared to new platforms starting from scratch to find trading entry points, Pools.trade launched with Uniswap's ready-made user base and distribution channels.

Two Launch Methods

Pools.trade offers Instant Launch and Crowd Launch modes, respectively:

  • Instant Launch: Launch immediately. After the creator fills in the name, ticker, image, and description, the token opens for trading directly. The price fluctuates with market buying and selling, with no minimum market cap requirement or fixed end time.
  • Crowd Launch: Employs a four-hour launch window. Participants submit budgets in advance, with orders executed progressively throughout the remaining time—typically the earlier the participation, the lower the price. After the launch ends, if the token's FDV reaches $10,000, it enters trading; if it fails to meet the threshold, all participating funds are refunded. This mode primarily aims to reduce the impact of bot front-running and bundle transactions at launch.

The Platform's Most Prominent Feature: Trading Fees Only a Quarter of Pons and Flap

Pools.trade does not charge additional launchpad fees. Each transaction incurs a 0.25% Uniswap v4 pool fee. If the creator enables the fee split, 0.05% goes to the creator, and 0.20% is automatically reinvested into the permanently locked liquidity pool. Uniswap Labs does not take a share.

Trading fees for both Pons and Flap are 1%. Calculating with $10 million in trading volume: Pools.trade generates $25,000 in fees, with the token creator receiving $5,000; Pons generates $100,000 in fees, and based on a 70% creator share, the token creator would receive $70,000.

Pools.trade lowers transaction costs and keeps most of the fees within the liquidity; Pons and Flap offer higher direct income incentives for token creators. The former benefits trading more, while the latter provides more direct motivation for creators.

For a detailed introduction, recommended reading: "Uniswap Launches Token Launch Platform Pools.trade, Reshuffling the Robinhood Launchpad Ecosystem?".

Only Two Tokens Surpass $1 Million Market Cap, Early Minting Raises Fairness Concerns

Compared to the impressive number of token launches and platform trading volume, Pools.trade has not yet produced a high-market-cap Meme coin. As of now, only two tokens on Pools.trade have a market cap above $1 million, namely FRONG and POOLS; additionally, tokens with a market cap above $400,000 include HOOKR, UNIPEG, CHWDR, and PosM.

FRONG: Market Cap Once Touched $18 Million

FRONG is currently the highest-market-cap Meme on Pools.trade. At 00:00 on August 5th, Uniswap's official Twitter account began the 24-hour countdown for Pools.trade's launch, posting a video of a frog "playing" by a pond.

After the tweet was posted, the community quickly noticed the frog-themed Meme coin—FRONG—issued through the Pools.trade early contract and began to view it as the platform's mascot concept coin. Driven by this FOMO sentiment, FRONG's market cap briefly touched $18 million.

However, FRONG had already been minted via contract before Uniswap even started the Pools.trade launch countdown. On-chain records show that FRONG was minted and a trading pool was established as early as July 30th, five days before Uniswap's countdown announcement; related contracts were even deployed roughly three weeks prior, at that time with no indication of affiliation with Uniswap or Pools.trade.

As this time gap was discovered, questions arose about the fairness of FRONG's launch, and its market cap rapidly retreated from its highs. Even after Pools.trade officially launched yesterday at 00:00, FRONG did not receive strong community enthusiasm, its market cap remaining below $10 million, currently reported at around $7 million.

POOLS: Market Cap Once Broke $4 Million

POOLS, currently the second-highest market cap token on Pools.trade, shares a similar situation with FRONG—it was also a Meme coin minted before the platform's official launch.

Compared to FRONG's "frog mascot" narrative, POOLS's logic is more direct—its name matches the platform, so the community treated it as the Pools.trade concept coin. Its market cap once exceeded $4 million before falling back to around $1.8 million.

FRONG relied on the "frog mascot" narrative, POOLS on the platform's namesake—both should have had higher market cap expectations. However, both faced diminished community FOMO sentiment due to the "insider trading" controversy arising from early minting, resulting in market caps below $10 million.

The most fundamental logic of Meme coins is that everyone wants to believe they are starting from the same line. Once fairness is questioned, even the best token narrative struggles to sustain spontaneous community propagation. This is perhaps why Pools.trade, despite impressive data, has yet to produce a high-market-cap Meme coin.

However, Uniswap stands behind Pools.trade, and Robinhood Chain is one of the most discussed public chains for Memes at the moment. Currently, the platform lacks not for traffic, but for a new narrative that is intriguing enough and free from "insider trading" controversy. The first "speedrun" on Pools.trade might not be far off.

Kripto yang Sedang Tren

Pertanyaan Terkait

QWhat was the main reason why Pools.trade's launch did not go as planned according to the article?

AThe main reason was that the community discovered and started trading tokens on the early deployed contracts before the official front-end launch, generating over $150 million in volume and forcing Uniswap to scramble to adjust the site and data indexing, disrupting the planned launch schedule.

QWhat are the two token launch modes offered by Pools.trade?

APools.trade offers two modes: Instant Launch (immediate token creation and trading with no minimum market cap or fixed end time) and Crowd Launch (a 4-hour launch window where orders are filled progressively, with a $10,000 FDV threshold for the token to go live post-launch).

QHow does the transaction fee structure of Pools.trade compare to platforms like Pons and Flap?

APools.trade charges a 0.25% fee per transaction (0.05% to the creator and 0.20% auto-reinvested into the permanently locked liquidity pool), while Pons and Flap charge a 1% fee, which offers creators a higher direct revenue share.

QAccording to the article, why haven't any high-market-cap meme coins emerged on Pools.trade despite its high volume?

AThe primary reason is that the early high-profile tokens like FRONG and POOLS were minted before the official platform announcement, leading to 'fair launch' controversies and 'rat warehouse' accusations, which severely dampened community FOMO and trust, undermining their potential for sustained growth.

QWhat key advantage does Pools.trade have over new token launch platforms, as mentioned in the article?

APools.trade's key advantage is that it launches with immediate access to Uniswap's existing user base, distribution channels, and integrations (like the Uniswap web interface, wallet, Launches page, Trading API, MetaMask, Ledger, and DEX aggregators).

Bacaan Terkait

Harga Saham Melonjak 655%, Dua Bersaudara Sichuan Sukses Raih IPO Semikonduktor Bernilai 50 Miliar

Saham perusahaan peralatan semikonduktor asal Chengdu, China, Sichuan Chaochun Yingcai Co., Ltd. (Chaochun Yingcai), melonjak hingga 654.66% pada hari perdagangan perdananya di Bursa Efek Shenzhen, mencapai valuasi pasar lebih dari 50 miliar yuan. Perusahaan yang didirikan oleh dua bersaudara, Chai Jie dan Chai Lin, ini merupakan pemasok komponen inti untuk peralatan semikonduktor. Chaochun Yingcai berfokus pada pengembangan, produksi, dan penjualan komponen berpelapis khusus untuk peralatan semikonduktor dan perangkat optik presisi. Perusahaan ini adalah pemasok kunci untuk komponen dalam peralatan etching untuk proses manufaktur chip 5nm dan lebih canggih, serta memegang pangsa pasar domestik terbesar di segmennya. Pendapatan perusahaan menunjukkan pertumbuhan yang kuat, dari 169 juta yuan pada 2023 menjadi 496 juta yuan pada 2025, dengan laba bersih meningkat dari 65 juta menjadi 185 juta yuan dalam periode yang sama. Lebih dari 95% pendapatan utamanya pada 2025 berasal dari penjualan komponen berpelapis khusus. Perusahaan memiliki basis klien yang terkonsentrasi, dengan lima klien terbesar menyumbang hampir 90% pendapatan pada 2025, diduga termasuk raksasa peralatan domestik seperti Northern Huachuang dan AMEC. Di sisi pasokan, pembelian dari lima pemasok terbesar juga mencakup porsi yang signifikan. Dana hasil IPO sekitar 1,68 miliar yuan akan dialokasikan untuk ekspansi kapasitas produksi, proyek material semikonduktor, dan pembangunan pusat penelitian. Dengan tingkat lokalisasi komponen peralatan semikonduktor di China yang masih rendah, Chaochun Yingcai berpotensi mengambil bagian dalam proses substitusi impor yang terus berjalan, didorong oleh kebijakan pemerintah dan peningkatan kemampuan teknis perusahaan-perusahaan domestik.

marsbit26m yang lalu

Harga Saham Melonjak 655%, Dua Bersaudara Sichuan Sukses Raih IPO Semikonduktor Bernilai 50 Miliar

marsbit26m yang lalu

Pandangan: Altcoin Mungkin Masih Bisa Diselamatkan, Tapi Koin VC Benar-Benar Tidak Ada Harapan Lagi

Penulis Haotian berbagi pandangan dari diskusi mendalam dengan para ahli di bidang on-chain tentang aturan bertahan dalam siklus pasar saat ini. **Pasar telah bergeser total dari "mendengarkan narasi dan berspekulasi pada ekspektasi" menuju "melihat arus kas dan memverifikasi implementasi nyata."** Beberapa prinsip utama yang dibahas: 1) **Prioritaskan aset dengan kemampuan menangkap nilai nyata.** Di pasar bearish, hanya arus kas riil dan catatan buyback/burn yang diperhitungkan. "Tiket aman" dalam siklus ini adalah protokol yang terus menghasilkan fee dan mendistribusikannya kembali ke pemegang token melalui buyback, burn, atau dividen. Contoh: $UNI, $PUMP, $PONS, dan $HYPE. 2) **Pilih proyek dengan Product-Market Fit (PMF) yang telah terbukti dan membentuk siklus tertutup.** Narasi utama di siklus berikutnya diperkirakan terkait "tokenisasi aset" dan "Agentic Economy" (seperti Perps, prediksi, stablecoin, Payment). Pasar akan beralih dari narasi teknologi ke verifikasi utilitas dan adopsi nyata. Proyek tanpa pengguna, transaksi, atau pendapatan riil akan tersaring. Contoh yang perlu dilihat berdasarkan data AUM dan kemampuan menghasilkan fee: $ONDO, $VVV, $VIRTUAL. 3) **Pilih aset dengan "konsensus" yang kuat.** Konsensus yang bertahan lintas siklus dan terbentuk secara alami di pasar adalah kunci. Aset yang mungkin tidak dipahami pemula tetapi memiliki likuiditas dan komunitas yang tangguh, seperti meme coin lama ($DOGE, $PEPE, $PEOPLE) atau aset pionir di niche tertentu ($ZEC, $TAO), cenderung menarik perhatian dan likuiditas. 4) **Hindari "VC Coin" murni.** Token VC dengan FDV tinggi, sirkulasi rendah, dan unlock besar yang berkelanjutan bergantung pada hype sekitar TGE/airdrop. Tanpa kemampuan menangkap nilai, token ini cenderung kehilangan momentum dan mengalami tekanan jual saat unlock, menjadi penyebab utama siklus "bull yang tidak gila dan bear yang dalam" saat ini. Catatan: Ini adalah rangkuman diskusi pribadi dan contoh token hanya untuk ilustrasi, bukan rekomendasi investasi.

marsbit56m yang lalu

Pandangan: Altcoin Mungkin Masih Bisa Diselamatkan, Tapi Koin VC Benar-Benar Tidak Ada Harapan Lagi

marsbit56m yang lalu

Trading

Spot

Artikel Populer

Cara Membeli CAP

Selamat datang di HTX.com! Kami telah membuat pembelian Cap (CAP) menjadi mudah dan nyaman. Ikuti panduan langkah demi langkah kami untuk memulai perjalanan kripto Anda.Langkah 1: Buat Akun HTX AndaGunakan alamat email atau nomor ponsel Anda untuk mendaftar akun gratis di HTX. Rasakan perjalanan pendaftaran yang mudah dan buka semua fitur.Dapatkan Akun SayaLangkah 2: Buka Beli Kripto, lalu Pilih Metode Pembayaran AndaKartu Kredit/Debit: Gunakan Visa atau Mastercard Anda untuk membeli Cap (CAP) secara instan.Saldo: Gunakan dana dari saldo akun HTX Anda untuk melakukan trading dengan lancar.Pihak Ketiga: Kami telah menambahkan metode pembayaran populer seperti Google Pay dan Apple Pay untuk meningkatkan kenyamanan.P2P: Lakukan trading langsung dengan pengguna lain di HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Kami menawarkan layanan yang dibuat khusus dan kurs yang kompetitif bagi para trader.Langkah 3: Simpan Cap (CAP) AndaSetelah melakukan pembelian, simpan Cap (CAP) di akun HTX Anda. Selain itu, Anda dapat mengirimkannya ke tempat lain melalui transfer blockchain atau menggunakannya untuk memperdagangkan mata uang kripto lainnya.Langkah 4: Lakukan trading Cap (CAP)Lakukan trading Cap (CAP) dengan mudah di pasar spot HTX. Cukup akses akun Anda, pilih pasangan perdagangan, jalankan trading, lalu pantau secara real-time. Kami menawarkan pengalaman yang ramah pengguna baik untuk pemula maupun trader berpengalaman.

481 Total TayanganDipublikasikan pada 2026.06.26Diperbarui pada 2026.06.26

Cara Membeli CAP

Diskusi

Selamat datang di Komunitas HTX. Di sini, Anda bisa terus mendapatkan informasi terbaru tentang perkembangan platform terkini dan mendapatkan akses ke wawasan pasar profesional. Pendapat pengguna mengenai harga CAP (CAP) disajikan di bawah ini.

活动图片