India Cracks Down: Stricter Rules To Combat Rising Digital Payments Fraud

bitcoinistDipublikasikan tanggal 2025-09-26Terakhir diperbarui pada 2025-09-26

Abstrak

India has launched a sharp clampdown on online payment scams, ordering tougher checks and new rules that aim to cut...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

India has launched a sharp clampdown on online payment scams, ordering tougher checks and new rules that aim to cut the rising tide of fraud. Based on reports, regulators and payment networks moved after authorities recorded big jumps in both the number of cases and the money lost to scams last year.

India: RBI And NPCI Move Fast

Regulators have pushed several changes into the banking and payments system. According to published figures, incidents tied to Unified Payments Interface or UPI more than doubled from about 7.25 lakh ($8,700) to 13.42 lakh ($16,200) in fiscal year 2023-24.

Reported losses rose too, from ₹573 crore ($69 million) the year before to ₹1,087 crore ($131 million) in 2023-24. The central bank has allowed risk-based additional checks for certain transactions, and NPCI has told banks and apps to block pull or collect requests on UPI from October 1, 2025, a move meant to shut a common scam vector.

New Authentication And Domain Rules

One of the headline changes is a requirement for two-factor authentication for payments, set to come into effect on April 1, 2026. Banks and payment firms will need to apply at least two methods of ID for transactions — such as biometrics, device tokens, or passphrases — while SMS OTPs will still be allowed in some cases.

Reports also say the industry will be asked to reserve clear, trusted web domains for banks and finance firms — examples given include “bank.in” for banks and “fin.in” for non-bank financial companies — to make phishing sites easier to spot and block.

Total crypto market cap currently at $3.67 trillion. Chart: TradingView

How Users And Banks Will Be Affected

The new rules are meant to stop impersonation scams, fake calls that pretend to be law enforcement, and other social engineering tricks that send money out of accounts.

A special Cyber Fraud Mitigation Centre and the Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre will coordinate responses, and a suspect registry drawn from the national cybercrime portal is being used to track suspicious accounts and identities.

Banks and small operators that run Aadhaar-enabled payment services will face stricter due diligence requirements for their agents and terminals.

Costs, Complexity And The Rural Gap

Banks and tech providers must upgrade systems to run the extra checks and keep records. That will add cost and complexity, especially for smaller firms and rural operators that rely on older devices.

Users may face more steps when they pay, particularly for cross-border or unusual transactions. Reports warn that fraudsters often change tactics after rules tighten, so the measures will need constant review and active enforcement to stay effective.

Featured image from Unsplash, chart from TradingView

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Christian, a journalist and editor with leadership roles in Philippine and Canadian media, is fueled by his love for writing and cryptocurrency. Off-screen, he's a cook and cinephile who's constantly intrigued by the size of the universe.

Bacaan Terkait

Pajak Kripto 0,2% di Negara Bagian Illinois Memicu Gugatan Hukum Besar-besaran

Asosiasi Blockchain dan Dewan Inovasi Crypto mengajukan gugatan pada 21 Agustus di Pengadilan Distrik Sangaamon County terhadap Direktur Departemen Pendapatan Illinois David Harris, Jaksa Agung Kwame Raoul, dan Jaksa Sangaamon County John Milhizer. Mereka menuntut agar Hukum Pajak Aset Digital dinyatakan tidak sah dan mengajukan perintah pengadilan sementara serta permanen untuk mencegah pemberlakuannya. Gugatan ini mempertanyakan pajak baru Illinois sebesar 0,2% pada nilai aset digital untuk transaksi tertentu yang dilakukan melalui perantara aset digital. Pajak ini bisa dikenakan bahkan untuk aktivitas seperti mentransfer bitcoin antar akun atau membayar layanan penyimpanan, yang biasanya tidak dikenai pajak untuk aset keuangan tradisional seperti saham atau emas. Penggugat berargumen bahwa hukum ini tidak memiliki padanan nyata, tidak jelas, dan berpotensi diskriminatif. Ketidakjelasan mencakup definisi peristiwa kena pajak (apakah satu transaksi bisa menimbulkan beberapa peristiwa pajak), cara penilaian aset, dan metode untuk menentukan lokasi klien. Ketiadaan kejelasan ini membebani perusahaan dengan biaya kepatuhan tinggi dan risiko sanksi pidana. Proses legislatif hukum ini juga dikritik. RUU Senat 3019 awalnya hanya dua halaman mengenai pertanian, tetapi amandemen menjelang akhir sesi mengubahnya menjadi paket 1.624 halaman, dengan ketentuan pajak aset digital kurang dari 20 halaman. Proses ini disebut melanggar persyaratan konstitusional Illinois. Gugatan juga menyatakan pajak ini melanggar Undang-Undang Kebebasan Pajak Internet federal, Klausul Perdagangan Tersembunyi, dan jaminan proses hukum. Tujuan utama penggugat saat ini adalah menghentikan pemberlakuan pajak yang dijadwalkan pada 1 Januari, mencegah kewajiban pendaftaran dan pemungutan bagi bisnis. Kasus ini menjadi ujian apakah satu negara bagian dapat mengenakan pajak khusus pada aktivitas keuangan hanya karena menggunakan aset digital.

cryptonews.ru1j yang lalu

Pajak Kripto 0,2% di Negara Bagian Illinois Memicu Gugatan Hukum Besar-besaran

cryptonews.ru1j yang lalu

Trading

Spot
活动图片