Pantera Capital Refutes Investment in NFT Project Akio

TheCryptoTimesDipublikasikan tanggal 2025-09-26Terakhir diperbarui pada 2025-09-26

Akio, a Non-Fungible Token (NFT) project, falsely announced on September 24 that it had raised a $5 million seed round led by Pantera Capital. The announcement, made on the social media platform X, was quickly and publicly denied by Pantera partner Franklin Bi, highlighting an issue of projects making unsubstantiated claims to generate interest. The incident is a warning of the importance of background checks on statements claimed in social media, by crypto projects.

A Funding Claim Unravels

The incident began when Akio published a graphic on its X account detailing a supposed $5 million seed round with Pantera Capital as the lead investor, along with Nvidia Ventures, Hasbro Ventures, AMD Ventures, and other players.

Shortly after the post went live, Franklin Bi of Pantera Capital issued a direct denial on X, stating, “Pantera is not an investor in this.”

Beyond Pantera, none of the other companies shown in the Akio post, Nvidia Ventures, Hasbro Ventures, AMD Ventures, Net Ease Global, SBI GRoup, SIG DTI, Susquehanna International Group Company, have publicly acknowledged any investment in Akio or the publication.

Instead of issuing a correction, the Akio project reportedly blocked Franklin Bi on the platform following his refutation of their announcement.

Legit Information 

The Akio incident offers a direct example of red flags and underscores that investors have to carefully review information, as well as the source of the announcement. Legitimate funding rounds are typically confirmed through official press releases or on the investors’ own channels, not just a social media graphic.

Investors can also verify claims with the alleged investors directly, such as: Pantera Capital’s official website reveals no mention of Akio in its portfolio. A lack of confirmation on a venture firm’s official blog, portfolio page, or social media can be a warning sign. 

A Playbook for Investor Due Diligence

The Akio incident serves as a real-time case study in the red flags that can surround fundraising announcements. For investors, it places a spotlight on the importance of verifying claims before making financial decisions. Here are key steps for due diligence:

  1. Trust Official Channels: Legitimate funding rounds are almost always announced via official press releases or are featured on the venture capital firm’s own website, blog, or verified social media accounts. An unverified graphic on a project’s own social media is not sufficient proof.
  2. Verify the Portfolio: Check the investor’s official website. Pantera Capital’s online portfolio, for example, contains no mention of Akio. A project’s absence from its alleged backer’s portfolio is a significant red flag.
  3. Seek Cross-Confirmation: Look for reporting from reputable, independent crypto news outlets that have verified the round with the parties involved.

Why false claims threaten investor trust

False claims damage the reputation of the project making them and force venture capital firms to publicly defend their credibility. Also, it contributes to an erosion of trust across the industry. Furthermore, false hype can be used to temporarily inflate the price of tokens or NFTs, leaving uninformed buyers at a loss when the claims are proven false. The Akio-Pantera is a reminder that in a largely unregulated space, claims should  be treated with skepticism. 

Also read: X Exposes Crypto Scam Bribery Network Amid Rising Fraud


Mobile Only Image

Bacaan Terkait

Pajak Kripto 0,2% di Negara Bagian Illinois Memicu Gugatan Hukum Besar-besaran

Asosiasi Blockchain dan Dewan Inovasi Crypto mengajukan gugatan pada 21 Agustus di Pengadilan Distrik Sangaamon County terhadap Direktur Departemen Pendapatan Illinois David Harris, Jaksa Agung Kwame Raoul, dan Jaksa Sangaamon County John Milhizer. Mereka menuntut agar Hukum Pajak Aset Digital dinyatakan tidak sah dan mengajukan perintah pengadilan sementara serta permanen untuk mencegah pemberlakuannya. Gugatan ini mempertanyakan pajak baru Illinois sebesar 0,2% pada nilai aset digital untuk transaksi tertentu yang dilakukan melalui perantara aset digital. Pajak ini bisa dikenakan bahkan untuk aktivitas seperti mentransfer bitcoin antar akun atau membayar layanan penyimpanan, yang biasanya tidak dikenai pajak untuk aset keuangan tradisional seperti saham atau emas. Penggugat berargumen bahwa hukum ini tidak memiliki padanan nyata, tidak jelas, dan berpotensi diskriminatif. Ketidakjelasan mencakup definisi peristiwa kena pajak (apakah satu transaksi bisa menimbulkan beberapa peristiwa pajak), cara penilaian aset, dan metode untuk menentukan lokasi klien. Ketiadaan kejelasan ini membebani perusahaan dengan biaya kepatuhan tinggi dan risiko sanksi pidana. Proses legislatif hukum ini juga dikritik. RUU Senat 3019 awalnya hanya dua halaman mengenai pertanian, tetapi amandemen menjelang akhir sesi mengubahnya menjadi paket 1.624 halaman, dengan ketentuan pajak aset digital kurang dari 20 halaman. Proses ini disebut melanggar persyaratan konstitusional Illinois. Gugatan juga menyatakan pajak ini melanggar Undang-Undang Kebebasan Pajak Internet federal, Klausul Perdagangan Tersembunyi, dan jaminan proses hukum. Tujuan utama penggugat saat ini adalah menghentikan pemberlakuan pajak yang dijadwalkan pada 1 Januari, mencegah kewajiban pendaftaran dan pemungutan bagi bisnis. Kasus ini menjadi ujian apakah satu negara bagian dapat mengenakan pajak khusus pada aktivitas keuangan hanya karena menggunakan aset digital.

cryptonews.ru1j yang lalu

Pajak Kripto 0,2% di Negara Bagian Illinois Memicu Gugatan Hukum Besar-besaran

cryptonews.ru1j yang lalu

Trading

Spot
活动图片