Ethereum Negative Supply Dynamics Hold As ETH Issuance Falls Behind Burns – Here’s What To Know

bitcoinistPublished on 2025-12-17Last updated on 2025-12-17

Abstract

Amid recent market volatility and bearish price action, Ethereum's supply dynamics are drawing significant attention. On-chain data reveals that ETH's supply has remained net negative, with more tokens being removed from circulation than issued. Over a seven-day period, 30,000 new ETH were issued, but Spot Ethereum ETFs accumulated over 67,100 ETH, and approximately 11,700 ETH were burned through network fees. This resulted in a net supply change of -49,800 ETH, meaning tokens removed from circulation exceeded new issuance by 2.7 times. Despite this structural demand outpacing supply—a scenario that typically precedes price increases—ETH's price has not yet responded. According to analyst Leon Waidmann, this is due to passive, non-price-chasing demand, distribution by large holders during rallies, and derivatives markets setting marginal prices. Additionally, the Ethereum network has achieved a historical high in execution throughput, largely driven by the recent Fusaka Upgrade, which has doubled mainnet capacity and significantly enhanced rollup scalability.

Except for Ethereum’s fluctuating price action in the past few weeks following a broader market volatility, another key area is drawing notable attention in the sector. ETH’s price has been exhibiting bearish performance, and at the same time, its supply dynamics have been demonstrating a negative trend.

Net Negative Ethereum Supply Persists

Even with the current bearish state of the market, the supply dynamics of Ethereum are hinting at a quiet but powerful signal to the market. In a post on the social media platform X, Leon Waidmann, a market expert and the head of research at On-Chain Foundation, has delved into the asset’s supply dynamics, revealing a persistent negative trend.

On-chain data indicates that Ethereum supply has remained net negative despite continuous price swings, as seen on the chart shared by Waidmann. The data also shows that the metric has been exhibiting a negative trend over the last 7 days.

When Ethereum’s supply dynamics stay negative, it simply implies that more ETH are being removed from circulation compared to those being added to the market. This pattern is a result of persistent network activity, ongoing fee burning, and rising long-term holding and staking demand.

During the 7-day period, Waidmann highlighted that over 30,000 fresh ETH were added to the market. Meanwhile, Spot Ethereum Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) accumulated over 67,100 ETH, with about 11,700 ETH being burned via network fees.

ETH’s issuance well below demand | Source: Chart from Leon Waidmann on X

Overall, this brings the network’s net supply change to -49,800 ETH. Therefore, the number of ETH removed from circulation was 2.7x more than those issued in the market within the period. What this means is that the current demand for ETH continues to structurally outpace issuance.

Typically, heightened demand in the market has preceded upward swings in price. However, the price of ETH has failed to respond in this direction. Waidman noted that the price is not moving yet, because most demand is passive and not price-chasing.

Thus, the expert declares absorption first before breakout comes later. Furthermore, large holders are still distributing into rallies, which leads to the capping of short-term moves. Another reason hinges on derivatives, as it often sets the marginal price, not spot flows.

During negative supply dynamics, there is usually a tightening of the floor before it lifts the ceiling. Waidmann has highlighted a market structure where supply breaks first, then price follows, which is a clear pattern of how bases are formed.

ETH Network Throughput Makes Historical Highs

With recent updates, the Ethereum network has sprung back to life at a rapid rate. Joseph Young, a crypto enthusiast, has shared a fresh milestone for ETH, as the network’s execution throughput surges to an all-time high. The newly launched Fusaka Upgrade drives the network’s recent spark.

Since the introduction of the key update, Young stated that ETH’s mainnet capacity has doubled, and rollups such as Base are already processing 10x that execution. According to Young, rollups are scaling in production while ETH is rapidly scaling, reinforcing the growing notion that ETH is the settlement layer of finance.

ETH trading at $2,923 on the 1D chart | Source: ETHUSDT on Tradingview.com

Related Reads

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

In recent months, the rapid growth of the AI industry has attracted significant talent from the crypto sector. A persistent question among researchers intersecting both fields is whether blockchain can become a foundational part of AI infrastructure. While many previous AI and Crypto projects focused on application layers (like AI Agents, on-chain reasoning, data markets, and compute rentals), few achieved viable commercial models. Gensyn differentiates itself by targeting the most critical and expensive layer of AI: model training. Gensyn aims to organize globally distributed GPU resources into an open AI training network. Developers can submit training tasks, nodes provide computational power, and the network verifies results while distributing incentives. The core issue addressed is not decentralization for its own sake, but the increasing centralization of compute power among tech giants. In the era of large models, access to GPUs (like the H100) has become a decisive bottleneck, dictating the pace of AI development. Major AI companies are heavily dependent on large cloud providers for compute resources. Gensyn's approach is significant for several reasons: 1) It operates at the core infrastructure layer (model training), the most resource-intensive and technically demanding part of the AI value chain. 2) It proposes a more open, collaborative model for compute, potentially increasing resource utilization by dynamically pooling idle GPUs, similar to early cloud computing logic. 3) Its technical moat lies in solving complex challenges like verifying training results, ensuring node honesty, and maintaining reliability in a distributed environment—making it more of a deep-tech infrastructure company. 4) It targets a validated, high-growth market with genuine demand, rather than pursuing blockchain integration without purpose. Ultimately, the boundaries between Crypto and AI are blurring. AI requires global resource coordination, incentive mechanisms, and collaborative systems—areas where crypto-native solutions excel. Gensyn represents a step toward making advanced training capabilities more accessible and collaborative, moving beyond a niche controlled by a few giants. If successful, it could evolve into a fundamental piece of AI infrastructure, where the most enduring value in the AI era is often created.

marsbit6h ago

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

marsbit6h ago

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

A US researcher's visit to China's top AI labs reveals distinct cultural and organizational factors driving China's rapid AI development. While talent, data, and compute are similar to the West, Chinese labs excel through a pragmatic, execution-focused culture: less emphasis on individual stardom and conceptual debate, and more on teamwork, engineering optimization, and mastering the full tech stack. A key advantage is the integration of young students and researchers who approach model-building with fresh perspectives and low ego, prioritizing collective progress over personal credit. This contrasts with the US culture of self-promotion and "star scientist" narratives. Chinese labs also exhibit a strong "build, don't buy" mentality, preferring to develop core capabilities—like data pipelines and environments—in-house rather than relying on external services. The ecosystem feels more collaborative than tribal, with mutual respect among labs. While government support exists, its scale is unclear, and technical decisions appear driven by labs, not state mandates. Chinese companies across sectors, from platforms to consumer tech, are building their own foundational models to control their tech destiny, reflecting a broader cultural drive for technological sovereignty. Demand for AI is emerging, with spending patterns potentially mirroring cloud infrastructure more than traditional SaaS. Despite challenges like a less mature data industry and GPU shortages, Chinese labs are propelled by vast talent, rapid iteration, and deep integration with the open-source community. The competition is evolving beyond a pure model race into a contest of organizational execution, developer ecosystems, and industrial pragmatism.

marsbit7h ago

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

marsbit7h ago

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

Corning, a 175-year-old glass company, is experiencing a dramatic revival as a key player in AI infrastructure, driven by surging demand for high-performance optical fiber in data centers. AI data centers require vastly more fiber than traditional ones—5 to 10 times as much per rack—to handle high-speed data transmission between GPUs. This structural demand shift, coupled with supply constraints from the lengthy expansion cycle for fiber preforms, has created a significant supply-demand gap. Nvidia has invested in Corning, along with Lumentum and Coherent, in a $4.5 billion total commitment to secure the optical supply chain for AI. Corning's competitive edge lies in its expertise in producing ultra-low-loss, high-density, and bend-resistant specialty fiber, which is critical for 800G+ and future 1.6T data rates. Its deep involvement in co-packaged optics (CPO) with partners like Nvidia further solidifies its position. While not the largest fiber manufacturer globally, Corning's revenue from enterprise/data center clients now exceeds 40% of its optical communications sales, and it has secured multi-year supply agreements with major hyperscalers including Meta and Nvidia. Financially, Corning's optical communications revenue has surged, doubling from $1.3 billion in 2023 to over $3 billion in 2025. Its stock price has risen nearly 6-fold since late 2023. Key future catalysts include the rollout of Nvidia's CPO products and the scale of undisclosed customer agreements. However, risks include high current valuations and potential disruption from next-generation technologies like hollow-core fiber. The company's long-term bet on light over electricity, maintained even through the telecom bubble crash, is now being validated by the AI boom.

marsbit8h ago

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

marsbit8h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片