Understanding the Key Issues of Tokenization in One Article

marsbitPublicado a 2026-04-16Actualizado a 2026-04-16

Resumen

The core of tokenization lies in eliminating friction in financial infrastructure, not speculative digital assets. The true value is in near-instant settlement (T+0 vs. traditional T+2), 24/7 liquidity, fractional ownership, and the disintermediation of financial processes. Tokenization represents real-world assets (real estate, bonds, private equity) as digital tokens on a blockchain, functioning as programmable digital deeds that enable self-custody and automated ownership tracking. It addresses four key problems: 1) Settlement Speed: Atomic, near-instant settlement replaces multi-day processes. 2) Liquidity: Enables secondary markets for historically illiquid assets. 3) Fractional Ownership: Drastically lowers investment minimums by automating administrative overhead. 4) Disintermediation: Replaces trust-based functions of custodians and clearinghouses with self-executing smart contracts. This is not about cryptocurrency speculation. Major institutions like J.P. Morgan (Onyx), BlackRock (BUIDL), and Goldman Sachs are building the infrastructure, focusing on reliable asset management. Significant hurdles remain, including uncertain legal frameworks, lack of different blockchain platforms, and resistance from intermediaries protecting their revenue streams. Tokenization doesn't create a frictionless utopia but fundamentally reshapes the cost structure and efficiency of global financial infrastructure, representing its largest reorganization since the advent of electronic...

Author: Theo

Compiled by: Jiahuan, ChainCatcher

The core of tokenization lies in eliminating all friction.

Here is a statement that sounds mundane at first but is profound upon reflection: when you sell a stock today, you actually have to wait two business days to get the money. Not two seconds, not two minutes, but two full days.

This is called T+2 settlement. It is so commonplace, so thoroughly embedded in the architecture of modern finance, that most investors never stop to ask why.

<p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 16px; font-weight: inherit; word-break: break-all; line-height: 2; font-family: PingFang SC,Helvetica Neue,Helvetica,Arial,Hiragino Sans GB,Heiti SC,Microsoft YaHei,WenQu极速结算、7×24 小时全天候流动性、碎片化所有权以及金融中介的缓慢消亡:这些看似枯燥的基础设施变革,才是真正重塑市场的力量。</p> <p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 16px; font-weight极速结算、7×24 小时全天候流动性、碎片化所有权以及金融中介的缓慢消亡:这些看似枯燥的基础设施变革,才是真正重塑市场的力量。

This is the real significance of asset tokenization: not coins, not speculation, not NFT avatars, but a bet—a bet that the entire settlement and custody infrastructure of global finance can be rebuilt on programmable ledgers.

When that day comes, those two days of waiting, intermediary fees, qualified investor thresholds, and trading hour restrictions will seem as ancient and obsolete as fax machines.

So, what exactly is asset tokenization?

Layman's Definition: Think of a token as a digital deed. When you buy a tokenized share of a commercial property, your digital wallet receives a token representing your ownership share.

This token automatically records who owns it, when it changes hands, and under what conditions it can be transferred, all without a registrar updating a spreadsheet.

Unlike a paper deed or brokerage account record maintained by a third-party custodian, a blockchain-based token is by design self-custodied: the ownership record is maintained by the network itself, not by any single institution that could freeze, lose, or misrepresent it.

The underlying mechanisms vary; some tokenization projects use public blockchains like Ethereum, others use permissioned enterprise chains operated by consortia of banks.

<p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 16px; font-weight: inherit; word-break: break-all; line-height极速结算、7×24 小时全天候流动性、碎片化所有权以及金融中介的缓慢消亡:这些看似枯燥的基础设施变革,才是真正重塑市场的力量。</p> <h3 style="font-family: '极速结算、7×24 小时全天候流动性、碎片化所有权以及金融中介的缓慢消亡:这些看似枯燥的基础设施变革,才是真正重塑市场的力量。

Problem 1: Settlement Speed

The T+2 settlement window exists because it takes time to reconcile trades across multiple intermediaries (exchanges, clearing brokers, central securities depositories). Each institution maintains its own records; synchronizing these records requires a sequential handoff process.

On a blockchain, settlement is atomic. When a trade executes, the token moves from one wallet to another in the same transaction. There is no handoff, no reconciliation, and no window of counterparty risk.

Settlement happens in seconds, or in current implementations, under a minute for more complex trades. The US stock market moved from T+3 to T+2 in 2017 and to T+1 in 2024; the tokenized market skips all that and goes straight to near-instant settlement.

For institutional traders, the difference between T+1 and T+0 is not just speed, it's capital efficiency. Every day between trade execution and settlement is a day that capital is locked in a limbo state, unable to be redeployed.

"The two-day settlement window is accumulated institutional friction that has calcified into standard practice, and tokenization is the first credible solution to dismantle it."

<strong style="font-size: inherit; font-family: Ping极速结算、7×24 小时全天候流动性、碎片化所有权以及金融中介的缓慢消亡:这些看似枯燥的基础设施变革,才是真正重塑市场的力量。</p> <p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 16px; font-weight: inherit; word-break: break-all; line-height: 2; font-family: PingFang SC,Helvetica Neue,Helvetica,Arial,Hiragino Sans GB极速结算、7×24 小时全天候流动性、碎片极速结算、7×24 小时全天候流动性、碎片化所有权以及金融中介的缓慢消亡:这些看似枯燥的基础设施变革,才是真正重塑市场的力量。

Selling it requires finding a willing bidder, negotiating a price, hiring lawyers on both sides, conducting due diligence, and then waiting months for the closing. There is no exchange, no bid-ask spread, and if you desperately need $200,000 in cash on a Thursday, you can't just sell a small piece of the building.

This is not unique to real estate. Private equity, infrastructure assets, fine art, venture capital fund shares, litigation financing rights: vast pools of wealth are stuck in assets that trade extremely infrequently, are incredibly opaque, and are limited to large institutions with patience and resources.

Tokenization does not automatically make illiquid assets liquid. But it creates the infrastructure for secondary markets to exist.

If ownership of a building can be divided into tokens traded on a digital exchange, then a limited partner needing liquidity doesn't have to wait for a fund's redemption window or find a buyer for their entire stake. They can sell tokens. Not the whole asset, just slices of it. This changes the investment logic for every asset class historically burdened by an illiquidity premium.

The more experienced builders in this space have learned a deeper lesson: issuing the token is only half the job.

A tokenized asset without a secondary market, without a recognized collateral framework, and without integration into trading venues is functionally inert. It's a better proof of ownership, but not yet a better financial instrument.

A few platforms are now starting to treat liquidity as a day-one design requirement, not something to be left to develop organically post-launch. Theo, founded by former market makers from IMC Trading and Optiver, launched thBILL (an on-chain exposure investing in an institutional-grade US Treasury strategy managed by Wellington Management, in partnership with Standard Chartered's Libeara).

This product integrated market making, lending protocol support, and cross-chain deployment (covering Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, and HyperEVM) from the very inception. This token can be traded, used as collateral, or put to work directly in DeFi protocols without conversion.

This is a live demonstration of what it truly takes to solve the liquidity problem: not just issuance infrastructure, but a complete market structure that makes holding the tokenized asset worthwhile.

Problem 3: Fractional Ownership and Access Barriers

Most private credit funds have a minimum investment of $500,000. Many commercial real estate syndications have a minimum of $100,000.

Traditional Ownership vs. Tokenized Ownership

Smart contracts eliminate most of the administrative overhead. Dividend distributions can be programmed to execute automatically when conditions are met, without manual processing or custody fees. Ownership records update in real-time. Investor communication can happen on-chain.

The regulatory environment here is indeed very complex: securities laws in most jurisdictions still require accredited investor status for certain investments, and tokenization does not change these rules.

What it changes is: the economic feasibility of serving a broader investor base once regulations permit, or in the growing asset classes where regulations already do.

<strong style="font-size: inherit; font-family: PingFang SC,Helvetica Neue,Helvetica极速结算、7×24 小时全天候流动性、碎片化所有权以及金融中介的缓慢消亡:这些看似枯燥的基础设施变革,才是真正重塑市场的力量。</p> <p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 16px; font-weight: inherit; word-break: break-all极速结算、7×24 小时全天候流动性、碎片化所有权以及金融中介的缓慢消亡:这些看似枯燥的基础设施变革,才是真正重塑市场的力量。

Every intermediary present in a financial transaction exists to solve a trust problem. Escrow agents ensure no one runs off with the money during a property closing. Clearing houses guarantee you still receive your securities if your counterparty defaults. Custodians hold assets for clients who cannot be trusted to self-custody safely.

Smart contract replaces trust with code. A tokenized bond can be programmed to automatically pay coupons to token holders on specific dates, release collateral upon loan repayment, and execute early redemptions if certain conditions are triggered.

<p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 16px; font-weight: inherit; word-break: break-all; line-height极速结算、7×极速结算、7×24 小时全天候流动性、碎片化所有权以及金融中介的缓慢消亡:这些看似枯燥的基础设施变革,才是真正重塑市场的力量。</p> <ol> <li> <p><strong style="font-size: inherit; font-family: PingFang SC,Helvetica Neue,Helvetica,Arial,Hiragino Sans GB,Heiti SC,Microsoft YaHei,Wen极速结算、7×24 小时全天候流动性、碎片化所有权以及金融中介的缓慢消亡:这些看似枯燥的基础设施变革,才是真正重塑市场的力量。

  • Terms are Programmed into the Contract Payment schedules, transfer restrictions, redemption conditions, and governance rights are embedded in the code, self-executing without human intermediaries.

  • Tokens Trade on Secondary Market Token holders can sell their positions on exchanges built for tokenized assets, with settlement in seconds and no clearing intermediary.

  • Cash Flows are Automatically Distributed Rental income, coupon payments, and other distributions go directly into token holders' wallets upon triggering, without paying agents, float, or processing delays.

  • Why This Has Nothing to Do with Cryptocurrency

    It is understandable to conflate tokenization with cryptocurrency speculation, but it is almost entirely unhelpful. Yes, tokenization uses blockchain technology. Yes, the same ledger infrastructure underpins Bitcoin. But the similarity ends there.

    Bitcoin and its speculative derivatives derive their value from scarcity and narrative. Tokenized real estate, bonds, and private equity are representations of assets whose value derives from income, cash flow, and physical operations. Tokenization is a new layer of ownership and settlement for existing asset classes.

    The institutions building tokenization infrastructure include J.P. Morgan, BlackRock, Franklin Templeton, Goldman Sachs, and HSBC—institutions whose entire business models rely on managing real assets for real clients.

    "The institutions building tokenization infrastructure are companies like BlackRock, Franklin Templeton, and J.P. Morgan, whose survival depends on managing core assets with extreme reliability."</极速结算、7×24 小时全天候流动性、碎片化所有权以及金融中介的缓慢消亡:这些看似枯燥的基础设施变革,才是真正重塑市场的力量。

    It would be dishonest to portray tokenization as an absolute inevitability. There are structural hurdles that will slow its adoption, and these hurdles have nothing to do with the technology itself.

    The legal framework in most jurisdictions still defines asset ownership in terms of paper records, registered agents, and custodial accounts. A token on a blockchain has no automatic legal standing; it requires explicit regulatory recognition, which varies wildly between countries and asset classes.

    Some governments are acting. The EU's DLT Pilot Regime and the UK's proposed Property (Digital Assets etc.) Bill are early examples. But legal certainty for tokenized assets remains patchwork.

    Interoperability between different blockchain platforms is another unresolved issue. A tokenized bond issued on J.P. Morgan's Onyx chain cannot automatically settle with a tokenized fund share issued on Ethereum without a cross-chain bridge, which reintroduces another form of counterparty risk.

    Ironically, the proliferation of numerous competing settlement networks is recreating the very problem of "siloed institutional databases" that tokenization was meant to solve.

    Finally, there is the issue of vested interests. The intermediaries being displaced are not passive bystanders. Custodians, clearing houses, and transfer agents provide significant fee income to the very institutions also trying to build tokenization platforms. These incumbent groups have every incentive to adopt the technology slowly and in ways that protect their existing revenue streams.

    What is Changing, What is Not

    <p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 16px; font-weight: inherit; word-break: break-all; line-height: 2; font-family: PingFang SC,Helvetica Neue,Helvetica,Arial极速结算、7×24 小时全天候流动性、碎片化所有权以及金融中介的缓慢消亡:这些看似枯燥的基础设施变革,才是真正重塑市场的力量。</p> <p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 16px; font-weight: inherit; word-break: break-all; line-height: 2; font-family: PingFang SC,Helvetica Neue,Helvetica,Arial,Hiragino Sans GB,Heiti SC,Microsoft极速结算、7×24 小时全天候流动性、碎片化所有权以及金融中介的缓慢消亡:这些看似枯燥的基础设施变革,才是真正重塑市场的极速结算、7×24 小时全天候流动性、碎片化所有权以及金融中介的缓慢消亡:这些看似枯燥的基础设施变革,才是真正重塑市场的力量。

    Fractional ownership does not automatically create deep liquidity: a thousand small散户 of a tokenized building still cannot force an asset sale, and the market for the tokens will remain thin unless market makers are actively involved.

    <p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 16px; font-weight: inherit; word-break: break-all; line-height: 2; font-family: PingFang SC,Helvetica Neue,Helvetica,Arial,Hiragino Sans GB,Heiti SC,Microsoft YaHei,WenQuan极速结算、7×24 小时全天候流动性、碎片化所有权以及金融中介的缓慢消亡:这些看似枯燥的基础设施变革,才是真正重塑市场的力量。</p> <p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 16px; font-weight: inherit; word-break: break-all; line极速结算、7×24 小时全天候流动性、碎片化所有权以及金融中介的缓慢消亡:这些看似枯燥的基础设施变革,才是真正重塑市场的力量。

    The T+2 window compresses relentlessly towards zero. The minimum viable investment for illiquid asset classes is falling. The per-transaction cost of processing a payment or recording an ownership transfer becomes closer to the cost of a database write, not the cost of a human-operated administrative task.

    None of these changes are dramatic in isolation. But when stacked on top of all the assets currently locked in slow, expensive, heavily intermediated structures, it constitutes the largest reorganization of financial infrastructure since electronic trading replaced open outcry.

    This is a story about infrastructure. Your investment thesis, your regulatory questions, your timeline predictions depend entirely on whether you truly understand this. And right now, most people watching tokenization still don't see it.

    Criptos en tendencia

    Preguntas relacionadas

    QWhat is the core purpose of tokenization according to the article?

    AThe core purpose of tokenization is to eliminate friction in the financial system, specifically by enabling near-instant settlement, providing 24/7 liquidity, enabling fractional ownership, and removing the need for slow financial intermediaries.

    QWhat problem does the T+2 settlement cycle in traditional finance highlight, and how does tokenization solve it?

    AThe T+2 settlement cycle highlights the institutional friction and inefficiency caused by a chain of custodians, clearinghouses, and counterparty reconciliation systems. Tokenization solves this with atomic settlement on a blockchain, where asset transfers and payment occur simultaneously in a single transaction within seconds, eliminating the waiting period and counterparty risk.

    QHow does tokenization address the issue of illiquidity in assets like commercial real estate?

    ATokenization creates the infrastructure for secondary markets by representing ownership of an illiquid asset as digital tokens. These tokens can be fractionally owned and traded on digital exchanges, allowing investors to sell slices of the asset instead of the whole thing, which was previously impractical. However, the article notes that liquidity is not just issuance but requires a full market structure with market makers and integration into trading venues.

    QWhy is tokenization not primarily about cryptocurrency speculation, and which institutions are leading its development?

    ATokenization is not about cryptocurrency speculation because its value is derived from the income, cash flow, and physical operations of real-world assets (like real estate, bonds, private equity), not from scarcity or narrative. It is a new ownership and settlement layer for existing asset classes. Leading institutions building this infrastructure include J.P. Morgan (Onyx), BlackRock (BUIDL), Franklin Templeton, Goldman Sachs, and HSBC.

    QWhat are some of the major real-world obstacles to the widespread adoption of tokenization mentioned in the article?

    AMajor obstacles include: 1) Legal and regulatory frameworks in most jurisdictions that are based on paper records and custodial accounts, requiring explicit regulatory recognition for blockchain tokens. 2) A lack of interoperability between different blockchain platforms, which recreates the problem of siloed databases. 3) Resistance from existing financial intermediaries (custodians, clearinghouses) whose fee-based revenue models are threatened by this disintermediating technology.

    Lecturas Relacionadas

    Tras tres trimestres consecutivos de caída, ¿puede el mercado cripto encontrar una ventana de estabilización en el tercer trimestre?

    El mercado cripto sufrió su peor trimestre desde 2022, con una caída del 12.6% en la capitalización total (ahora en $2.1 billones). El volumen de operaciones y el valor de las stablecoins también disminuyeron, señalando una salida generalizada de capitales. Bitcoin y Ethereum cayeron un 14.2% y 25.4% respectivamente, rompiendo su correlación con los mercados de riesgo tradicionales. Los ETFs de Bitcoin en EE.UU. registraron importantes salidas netas ($4.67 mil millones en Q2), aunque datos sugieren que el ciclo de ventas podría estar cerca de su fin. La atención del mercado se centra ahora en la reunión de la FED a finales de julio, cuya postura (halcón o paloma) podría definir el rango de trading de Bitcoin para el trimestre. El avance de la ley CLARITY en el Senado estadounidense se ha estancado, reduciendo la probabilidad de aprobación en 2026 y manteniendo una prima de riesgo regulatorio alta. Solo dos sectores mostraron crecimiento: los mercados de predicción (volumen +48.7%) y los coleccionables tokenizados (volumen +143% vs. Q1). El sentimiento general es de cautela. La lógica del mercado ha cambiado, priorizando fundamentos como la política monetaria y la regulación frente a los simples impulsos narrativos. Aunque las bases para una caída extrema parecen limitadas, la recuperación sostenida en Q3 depende críticamente de la FED y de un posible progreso regulatorio.

    marsbitHace 6 hora(s)

    Tras tres trimestres consecutivos de caída, ¿puede el mercado cripto encontrar una ventana de estabilización en el tercer trimestre?

    marsbitHace 6 hora(s)

    BIT Trading Moments: BTC aún presionado por la EMA 200 semanal, tras el rechazo podría reiniciar la caída, los valores de almacenamiento y semiconductores que subieron fuertemente anoche comenzaron a caer en la sesión nocturna

    **BIT Trading Moments: BTC aún presionado por la EMA 200 semanal; almacenamiento y semiconductores caen en el after-hours** El mercado de cripto continúa su recuperación, con **Bitcoin** manteniéndose cerca de los $66,000. Enfrenta una fuerte resistencia en la zona de los $68,000, nivel que coincide con el costo promedio de los inversores en los últimos cinco meses y un punto de fallo anterior. Los analistas señalan que se encuentra atrapado entre la media móvil simple (MA) de 200 semanas (~$63,333) y la media exponencial (EMA) de 200 semanas (~$68,328). Se necesitaría un cierre semanal por debajo de $55,000 o por encima de $70,000 para confirmar una dirección de mayor alcance. Los ETF de Bitcoin registran entradas netas por sexto día consecutivo. En Wall Street, los **futuros de los principales índices** caen. Después de fuertes ganancias el martes, las acciones de **semiconductores y almacenamiento** retroceden en el after-hours: el ETF de semiconductores cae un 2.22%, Micron un 2.29% y SK Hynix casi un 5%. Sin embargo, **Super Micro Computer (SMCI)** se dispara más de un 20% tras el cierre, impulsada por sólidos pedidos. Otras noticias positivas incluyen un contrato de $266M de la Fuerza Aérea para **Rocket Lab**. A pesar del repunte bursátil, factores como el **crudo Brent por encima de $91** y el **rendimiento del bono estadounidense a 10 años subiendo a ~4.64%** generan preocupaciones inflacionarias y enfrían el optimismo. Las acciones relacionadas con cripto, como Coinbase y Robinhood, tuvieron un buen desempeño apoyadas por avances regulatorios. En Asia, los mercados siguieron la recuperación tecnológica. El **índice KOSPI de Corea del Sur** subió un 0.74%, con acciones de semiconductores mostrando volatilidad. El principal riesgo es el **yen japonés**, que tocó su nivel más bajo desde 1986, lo que genera temores a una intervención del gobierno. **Próximos eventos clave:** Este miércoles 22 de julio, el enfoque está en los eventos de **AMD AI** y los resultados financieros de **Alphabet (Google), Tesla e IBM** después del cierre. El jueves 23, la **decisión de tasas del BCE** y los resultados de **Intel** serán cruciales para el sentimiento del mercado.

    marsbitHace 6 hora(s)

    BIT Trading Moments: BTC aún presionado por la EMA 200 semanal, tras el rechazo podría reiniciar la caída, los valores de almacenamiento y semiconductores que subieron fuertemente anoche comenzaron a caer en la sesión nocturna

    marsbitHace 6 hora(s)

    Trading

    Spot

    Artículos destacados

    Cómo comprar ONE

    ¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Harmony (ONE) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Harmony (ONE) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Harmony (ONE)Después de comprar tu Harmony (ONE), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Harmony (ONE)Tradear fácilmente con Harmony (ONE) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

    588 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.12Actualizado en 2026.06.02

    Cómo comprar ONE

    Discusiones

    Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de ONE (ONE).

    活动图片