Telegram Takes Direct Control of TON, Social Traffic Rewrites the Public Chain Narrative

marsbitPublicado a 2026-05-11Actualizado a 2026-05-11

Resumen

Telegram founder Pavel Durov announced that Telegram will replace the TON Foundation as the core driver and largest validator of The Open Network (TON). Key initiatives include a sixfold reduction in transaction fees, performance upgrades, and improved developer tools within the next few weeks. This marks a strategic shift from Telegram merely providing user access to deeply integrating TON into its platform's core infrastructure. The goal is to transform Telegram's massive social traffic into sustainable on-chain activity. While viral mini-apps like Notcoin have demonstrated Telegram's ability to drive user adoption, TON aims to support frequent, low-value transactions inherent to social platforms—such as tipping, in-app payments, and game rewards. Ultra-low fees and sub-second finality (0.6 seconds) are crucial to making blockchain interactions seamless and nearly invisible within the Telegram user experience. However, Telegram's increased central role raises questions about network decentralization. Durov argues that Telegram's participation will attract more large validators, thereby enhancing decentralization. TON also offers high annual staking rewards (18.8%), aiming to retain capital within its ecosystem. The fundamental challenge for TON is no longer leveraging Telegram's user base, but becoming an indispensable, seamless infrastructure layer for Telegram's everyday applications—moving from an adjacent chain to an embedded utility.

Author | Asher(@Asher_ 0210)

On May 4th, Telegram founder Pavel Durov announced on platform X that TON network transaction fees have been reduced by 6 times, nearing zero. More crucially, he stated that Telegram will replace the TON Foundation, becoming the new core driving force of the TON network and its largest validator. TON's focus will now shift to technological advantages, including a new ton.org, new developer tools, and performance upgrades, with a timeframe of the next 2 to 3 weeks.

Telegram Founder: TON Fees Reduced by 6x, Telegram to Become Largest Validator

In the past, the relationship between TON and Telegram was more like a strong binding with weak leadership. Telegram provided the gateway, while the Foundation and community were responsible for advancement, with a layer of distance always between them. But this time, Telegram isn't just continuing to bring users to TON; it's beginning to enter more foundational positions such as validator, technical roadmap, and development tools. TON is no longer just a chain adjacent to the Telegram ecosystem but is being reintegrated into Telegram's product system.

TON Doesn't Lack a Gateway; It Lacks Turning the Gateway into Use Cases

Past market discussions about TON often revolved around Telegram's user scale. But for a public chain, having a gateway doesn't equal having an ecosystem, and having user reach doesn't equal having long-term usage. TON's unique aspect is its inherent attachment to a high-frequency social platform, where Mini Apps, wallets, channels, bots, games, and payments already exist within Telegram. This allows TON to avoid having to find users from scratch like most Layer1s. However, if these scenarios cannot solidify into sustained on-chain interactions, Telegram's traffic can only bring waves of short-term hype.

Projects like Notcoin and Dogs have proven that Telegram can quickly generate viral spreads. Simple gameplay combined with social relationship chains can indeed attract a large number of users into crypto applications in a short time. But such explosions come and go quickly. TG mini-games and airdrops can bring attention but can hardly alone sustain a long-term ecosystem.

Therefore, the fee reduction, speed increase, developer tools, and validator role emphasized by Pavel Durov this time point not to a single technological upgrade, but to TON addressing its most critical missing link—transforming Telegram's gateway into sustainable use cases. Only when fees are low enough, confirmation speeds are fast enough, and developer integration is simple enough can scenarios like channel tipping, Mini Apps tasks, game rewards, creator revenue, ad revenue sharing, bot calls, and group micropayments potentially evolve from product features into on-chain activities.

TON no longer needs to repeat the story of "backed by Telegram." What it truly needs to prove is whether the high-frequency behaviors within Telegram can be effectively borne by TON.

Fee Reduction and Speed Increase Aim to Enable Smaller, Higher-Frequency Transactions

The fee reduction by TON this time shouldn't be understood merely as cost optimization typical of public chains. Viewed within the context of Telegram, it actually solves the problem of whether small-amount, high-frequency interactions can become viable.

Most potential on-chain behaviors within Telegram are not large transfers but more fragmented daily operations. Individual transaction amounts are low, but occurrence frequency is high. If users have to perceive fees, wait for confirmations, and repeatedly handle wallet interactions with every button click, these scenarios can hardly truly take off.

Therefore, fee reduction and speed increase must be considered together. Fees approaching zero lower the usage barrier; reducing finality time to 0.6 seconds lowers the perception of waiting. For Telegram, the chain shouldn't become an extra layer perceived by users but should be hidden as much as possible behind product actions like sending messages, clicking buttons, and viewing balance changes.

Comparison of "Finality Time" Among Mainstream Public Chains

This also distinguishes TON from many other Layer1s. Its goal isn't solely to make DeFi trades faster or transfers cheaper; it aims to embed the chain into Telegram's daily use. Only when cost, waiting time, and wallet operations are minimized enough can TON potentially evolve from a Telegram-related public chain into the underlying network directly invoked by Telegram's application layer.

From Gateway to Validator, Telegram Begins Penetrating TON's Core

Telegram becoming TON's largest validator is the most significant step in this change. It means Telegram is no longer just providing TON with a gateway and brand endorsement but is entering the network's security and operational mechanisms. Previously, TON was driven by the Foundation and community, which offered greater openness but a relatively decentralized pace. Now, with Telegram directly involved, its products, wallet, Mini Apps, payments, and developer tools have the opportunity to be realigned.

Efficiency may increase, but controversy will also grow. Telegram replacing the TON Foundation as the main driving force and becoming the largest validator will inevitably lead to renewed external discussions about TON's centralization risks. In response, Pavel Durov stated that Telegram's participation would attract more large-scale participants into the validator pool, thereby enhancing decentralization. This logic is not without merit, but the final judgment will depend on results, not statements.

The truly important aspects going forward are whether the validator structure can become more diverse, whether governance information is sufficiently transparent, whether the Foundation and community retain independent space, and whether ecosystem projects can continue developing without relying on Telegram's will.

Therefore, Telegram's return is not a simple positive but a trade-off. For TON to enter the mainstream application layer, it needs Telegram's strong execution capabilities; but the more prominent Telegram's role, the more TON needs to prove it is not merely an internal settlement chain serving Telegram.

High Staking Rewards Retain More Tokens for TON

Pavel Durov subsequently emphasized that TON ranks first in annual staking rewards among the top 50 cryptocurrencies by market cap, with a high rate of 18.8%. Compared to fee reduction and speed increase, high staking rewards are more likely to mobilize capital sentiment and provide TON with another layer of holding rationale in the market's eyes.

TON Annual Staking Rewards Rank First Among Top 50 Cryptocurrencies

This also makes TON's narrative somewhat more complete. It's not just relying on Telegram's user gateway to attract attention or improving experience through technical upgrades; it's also using staking rewards to keep capital within its ecosystem. The simultaneous presence of gateway, performance, validators, and rewards makes this change more substantial than a single positive factor.

Of course, high yield itself is not the end goal; it's more like buying TON a longer observation period. As long as subsequent developer tools and performance upgrades are delivered, and more capital is locked into the network, a positive feedback loop with real usage may form. For TON, the value of staking rewards isn't just about increasing holding returns but making the market willing to continue waiting for it to truly convert Telegram's gateway advantage.

TON's Return to Telegram Is Not the Finish Line, But a Tougher Challenge

The key for TON going forward is not to continue leveraging Telegram for traffic, but to truly become part of Telegram's application ecosystem. If Telegram's chat, payments, applications, creator economy, and automated interactions are gradually undertaken by TON, then TON's competitors will not just be other Layer1s, but all networks attempting to become the next-generation application infrastructure.

TON isn't just repeating the social traffic story; it's beginning to attempt to turn social traffic into on-chain order. The gateway is just the beginning; usage is the answer. Telegram can push TON to the forefront, but whether it stays there ultimately depends on whether TON can become the layer of infrastructure that operates behind user perception, within the functioning of applications.

If the past TON was still proving how close it is to Telegram, now it must prove how deeply integrated it can be within Telegram's daily use. True mainstream adoption isn't about making users aware they are using a chain, but about making the chain part of the application experience.

TON's opportunity lies here, and so does its pressure.

Preguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the article, what is the new role that Telegram will assume in the TON network, as announced by Pavel Durov?

ATelegram will become the new core driver of the TON network, replacing the TON Foundation. It will also become the network's largest validator.

QWhat is identified as the key challenge TON needs to overcome, beyond just having access to Telegram's large user base?

ATON needs to transform its access and user reach into sustainable, long-term usage scenarios. It must convert Telegram's high-frequency social interactions into persistent on-chain activities.

QWhy are the reductions in transaction fees and improvements in speed particularly important for TON within the Telegram context?

ALow fees (approaching zero) and fast finality (0.6 seconds) are crucial to enable the small, frequent, and fragmented transactions typical of Telegram's daily use cases. They lower the barrier and reduce user friction, allowing the blockchain to operate seamlessly in the background of the app experience.

QWhat potential downside or concern is raised regarding Telegram becoming the core driver and largest validator of TON?

AThe move raises concerns about increased centralization risk and questions regarding the future independence of the TON Foundation and community projects. It represents a trade-off between stronger execution from Telegram and the need for TON to maintain network decentralization.

QHow does the article frame the high annual staking reward offered by TON, and what purpose does it serve?

AThe high staking reward (18.8% annually, ranked first among top 50 cryptocurrencies) is seen as a mechanism to attract and lock in capital within the TON ecosystem. It provides an additional incentive for holding TON and buys time for the network to realize its potential in converting Telegram's user base into active usage.

Lecturas Relacionadas

El precio real de la estrategia obligada a "acumular" dólares

Strategy (antigua MicroStrategy) ha aumentado drásticamente sus reservas en dólares a 46.5 mil millones, mientras vendía casi 7000 BTC desde junio de 2026. Este movimiento contrasta con su identidad centrada en Bitcoin y plantea dudas sobre su estrategia. La razón principal es su modelo de negocio único: funciona como una plataforma de crédito digital, emitiendo valores preferentes (STRC) con dividendos fijos en dólares respaldados por su gran balance en Bitcoin. Para mejorar su calificación crediticia (B- de S&P) y sostener estas emisiones, necesita mostrar solidez en dólares, ya que las agencias de calificación descuentan el valor del BTC por su volatilidad. Esto tiene un costo significativo. Reservar dólares para cubrir dividendos reduce el capital disponible para comprar Bitcoin, elevando la tasa de rendimiento requerida para que las inversiones restantes en BTC sean rentables. Aunque la liquidez en efectivo ofrece ventajas, como evitar ventas forzadas de BTC en caídas o recomprar valores preferentes con descuento, impone una "carga estructural" al rendimiento. Para la mayoría de las empresas relacionadas con Bitcoin, acumular grandes reservas en dólares no es necesario ni óptimo. Sus necesidades de efectivo deben derivar estrictamente de sus operaciones comerciales reales y un colchón de liquidez prudente. El capital excedente generalmente se destina mejor a comprar más Bitcoin, pagar deudas costosas o recomprar acciones, en lugar de mantenerlo en efectivo donde sufre erosión inflacionaria. En conclusión, la estrategia de Strategy es un caso extremo, impulsado por su estructura de crédito específica y el sesgo de las agencias de calificación. Otras empresas no deberían imitarla sin una razón comercial sólida, ya que mantener dólares en exceso significa perder la revalorización potencial del Bitcoin.

marsbitHace 4 min(s)

El precio real de la estrategia obligada a "acumular" dólares

marsbitHace 4 min(s)

Mercado de EE.UU.: Tendencias del 13 de agosto: El IPC cumple expectativas, Nasdaq lidera las ganancias, Coherent supera estimaciones pero retrocede en extended

**Tendencias del mercado estadounidense (13 de agosto): El IPC cumple expectativas y el Nasdaq lidera las ganancias, Coherent cae en posmercado pese a superar previsiones** Los principales índices de EE.UU. cerraron mixtos. El IPC de julio cumplió con todas las expectativas del mercado (inflación general anual del 3.4%, núcleo anual del 2.5%), manteniendo la probabilidad de una subida de tasas en septiembre en torno al 45%. El S&P 500 subió un 0.26%, acercándose a máximos históricos, y el Nasdaq ganó un 0.54%, mientras que el Dow Jones cayó ligeramente un 0.04%. Tras el dato del IPC, el capital fluyó hacia el sector de la IA. Los servicios en la nube de IA (Nebius +34%, CoreWeave +19%), las comunicaciones ópticas y los chips de memoria (SK Hynix +9%) registraron fuertes subidas. Sin embargo, la temporada de resultados después del cierre reveló una realidad más dura. Coherent superó las previsiones de ingresos y beneficios, pero sus acciones cayeron más del 8% en posmercado, lo que sugiere que el mercado ahora exige un crecimiento continuo que supere las expectativas. Cerebras cayó más del 17% tras reportar ventas de hardware inesperadamente más débiles. Cisco, pese a anunciar pedidos de IA por 40 mil millones de dólares, dio un vuelco y cayó más del 6% en posmercado, reflejando preocupaciones sobre la sostenibilidad y las elevadas valoraciones. El oro extendió sus ganancias por tercer día, superando los 4.412 dólares por onza. El petróleo cerró al alza y el Bitcoin se recuperó por encima de los 64.250 dólares tras el dato del IPC. El enfoque del jueves estará en la digestión de estos resultados y en los datos de ventas minoristas de EE.UU., que podrían influir en la confianza sobre un "aterrizaje suave" de la economía.

marsbitHace 25 min(s)

Mercado de EE.UU.: Tendencias del 13 de agosto: El IPC cumple expectativas, Nasdaq lidera las ganancias, Coherent supera estimaciones pero retrocede en extended

marsbitHace 25 min(s)

Bitwise ha cerrado 8 ETFs y reducido un 14% su plantilla, pero sigue lanzando nuevos productos

El gestor de activos cripto Bitwise ha reducido su plantilla en aproximadamente un 14%, pasando de 180 a 155 empleados, según confirmó la empresa. Este recorte se produce en un contexto en el que varias empresas del sector, como Coinbase y BitGo, también han anunciado despidos en 2024. Paralelamente, Bitwise ha procedido a la liquidación de ocho ETFs en un periodo de unos tres meses. Estos productos incluían fondos temáticos de Web3, estrategias de rotación entre criptomonedas y bonos del Tesoro, y ETFs de renta por opciones vinculadas a activos únicos. La empresa no ha especificado las razones exactas detrás de estas liquidaciones, que reducen el número de productos a gestionar. A pesar de estos ajustes, la compañía continúa lanzando nuevos productos. Recientemente ha introducido un ETP con staking de Avalanche en Europa, el ETF Hyperliquid, y ha asumido la gestión del "Crypto Carry Fund" de Superstate, un fondo tokenizado con más de 267 millones de dólares en activos. El CEO, Hunter Horsley, afirmó que el equipo ajustado sigue siendo el más grande en la historia de la empresa y expresó su confianza en el crecimiento a largo plazo a medida que los activos cripto se integran en la economía global. La combinación de recortes de personal, salida de productos establecidos y lanzamiento de nuevos fondos en áreas como el staking y la tokenización refleja un reenfoque estratégico por parte de Bitwise en un mercado volátil.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Bitwise ha cerrado 8 ETFs y reducido un 14% su plantilla, pero sigue lanzando nuevos productos

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

CoreWeave: ¿Ha llegado el punto de inflexión? ¿Finalmente el 'trabajador explotado' puede generar ganancias?

CoreWeave, el unicornio de la nube de IA, publicó sus resultados del segundo trimestre de 2026, con un aumento de aproximadamente el 15% en el precio de sus acciones. Los ingresos totales fueron de casi 2.580 millones de dólares, un aumento del 112% interanual, en línea con las expectativas del mercado. El principal factor positivo fue la aceleración en el despliegue de capacidad de computación (Active Power), que alcanzó los 1.500 MW, con un incremento neto récord de 500 MW en el trimestre, superando ampliamente las expectativas. Esto señala una futura aceleración en la generación de ingresos. Los márgenes de beneficio mostraron signos de un punto de inflexión. El margen bruto "real" (después de costos e infraestructura) subió al 7,3%, 3 puntos porcentuales más que el mínimo del trimestre anterior. El margen operativo ajustado mejoró significativamente al 5%, frente al 1% del trimestre anterior, impulsado por economías de escala y un mejor control de gastos. La guía para el próximo trimestre apunta a una mayor aceleración del crecimiento de los ingresos (158% interanual) y una mejora continua de la rentabilidad (margen operativo ajustado del 6,5%). Para todo 2026, la compañía elevó su previsión, esperando que el margen operativo ajustado alcance alrededor del 14,6% en el cuarto trimestre. Factores recientes como un aumento de precios del 25% en sus servicios y el lanzamiento de nuevos servicios de inferencia gestionada (TaaS) deberían apoyar aún más la mejora de la rentabilidad. Aunque las perspectivas a largo plazo en un mercado competitivo son inciertas, la tendencia actual de aceleración en el crecimiento y la rentabilidad, junto con un renovado optimismo del mercado hacia el sector cloud, presenta una oportunidad de alto potencial a medio plazo para este activo de alta beta.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

CoreWeave: ¿Ha llegado el punto de inflexión? ¿Finalmente el 'trabajador explotado' puede generar ganancias?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片