Middle East Conflict Rekindles Rate Hike Expectations, Gold Suffers Worst Sell-off in 43 Years

marsbitPublicado a 2026-03-23Actualizado a 2026-03-23

Resumen

Gold suffered its worst weekly decline in 43 years, with spot prices falling for eight consecutive sessions—the longest losing streak since October 2023. Silver also plunged over 15%, while platinum and palladium followed lower. The sell-off was triggered by escalating Middle East conflicts, which drove up oil prices and reinforced expectations of Federal Reserve rate hikes rather than cuts. Market bets on a Fed hike by October rose to 50%, reducing the appeal of non-yielding gold amid higher real rate prospects. Technical indicators worsened, with RSI falling below 30, triggering stop-losses and self-reinforcing selling. Gold ETFs saw outflows for three straight weeks, losing over 60 tons. The situation echoes the 1983 crash when OPEC nations sold gold reserves to raise cash amid an oil price collapse. Despite a 4% year-to-date gain, macro conditions have deteriorated. Rising energy prices may reduce global GDP by 0.3% and lift inflation by 0.5-0.6%, increasing stagflation risks. Gold’s future trajectory hinges on real rates and geopolitical developments—further rate hike expectations could sustain pressure, while any de-escalation may revive safe-haven demand.

Gold recorded its worst weekly decline in 43 years this week, with historical echoes sending chills through the market.

This week, gold posted its largest weekly drop since March 1983, with the spot price falling for eight consecutive days, marking the longest losing streak since October 2023. Meanwhile, silver fell more than 15% this week, with palladium and platinum also moving lower.

The trigger for this sharp decline was the escalating Middle East conflict, which pushed up energy prices and, in turn, suppressed expectations for interest rate cuts. Market bets on a Federal Reserve rate hike have risen to 50%, fueling this wave of selling in precious metals.

More alarmingly for the market, the current situation bears a striking resemblance to the historic crash in March 1983, which was triggered by massive gold sales by Middle Eastern oil producers—back then, OPEC members, facing plummeting oil revenues, were forced to sell their gold reserves for cash, causing the gold price to plunge over a hundred dollars in a matter of days.

It is worth noting that, according to historical data, this week's decline in gold is the most severe since that "sell-gold-for-cash" storm 43 years ago.

Rate Cut Expectations Unravel, Gold's Safe-Haven Logic Fails

Since the US and Israel launched attacks on Iran last month, gold has been declining for several weeks, a stark contrast to its traditional role as a "safe-haven asset."

The reason is that the war brings not expectations of easing but inflationary pressures. Currently, the market's prediction of the Fed's policy path has undergone a fundamental reversal.

Traders are now pricing in a 50% probability of a Fed rate hike by October. Soaring energy prices are boosting inflation expectations, and gold, as a non-yielding asset, becomes significantly less attractive in an environment of rising real interest rates.

At the same time, there are signs of tightening US dollar liquidity. Cross-currency basis swaps began to widen noticeably this week, indicating a degree of dollar funding pressure.

This phenomenon may explain the deeper logic behind the gold sell-off—when dollar liquidity tightens, gold is often one of the first assets investors liquidate.

It is noteworthy that the most severe declines in the metals market this week were concentrated during Asian and European trading hours, consistent with the pattern of dollar shortage pressures first appearing in offshore markets.

Technical Stop-Losses Triggered, Selling Becomes Self-Reinforcing

Amid the sustained decline, gold's technical indicators have deteriorated significantly, with the 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) falling below 30, entering a zone some traders consider oversold.

Rhona O'Connell, an analyst at StoneX Financial, pointed out that this gold correction is the result of profit-taking and liquidity liquidation. She stated that the price above $5,200 had attracted substantial buying, making the market积累相当的回调脆弱性 (accumulated considerable vulnerability to a correction).

Once prices started to fall, a large number of investors' stop-loss orders were automatically triggered, rapidly forming a self-reinforcing spiral of selling. Technical signals like moving averages further exacerbated the downward pressure.

Meanwhile, passive selling triggered by falling stock markets also spilled over into gold.

O'Connell noted that forced liquidations related to equity assets may have dragged down gold prices, while slowing central bank gold purchases and continued outflows from gold ETFs further dampened market sentiment. According to Bloomberg data, gold ETFs have seen net outflows for three consecutive weeks, with combined holdings dropping by more than 60 tonnes over those three weeks.

The Ghost of the 1983 Middle East "Sell-Gold-for-Cash"

The current situation reminds market participants of the oil crisis-induced gold crash 43 years ago.

Historical data shows that around February 21, 1983, British and Norwegian oil producers led price cuts, putting pressure on OPEC to follow suit, abruptly intensifying the global oil market's oversupply. Facing a sharp contraction in oil revenues, Middle Eastern oil producers (mainly OPEC members) were forced to sell their gold reserves on a large scale to raise cash, triggering a gold price crash.

Reporting from The New York Times at the time corroborates this. According to a March 1, 1983, New York Times report, traders explicitly stated that sales by Middle Eastern oil producers were the direct trigger for the gold price plunge and warned that if oil revenues fell further, these Arab countries might sell more gold. At that time, the gold price plunged more than $105 from its high in less than a week, with the largest single-day drop reaching $42.50, the worst in nearly three years.

According to the New York Times report at the time, the proceeds from the Middle Eastern sales immediately flowed into Eurodollars and other short-term investment vehicles, causing short-term interest rates to soften, which in turn sent a warning signal to the global gold market. Since February 21 coincided with the US Presidents' Day holiday, with New York markets closed, the full impact wasn't felt until the following week, subsequently triggering chain-reaction forced liquidations that also affected commodity markets like copper, grains, soybeans, and sugar.

ZeroHedge pointed out that the 1983 gold crash marked the entry of the oil market into a bear market cycle that lasted for years—OPEC discipline frayed, market share was continuously lost, and oil prices remained under pressure throughout the 1980s.

Stagflation Clouds Loom, Can Gold Prices Stabilize?

Despite this week's heavy losses, gold is still up about 4% year-to-date. The price hit a record high of nearly $5,600 per ounce in late January, supported then by investor enthusiasm, central bank buying sprees, and market concerns about Trump interfering with Fed independence.

However, the current macroeconomic environment has significantly deteriorated. According to a Bloomberg report, Goldman Sachs economist Joseph Briggs expects that rising energy prices will drag global GDP down by 0.3 percentage points over the next year and push overall inflation up by 0.5 to 0.6 percentage points. Rising stagflation risks are severely compressing central banks' policy space.

Goldman Sachs analyst Chris Hussey noted that the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz has entered its fourth week, and hopes for a quick resolution of the conflict are fading. If the conflict continues, the longer oil prices remain high, the harder it becomes for the "look-through the short-term pain" narrative in stock and bond markets to hold, and the vulnerability of global assets will be further exposed.

For gold, the path of real interest rates will be a key variable. If the conflict drags on, inflation expectations continue to heat up, and the Fed's rate hike path becomes clearer, pressure on gold may persist; whereas, once signals of a easing in geopolitical tensions emerge, whether suppressed safe-haven demand can be released again remains the market's biggest悬念 (suspense).

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the sharpest weekly decline in gold prices since 1983 triggered by?

AThe sharpest weekly decline in gold prices since 1983 was triggered by escalating Middle East conflicts, which raised energy prices and suppressed expectations for interest rate cuts, leading to increased bets on Federal Reserve rate hikes.

QHow does the current gold market situation parallel the historical event of 1983?

AThe current situation parallels the 1983 event where OPEC members, facing a sharp drop in oil revenue, were forced to sell off their gold reserves to raise cash, causing a historic crash in gold prices.

QWhy did the traditional 'safe-haven' logic for gold fail during the recent Middle East tensions?

AThe traditional safe-haven logic failed because the war brought inflationary pressure instead of expectations for monetary easing. Rising energy prices increased inflation expectations, making gold, a non-yielding asset, less attractive as real rates rose.

QWhat technical indicator signaled that gold had entered oversold territory during the sell-off?

AThe 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) fell below 30, which is a level some traders consider to indicate an oversold market.

QAccording to Goldman Sachs analysis, what is the expected economic impact of rising energy prices?

AGoldman Sachs economists estimated that rising energy prices would reduce global GDP by 0.3 percentage points over the next year and raise overall inflation by 0.5 to 0.6 percentage points, increasing stagflation risks.

Lecturas Relacionadas

"Gran Batalla" entre las casas de cambio coreanas y los reguladores, desafiando los límites de la aplicación y la legislación

Corea del Sur: los principales intercambios de criptomonedas desafían a los reguladores La industria cripto de Corea del Sur está en un conflicto regulatorio abierto. La Unidad de Inteligencia Financiera (FIU), principal regulador contra el lavado de dinero, ha impuesto multas y suspensiones de operación a grandes intercambios como Upbit (de Dunamu) y Bithumb por presuntas deficiencias en la verificación de clientes (KYC) y transacciones con VASP no registrados. Sin embargo, los intercambios ya no aceptan pasivamente las sanciones. Upbit ganó un fallo judicial inicial que anuló parte de la sanción de la FIU, con el tribunal señalando que los criterios regulatorios no estaban suficientemente claros. A Bithumb se le concedió una suspensión temporal de su sanción para evitar daños irreparables durante el litigio. La FIU ha apelado el caso de Upbit. En un segundo frente, la asociación de la industria DAXA protesta por una enmienda legal propuesta que obligaría a reportar como "sospechosas" todas las transferencias de cripto superiores a 10 millones de wones (unos 6.800 dólares). DAXA argumenta que esto colapsaría el sistema de reportes y desviaría la atención de las transacciones genuinamente riesgosas. Este enfrentamiento subraya una tensión en la regulación coreana: un marco legal integral aún está en desarrollo, mientras que la FIU aplica agresivamente normas AML existentes. Los intercambios ahora cuestionan la base legal y la proporcionalidad de las sanciones, llevando el debate a los tribunales y el proceso legislativo. El resultado podría redefinir los límites de la aplicación regulatoria en el mercado cripto surcoreano.

marsbitHace 10 min(s)

"Gran Batalla" entre las casas de cambio coreanas y los reguladores, desafiando los límites de la aplicación y la legislación

marsbitHace 10 min(s)

Los multimillonarios detrás de las elecciones de medio mandato más costosas de la historia

**Resumen: Los multimillonarios detrás de las elecciones intermedias más caras de la historia** Esta temporada electoral está marcada por contribuciones récord de grandes fortunas. Jeff Yass, fundador de Susquehanna International Group, es el tercer mayor donante individual con más de 81 millones de dólares, apoyando principalmente causas como la libertad de elección escolar y al comité de acción política de Trump, MAGA Inc. El ciclo electoral federal ha recaudado más de 4,700 millones de dólares, y se prevé que el gasto en anuncios políticos supere los 10,800 millones. Los fondos fluyen mayoritariamente hacia los comités republicanos y los PAC asociados a Trump, que recaudaron 917 millones solo en el primer trimestre, muy por encima de los 262 millones de los demócratas. Los superricos intervienen impulsados por intereses clave: Sergey Brin y Chris Larsen invierten millones para oponerse a un impuesto a los ultra ricos en California, y figuras como Marc Andreessen y Ben Horowitz financian PACs relacionados con la criptomoneda y la IA. Entre los mayores donantes destacan George Soros (102.6 millones), Elon Musk (84.8 millones) y Miriam Adelson (42.6 millones), cuyas donaciones moldean políticas sobre Israel, tecnología y elecciones judiciales. La influencia del "dinero oscuro" anónimo sigue en aumento. Estas enormes sumas subrayan la batalla por el control del Congreso y la definición de políticas cruciales en los últimos dos años de un posible segundo mandato de Trump.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Los multimillonarios detrás de las elecciones de medio mandato más costosas de la historia

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Después de 50 veces el almacenamiento, Sun Yuchen siempre está mirando al próximo decenio

La mayoría conoce a Sun Yuchen por sus excéntricas historias, desde gastar millones en cenas con Warren Buffett hasta volar al espacio. Pero detrás del escándalo, lleva una década acertando en inversiones: en 2016 recomendó comprar Bitcoin, Nvidia, Tesla y Tencent. Hoy, quienes siguieron su consejo han multiplicado su capital enormemente. Recientemente, Sun predijo el auge del almacenamiento de datos, y acciones como SanDisk (SNDK) se dispararon casi 50 veces. Ahora, su mirada está puesta en la inteligencia física (Physical AI), destacando cuatro áreas clave: 1. **Inteligencia encarnada (Robótica)**: Empresas como Unitree y Galaxy General lideran la producción y financiación de robots humanoides, impulsados por modelos VLA que permiten a las máquinas "ver" y actuar en el mundo real. 2. **Drones**: Ya son una realidad comercial, desde la agricultura hasta entregas urbanas y uso militar, siendo la primera aplicación de IA con un ciclo comercial cerrado en el mundo físico. 3. **Computación espacial**: Más allá del VR, tecnologías como el Apple Vision Pro buscan que la IA comprenda y interactúe con el espacio físico, un requisito fundamental para robots, drones y vehículos autónomos. 4. **Exploración espacial**: Sun viajó al espacio con Blue Origin y visualiza una "economía espacial" con blockchain para derechos de activos y transacciones interplanetarias. Su lógica de inversión se basa en apostar por sectores con dirección clara, diversificando entre actores clave: en robótica, apuesta por el "cuerpo" (Tesla Optimus) y el "cerebro" (Nvidia); en drones, por aplicaciones militares y comerciales; en el espacio, por SpaceX (próxima gran IPO) y Rocket Lab. En resumen, Sun Yuchen prevé que, mientras la última década transformó el flujo de información, las próximas dos décadas verán a la IA remodelar el mundo físico: robots en fábricas, vehículos autónomos, enjambres de drones y una creciente presencia humana y robótica en el espacio. Mientras muchos aún esperan oportunidades tradicionales, él ya está mirando hacia el próximo horizonte tecnológico.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Después de 50 veces el almacenamiento, Sun Yuchen siempre está mirando al próximo decenio

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

El mayor IPO de la historia se acerca, superando a SpaceX: 28 años de auto-iteración de la IA, cuenta atrás para la explosión de inteligencia

**Resumen: La carrera hacia el primer IPO de un billón de dólares y la cuenta atrás para la 'explosión de inteligencia'** Anthropic, la empresa de IA fundada en 2021, está cerca de una operación que la valoraría en casi **un billón de dólares**, superando potencialmente a SpaceX en lo que sería una de las OPV más grandes de la historia. Su valoración implícita en mercados previos a la OPV ya alcanza los 1,2 billones. Este frenesí inversor se debe a un crecimiento sin precedentes. Sus ingresos anuales recurrentes (ARR) se dispararon a **450.000 millones de dólares en mayo de 2026**, multiplicándose por 5 en solo cinco meses. Desde 2022, los ingresos han crecido 4.500 veces. Este crecimiento exponencial está impulsado por sus productos estrella, Claude Code y Cowork, que dominan los mercados de codificación con IA y colaboración empresarial. Sin embargo, la verdadera razón detrás de esta valoración astronómica es una audaz predicción de su cofundador, Jack Clark: **para finales de 2028, hay más de un 50% de probabilidad de que los sistemas de IA puedan automejorarse de forma autónoma**, iniciando una "explosión de inteligencia" recursiva. Clark compara esto con una impresora 3D capaz de imprimir cabezales de impresión mejores que sí misma, un concepto que cambiaría todo. Esta visión explica la estrategia de Anthropic de desbancar a gigantes de la consultoría como McKinsey mediante una empresa conjunta de 15.000 millones de dólares con Goldman Sachs y Blackstone. No se trata solo de reemplazar tareas, sino de que la IA ejecute estrategias complejas, probando si puede sustituir el trabajo cognitivo de alto nivel. Así, la vertiginosa valoración de Anthropic no solo cotiza un negocio exitoso, sino **la expectativa de un cambio de paradigma global**. La cuenta atrás hacia 2028, el año de la posible autorreplicación de la IA, ya ha comenzado, planteando tanto oportunidades extraordinarias como riesgos existenciales para la economía y la seguridad mundial.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

El mayor IPO de la historia se acerca, superando a SpaceX: 28 años de auto-iteración de la IA, cuenta atrás para la explosión de inteligencia

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片