Fed conference hears stablecoins may boost USD as global reserve currency

CointelegraphPublicado a 2022-07-06Actualizado a 2022-07-06

Resumen

The underlying tech of a central bank digital currency wasn’t enough to convince some panelists at a Fed conference that it could change the international currency system.

A note published by the United States Federal Reserve on a recently held conference found a majority of exports believe a U.S. dollar central bank digital currency (CBDC) would not drastically change the global currency ecosystem.

Panelists at the conference also agreed CBDC development outside of the U.S. doesn’t threaten the status of the dollar, but th development of cryptocurrencies could alter the role of the dollar globally, with some saying stablecoins could even boost the U.S. dollar's role as the global dominant reserve currency.

The assessments came from expert panelists at a June 16 and 17 conference hosted by the Federal Reserve on the “International Roles of the U.S. dollar” collated into a note and published by The Fed on July 5. The conference was used to gain insight from policymakers, researchers, and market experts to understand “potential factors that may alter the dominance of the U.S. dollar in the future” including new technologies and payment systems.

A discussion on a panel addressing digital assets and if CBDCs would provide advantages for the dollar had panelists agree that the underpinning technology alone wouldn’t “lead to drastic changes in the global currency ecosystem”.

Speakers on the panel included digital currency initiative director at MIT, Neha Narula, head of research at the Bank of International Settlements, Hyun Song Shin, chief investment strategist at asset management firm Bridgewater, Rebecca Patterson and HSBC bank’s head of FX research Paul Mackel.

The panelists agreed that factors such as market and political stability, along with market depth, are more crucial for dominant reserve currencies like the U.S. dollar that the development of a Fed issued digital dollar.

The development of CBDCs by other countries was also generally agreed by the panel to have a tendency to focus more heavily on that country’s own domestic retail market, and therefore was considered “not a threat to the U.S. dollar's international status”.

The Federal Reserve noted the amount and scope of CBDC’s for making cross-border payments is “still quite limited”, suggesting that these systems don’t yet pose a threat to the dollar, which accounts for a majority of international financial transactions according to an October 2021 note.

Focusing on cryptocurrencies, panelists said further development of digital assets could change the international role of the dollar, but adoption by institutional investors was throttled by a lacking regulatory framework, leaving the current crypto market to be dominated by speculative retail investors.

Another panel including Fed financial research advisor Asani Sarkar and finance professor Jiakai Chen, concluded that part of the demand for crypto, especially Bitcoin (BTC), was driven by a desire to evade domestic capital controls, citing BTC prices in China trading at a premium in comparison to other countries.

Despite this, the Fed says panelists didn’t see crypto as a threat to the global role of the dollar in the short term. Some even suggested in the “medium run” that crypto could reinforce the dollars' role if “new sets of services structured around these assets are linked to the dollar”, a likely reference to stablecoins, cryptocurrencies pegged to the value of a fiat currency (usually USD.)

The advice by panelists may help put a new spin on things for members of the Federal Reserve.

Previously, the Federal Reserve Board of governors said in June that stablecoins not sufficiently backed by liquid assets and proper regulatory standards “create risks to investors and potentially to the financial system” likely referencing the collapse of TerraUSD Classic (USTC).

The comment by the Board came before Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell stated a CBDC could “potentially help maintain the dollar’s international standing”.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Desglose de Estrategias de Trading de Bitcoin: Predicciones de Celebridades y Modelos Clásicos Fallan, Solo Quedan Estos Cuatro Indicadores

Resumen de la estrategia de trading de Bitcoin: Tras analizar todos los métodos de predicción desde 2017 hasta 2025, se descartaron pronósticos de celebridades, modelos clásicos como Stock-to-Flow e indicadores de sentimiento aislados (ej. Fear & Greed), por ser inexactos o estar desactualizados. El sistema final se basa en solo cuatro indicadores confiables: 1. **MVRV Z-Score**: Identifica fondos (zona verde) con precisión histórica, aunque perdió eficacia para techos tras los ETF. 2. **SOPR (28-day MA)**: Señala capitulación de holders (valor <1.0), crucial para fondos. 3. **Flujos netos de ETF**: Refleja la demanda institucional post-2024, invisible en datos on-chain. 4. **Liquidez macro (Fed y M2)**: Define la dirección general del mercado. La estrategia actúa solo con **resonancia de 3+ señales**: - **Fondo**: MVRV en verde + SOPR <1.0 + miedo extremo (Fear & Greed <20). - **Techo**: Sobrecalentamiento on-chain + flujos de ETF negativos. - La liquidez establece el contexto macro. Actualmente (15/04/2026), hay triple señal de fondo: Fear & Greed en 12 (pánico extremo), MVRV en zona verde y SOPR <1.0. Históricamente, esto precedió ganancias >100% en 12 meses (2018, 2020, 2022). La única señal en contra son los flujos de ETF, aún débiles. Conclusión: El marco evita predicciones subjetivas, focusing en datos objetivos y resonancia de señales para decisiones de alta probabilidad.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Desglose de Estrategias de Trading de Bitcoin: Predicciones de Celebridades y Modelos Clásicos Fallan, Solo Quedan Estos Cuatro Indicadores

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

El fundador de Netflix fue al lugar que más teme

El cofundador de Netflix, Reed Hastings, anuncia su salida total de la empresa tras casi 30 años, justo cuando la compañía reporta su mejor desempeño financiero: ingresos de $12.25 mil millones en Q1 2026 (+16%) y ganancias netas de $5.28 mil millones (+83%). Aunque Netflix afirma que su decisión no implica desacuerdos, Hastings ya se había unido en 2025 a la junta directiva de Anthropic, empresa de IA, y ha expresado abiertamente que la inteligencia artificial es la mayor amenaza para Netflix. Hastings, quien estudió IA en Stanford hace 40 años, inicialmente veía la IA como una herramienta creativa, pero su postura cambió radicalmente. En 2025 donó $50 millones para investigar el impacto de la IA en la sociedad y advirtió: "Lucharemos por la supervivencia y prosperidad humana". Su preocupación central es que la IA generative, como el modelo Seedance 2.0 de ByteDance, pueda reducir drásticamente el costo y la barrera de entrada para la creación de contenido, haciendo que contenido gratuito en plataformas como YouTube sea tan atractivo que desafíe el modelo de suscripción de Netflix. Aunque Netflix está adoptando IA para optimizar producciones (como la reciente compra de InterPositive por $600 millones), Hastings parece estar "protegiéndose": mantiene sus acciones de Netflix mientras se integra en el epicentro de la tecnología que podría disruptirla. Su salida coincide con el momento cumbre de Netflix, pero también con la aceleración imparable de la IA generative. El veredicto final sobre si su temor era profético o excesivo, dependerá de cuándo la IA logre producir contenido que realmente captive al público masivo.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

El fundador de Netflix fue al lugar que más teme

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片