SEC Overstepped Bounds in Kraken Lawsuit, State AGs Charge

CoinDeskPolicyPublicado a 2024-03-01Actualizado a 2024-03-01

A group of state attorneys general are arguing that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission exceeded its authority in suing the crypto exchange Kraken.

State law enforcement officials from Montana, Arkansas, Iowa, Mississippi, Nebraska, Ohio, South Dakota and Texas filed a joint amicus brief – or friend of the court filing – in the SEC's suit against Kraken on Thursday, alongside a number of industry lobbyists and other participants.

12.1K

Saying the SEC's suit might even harm consumers, the state AGs argued that the agency was expanding the definition of an "investment contract," and that cryptocurrencies "are not automatically securities."

Advertisement
Advertisement

The filing, which echoed some of Kraken's own arguments – as well as other crypto companies – said the states were not filing in support of the exchange, but rather in opposition to the federal regulator.

"States have a strong interest in preventing the potential preemption of consumer protection and other state laws by the SEC’s attempt to regulate crypto assets as securities," the filing said. "... The SEC’s exercise of this undelegated authority puts consumers at risk by potentially preempting state statutes better tailored to the specific risks of non-securities products. Some state laws are more protective of consumers than the federal securities laws."

State cases have helped clarify the definition of investment contracts in the past, the filing said.

If the SEC wins its suit, it might be able to preempt state consumer protection laws, as well as state regulations around crypto, the filing said.

The SEC sued Kraken last fall, alleging the exchange had failed to register as a securities broker, clearinghouse or trading platform. It's a similar complaint the SEC has brought against companies like Coinbase, Binance and Bittrex's U.S. branch. While Bittrex settled, the Coinbase and Binance/Binance.US suits are ongoing.

Unlike those other suits, the SEC argued that Kraken was explicitly involved in touting 11 different digital assets it said the exchange listed as unregistered securities. The SEC also alleged Kraken commingled customer and corporate funds.

Kraken filed a motion to dismiss last week, arguing the SEC had failed to "plausibly allege" its arguments, and that it was overreaching its bounds – similar arguments to those made by Coinbase and Binance.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The case saw a flurry of amicus briefs on Wednesday and Thursday from industry groups like the Chamber of Digital Commerce, the Blockchain Association and the DeFi Education Fund.

U.S. Senator Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.) also filed a brief, similar to the one her office filed in the SEC's case against Coinbase.

Lecturas Relacionadas

El Servicio de Supervisión Financiera de Corea revisa el sistema de compensación por pérdidas en esquemas de phishing con criptotráficantes

La Autoridad de Supervisión Financiera de Corea del Sur (FSS) está reformando su sistema de compensación para víctimas de phishing, con el fin de incluir activos en criptomoneda a partir de octubre. Actualmente, el sistema solo calcula las pérdidas en wones coreanos, lo que deja sin una compensación completa a aquellos cuyos fondos fueron robados en forma de activos digitales. La nueva plataforma determinará el tipo y la cantidad específicos de tokens a devolver a cada víctima, basándose en su valor al momento de congelar la transacción fraudulenta. También mejorará la detección de fondos distribuidos entre múltiples cuentas y agilizará el cálculo de reclamaciones por lotes. Estos cambios siguen a una enmienda del 31 de marzo a la Ley de Compensación por Fraude en Telecomunicaciones, que reconoce los activos virtuales como propiedad dañada y sujeto a reembolso. Además, plataformas de intercambio de criptomonedas como Upbit y Bithumb ahora tendrán las mismas obligaciones que los bancos para prevenir el fraude, verificar transacciones, rastrear fondos sospechosos y ayudar en la recuperación de activos. La ley entrará en vigor el 1 de octubre. La FSS dispondrá de un período de ajuste de tres meses, hasta finales de noviembre, y un presupuesto de 118,53 millones de wones para implementar el sistema. La medida responde al uso creciente de criptomonedas por parte de estafadores para lavar y transferir dinero al extranjero. Las pérdidas por fraude en telecomunicaciones en Corea del Sur aumentaron un 14,1% en 2025, alcanzando un máximo de cinco años con 433,8 billones de wones.

cryptonews.ruHace 1 hora(s)

El Servicio de Supervisión Financiera de Corea revisa el sistema de compensación por pérdidas en esquemas de phishing con criptotráficantes

cryptonews.ruHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片