XDC Network’s long game – Should traders brace for a deeper pullback soon?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-08Last updated on 2026-02-08

Abstract

XDC Network's token (XDC) declined slightly by 0.76% in 24 hours but remains up 6.13% weekly, outperforming Bitcoin. Despite a significant 84% drop in daily active users since 2021 and concerns about low on-chain utility, recent data suggests a potential easing in selling pressure. The network completed a successful hardfork to strengthen its real-world asset (RWA) tokenization infrastructure. A partnership with Liqi Digital Assets has led to $100 million in tokenized RWAs, with a target of $500 million by 2026. Another collaboration aims to tokenize $1 billion in debt and receivables. While the RWA narrative counters "ghost chain" fears, the price may still test the $0.022 support level before potentially consolidating. A price bottom could be weeks or months away.

XDC Network [XDC] token shed 0.76% of its value over the last 24 hours. However, on the weekly charts, it was still up 6.13%. This compared favorably to the 12% loss Bitcoin [BTC] recorded over the past week, hinting at hidden XDC strength.

There seemed to be no clear coin-specific catalysts at work. In fact, the network has not been stellar lately. A recent AMBCrypto report even highlighted that the Layer 1 network may be one of the chains with a high market cap but low active users.

With a respectable $706 million in market cap, the chain’s daily active users plunged by 84% from 2021 to just 45k. This signaled low demand due to on-chain utility.

CryptoQuant data showed that the spot volume bubble map was in a cooling phase, signaling a decline in trading volume. It was the opposite of overheated conditions that tend to accompany market tops. However, this does not mean that an XDC bottom may be in.

Additionally, the spot taker cumulative volume delta shifted to neutral over the past three weeks, after being in a taker-sell-dominant phase since October. This could be another sign that the selling pressure might be easing.

Infrastructure upgrade and RWA issuance milestone highlight XDC’s growth

On the other hand, the network announced a successful hardfork on 30 January. The upgrade strengthens XDC’s core infrastructure, which focuses on real-world asset tokenization.

Brazilian fintech Liqi Digital Assets and XDC Network announced a strategic partnership in April 2025. Aimed at bringing RWAs, DeFi, international payments, and trade finance, they recently reached the milestone of $100 million in tokenized RWAs on the XDC network.

In 2026, they target $500 million in issuances, further reinforcing the ease of tokenization as a way to manage debt and credit.

The partnership with Brazil’s VERT Capital is a sign of how XDC Network focuses on enterprise and institutional utility and is not a retail-centric chain. This deal’s aim is to tokenize $1 billion in debt and receivables on the XDC Network.

On the price front, the XDC token was valued at $0.037. The prevailing bearish trend would likely see the $0.022-support level tested in a few weeks. This demand zone has been respected since June 2022.

A retest of $0.0227 is likely to be followed by a consolidation phase where the price could form a range below $0.03. Once such a range is established, long-term investors can look to buy and hold XDC once more.


Final Thoughts

  • Ghost chain fears due to daily active addresses have been diluted by the strong RWA narrative being established around XDC Network.
  • On-chain metrics revealed that selling pressure might be easing, but a price bottom could be weeks or months away.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the recent price performance of XDC Network's token compared to Bitcoin?

AOver the last 24 hours, the XDC token shed 0.76% of its value. However, on the weekly charts, it was still up 6.13%, which compared favorably to Bitcoin's 12% loss over the same period.

QWhat does the significant drop in daily active users on the XDC Network signal?

AThe plunge of 84% in daily active users from 2021 to just 45k signals low demand for the chain due to a lack of on-chain utility.

QWhat recent infrastructure development did the XDC Network announce?

AThe network announced a successful hardfork on 30 January, which strengthened its core infrastructure with a focus on real-world asset (RWA) tokenization.

QWhat major milestone was achieved in the partnership between Liqi Digital Assets and XDC Network?

AThe strategic partnership recently reached the milestone of $100 million in tokenized real-world assets (RWAs) on the XDC network.

QAccording to the article, what is the likely price scenario for the XDC token in the coming weeks?

AThe prevailing bearish trend would likely see the $0.022-support level tested in a few weeks. A retest of $0.0227 is likely to be followed by a consolidation phase where the price could form a range below $0.03.

Related Reads

You'll Be Surprised How Much WeChat's Architecture Differs from Telegram's

An article compares the core architectural philosophies of WeChat and Telegram, highlighting fundamental differences in data storage, monetization, and developer ecosystems. **Data Storage:** Telegram offers unlimited, synchronized cloud storage for seamless access across all devices. In contrast, WeChat stores chat history locally on each device, requiring a manual migration process for transfer and tethering desktop sessions to an active smartphone. **Features & Ecosystem:** Telegram's open Bot API allows for easy, free bot creation, while WeChat's massive ecosystem of over 4.8 million "mini-programs" operates within a closed, curated, and more regulated platform. Commenting also differs: Telegram uses integrated discussion threads for channels, whereas WeChat relies on pre-moderated comments for official accounts and separate chats for interaction. **File Sharing & Payments:** Telegram supports large file transfers (up to 4GB for Premium), while WeChat limits most files to 200MB. A key divergence is in payments: WeChat Pay is deeply integrated into daily life and commerce in China, whereas Telegram lacks a comparable built-in fiat payment system, focusing instead on third-party bots and crypto. **Analysis:** The comparison reveals two distinct models: WeChat is a tightly integrated, closed ecosystem deeply embedded in the real economy, while Telegram prioritizes open protocols, flexible data handling, and low barriers for developers. An added perspective notes that WeChat's fusion of messaging and payments in a single interface without end-to-end encryption for chats potentially broadens the attack surface, raising security questions as more functions converge.

cryptonews.ru2h ago

You'll Be Surprised How Much WeChat's Architecture Differs from Telegram's

cryptonews.ru2h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片