Mantra’s OM extends 2025 loss to 99% – Why the team blames OKX

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-15Last updated on 2025-12-15

Abstract

Mantra's OM token crashed over 99% in 2025, leading to a public dispute between the project team and crypto exchange OKX. OKX accused the Mantra team of borrowing significant USDT and using OM as collateral to artificially inflate the token’s price, prompting the exchange to freeze accounts and liquidate holdings. The exchange questioned the origin of large OM quantities and dismissed the team's claims as misleading. Mantra CEO JP Mullin denied any legal action against OKX, stating the issue is between the exchange and larger OM traders. Despite earlier gains of 600% during the late 2024 rally, OM’s value plummeted following the controversy. As of press time, OM traded at $0.07 amid bearish sentiment. The project is proceeding with its planned migration to a Layer 1 blockchain, converting OM to MANTRA by January 2026, with over 36,000 holders still involved.

Since Mantra’s OM token crashed by over 99% in April, the project team and crypto exchange OKX have been embroiled in an ongoing blame game at the expense of investors.

In a recent statement, the exchange claimed that the team borrowed ‘significant amounts of USDT’ and used OM as collateral to ‘inflate’ the price of the token.

Following the price manipulation, the exchange’s risk team was forced to freeze the accounts and liquidate a portion of Mantra [OM] after the price fell slightly, triggering an aggressive sell-off across other platforms.

OKX added,

“There has been no explanation of where those unusually large quantities of OM originated, nor why these groups of individuals held and controlled such a substantial portion of the token supply.”

The exchange called the Mantra team’s accusations a ‘misleading narrative.’

Mixed reactions to OM’s price crash

However, other users, like Park Yong, questioned OKX’s interest and posed,

“If OKX genuinely viewed $OM as a scam, the response would be simple: delist it, allow withdrawals, and move on.”

He added,

“Is this really about user protection, or is there internal exposure related to $OM that became uncomfortable once migration timelines came into play?”

For the unfamiliar, Mantra is a tokenization-focused protocol that will be migrating into a fully fledged Layer 1 (L2) from Ethereum.

As a result, it will change its ERC-20 governance token, OM, to MANTRA., The migration will be finalized by the 15th of January 2026.

With the migration schedule, OKX reached out to the team to help facilitate the conversion of its OM holdings.

Although the exchange said that there were legal actions underway, Mantra CEO JP Mullin denied such actions, affirming,

“Neither MANTRA or myself have any ongoing litigation or legal actions ongoing with OKX. This is between them and other larger traders/investors of OM.”

Mantra reverses 600% gain

During the late 2024 rally, which extended into February 2025, OM posted a 600% gain.

Although it erased part of the gains amid early 2025 tariff headwinds, it dumped over 80% after OKX froze the team accounts amid manipulation claims.

As of press time, OM traded at $0.07 and had been experiencing overwhelmingly bearish sentiment in the Futures market, according to CoinGlass.

But beyond the price chart, the chain has been positioning itself with new products, including a stablecoin, MantraUSD.

There are still over 36K holders of OM ahead of the migration. It remains to be seen whether the migration will help the chain move past the OKX and project team scandal.


Final Thoughts

  • The Mantra team and OKX have denied crashing the OM price by over 90% in 2025.
  • Large OM investors were reportedly suing OKX for losses, according to the Mantra chain CEO.

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Weng Li's New Blog Proposes 'Self-Evolution Should Start from Harness', DeepSeek's Cui Tianyi Endorses with Repost

Lilian Weng, former OpenAI security VP and co-founder of Thinking Machines Lab, has published a new blog post titled "Harness Engineering for Self-Improvement," proposing a pragmatic path for AI self-evolution. She argues that Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI) may practically begin at the "Harness" layer—the external runtime system governing how models use tools, manage context, and execute tasks—rather than directly from the model rewriting its own weights. The blog outlines a progression from optimizing prompts (Context Engineering) to designing workflows, and ultimately to Self-Improving Harness systems. These systems can identify their own weaknesses, propose targeted, verifiable modifications to the harness code, and validate improvements. Works like Self-Harness and Darwin Gödel Machine (DGM) demonstrate significant performance gains on benchmarks like SWE-bench through such automated harness evolution, rivaling handcrafted agents. DeepSeek researcher Tianyi Cui endorsed the view, noting harness-based self-evolution is as promising as model-based approaches. Weng emphasizes this is complementary to model training, with both reinforcing each other. However, key challenges remain: weak evaluators for subjective tasks, reward hacking, diversity collapse, managing long-term system health versus short-term success, and defining the human oversight role. The consensus is growing: the harness is a critical variable, as the same model can exhibit vastly different capabilities within different harness systems.

marsbit39m ago

Weng Li's New Blog Proposes 'Self-Evolution Should Start from Harness', DeepSeek's Cui Tianyi Endorses with Repost

marsbit39m ago

Odaily Editorial Department Tea Party (July 8)

Odaily Editorial Team Casual Chat (July 8) This is an informal column from Odaily's editorial team, sharing immediate thoughts on industry news, data, and hot topics from various angles. It presents investment ideas and opportunity hypotheses still under verification—which may not be direct wealth codes but questions in themselves—alongside observations from industry interactions and materials that genuinely enhance the team's understanding. The content is based on real investment and observation experiences, carries no advertising, and does not constitute investment advice. Its purpose is to broaden perspectives and supplement information sources, not to create consensus. Team Member Shares: * **Wenser (@wenser2010):** Noted a deeper correction (nearly 30%) in US and Korean stocks, including memory stocks, but remains bullish on DRAM due to perceived supply shortages. In prediction markets, personal small bets outperformed blind copying; favors France to win the World Cup. Views crypto-related stocks like STRK as bearish for now, while seeing Circle and Coinbase as potential rebound plays. Observes recent strength in software stocks like Microsoft but is unsure if it's a sustained recovery. * **Bcxiongdi (@bcxiongdi):** Discusses the recent "recovery training" in meme coin markets on Solana and BSC, characterized by small-scale PVP opportunities, admitting to having sold many assets too early. Suggests also watching the Robinhood chain. Found World Cup prediction markets challenging, advising to consider buying during matches rather than only before. * **Azuma (@azuma_eth):** Focuses on the US stock market, particularly the significant semiconductor correction. Believes demand fundamentals remain and considers buying the dip in DRAM stocks. Notes a potential rotation signal as hedge funds have recently concentrated buying in tech stocks. Plans to continue adding to RKLB (Rocket Lab) stock, seeing limited downside and high upside potential at current levels after its founder's share sale window closed.

Odaily星球日报55m ago

Odaily Editorial Department Tea Party (July 8)

Odaily星球日报55m ago

Former Huawei 'Genius Teen' Who Questioned DeepSeek Interview Lands in 'Crossfire' from Web3 Investor

Former Huawei "Genius Youth" Li Bojie recently drew public attention by criticizing his interview experience with DeepSeek. The controversy escalated when Du Jun, co-founder of Web3 investment firm ABCDE Capital, publicly accused Li of being "the founder with the least sense of contractual spirit" he had ever cooperated with, sparking a dispute over Li's startup project, Metagent. Li detailed a frustrating DeepSeek interview where he was accused of potential plagiarism, leading him to end the session. The spotlight then shifted to his venture, Metagent, a Web3+AI project aiming to tokenize AI agents. ABCDE invested $1.5 million, with an initial $500k disbursed. Du Jun claimed the project's progress was severely lacking, with a poor-quality demo and minimal social media activity. He alleged Li stopped communicating, deleted his Telegram, and failed to provide proper financial reporting. In response, Li argued the remaining $1 million was never received, crippling operations and forcing salary cuts. He stated he left Metagent in October 2024 due to family reasons and Web3 compliance concerns, with board approval. He claimed to have fulfilled disclosure duties and that his subsequent projects avoided conflicting fields. Other investors, including ArkStream Capital, shared negative due diligence experiences, citing unprofessional contracts and evasive answers on tokenomics. Metagent's social media went silent in June 2024, effectively stalling. Li has since moved to a new consumer AI agent platform, Pine AI (formerly Logenic AI), which has raised $25 million in Series A funding. He served as its Chief Scientist but recently left, clarifying he was not the founder and departed due to a shift in research interests.

Foresight News1h ago

Former Huawei 'Genius Teen' Who Questioned DeepSeek Interview Lands in 'Crossfire' from Web3 Investor

Foresight News1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片