Your AI Anxiety Is Being Harvested

marsbitPublished on 2026-03-10Last updated on 2026-03-10

Abstract

The article critiques the excessive hype and anxiety surrounding AI, arguing that much of the online discourse is a form of fear-based marketing designed to harvest attention and engagement. It points out that blindly copying others' AI setups—like popular coding configurations—is ineffective because these are tailored to specific needs and contexts, not universal solutions. The author warns against over-reliance on AI, noting that it can erode independent thinking and core human skills like judgment, creativity, and time management. Citing data from Fortune, Goldman Sachs, and academic studies, the article reveals that many companies report no actual productivity gains from AI adoption; instead, it often intensifies workloads and leads to burnout. The key takeaway is to use AI strategically for repetitive tasks while preserving human strengths for critical thinking and decision-making. True success lies not in using AI everywhere, but in knowing when not to use it.

Author: jiayi Jiayi

AI is exploding with traffic on X, and my X feed sends me a new type of content every day—

Someone posts a screenshot of an AI tool setup, captioning it "This system increased my efficiency 10x." The comments immediately flood with "Installed," "So powerful," "Will be left behind if I don't learn this."

Others share their AI workflows, telling you that copying their method will earn you X amount per month.

And then? After you install it, you're still you.

For someone who doesn't know how to trade, AI effectively increases your efficiency at losing money. Your problem was never a lack of tools.

I don't deny that AI is the biggest variable of our era. But I want to state a few facts that people aren't keen to hear.

1. 80% of AI content on X is essentially fear-mongering

"You're finished if you don't use AI"—this statement itself is a harvesting tactic.

Create anxiety → Provide a solution → Gain traffic.

This is a very mature monetization chain.

If you look closely, those shouting the loudest about the "AI revolution" aren't selling AI capability,they are selling your panic. What they need most is not for you to actually learn AI, but for you to remain perpetually anxious, keep following them, and keep sharing their content.

It's the same logic as the crypto world yelling "get on board now or it's too late," just with a new skin.

Recently, an AI post on X saying "Something Big Is Happening" got70 million impressions. However, this post deliberately omitted crucial context, keeping only the parts most likely to induce panic.

Panic sells attention, not truth.

2. Copying someone else's AI strategy with one click is the dumbest way to learn

Tailoring AI ultimately depends on individual cognition.

Recently, a 50K star Claude Code configuration repository went viral. Many reposted saying "install it now."

I studied it carefully—

It's a development workflow configuration designed for professional programmers: TDD test-driven, code review Agent, security scanning, 17 dedicated sub-Agents. Very impressive.

But it's designed for people who write code.

For example, if I, someone in marketing, install this setup, it would literally interfere with the operation of my own smart skills.

Everyone's work scenario, pain points, and thinking patterns are different. Someone else's AI configuration is the result of them stumbling through countless pitfalls to create something tailored for themselves.

With one click, you're not copying their ability, but a bunch of files you can't use.

More ironically, Claude Code's creator, Boris Cherny, said himself: his configuration is actually "surprisingly vanilla"—the default settings are sufficient, not much customization is needed.

But that kind of talk isn't exciting enough, so no one shares it.

3. AI's biggest trap: Not "you can't use it," but "you use it for everything"

I've seen people ask AI to plan their day: what to do, the priority of each task, the time allocation for each task.

This shocked me.

The allocation of one's own time and energy is a person's core competency.

What you need to do, what to do first, what's worth investing in, what should be abandoned—these judgments are based on your self-awareness, clarity of goals, and sense of opportunity cost.

This is not a decision an AI can make for you.

Because AI doesn't know you had insomnia last night so you're not in good form today, doesn't know you have an intuitive confidence in a certain project, doesn't know your relationship with a certain partner is微妙 (delicate) and needs priority handling recently.

Handing this over to AI is like letting someone who just met you 5 minutes ago plan your life.

The key distinction is whether AI enhances your thinking, or AI replaces your thinking. It's essentially my criterion for judging whether AI or the human is the fuel. After all, living brain cells can now run operational AI.

4. The data tells a brutal truth

Most companies that use AI see no productivity improvement.

This isn't me saying it.

Fortune reported in February this year: Thousands of CEOs admit AI has had no practical impact on employment and productivity.

Goldman Sachs latest research: No significant correlation between AI and productivity.

Tom's Hardware citing a survey of 6000 executives:Over 80% of companies report no productivity gains from AI.

Nobel laureate in economics Daron Acemoglu stated bluntly: AI is not improving productivity.

Harvard Business Review's headline in February was even more direct:

"AI Doesn't Reduce Work — It Intensifies It"

UC Berkeley research also warns: The effect AI is producing in the workplace is the opposite of what was expected—employees did become more productive, but the workload also skyrocketed, ultimately leading to burnout.

5. What you should truly be anxious about is not "I haven't learned to use AI yet"

But rather "I've already forgotten how to think for myself."

Independent thinking is the scarcest asset of this era.

AI can help you write 80-point content, but the leap from 80 to 100, only the human brain can accomplish. AI can help you gather information, but judging which information is important and how to combine it into unique insights—that's human work.

Research shows that in SAT writing tests, the group using AI assistance had the lowest brain activity, and their content was evaluated as "lacking originality and warmth."

Over-reliance on AI, especially among young people, can negatively impact brain development.

While you're training AI, you're also letting your own brain atrophy.

This isn't science fiction. It's a悲哀 (tragic) thing happening right now.

6. The right posture

Embrace change, learn to enhance cognition, and stay清醒 (clear-headed).

Know what things AI does better than you—

Repetitive tasks, data organization, format conversion, first draft generation. Hand these over to AI, no problem.

Also know what things you do better than AI—

Strategic judgment, relationship maintenance, creative intuition, value trade-offs, time management. These abilities require you to practice repeatedly, not outsource to a model.

Not every problem needs an AI solution.

Sometimes turning off all tools and thinking quietly for 10 minutes is more effective than opening 10 AI windows.

Don't let "AI anxiety" become your new shackles.

Those selling AI panic on X are profiting from your anxiety. Every time you share "you're finished if you don't learn AI," you're working for them for free.

The real winners of this AI wave are not those who use AI the most, but those who know when NOT to use AI.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the main argument the author makes about AI content on social media platforms like X?

AThe author argues that 80% of AI content on platforms like X is essentially 'fear-mongering marketing,' a mature monetization chain that manufactures anxiety to capture attention and traffic, rather than providing genuine value or truth.

QAccording to the article, why is copying someone else's AI strategy or workflow a flawed approach?

AIt is flawed because AI strategies are highly personalized. Copying a configuration designed for a specific professional (e.g., a programmer) is ineffective for someone with a different role (e.g., a marketer), as it doesn't transfer the original user's cognitive framework and context, resulting in a collection of unusable files.

QWhat data and sources does the author cite to support the claim that AI has not improved productivity?

AThe author cites multiple sources: Fortune's report on CEOs admitting no real impact on jobs or productivity, a Goldman Sachs study finding no significant correlation, a Tom's Hardware survey of 6,000 executives where over 80% reported no productivity gains, and statements from Nobel laureate Daron Acemoglu and a Harvard Business Review article titled 'AI Doesn't Reduce Work — It Intensifies It'.

QWhat is identified as the 'biggest trap' of using AI?

AThe biggest trap is not that 'you don't know how to use AI,' but that 'you use it for everything.' This leads to outsourcing core human competencies like strategic judgment, relationship management, creative intuition, and, most critically, the ability to manage one's own time and priorities, which AI cannot effectively do as it lacks personal context.

QWhat does the author propose as the 'correct posture' for engaging with AI?

AThe correct posture is to embrace change and learn to use AI for tasks it excels at (repetitive work, data sorting, draft generation) while maintaining清醒 (clarity) and consciously practicing and preserving the human capabilities that AI cannot replicate (strategic judgment, creativity, value-based decision-making). The true winners are those who know when NOT to use AI.

Related Reads

Must-Watch Events Next Week|CLARITY Act Could Face Senate Vote; SpaceX, Circle to Report Earnings (8.3-8.9)

**Summary: Key Events and Developments to Watch (August 3-9)** The upcoming week is marked by significant financial disclosures, key legislative deadlines, and notable product updates. **Major Financial Events:** Several companies are scheduled to release their Q2 2026 earnings. American Bitcoin (ABTC) will report on August 3, followed by SpaceX and Hut 8 Mining Corp. on August 4, and Circle on August 5. Notably, a significant portion of SpaceX shares (up to 12% of total shares) will be unlocked on August 6 following their earnings release. **Key Legislative Deadline:** The U.S. Senate faces an August 7 deadline to secure 60 votes for the CLARITY Act, a bipartisan bill aiming to establish a federal regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies. The Senate may hold a full vote on the bill during the week. **Economic Data:** The U.S. July Non-Farm Payrolls report will be released on August 7, providing crucial labor market data. **Technology & Product Updates:** * **Shutdowns:** DeFi portfolio tracker Zapper and wallet app Ctrl Wallet will cease operations on August 3. * **Upgrades:** LayerZero will deprecate its v1 relayers on August 3. XRP Ledger's new version 3.3.0, featuring five new functions, is expected next week. * **AI:** Elon Musk announced that the advanced Grok 4.6 AI model is set for release around August 7. * **Bitcoin:** The BIP-110 forced signaling for a potential Bitcoin network change is scheduled to begin around August 8. **Other Notable Events:** Chinese robotics firm Unitree Tech has set its preliminary price inquiry for its IPO for August 5. South Korean exchange Upbit will delist AQT and AERGO tokens on August 3.

marsbit13m ago

Must-Watch Events Next Week|CLARITY Act Could Face Senate Vote; SpaceX, Circle to Report Earnings (8.3-8.9)

marsbit13m ago

Stocks Are Plummeting More Sharply Than Cryptocurrencies. Where Has the Money Gone?

Stock Markets Plunge Deeper Than Cryptocurrencies: Where Did the Money Go? In late July, Seoul's Kospi index triggered circuit breakers for two consecutive days, plummeting over 40% from its June high. The collapse was led by heavyweight stocks like SK Hynix, whose record profits still disappointed investors, and devastating leveraged ETFs, with one major product losing over 83% of its value. This signaled a global, forced deleveraging targeting the most crowded trades. Interestingly, while stocks exhibited extreme volatility akin to crypto markets, Bitcoin rose nearly 15% in July after a prior steep drop. Analysis shows the money fleeing equities did not flow into Bitcoin. Instead, Bitcoin had already absorbed its sell-off in May-June, when U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs saw historic outflows. The true safe-haven beneficiary was gold, whose price rose over 20% year-on-year, highlighting a decoupling between Bitcoin and gold as "digital gold." The sell-off was a targeted unwinding of leveraged positions in tech and semiconductors, accelerated by broker-dealer risk management and shifts in the AI narrative, including new competition from Chinese memory chipmakers. The retreat path was clear: from high-valuation tech stocks to cash and U.S. Treasuries, then to gold. For Bitcoin to attract sustained institutional inflows, conditions like eased global liquidity pressure, a "soft-landing" Fed rate cut, and U.S. regulatory clarity via legislation like the stalled CLARITY Act are needed. Currently, Bitcoin is not a safe haven but an already-cleared asset. Its low correlation with tech stocks, however, makes it a potential diversification play for institutional portfolios once the storm passes. The money isn't here yet, but the positioning is underway.

marsbit13m ago

Stocks Are Plummeting More Sharply Than Cryptocurrencies. Where Has the Money Gone?

marsbit13m ago

In Conversation with Ray Dalio: We Are Currently in an AI Bubble, with 1% of My Portfolio in Bitcoin

Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates, warns in an interview that the current AI boom shows classic bubble characteristics, which could lead to significant economic downturns as seen in past cycles like 1929 or 2000. He explains that speculative enthusiasm, fueled by debt and overvaluation, often precedes a crash when rising rates or taxation force asset sales, causing widespread losses and recession. Dalio also outlines his "Big Cycle" theory, describing an approximate 80-year pattern where widening wealth gaps, massive government deficits, and shifting geopolitical power (like China's rise) create internal conflict and global instability. He emphasizes that we are in a late-cycle, transitional phase where traditional powers like the US and UK face decline. For personal wealth protection, Dalio advises diversification beyond cash into assets like stocks, bonds, real estate, and particularly gold, which he prefers over Bitcoin. While he holds about 1% of his portfolio in Bitcoin as a non-printable hard asset, he views gold as more secure from technological or governmental threats. Regarding AI's impact, Dalio believes it will disproportionately benefit capital owners, worsening inequality by replacing both physical and cognitive labor. He suggests that human intuition and emotional intelligence, combined with AI, will be key for future workers. On taxation, Dalio argues that wealth taxes are impractical and risk triggering asset sell-offs, reducing productive investment. He points to the UK as a cautionary example of debt, low productivity, and political strife. Geopolitically, Dalio foresees a more regionalized world, with the US showing weakness in prolonged conflicts like with Iran, akin to past imperial declines. The ideal outcome, he suggests, is coexisting powerful blocs (e.g., Americas, China-Asia Pacific) without major war.

marsbit4h ago

In Conversation with Ray Dalio: We Are Currently in an AI Bubble, with 1% of My Portfolio in Bitcoin

marsbit4h ago

Daily 7.2 Trillion KRW: Foreign Capital's Record Net Buying on Friday! Wall Street Says Headwinds for Korean Stock Fund Flows Have Subsided

South Korean stock market sees a dramatic shift in fund flows. On July 31, foreign investors made a record net purchase of approximately KRW 7.2 trillion in KOSPI stocks, marking a fundamental reversal from the persistent large-scale net outflows seen in previous months. This contributed to a significant narrowing of foreign net selling in July to KRW 9.8 trillion, down sharply from KRW 48.4 trillion in June and KRW 44.5 trillion in May. Simultaneously, domestic institutional pressure eased. South Korean pension funds and asset managers turned to a net buying position in July, purchasing KRW 1.0 trillion worth of KOSPI shares, contrasting with net sales in May and June. Market volatility is expected to be dampened by new financial regulations. Effective July 31, the Financial Services Commission tightened access for retail investors to single-stock leveraged ETFs by raising the minimum cash deposit requirement. Trading volumes for these products subsequently dropped to about 50% of their monthly average. Citigroup Research maintains its year-end KOSPI target of 10,000 points. The firm cites several supportive factors: the substantial easing of headwinds from capital outflows, a robust fundamental outlook for the semiconductor sector, historically low market valuations, strong economic fundamentals, and the potential for policy support from financial authorities if needed.

marsbit4h ago

Daily 7.2 Trillion KRW: Foreign Capital's Record Net Buying on Friday! Wall Street Says Headwinds for Korean Stock Fund Flows Have Subsided

marsbit4h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片