Your AI Anxiety Is Being Harvested

marsbitPublished on 2026-03-10Last updated on 2026-03-10

Abstract

The article critiques the excessive hype and anxiety surrounding AI, arguing that much of the online discourse is a form of fear-based marketing designed to harvest attention and engagement. It points out that blindly copying others' AI setups—like popular coding configurations—is ineffective because these are tailored to specific needs and contexts, not universal solutions. The author warns against over-reliance on AI, noting that it can erode independent thinking and core human skills like judgment, creativity, and time management. Citing data from Fortune, Goldman Sachs, and academic studies, the article reveals that many companies report no actual productivity gains from AI adoption; instead, it often intensifies workloads and leads to burnout. The key takeaway is to use AI strategically for repetitive tasks while preserving human strengths for critical thinking and decision-making. True success lies not in using AI everywhere, but in knowing when not to use it.

Author: jiayi Jiayi

AI is exploding with traffic on X, and my X feed sends me a new type of content every day—

Someone posts a screenshot of an AI tool setup, captioning it "This system increased my efficiency 10x." The comments immediately flood with "Installed," "So powerful," "Will be left behind if I don't learn this."

Others share their AI workflows, telling you that copying their method will earn you X amount per month.

And then? After you install it, you're still you.

For someone who doesn't know how to trade, AI effectively increases your efficiency at losing money. Your problem was never a lack of tools.

I don't deny that AI is the biggest variable of our era. But I want to state a few facts that people aren't keen to hear.

1. 80% of AI content on X is essentially fear-mongering

"You're finished if you don't use AI"—this statement itself is a harvesting tactic.

Create anxiety → Provide a solution → Gain traffic.

This is a very mature monetization chain.

If you look closely, those shouting the loudest about the "AI revolution" aren't selling AI capability,they are selling your panic. What they need most is not for you to actually learn AI, but for you to remain perpetually anxious, keep following them, and keep sharing their content.

It's the same logic as the crypto world yelling "get on board now or it's too late," just with a new skin.

Recently, an AI post on X saying "Something Big Is Happening" got70 million impressions. However, this post deliberately omitted crucial context, keeping only the parts most likely to induce panic.

Panic sells attention, not truth.

2. Copying someone else's AI strategy with one click is the dumbest way to learn

Tailoring AI ultimately depends on individual cognition.

Recently, a 50K star Claude Code configuration repository went viral. Many reposted saying "install it now."

I studied it carefully—

It's a development workflow configuration designed for professional programmers: TDD test-driven, code review Agent, security scanning, 17 dedicated sub-Agents. Very impressive.

But it's designed for people who write code.

For example, if I, someone in marketing, install this setup, it would literally interfere with the operation of my own smart skills.

Everyone's work scenario, pain points, and thinking patterns are different. Someone else's AI configuration is the result of them stumbling through countless pitfalls to create something tailored for themselves.

With one click, you're not copying their ability, but a bunch of files you can't use.

More ironically, Claude Code's creator, Boris Cherny, said himself: his configuration is actually "surprisingly vanilla"—the default settings are sufficient, not much customization is needed.

But that kind of talk isn't exciting enough, so no one shares it.

3. AI's biggest trap: Not "you can't use it," but "you use it for everything"

I've seen people ask AI to plan their day: what to do, the priority of each task, the time allocation for each task.

This shocked me.

The allocation of one's own time and energy is a person's core competency.

What you need to do, what to do first, what's worth investing in, what should be abandoned—these judgments are based on your self-awareness, clarity of goals, and sense of opportunity cost.

This is not a decision an AI can make for you.

Because AI doesn't know you had insomnia last night so you're not in good form today, doesn't know you have an intuitive confidence in a certain project, doesn't know your relationship with a certain partner is微妙 (delicate) and needs priority handling recently.

Handing this over to AI is like letting someone who just met you 5 minutes ago plan your life.

The key distinction is whether AI enhances your thinking, or AI replaces your thinking. It's essentially my criterion for judging whether AI or the human is the fuel. After all, living brain cells can now run operational AI.

4. The data tells a brutal truth

Most companies that use AI see no productivity improvement.

This isn't me saying it.

Fortune reported in February this year: Thousands of CEOs admit AI has had no practical impact on employment and productivity.

Goldman Sachs latest research: No significant correlation between AI and productivity.

Tom's Hardware citing a survey of 6000 executives:Over 80% of companies report no productivity gains from AI.

Nobel laureate in economics Daron Acemoglu stated bluntly: AI is not improving productivity.

Harvard Business Review's headline in February was even more direct:

"AI Doesn't Reduce Work — It Intensifies It"

UC Berkeley research also warns: The effect AI is producing in the workplace is the opposite of what was expected—employees did become more productive, but the workload also skyrocketed, ultimately leading to burnout.

5. What you should truly be anxious about is not "I haven't learned to use AI yet"

But rather "I've already forgotten how to think for myself."

Independent thinking is the scarcest asset of this era.

AI can help you write 80-point content, but the leap from 80 to 100, only the human brain can accomplish. AI can help you gather information, but judging which information is important and how to combine it into unique insights—that's human work.

Research shows that in SAT writing tests, the group using AI assistance had the lowest brain activity, and their content was evaluated as "lacking originality and warmth."

Over-reliance on AI, especially among young people, can negatively impact brain development.

While you're training AI, you're also letting your own brain atrophy.

This isn't science fiction. It's a悲哀 (tragic) thing happening right now.

6. The right posture

Embrace change, learn to enhance cognition, and stay清醒 (clear-headed).

Know what things AI does better than you—

Repetitive tasks, data organization, format conversion, first draft generation. Hand these over to AI, no problem.

Also know what things you do better than AI—

Strategic judgment, relationship maintenance, creative intuition, value trade-offs, time management. These abilities require you to practice repeatedly, not outsource to a model.

Not every problem needs an AI solution.

Sometimes turning off all tools and thinking quietly for 10 minutes is more effective than opening 10 AI windows.

Don't let "AI anxiety" become your new shackles.

Those selling AI panic on X are profiting from your anxiety. Every time you share "you're finished if you don't learn AI," you're working for them for free.

The real winners of this AI wave are not those who use AI the most, but those who know when NOT to use AI.

Related Questions

QWhat is the main argument the author makes about AI content on social media platforms like X?

AThe author argues that 80% of AI content on platforms like X is essentially 'fear-mongering marketing,' a mature monetization chain that manufactures anxiety to capture attention and traffic, rather than providing genuine value or truth.

QAccording to the article, why is copying someone else's AI strategy or workflow a flawed approach?

AIt is flawed because AI strategies are highly personalized. Copying a configuration designed for a specific professional (e.g., a programmer) is ineffective for someone with a different role (e.g., a marketer), as it doesn't transfer the original user's cognitive framework and context, resulting in a collection of unusable files.

QWhat data and sources does the author cite to support the claim that AI has not improved productivity?

AThe author cites multiple sources: Fortune's report on CEOs admitting no real impact on jobs or productivity, a Goldman Sachs study finding no significant correlation, a Tom's Hardware survey of 6,000 executives where over 80% reported no productivity gains, and statements from Nobel laureate Daron Acemoglu and a Harvard Business Review article titled 'AI Doesn't Reduce Work — It Intensifies It'.

QWhat is identified as the 'biggest trap' of using AI?

AThe biggest trap is not that 'you don't know how to use AI,' but that 'you use it for everything.' This leads to outsourcing core human competencies like strategic judgment, relationship management, creative intuition, and, most critically, the ability to manage one's own time and priorities, which AI cannot effectively do as it lacks personal context.

QWhat does the author propose as the 'correct posture' for engaging with AI?

AThe correct posture is to embrace change and learn to use AI for tasks it excels at (repetitive work, data sorting, draft generation) while maintaining清醒 (clarity) and consciously practicing and preserving the human capabilities that AI cannot replicate (strategic judgment, creativity, value-based decision-making). The true winners are those who know when NOT to use AI.

Related Reads

$9.4 Billion: The Largest Robotics Funding This Year Has Emerged

Munich-based humanoid robotics company Neura has completed a $1.4 billion (approximately RMB 94.9 billion) Series C funding round, valuing the company at around $7 billion and positioning it among the global leaders in the sector. The investment round is notable not just for its size—reportedly the largest in robotics this year—but also for its strategic backers, which include tech giants like NVIDIA and Amazon, alongside established industrial players such as German engineering firms Bosch and Schaeffler. This mix of investors signals a significant shift in the industry's focus from technological demonstrations and general-purpose narratives toward practical, industrial deployment and commercialization. Neura's approach centers on developing humanoid robots for defined, high-value industrial tasks rather than pursuing a general-purpose model. Its early validation comes from a partnership with BMW, where its robots are being tested on actual production lines. The involvement of Bosch and Schaeffler, companies deeply embedded in global manufacturing, underscores a growing belief that humanoid robots are transitioning from labs to viable factory-floor solutions. The article highlights two converging trends driving investment: advancements in AI and large language models, which enhance robots' perception and decision-making in unstructured environments, and mounting pressure from labor shortages and rising costs in major manufacturing regions. The funding landscape is now bifurcating between companies like Figure AI, focusing on versatile general-purpose robots, and firms like Neura, targeting specific vertical industrial applications with clearer, shorter paths to ROI. While technical hurdles remain, the core challenges for widespread adoption are increasingly seen as engineering and commercial in nature: managing the high integration and customization costs for different factory environments and establishing robust, localized maintenance and service networks. The record investment in Neura, particularly from industrial capital, indicates the industry's growing confidence in moving from proving feasibility to solving the practical problems of scalability, reliability, and building sustainable business models around humanoid robots in real-world settings like automotive manufacturing and hazardous labor environments.

marsbit12h ago

$9.4 Billion: The Largest Robotics Funding This Year Has Emerged

marsbit12h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片