Why Does the Term 'Year of AI Computing Power Realization' Have Pitfalls? —Understanding the Four Hurdles from Policy Signals to Actual Orders in One Article

marsbitPublished on 2026-05-08Last updated on 2026-05-08

Abstract

This article critiques the phrase "The First Year of AI Computing Power Cashing In," arguing it oversimplifies a complex, multi-stage process. It proposes a "Four Gates" framework to assess the true commercialization of domestic AI computing power (like Huawei's Ascend chips): 1. **Policy Procurement:** Widely open in 2026. Significant government funding and large bulk orders from tech giants like Alibaba and Tencent exist. However, purchasing hardware is not the same as deploying it for real use. 2. **Real Deployment:** A crack has opened. The key evidence is DeepSeek V4, a top-tier AI model fully migrating from NVIDIA's CUDA to domestic computing platforms. This proves the capability for real, high-level tasks, but widespread adoption beyond leading tech firms is still nascent. 3. **Mature Software Ecosystem:** A narrow crack has opened. While frameworks like Huawei's CANN are progressing, they lag far behind NVIDIA's vast, established CUDA ecosystem in terms of supported models and developer ease-of-use. Building this middle-to-downstream developer environment is estimated to need 1-2 more years. 4. **Scalable Replication:** Essentially closed. This final gate, where thousands of mid-sized enterprises across various industries can easily adopt the technology without major migration costs, is not expected before 2027-2028. The core risk is conflating these stages. While 2026 marks a real turning point in policy-driven procurement and proving technical viability (Gates...

You must have seen this phrase in various research reports lately:

"2026 is the year of full realization for domestic AI computing power."

Dongwu Securities said it, Huayuan Securities said it, Galaxy Securities said it. They said it resolutely, as if it were an industry consensus.

But I want to ask a simple question: What exactly is being "realized"?

If you are investing in this sector or working in this industry, this question is worth answering seriously once.

Because there is a pitfall hidden in the term "year of realization"—it blurs a crucial distinction: policy procurement, trial orders, scaled deployment, and software ecosystem maturity are four completely different gates. Their timelines are different, and their value to the industrial chain is also completely different.

Mixing these four gates together and calling it "realization" can easily lead you to systematically misjudge the actual progress.

As usual, I will try to use one article to help you see these four gates clearly.

First, establish a framework for understanding: What does "true realization" mean?

Before discussing whether computing power is being realized, we first need to understand: What stages must a computing power product go through from being "developed" to "truly creating value"?

I summarize it into a transmission chain: policy procurement → real deployment → software ecosystem maturity → scaled replication.

First Gate·Policy Procurement: Procurement driven by government funding or policies. Computing power is bought, machines are shipped, but it may not be for real business needs, but to "complete deployment tasks."

Second Gate·Real Deployment: The purchased computing power is actually used to run business applications, not left idle in the server room. This requires enterprises to have real AI needs and be willing to connect them to this computing power.

Third Gate·Software Ecosystem Maturity: Developers can smoothly write code, deploy models, debug, and optimize on this computing power, rather than requiring "customized migration" each time with high adaptation costs.

Fourth Gate·Scaled Replication: The solution based on this computing power can be promoted from top-tier large enterprises to medium-sized enterprises, penetrating from the government/enterprise market to the internet/commercial market, forming economies of scale.

These four gates are progressive. If the later gates are not opened, progress in the earlier ones may look good on financial statements, but the real value of the industry is far from being realized.

First Gate·Policy Procurement: Already Open, and Opened Wide

This gate is indeed open in 2026, and it's opened quite wide.

Galaxy Securities believes that the heavyweight release of DeepSeek-V4 is gradually shifting market expectations from policy-driven substitution to the realization of real demand orders. Dongwu Securities believes that in Q1 2026, the computing power leasing industry ushered in a "quantitative change" of increased orders and price hikes, and a "qualitative change" in business model upgrades.

The Sci-Tech Innovation Relending Facility has expanded to 1.2 trillion yuan, targeting AI and semiconductors, and the 91.5 billion yuan NDRC equipment renewal fund is also tilted towards computing power infrastructure.

According to reports, Alibaba, ByteDance, and Tencent have placed bulk orders totaling hundreds of thousands of units for Huawei's upcoming Ascend 950PR chips. Due to surging demand, the price of Ascend 950PR chips has increased by about 20%.

This number means: This is no longer "symbolic procurement," but real large-scale orders.

But beware: The opening of policy procurement does not equal the comprehensive realization of the industrial chain. How many computing power cards are purchased and how much real business these cards run are two different things.

Second Gate·Real Deployment: A Crack Has Opened, But Full Opening is Still Some Distance Away

This gate is the key breakthrough point in 2026—but it is "a crack has opened," not "the door is wide open."

The core evidence for real deployment is DeepSeek V4.

On April 6, 2026, DeepSeek V4 was officially announced to have completely abandoned the NVIDIA CUDA ecosystem, migrating 100% to Huawei Ascend chips and the CANN software framework, becoming the world's first trillion-parameter MoE large model trained and deployed on purely domestic computing power. DeepSeek broke industry惯例 this time by not providing early testing access for V4 to U.S. chip suppliers, only giving priority adaptation windows to domestic chip manufacturers like Huawei and Cambricon.

What is the significance of this? It proves that domestic computing power can support the complete training and inference of world-class large models—not "just barely usable," but actually running. This is the most powerful proof that the second gate is opening.

However, the full opening of the second gate requires not just adaptation by leading large model companies, but the real business deployment by a wide range of enterprises. Internet giants running their own models is one thing; traditional enterprises landing AI into their own production processes is another—the latter is much slower than the former.

DeepSeek V4 broke the industry pricing system with its "cent-era" pricing, promoting AI applications from pilots to普及. In the second half of 2026, the core theme of China's AI industry will shift: low-cost models will stimulate an explosion in inference demand, and domestic computing power adaptation will enter the realization period.

But there is a subtle cycle here: model prices decrease → more companies are willing to trial → real call volume increases → computing power demand becomes stronger → computing power supply increases → model prices further decrease. This positive cycle has just begun and is not yet fully underway.

Judgment on the second gate: A crack has opened. Leading scenarios are already running, but mid- and long-tail scenarios are still on the way.

Third Gate·Software Ecosystem Maturity: A Crack Has Opened, But This Crack is the Narrowest

This is the most easily overlooked of the four gates, but also the most critical one for true "realization."

NVIDIA's CUDA is an ecosystem that started construction in 2006 and took twenty years to accumulate millions of developers. Huawei's CANN currently supports over 160 mainstream AI models, while the NVIDIA CUDA ecosystem covers over 23,000 models. This gap cannot be bridged in a few months.

But this gate is opening quickly.

The most powerful signal is DeepSeek V4's adaptation strategy. DeepSeek stated that, limited by high-end computing power, the service throughput of Pro is currently quite limited. It is expected that after the batch上市 of Ascend 950 super nodes in the second half of the year, the price of Pro will be significantly reduced.

Hidden in this statement is an important signal: DeepSeek is not just "using domestic computing power"; it is actively waiting for the scaled supply of domestic computing power to ramp up, then converting this computing power capability into lower API pricing to promote broader application普及. This is a symbiotic relationship deeply绑定 between a model provider and a computing power provider, not passive adaptation.

Caitong Securities believes that 2026 is also the first year of scaled volume for domestic super nodes on the inference side. Currently, many domestic manufacturers have released new-generation super node solutions. Huawei Atlas 950/960搭载 8192/15488 computing power cards. Sugon, Moore Threads, Kunlunxin, Alibaba Panjiu, etc., all have super node layouts. Supply and demand sides are meeting each other halfway, and the industrial chain is about to enter a volume-expansion phase.

Judgment on the third gate: Top-level adaptation has been achieved, but the mid- and downstream developer ecosystem needs 1-2 years of systematic construction to truly mature.

Fourth Gate·Scaled Replication: Not Yet Opened

This is the gate currently farthest away among the four, and also the final form of "realization."

What does scaled replication mean? It means it's not just Huawei, ByteDance, Tencent using domestic computing power, but the IT systems of thousands of medium-sized enterprises, quality inspection AI in industrial manufacturing, auxiliary diagnosis systems in hospitals—all running on domestic computing power, and these customers do not feel significant migration costs.

This step has not arrived in 2026.

The core reason: The IT teams of medium-sized enterprises do not have the capability to independently complete computing power migration. Top-tier large companies have AI infrastructure teams of hundreds of people who can invest manpower in customized adaptation; a manufacturing company with 500 people might have an IT team of only three to five people. They need "plug-and-play" solutions, not computing platforms that "require six months of migration engineering."

This issue is not about chip performance, not about the software framework, but about the封装 level of the solution—it requires a complete service capability from computing hardware to the application layer, allowing medium-sized enterprises to use domestic computing power to run their own AI without needing to understand the底层.

Judgment on the fourth gate: Scaled replication is not visible in 2026; this might be something that happens in 2027-2028.

"Four Gates of Computing Power Realization" Verification Checklist

Next time you see any report about "computing power realization," you can use this verification checklist for reference:

First Gate·Policy Procurement

Verification Metrics: Scale of policy fund落地 / Number of domestic chip大单成交

2026 Status: Opened, and opened wide

Risk Warning: Procurement volume ≠ Deployment volume. Don't confuse them.

Second Gate·Real Deployment

Verification Metrics: Q1 computing power leasing increased orders & price hikes / Real adaptation status of large model vendors / Computing power utilization rate

2026 Status: A crack has opened. Leading scenarios are running, mid- and long-tail scenarios still on the way.

Risk Warning: Looking at the leaders does not equal looking at the whole picture.

Third Gate·Software Ecosystem Maturity

Verification Metrics: Number of models covered by CANN / Developer migration cost / Number of adaptation cases for medium-sized enterprises

2026 Status: Top-level adaptation achieved. Mid- and downstream ecosystem needs 1-2 years.

Risk Warning: This gate determines how deep the computing power's "moat" is.

Fourth Gate·Scaled Replication

Verification Metrics: Number of projects where medium-sized enterprises purchase domestic computing power / Case studies of vertical industry AI application落地

2026 Status: Basically not opened.

Risk Warning: This gate is the final state of "realization." Don't celebrate early.

A Final Fair Word

Saying the phrase "year of realization" is completely wrong would be incorrect. From the perspective of the first gate (policy procurement), 2026 is indeed a real realization. Domestic computing power has changed from "requiring policy subsidies for anyone to buy" to "a supplier actively competed for by large companies"—this qualitative change is real.

But if you understand "year of realization" as "the computing power industrial chain comprehensively explodes, and the performance of related companies is fully realized," then that's dangerous.

The fourth gate not being open means the current industrial landscape is still a game among a few leading players. True economies of scale need to wait for the third and fourth gates to open one after another—that will be the point of a larger, more sustained market爆发.

After completing the research for this article, I have two takeaways for your reference:

First, within the computing power industrial chain, the "realization progress" corresponding to different segments varies极大. Chip design and manufacturing (most directly benefiting from the first gate), computing power leasing (benefiting from the second gate), software toolchains (benefiting from the third gate), vertical industry solution providers (benefiting from the fourth gate)—the realization time windows for these four directions could differ by a full two years.

Second, the deep binding between DeepSeek V4 and domestic computing power is the most important industrial signal of 2026, bar none. It transforms the question from "Can domestic computing power be used?" to "When can domestic computing power be supplied?"—this is an essential shift in the narrative.

This article is from the WeChat public account "BT财经" (ID: btcjv1), author: BT财经

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, what are the four stages (or gates) that AI computing power needs to pass through from development to truly creating value?

AThe four stages are: 1) Policy-Driven Procurement, 2) Real Business Deployment, 3) Mature Software Ecosystem, and 4) Large-Scale Replication.

QWhat is the key evidence mentioned in the article that the second gate (Real Business Deployment) has begun to open?

AThe key evidence is DeepSeek V4's official announcement to completely abandon the Nvidia CUDA ecosystem and 100% migrate to Huawei's Ascend chips and CANN framework, proving that domestic computing power can support the full training and inference of a world-class large-scale model.

QWhy does the article say the third gate (Mature Software Ecosystem) is the narrowest and most critical for true 'realization'?

ABecause Nvidia's CUDA ecosystem has been built over 20 years, covering over 23,000 models, while Huawei's CANN currently supports around 160. Bridging this gap in developers and model coverage takes time, and a mature ecosystem is crucial for reducing migration costs and achieving widespread adoption.

QWhat is the main reason given for the fourth gate (Large-Scale Replication) not being open yet in 2026?

AMid-sized enterprises lack the in-house IT capabilities (unlike tech giants with large dedicated teams) to handle the customized migration work required to adopt domestic computing power. They need fully packaged 'plug-and-play' solutions, which are not yet widely available.

QWhat does the article identify as the most important industrial signal of 2026 regarding domestic AI computing power?

ADeepSeek V4's deep binding with domestic computing power. It transforms the industry narrative from 'Can domestic computing power be used?' to 'When can domestic computing power supply meet the demand?', representing a fundamental shift.

Related Reads

Must-Watch Events Next Week|CLARITY Act Could Face Senate Vote; SpaceX, Circle to Report Earnings (8.3-8.9)

**Summary: Key Events and Developments to Watch (August 3-9)** The upcoming week is marked by significant financial disclosures, key legislative deadlines, and notable product updates. **Major Financial Events:** Several companies are scheduled to release their Q2 2026 earnings. American Bitcoin (ABTC) will report on August 3, followed by SpaceX and Hut 8 Mining Corp. on August 4, and Circle on August 5. Notably, a significant portion of SpaceX shares (up to 12% of total shares) will be unlocked on August 6 following their earnings release. **Key Legislative Deadline:** The U.S. Senate faces an August 7 deadline to secure 60 votes for the CLARITY Act, a bipartisan bill aiming to establish a federal regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies. The Senate may hold a full vote on the bill during the week. **Economic Data:** The U.S. July Non-Farm Payrolls report will be released on August 7, providing crucial labor market data. **Technology & Product Updates:** * **Shutdowns:** DeFi portfolio tracker Zapper and wallet app Ctrl Wallet will cease operations on August 3. * **Upgrades:** LayerZero will deprecate its v1 relayers on August 3. XRP Ledger's new version 3.3.0, featuring five new functions, is expected next week. * **AI:** Elon Musk announced that the advanced Grok 4.6 AI model is set for release around August 7. * **Bitcoin:** The BIP-110 forced signaling for a potential Bitcoin network change is scheduled to begin around August 8. **Other Notable Events:** Chinese robotics firm Unitree Tech has set its preliminary price inquiry for its IPO for August 5. South Korean exchange Upbit will delist AQT and AERGO tokens on August 3.

marsbit49m ago

Must-Watch Events Next Week|CLARITY Act Could Face Senate Vote; SpaceX, Circle to Report Earnings (8.3-8.9)

marsbit49m ago

Stocks Are Plummeting More Sharply Than Cryptocurrencies. Where Has the Money Gone?

Stock Markets Plunge Deeper Than Cryptocurrencies: Where Did the Money Go? In late July, Seoul's Kospi index triggered circuit breakers for two consecutive days, plummeting over 40% from its June high. The collapse was led by heavyweight stocks like SK Hynix, whose record profits still disappointed investors, and devastating leveraged ETFs, with one major product losing over 83% of its value. This signaled a global, forced deleveraging targeting the most crowded trades. Interestingly, while stocks exhibited extreme volatility akin to crypto markets, Bitcoin rose nearly 15% in July after a prior steep drop. Analysis shows the money fleeing equities did not flow into Bitcoin. Instead, Bitcoin had already absorbed its sell-off in May-June, when U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs saw historic outflows. The true safe-haven beneficiary was gold, whose price rose over 20% year-on-year, highlighting a decoupling between Bitcoin and gold as "digital gold." The sell-off was a targeted unwinding of leveraged positions in tech and semiconductors, accelerated by broker-dealer risk management and shifts in the AI narrative, including new competition from Chinese memory chipmakers. The retreat path was clear: from high-valuation tech stocks to cash and U.S. Treasuries, then to gold. For Bitcoin to attract sustained institutional inflows, conditions like eased global liquidity pressure, a "soft-landing" Fed rate cut, and U.S. regulatory clarity via legislation like the stalled CLARITY Act are needed. Currently, Bitcoin is not a safe haven but an already-cleared asset. Its low correlation with tech stocks, however, makes it a potential diversification play for institutional portfolios once the storm passes. The money isn't here yet, but the positioning is underway.

marsbit49m ago

Stocks Are Plummeting More Sharply Than Cryptocurrencies. Where Has the Money Gone?

marsbit49m ago

In Conversation with Ray Dalio: We Are Currently in an AI Bubble, with 1% of My Portfolio in Bitcoin

Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates, warns in an interview that the current AI boom shows classic bubble characteristics, which could lead to significant economic downturns as seen in past cycles like 1929 or 2000. He explains that speculative enthusiasm, fueled by debt and overvaluation, often precedes a crash when rising rates or taxation force asset sales, causing widespread losses and recession. Dalio also outlines his "Big Cycle" theory, describing an approximate 80-year pattern where widening wealth gaps, massive government deficits, and shifting geopolitical power (like China's rise) create internal conflict and global instability. He emphasizes that we are in a late-cycle, transitional phase where traditional powers like the US and UK face decline. For personal wealth protection, Dalio advises diversification beyond cash into assets like stocks, bonds, real estate, and particularly gold, which he prefers over Bitcoin. While he holds about 1% of his portfolio in Bitcoin as a non-printable hard asset, he views gold as more secure from technological or governmental threats. Regarding AI's impact, Dalio believes it will disproportionately benefit capital owners, worsening inequality by replacing both physical and cognitive labor. He suggests that human intuition and emotional intelligence, combined with AI, will be key for future workers. On taxation, Dalio argues that wealth taxes are impractical and risk triggering asset sell-offs, reducing productive investment. He points to the UK as a cautionary example of debt, low productivity, and political strife. Geopolitically, Dalio foresees a more regionalized world, with the US showing weakness in prolonged conflicts like with Iran, akin to past imperial declines. The ideal outcome, he suggests, is coexisting powerful blocs (e.g., Americas, China-Asia Pacific) without major war.

marsbit4h ago

In Conversation with Ray Dalio: We Are Currently in an AI Bubble, with 1% of My Portfolio in Bitcoin

marsbit4h ago

Daily 7.2 Trillion KRW: Foreign Capital's Record Net Buying on Friday! Wall Street Says Headwinds for Korean Stock Fund Flows Have Subsided

South Korean stock market sees a dramatic shift in fund flows. On July 31, foreign investors made a record net purchase of approximately KRW 7.2 trillion in KOSPI stocks, marking a fundamental reversal from the persistent large-scale net outflows seen in previous months. This contributed to a significant narrowing of foreign net selling in July to KRW 9.8 trillion, down sharply from KRW 48.4 trillion in June and KRW 44.5 trillion in May. Simultaneously, domestic institutional pressure eased. South Korean pension funds and asset managers turned to a net buying position in July, purchasing KRW 1.0 trillion worth of KOSPI shares, contrasting with net sales in May and June. Market volatility is expected to be dampened by new financial regulations. Effective July 31, the Financial Services Commission tightened access for retail investors to single-stock leveraged ETFs by raising the minimum cash deposit requirement. Trading volumes for these products subsequently dropped to about 50% of their monthly average. Citigroup Research maintains its year-end KOSPI target of 10,000 points. The firm cites several supportive factors: the substantial easing of headwinds from capital outflows, a robust fundamental outlook for the semiconductor sector, historically low market valuations, strong economic fundamentals, and the potential for policy support from financial authorities if needed.

marsbit4h ago

Daily 7.2 Trillion KRW: Foreign Capital's Record Net Buying on Friday! Wall Street Says Headwinds for Korean Stock Fund Flows Have Subsided

marsbit4h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片