Vitalik: What We Need to Do Is Not Fight AI, But Create Sanctuaries

marsbitPublished on 2026-05-18Last updated on 2026-05-18

Abstract

Vitalik Buterin, in an a16z podcast, addresses the core challenge of the AI era: not to fight AI, but to build "sanctuary technologies" that protect humans without stripping away privacy and agency. He argues the greatest risk is not super-intelligent AI, but humans becoming passive passengers who outsource decisions to centralized systems and AI, leading to a disempowering safety. He redefines Ethereum/crypto's mission as creating such a sanctuary—a parallel, optional space for free coordination, not a fix for the existing system. This becomes crucial as AI and corporate power centralize. Reflecting on his journey from a 19-year-old on "autopilot" to an active "pilot," Vitalik emphasizes that the world reinvents itself every 5-10 years, demanding proactive adaptation. He stresses that active learning is 10x more effective than passive learning, even with equal time. His key advice is to intentionally maintain "manual mode" amidst powerful AI: do tasks yourself, engage in active learning, and avoid total cognitive outsourcing to prevent mental atrophy. For builders, the focus should be on creating tools that preserve human sovereignty, foster serendipity, and keep strategic control. In summary, the AI era demands greater human initiative. True value lies not in computational power, but in active, sovereign individuals who use technology as a tool for agency, not a replacement for it.

Author: Saito

Just finished listening to this episode of Vitalik's podcast on a16z, and it's absolutely packed with insights.

He founded Ethereum at 19, and now in his early 30s, he has shifted from living on "autopilot" to being an "active pilot."

The core topic of this episode is the question we're most anxious about right now: As AI grows increasingly powerful, what should humanity do?

Vitalik's answer is not to "fight AI," but to create sanctuary technologies. These technologies protect us without stripping away our privacy and agency.

Today, I'll break down the hardest counterintuitive points, practical advice, and Ethereum's new positioning from this episode.

The Greatest Risk in the AI Era Is Not AI Being Too Smart, But Humans Being Too Passive

Vitalik states bluntly that the world is less safe and less peaceful now than it was 10 to 15 years ago.

Many people are chasing a kind of "safety": handing everything over to "uncles in the sky"—big companies, super AIs, centralized systems—letting them make decisions, manage risks, and provide protection for us.

But the cost of this safety is the loss of our privacy and agency.

Vitalik calls this safety "disempowering safety"—safety that makes people increasingly powerless.

This is also where he reinterprets the mission of crypto/Ethereum. The significance of Ethereum is not to "fix the dollar" or repair the existing financial system, but to create a new option. You can freely choose to use it or not.

This is what a true sanctuary is: both safe and allowing you to retain sovereignty.

Sanctuary Technologies: Small Spaces That Preserve Human Freedom

Sanctuary Technologies is a term coined by Vitalik himself, and "sanctuary technologies" is a fitting translation.

It's not about turning the entire world into a safe house, nor is it about ruling everyone with a larger system. What it truly aims to do is: give you a safe, small space where you can think, coordinate, and create freely, without being completely controlled by external forces.

It has several core characteristics: not totalizing, not attempting to rule the world; preserving privacy and agency; everyone can freely enter and exit, no coercion.

Ethereum is a typical sanctuary tech. It doesn't try to fix the existing financial system; it gives you a parallel option. Use it if you want, don't if you don't.

This will become increasingly important in the AI era. Because as big companies and super AIs grow stronger, what humanity truly needs is not another system that "arranges everything for you," but spaces that allow you to retain choice.

From Autopilot to Active Pilot: Vitalik's Personal Growth

Reflecting on founding Ethereum at 19, Vitalik says he was largely on autopilot back then.

Many decisions were made by going with the flow: dropping out, writing the whitepaper, getting his visa denied by Ripple, which ironically became a life turning point. He was more like being pushed along by the world then.

But now he increasingly realizes: the world is changing too fast, no one is coming to save you, you must be the pilot yourself.

He gives several relatable examples. Ten years ago, people could go days without contacting friends; now, not replying to a message for a day causes anxiety. Ten years ago, you could genuinely get lost while walking; now, with phone navigation, cities have become a series of "teleportation points."

These changes remind us: the world "dies and is reborn" every 5 to 10 years. If you keep living by the old script, you'll quickly fall behind.

So what's truly important in the AI era is not passively waiting for technology to take you somewhere, but actively deciding how you want to use technology.

The Stronger the AI, the More Humans Need to Stay in "Manual Mode"

Vitalik emphasizes: active learning is 10 times more effective than passive learning, even with the same amount of time spent.

Since childhood, he has forced himself to do many things manually, like doing chemistry without a calculator, walking without navigation. The goal isn't to oppose technology, but to keep the brain engaged.

The stronger the AI, the more we must deliberately preserve some "manual mode."

Sometimes intentionally not using AI to write code, sometimes intentionally walking without navigation, sometimes intentionally not using a chatbot to think through problems for you.

This isn't nostalgia or rejecting efficiency; it's to prevent brain atrophy and maintain one's own agency.

AI can help us with many things, but if all thinking, judgment, and exploration are outsourced, people will gradually become passengers in the system. Vitalik's reminder is: you can use AI, but don't let yourself become utterly dependent on it.

Practical Advice for Builders

The insights Vitalik gives for ordinary builders in this episode are very direct.

First, force yourself to do things manually. Even if AI can help you, do it yourself from time to time to ensure your brain doesn't get rusty.

Second, active learning. Don't just let AI give you answers; derive, verify, and do things yourself.

Third, build sanctuary technologies. Whether you're working on open-source tools, decentralized protocols, or personal knowledge bases, prioritize one thing: does it help people retain sovereignty?

Fourth, don't outsource all brainpower. AI can handle execution, but strategy, direction, and values must be controlled by you.

Fifth, maintain serendipity. Attend more offline events, talk to real people more, don't leave all discoveries to algorithmic recommendations.

These points all point to the same core: the AI era isn't about using fewer tools, but about using tools more actively.

Ethereum's New Positioning: Not Fixing the Old World, But Creating New Options

Vitalik's positioning of crypto is also clear.

Crypto can't solve all the problems of the dollar, nor does it need to pretend it can solve all problems. But it can create something new that doesn't have those flaws.

Everyone can freely choose to use it or not.

This is crypto's greatest strength: it doesn't force you; it gives you a choice.

In an era of increasingly concentrated AI power, this will become increasingly precious. Because as more and more systems try to make decisions for you, filter information for you, and assess risk for you, a parallel, non-coercive option that allows free entry and exit becomes very important in itself.

The value of Ethereum/crypto is not "beating the old world," but giving you a new world you can freely choose.

The Most Counterintuitive Lines from This Episode

The greatest risk in the AI era is not AI replacing humans, but humans willingly turning themselves into passengers.

A sanctuary isn't about making the whole world safe, but giving you a safe, small space where you can still retain freedom.

Active learning is 10 times more effective than passive learning, even with the same time spent.

The world dies and is reborn every 5 to 10 years, and we must be the pilots ourselves.

Inspiration for Ordinary People

The stronger the AI, the more proactive people must be.

Don't outsource all thinking to models. Do more manual things to keep your brain engaged. Participate in building tools that preserve human sovereignty, whether open-source, decentralized, or personal knowledge management systems.

Remember: technology ultimately serves humanity; it doesn't replace it.

Vitalik concludes by saying that we humans are the brightest stars. AI can be strong, but what truly drives the world forward are active, agentic people.

One-Sentence Summary

Vitalik, drawing on his 10 years of personal experience, tells us: the AI era is not an era to lie back, but an era that requires humans to be even more proactive pilots.

Don't outsource your brain to models. Do more manual things, build sanctuary technologies, and preserve your privacy and agency.

My biggest takeaway from this episode is: we used to fear AI taking our jobs, but now it seems AI is actually upgrading humans from "executors" to "designers."

What's truly scarce has never been computing power, but people willing to think actively and retain sovereignty.

Related Questions

QAccording to Vitalik, what is the core purpose of 'Sanctuary Technologies'?

AThe core purpose of 'Sanctuary Technologies' is to provide safe spaces where people can freely think, coordinate, and create while preserving their privacy and agency. They are not designed to dominate or fix the entire world, but to offer a voluntary, non-compulsory alternative, giving people a choice in an era of increasingly centralized power from large corporations and super-AI.

QWhat is the main risk of the 'disempowering safety' that Vitalik warns against in the AI era?

AThe main risk of 'disempowering safety' is that it makes humans increasingly passive and powerless. By handing over decisions, risk management, and protection to centralized entities like big companies or super-AI, individuals lose their privacy and agency. The article argues the biggest danger is not AI being too smart, but humans willingly turning themselves into passive passengers.

QHow does Vitalik's view of Ethereum's mission differ from simply 'fixing' the existing financial system?

AVitalik's view is that Ethereum's mission is not to 'fix' the existing financial system (like the US dollar), but to create a new, parallel option. Its power lies in giving people the freedom to choose whether to use it or not, offering an alternative without the flaws of the old system. This approach of providing voluntary choice, rather than enforced replacement, is its key strength.

QWhat practical advice does Vitalik offer for builders and individuals to maintain agency in the AI age?

AVitalik offers several practical pieces of advice: 1) Force yourself to do things manually at times to keep your mind sharp. 2) Engage in active learning (self-driven exploration) rather than just passively accepting AI answers. 3) Build tools that prioritize preserving human sovereignty. 4) Do not outsource all strategic and creative thinking to AI. 5) Maintain serendipity through real-world interactions.

QWhat does Vitalik mean by saying 'the world dies and gets reborn every 5 to 10 years' and its implication for individuals?

AVitalik means that the world undergoes fundamental transformations every 5-10 years, making old patterns of living obsolete. The implication for individuals is that they cannot rely on an old 'script' or be passive. To keep up and thrive, people must actively 'pilot' their own lives, make conscious choices about how to use technology, and continuously adapt, rather than being passively carried along by change.

Related Reads

TaiJi Secures $3.5 Million Strategic Funding with Participation from Castrum Capital, Becker Ventures, and Coinvestor Ventures

TaiJi Secures $3.5 Million Strategic Funding TaiJi has announced the completion of a $3.5 million strategic funding round, with participation from Castrum Capital, Becker Ventures, and Coinvestor Ventures. The investment will support product development, upgrades to its AI inference engine, the construction of a multi-agent analysis system, improvements to market data infrastructure, global community expansion, and the advancement of ecosystem partnerships. Operating within the BSC ecosystem, TaiJi is building an AI-driven on-chain market intelligence network. The platform integrates market data, on-chain fund flows, liquidity changes, social media sentiment, news events, and project developments into a unified AI inference system. This approach aims to transform fragmented information into structured event inferences, impact pathways, risk assessments, and follow-up indicators, helping users navigate the increasingly complex and event-driven Web3 market. Unlike traditional market tools, TaiJi is constructing an intelligent analysis framework. It continuously aggregates real-time data to form a native market data network and builds a dataset of post-event market reactions for review. A core component is its multi-agent inference framework, where specialized agents—for markets, on-chain activity, sentiment, risk, and events—collaborate to analyze signals and generate insights. The first phase of TaiJi's product will focus on several key modules: Market Intelligence for real-time data aggregation; a Scenario Engine for AI-driven event inference; an Impact Map visualizing effects on assets and narratives; Risk Signals for identifying potential threats; and My TaiJi for personalized tracking and historical analysis. With this new funding, TaiJi plans to accelerate product development and testing, gradually rolling out its core features while expanding its presence within the BSC ecosystem and the broader global Web3 market.

链捕手3m ago

TaiJi Secures $3.5 Million Strategic Funding with Participation from Castrum Capital, Becker Ventures, and Coinvestor Ventures

链捕手3m ago

Eight Global Central Banks Enter the Fray, Aiming to Claim a Piece of the Stablecoin Pie?

The article discusses the Agorá project, a global cross-border payment system initiative led by the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) with participation from eight major central banks (including the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Bank of England, and Bank of Japan) and over 40 private financial institutions like JPMorgan and SWIFT. Agorá aims to create a unified platform for the instant settlement of cross-border transactions using tokenized commercial bank deposits. A key feature is its strict "permissioned" design, where funds are pre-labeled by country and smart contracts enforce AML and sanctions checks. This contrasts with the "permissionless" ideal suggested by its ancient Greek namesake. The system employs a two-tier architecture: central banks retain full control over sovereign reserves on separate ledgers, while private entities manage a shared ledger for multi-currency clearing. The project, which completed a prototype in May 2026, seeks to streamline the slow, multi-step process of traditional cross-border payments. It is positioned as a centralized, regulatory-compliant alternative to decentralized stablecoins like Tether, targeting large-scale institutional transfers. The analysis highlights a potential future market split: projects like Agorá could dominate wholesale institutional payments, while public blockchain-based stablecoins retain their role in retail, remittance, and emerging market use cases. This represents an effort by traditional finance to establish boundaries for decentralized networks. The upcoming integration of the EU's Pontes framework with its core settlement system will test this dynamic.

marsbit22m ago

Eight Global Central Banks Enter the Fray, Aiming to Claim a Piece of the Stablecoin Pie?

marsbit22m ago

BitMart Research Institute Weekly Highlights: ETF Continued Outflows + AI Drain, Crypto Market Seeks Bottom Amid Volatility

**BitMart Research Weekly Highlights: ETF Outflows and AI Demand Weigh on Crypto Market** The crypto market saw a correction this past week, diverging from the all-time highs in U.S. equity markets. Bitcoin (BTC) fell roughly 6%, while Ethereum (ETH) declined about 4.5%. The primary pressure point was significant and sustained outflows from U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs, which experienced a record nine consecutive days of net redemptions totaling approximately $2.8 billion. Spot Ethereum ETFs also faced continuous outflows. This weakness in digital assets contrasted with the continued surge in traditional markets, particularly AI-related stocks. The news of Anthropic's secret IPO filing, targeting a potential $750B IPO, and Alphabet's major new AI infrastructure funding further fueled the tech rally. The analysis suggests a potential "liquidity siphon" effect, where capital is being diverted from crypto into the dominant AI investment narrative. Other notable developments include DTCC's DTC announcing plans to integrate Stellar for tokenized asset services, signaling a major step for tokenized equities. Meanwhile, MicroStrategy paused its primary mechanism for funding Bitcoin purchases to focus on debt management, removing a key institutional buyer from the market. The report concludes that the crypto market remains under pressure from the competing AI narrative and major upcoming IPOs, with a potential for a broader market bottom if an AI-driven correction occurs later this cycle.

marsbit38m ago

BitMart Research Institute Weekly Highlights: ETF Continued Outflows + AI Drain, Crypto Market Seeks Bottom Amid Volatility

marsbit38m ago

The Death of the Three-Act Play: AI Ushers Enterprise Software Startups into the ‘Speedrun Era’

The Death of the Three-Act Play: How AI is Ushering in a 'Speedrun Era' for Enterprise Software Startups The traditional three-act play for building an enterprise software company—first, a niche wedge product; second, an expanded suite; third, a dominant platform—is becoming obsolete in the AI era. Previously, startups would spend 3-5 years perfecting a single-point solution to reach tens of millions in ARR (Act 1: The Wedge). Then, over another few years, they'd build adjacent products to form a suite and cross the $100M ARR threshold (Act 2: The Suite). Finally, with scale and user engagement, they could aim to become a foundational platform themselves (Act 3: The Platform). This model assumed a timeline measured in years. However, AI-driven tools have dramatically compressed software development costs and timelines. Companies like Cursor, Clay, and Harvey have scaled from near zero to approaching or surpassing $100M ARR in remarkably short periods, demonstrating a new competitive pace. The core argument is that in this rapidly changing market, relying on a small, "safe" wedge as a protective harbor may now be a conservative, even risky, strategy. The plummeting cost of building software means the time required for Acts 1 and 2 is approaching zero. Consequently, rational strategy now favors planning to build the entire vision from the outset. This shift changes the calculus for early-stage investment. The emphasis is moving from finding a defensible niche to backing founders with "unreasonable, relentless ambition" to reimagine entire workflows or replace incumbent platforms from day one. The age of gradual expansion is giving way to an era of immediate, full-scale ambition.

marsbit57m ago

The Death of the Three-Act Play: AI Ushers Enterprise Software Startups into the ‘Speedrun Era’

marsbit57m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片