Vitalik: We Need to Create Sanctuaries, Not Fight AI

链捕手Published on 2026-05-17Last updated on 2026-05-17

Abstract

In a recent interview, Vitalik Buterin, founder of Ethereum, addresses the central anxiety of the AI era. He argues the primary risk isn't AI's intelligence, but human passivity—ceding decisions, privacy, and agency to centralized systems or "super AIs" for a sense of "disempowering safety." His solution is not to fight AI, but to build "sanctuary technologies." These are optional, non-totalizing spaces that protect users while preserving their sovereignty and privacy. Ethereum is presented as a prime example, offering a parallel financial system one can freely choose, not a fix for the old one. Reflecting on his journey from a 19-year-old on "autopilot" to an active "pilot," Vitalik notes the world reinvents itself every 5-10 years. To keep up, individuals must actively pilot their lives, not be passive passengers. He stresses that active learning vastly outperforms passive learning, even with equal time invested. His practical advice for builders and individuals in the AI age includes: periodically forcing oneself to do tasks manually to keep the mind engaged; prioritizing active learning and verification over outsourcing answers; building tools that help retain human agency; not outsourcing all strategic thinking to AI; and preserving serendipity through real-world interactions. Ultimately, Buterin redefines Ethereum/crypto's role: not to win against or fix the old world, but to provide a free, optional alternative. The core message is that as AI grows more powerful, t...

Author: Saito

Just finished listening to this a16z podcast episode with Vitalik. The amount of information was mind-blowing.

He founded Ethereum at 19, now in his early 30s, he's transitioned from living on "autopilot" to being an "active pilot."

The core topic of this episode is the issue we're most anxious about right now: As AI gets stronger, what should humans do?

Vitalik's answer is not "fighting AI," but creating "sanctuary technologies." These technologies protect us without stripping away our privacy and agency.

Today, I'm breaking down the most counterintuitive ideas, practical advice, and Ethereum's new positioning from this episode.

The Biggest Risk in the AI Era Isn't AI Being Too Smart, It's Humans Being Too Passive

Vitalik states directly that the world today is less safe and less peaceful than it was 10 to 15 years ago.

Many people are pursuing a kind of "safety": handing everything over to "Uncle in the sky"—big companies, super AIs, centralized systems—letting them make decisions, manage risks, and provide protection for us.

But the price of this safety is losing our privacy and agency.

Vitalik calls this safety "disempowering safety," safety that makes people increasingly powerless.

This is also where he reinterprets the mission of crypto/Ethereum. Ethereum's significance isn't to "fix the dollar," not to repair the existing financial system, but to create a new option. You are free to choose whether to use it or not.

This is the real sanctuary: both safe, and allowing you to retain sovereignty.

Sanctuary Technologies: Small Spaces Preserving Human Freedom

"Sanctuary Technologies" is a term coined by Vitalik, and "sanctuary technologies" is a fitting translation.

It's not about turning the whole world into a safe house, nor is it about using a bigger system to rule everyone. What it truly aims to do is: give you a safe small space where you can think freely, coordinate, create, without being completely controlled by external forces.

It has several core features: it is not totalizing, does not attempt to rule the world; preserves privacy and agency; everyone can freely enter and exit, it's not mandatory.

Ethereum is a typical sanctuary tech. It doesn't try to fix the existing financial system, but gives you a parallel option. Use it if you want, don't if you don't.

This will become increasingly important in the AI era. Because as big companies and super AIs become more powerful, what humans truly need is not another system that "arranges everything for you," but a space that allows you to retain the power of choice.

From Autopilot to Active Pilot: Vitalik's Personal Growth

Looking back on founding Ethereum at 19, Vitalik says he was largely in an autopilot state back then.

Many decisions were made by going with the flow: dropping out of school, writing the whitepaper, getting his visa denied by Ripple, which ironically became turning points in his life. He was more like being pushed along by the world.

But now he increasingly realizes: the world changes too fast, no one is coming to save you, you have to be the pilot yourself.

He gives a few very relatable examples. Ten years ago, people wouldn't worry about not contacting friends for days; now you get anxious if you don't reply to a message for a day. Ten years ago, you could actually get "lost" while walking; now with phone navigation, cities have become clusters of "teleportation points."

These changes remind us: the world "dies once and is reborn again" every 5 to 10 years. If you keep living by the old script, you'll fall behind quickly.

So what's truly important in the AI era is not passively waiting for technology to take you somewhere, but actively deciding how you want to use technology.

The Stronger the AI, the More Humans Must Maintain "Manual Mode"

Vitalik emphasizes this: active learning is 10 times more effective than passive learning, even if the time spent is the same.

Since childhood, he has forced himself to do many things manually, like not using a calculator in chemistry class, walking without navigation. The goal isn't to be anti-technology, but to keep the brain engaged.

The stronger AI becomes, the more we must intentionally preserve some "manual mode."

Sometimes deliberately not using AI to write code, sometimes deliberately walking without navigation, sometimes deliberately not letting a chatbot think through problems for you.

This isn't nostalgia, nor rejecting efficiency. It's to prevent brain atrophy and maintain one's own agency.

AI can help us do many things, but if all thinking, judgment, and exploration are outsourced, humans will gradually become passengers in the system. Vitalik's reminder is: you can use AI, but don't let yourself become completely dependent on it.

Practical Advice for Builders

Vitalik's inspiration for ordinary builders in this episode is very direct.

First, force yourself to do things manually. Even if AI can help you, do it yourself from time to time to ensure your brain doesn't get rusty.

Second, active learning. Don't just let AI give you answers. Derive, verify, and do things yourself.

Third, build sanctuary technologies. Whether you're building open-source tools, decentralized protocols, or a personal knowledge base, prioritize one thing: does it help people retain sovereignty?

Fourth, don't outsource all brainpower. AI can help with execution, but strategy, direction, and values must be controlled by you.

Fifth, maintain serendipity. Attend offline events more, talk to real people more, don't leave all discovery to algorithm recommendations.

These points all point to the same core: the AI era isn't about using tools less, but about using them more proactively.

Ethereum's New Positioning: Not Fixing the Old World, But Creating a New Option

Vitalik is also clear about crypto's positioning.

Crypto can't solve all of the dollar's problems, nor does it need to pretend it can solve all problems. But it can create something new that doesn't have those drawbacks.

Everyone is free to choose whether to use it or not.

This is crypto's greatest strength: it doesn't force you, it gives you a choice.

In an era where AI is becoming increasingly centralized, this will become increasingly precious. Because as more and more systems try to make decisions for you, filter information for you, and judge risks for you, a parallel, non-coercive option that allows free entry and exit becomes very important in itself.

The value of Ethereum/crypto is not "winning against the old world," but giving you a new world you can freely choose.

The Most Counterintuitive Quotes from This Episode

The biggest risk in the AI era isn't AI replacing humans, it's humans willingly turning themselves into passengers.

Sanctuary isn't about making the whole world safe, but giving you a safe small space where you can still retain freedom.

Active learning is 10 times more effective than passive learning, even with the same time.

The world dies and is reborn every 5 to 10 years; we must be the pilot ourselves.

Inspiration for Ordinary People

The stronger the AI, the more proactive humans need to be.

Don't outsource all thinking to models. Do more manual things to keep your brain engaged. Participate in building tools that preserve human sovereignty, whether open-source, decentralized, or personal knowledge management systems.

Remember: technology ultimately serves humanity, it doesn't replace it.

Vitalik concludes by saying we humans are the brightest stars. AI can be strong, but what truly drives the world forward are still active, agential humans.

One-Sentence Summary

Using his 10-year personal experience, Vitalik tells us: the AI era is not an era to lie back, but an era where humans need to actively steer more than ever.

Don't outsource your brain to models. Do more manual things, build sanctuary technologies, preserve your own privacy and agency.

My biggest takeaway after listening to this episode is: we used to fear AI taking our jobs; now it seems AI is actually upgrading humans from "executors" to "designers."

What's truly scarce has never been computing power, but people willing to think actively and preserve their sovereignty.

Related Questions

QWhat is the core argument Vitalik makes regarding humanity's approach to increasingly powerful AI?

AVitalik argues that we should not aim to 'fight AI,' but instead focus on creating 'sanctuary technologies.' These are technologies that protect us without stripping away our privacy and personal agency (sovereignty). They provide a safe, optional space for human freedom, thought, and coordination without seeking total control.

QHow does Vitalik define the term 'sanctuary technologies' and what are its key characteristics?

A'Sanctuary technologies' is a term coined by Vitalik. It refers to technologies designed to create small, safe spaces where individuals can retain their freedom and sovereignty. Key characteristics are: they are not totalizing (do not seek to rule everything), they preserve privacy and agency, and they are optional—people can freely choose to enter or exit them, like Ethereum.

QAccording to the article, what is Vitalik's personal evolution from his early days to the present?

AVitalik describes his evolution from being on 'autopilot' at age 19 when he co-founded Ethereum—making decisions reactively as events unfolded—to becoming an 'active pilot.' He now consciously takes charge, recognizing that the world changes drastically every 5-10 years and that one must actively navigate these shifts rather than passively relying on old scripts or external saviors.

QWhat practical advice does Vitalik offer for individuals and builders in the AI era?

AVitalik's advice includes: 1) Force yourself to do things manually sometimes to keep your mind sharp. 2) Engage in active learning (self-directed, hands-on) over passive learning. 3) Build or support sanctuary technologies that help preserve human sovereignty. 4) Do not outsource all strategic thinking and values to AI. 5) Maintain serendipity through in-person interactions, not just algorithmic discoveries.

QHow does Vitalik reframe the role and value of Ethereum/crypto in the context of AI and modern systems?

AVitalik reframes Ethereum/crypto not as a tool to 'fix' the existing system (like the dollar or traditional finance), but as a creator of a new, parallel option. Its core value is offering freedom of choice—you can use it or not. In an age where centralized systems and powerful AI may seek to make decisions for people, the ability to opt into a non-coercive, sovereign alternative becomes increasingly vital.

Related Reads

"Water Scarcity": The Hidden Fatal Flaw of AI Infrastructure

“Water Scarcity: The Hidden Vulnerability of AI Infrastructure” In June 2026, SpaceX revised its IPO prospectus to highlight a core resource constraint alongside power and processors: water. This move signals a pivotal shift where water scarcity has transformed from an operational cost to a major, uncontrollable investment risk, directly threatening AI data center expansion. The scale of the problem is immense. U.S. data centers consumed an estimated 17 billion gallons of water for direct cooling in 2023, with indirect water use for power generation exceeding 211 billion gallons. Giants like Google alone use billions of gallons annually, with single sites consuming volumes equivalent to a medium-sized city. This water is largely “consumptive,” evaporated into the atmosphere and lost. This massive demand is colliding with scarcity. Tech companies are building “water tigers” in arid regions, sparking community protests in places like Mexico and Arizona, where data centers can legally use millions of gallons daily—enough for tens of thousands of residents. These conflicts are not about illegality, but about a mismatch between historic water allocation frameworks and new, colossal demand. The consequences are real. Community opposition, largely centered on water, has reportedly stalled or canceled $64 billion in U.S. data center projects over two years. Simultaneously, investors are pressuring companies for greater water footprint transparency, viewing it as a financial risk, not just an ESG metric. Technological solutions like air or liquid cooling involve trade-offs between water and electricity use, with final choices dictated by local constraints. The irony is stark: while industry leaders envision AI as a utility “like water,” its physical infrastructure is straining real-world water supplies. The race for AI supremacy may ultimately be governed not by the fastest chip, but by the slowest water meter.

marsbit26m ago

"Water Scarcity": The Hidden Fatal Flaw of AI Infrastructure

marsbit26m ago

Global Card Issuance Enters a Compliance-Driven Era: WasabiCard is Building the Next-Generation Payment Infrastructure

Global card issuance is entering a compliance-driven era, with WasabiCard building next-generation payment infrastructure. The platform asserts that as stablecoins increasingly enter cross-border payments, corporate settlements, and global commerce, the industry is shifting focus from "availability" and "growth-driven" models to long-term, compliant operation under global frameworks. Competition will center on sustainable compliance and global infrastructure capabilities. Stablecoins are evolving from on-chain assets into key payment tools in global business, with card issuance acting as critical infrastructure connecting digital assets to traditional payment networks like Visa and Mastercard. This expansion has revealed structural issues, including cross-regional issuance, BIN resource management, and insufficient AML and risk controls. In response, the industry is moving away from reliance on "grey efficiency" towards prioritizing compliance, risk management, and long-term operational stability. WasabiCard outlines its strategy: collaborating with licensed principals and local partners for localized operations, building robust KYC/AML systems, strictly separating commercial and consumer BIN usage, and enhancing global issuance, payment, and cross-border fund flow infrastructure. The goal is to build stable, scalable payment infrastructure amid evolving global regulations, shifting industry competition from scale to infrastructure capability. As stablecoins integrate further with global commerce, payment infrastructure will become a fundamental, embedded component of internet business. WasabiCard will continue to develop capabilities in global card issuance, stablecoin payments, cross-border fund flows, and API-driven financial workflows.

marsbit36m ago

Global Card Issuance Enters a Compliance-Driven Era: WasabiCard is Building the Next-Generation Payment Infrastructure

marsbit36m ago

Zhou Hang: How Much Is SpaceX Really Worth?

**Zhou Hang: How Much is SpaceX Really Worth?** SpaceX, arguably one of the greatest industrial companies of the past 50 years, is reportedly targeting a staggering $1.75 trillion valuation in its potential IPO. However, the author argues this figure is inflated by approximately $1.25 trillion when assessed through standard financial metrics. The analysis begins by acknowledging SpaceX's undeniable success: drastically reducing launch costs, achieving near-monopoly in commercial launches, and building the strategic Starlink network. Its achievement surpasses even Tesla's, given it disrupted a state-monopolized industry. Despite this greatness, a $1.75 trillion valuation places SpaceX above the combined market cap of Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, RTX, and General Dynamics. Projecting optimistic 2030 revenues of $50-80 billion and applying generous tech-sector multiples yields a "reasonable" valuation range of $500 billion to $1.2 trillion. The $1.25 trillion gap is attributed to three non-financial premiums: 1. **Long-term vision premium** for future Starship-enabled markets (e.g., space-based computing). 2. **Sovereign asset/strategic premium**, as SpaceX is deeply integrated into U.S. national security. 3. **Retail narrative/Musk cult premium**, driven by a heroic story and personal following. Post-IPO, three scenarios are outlined: valuation solidifying (25% probability), sideways volatility as narrative outpaces reality (50%), or a re-rating down to $800B-$1.2T if execution falters or Musk-related risks emerge (25%). The probability-weighted expected value is $1.3-1.5 trillion, suggesting negative expected returns for those buying at the IPO price. The conclusion advises investors to separate the company's excellence from its stock price. Buying at the IPO likely prices in excessive optimism. A more prudent strategy would be to wait for key milestones (e.g., Starship V3 stability) or a significant price correction before investing, or to treat an early purchase as a long-term, high-conviction hold with limited position size, not a short-term bet.

链捕手41m ago

Zhou Hang: How Much Is SpaceX Really Worth?

链捕手41m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片