The Wind of 'Proactive' AI Blows into Silicon Valley: Hark Secures $700 Million in Funding

marsbitPublished on 2026-05-28Last updated on 2026-05-28

Abstract

Hark, an AI startup founded in late 2025, has raised $700 million in Series A funding at a $6 billion valuation. Led by Parkway Venture Capital with participation from NVIDIA, AMD Ventures, Intel Capital, Qualcomm Ventures, and Salesforce Ventures, the company aims to develop next-generation human-computer interfaces using a combination of proprietary foundational models and custom-built AI-native hardware. Founded by serial entrepreneur Brett Adcock, Hark envisions a system of multimodal devices equipped with agentic capabilities, end-to-end voice models, and personalized memory. This "active" AI approach seeks to move beyond passive chatbots, creating collaborative companions that anticipate needs and interact naturally within the real world. Adcock's experience with Figure, a humanoid robotics company, informs this hardware-focused venture. The article argues that while current AI is powerful, it remains confined to screens and traditional interfaces like chat. The next paradigm shift requires dedicated hardware that is always-on, possesses persistent memory, and enables intuitive interaction, potentially rivaling the impact of the iPhone. Hark is assembling a team with talent from Apple, Meta, Google, and Tesla to tackle this complex engineering challenge across models, hardware, and interaction design. Finally, the piece suggests Chinese startups may have an advantage in this "active" AI hardware space due to strong manufacturing ecosystems, a vast domestic market, an...

By | Alpha Community

An AI startup founded at the end of 2025, which hasn't even publicly launched a product yet, has secured $700 million in Series A funding, propelling its valuation to $6 billion. This round was led by Parkway Venture Capital, with participation from NVIDIA, AMD Ventures, Intel Capital, Qualcomm Ventures, and Salesforce Ventures.

It's evident that this company has raised a massive amount of capital in a short time and has received backing from the industry's top software and hardware tech giants.

This company, named Hark, has a clear focus: they aim to create the next generation of universal human-computer interface using a combination of "self-developed foundational models + custom hardware."

In essence, this is a new type of artificial intelligence interface. Its form is AI-native hardware, which can be broken down into a series of customized native hardware devices and computing devices equipped with agent capabilities, featuring end-to-end voice models and highly personalized memory. All these AI systems are multimodal, capable of understanding and interacting in natural ways.

When we saw Hark complete its funding round at a $6 billion valuation with simultaneous investment from NVIDIA and Qualcomm, we weren't surprised. Since 2024, Alpha Community has been strategically investing in the "proactive AI" direction—our early investment in Looki has already sold multimodal AI wearable devices to users worldwide, making it the world's highest-volume seller of multimodal wearable general intelligent devices; LightSail Technology has independently developed a native AI operating system for smart hardware and pioneered the category of AI headphones with visual perception capabilities.

Hark's massive funding round once again confirms an increasingly obvious trend: the next decade of AI is not just on screens, but even more so in the real world.

AI Has Gotten Smarter, But It's Still Using Old Shells and Interaction Methods

Hark was founded by Brett Adcock at the end of 2025, initially with a $100 million personal investment from him. Brett Adcock has previously founded companies like Archer, Figure, and Vettery.

Among them, Archer entered the electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) aircraft market and successfully went public. Figure is a humanoid robotics company. In 2024, Figure raised $675 million, and in September 2025, Figure completed over $1 billion in Series C funding, reaching a valuation of $39 billion. Its investors include Jeff Bezos, NVIDIA, Microsoft, OpenAI, etc.

Why would Brett Adcock want to start a company in the direction of "proactive" AI-native hardware? Because Figure's own path is essentially a systems engineering project of "AI + hardware + real-world interaction." Fundamentally, this shares a similar underlying technology stack with AI-native hardware; he knows where the pitfalls are. And recently, Figure's live demonstration of robots performing long-duration package sorting tasks indicates they have already solved some of these problems.

Image Source: Brett Adcock's Personal Website

In addition to Brett Adcock himself, Abidur Chowdhury has joined Hark as Head of Design. He was formerly a product design executive at Apple, involved in the design of products like the iPhone and Air. Hark has also attracted engineers from Apple, Meta, Google, Tesla, and leading AI labs to join, covering AI research, hardware engineering, and design.

Looking back at the history of personal hardware terminal development, it's actually a history of alternating advances in hardware form factors, interaction methods, and applications: hardware form factors and interaction methods evolve, giving rise to new applications, unlocking new capabilities, and spreading to a broader user base.

For example, when the PC form factor was established and its size became sufficiently small, coupled with the maturity of interaction interfaces like the mouse and GUI, it became easier for ordinary people to use. And with the proliferation of the internet, it moved from business and creative professional circles into the mass market.

The next breakthrough came with the iPhone. This breakthrough was not only about integrating computer and phone capabilities into a very small form factor but also about the multi-touch interaction method, which further lowered the interaction barrier, elevating the user base of smartphones (including tablets) by an order of magnitude compared to PCs.

Moreover, its App Store ecosystem directly became the software standard of the mobile internet era. In 2024, the global App Store ecosystem facilitated approximately $1.3 trillion in developer billings and sales.

Now, the problem with AI is that it has intelligence, strong software capabilities, but currently primarily operates and interacts through chat interfaces and non-AI-native devices like computers/phones. It lacks persistent memory of user identity and hardware specifically designed for intelligent interaction.

A preliminary industry consensus is that the next stage requires intelligent agent systems that can naturally interact with people and the real world. These systems need to anticipate needs, reduce cognitive load, and operate like collaborative partners rather than waiting for commands like traditional software.

Currently, at the software level, AI has already spawned super-startups like OpenAI and Anthropic with valuations approaching a trillion dollars. Once AI-native hardware further develops, its impact on the tech industry is likely to be on the scale of the iPhone.

However, for "proactive" AI-native hardware to mature is a complex engineering task. For instance, Hark needs to build this entire system across layers like models, AI hardware, interaction, and memory.

First, their models will possess agent capabilities, multimodal capabilities, and memory capabilities, able to remember who the user is, what they've said, and work across products and services the user already uses.

They will design AI-native hardware, integrated with Hark's foundational models. And judging from their recruitment for real-time voice infrastructure positions, their interaction interface is likely to start with voice.

Developing "Proactive" AI: Chinese Startups Hold an Advantage

Current AI, whether ChatBots or Agents, are temporarily just tools because they are trapped on screens. Only when people need them do they issue commands and get results.

Compared to these "passive" AIs, why is "proactive" AI important? Because it transforms AI from a tool into a collaborator. AI can, to a certain extent, independently think for people, act for people, and accomplish tasks.

Building a "proactive" AI system requires an AI-native hardware that combines software and hardware. It needs to possess perception, memory, intelligence, new and lower-barrier interaction methods, and needs to be always by the user's side (always on).

During the previous exploration period for AI hardware (e.g., smart speakers, etc.), it had perception but could only store, intelligence was insufficient, and interaction was rigid.

In the current new AI boom period, perception capabilities have further improved, AI memory and intelligence have made huge leaps, interaction is still being explored, but the exploration path has become initially clear.

True "proactive" AI has already taken a big step forward.

And for "proactive" AI to mature further, it's not a race for single-point breakthroughs. It requires the joint development and progress of foundational models, agent operating systems, personalized memory, and hardware terminals. The competition in AI-native hardware is a comprehensive one.

In innovating and exploring this field, Chinese startups have a greater chance of success. They possess three unique advantages: first, the manufacturing ecosystem advantage, with places like Shenzhen having the world's most complete supply chain foundation; second, the market scale advantage, as China is both the largest manufacturing country and the largest application market; third, the policy support advantage, with the country listing AI as a strategic priority, providing certainty for long-term investment.

Related Questions

QWhat is the main focus of Hark as described in the article?

AHark's main focus is to create the next-generation general human-machine interface using a combination of self-developed foundation models and custom hardware, aiming to develop AI-native hardware with agent capabilities, multimodal understanding, and personalized memory.

QWhich major technology companies participated in Hark's $7 billion Series A funding round?

AThe funding round was led by Parkway Venture Capital, with participation from NVIDIA, AMD Ventures, Intel Capital, Qualcomm Ventures, and Salesforce Ventures.

QAccording to the article, why does the founder Brett Adcock have relevant experience for starting Hark?

ABrett Adcock has relevant experience because he previously founded Figure, a humanoid robotics company, which operates on a similar 'AI + hardware + real-world interaction' systems engineering approach, giving him insight into the challenges in the AI-native hardware space.

QWhat does the article suggest is a key limitation of current AI systems that 'active' AI aims to solve?

AA key limitation of current AI systems is that they are primarily 'passive,' trapped behind screens (like chatbots or agents) and require explicit user commands. 'Active' AI aims to transform AI from a tool into a proactive collaborator that can think and act independently to assist users.

QWhat three advantages do Chinese startups have in developing 'active' AI, according to the article?

AAccording to the article, Chinese startups have three advantages: 1) Manufacturing ecosystem advantage, with complete supply chains in places like Shenzhen; 2) Market scale advantage, as China is both the largest manufacturer and a huge application market; 3) Policy support advantage, with AI being a national strategic priority providing long-term investment certainty.

Related Reads

Three Years Later: Looking Back at My Predictions About ChatGPT in 2023

Three Years Later: Revisiting My 2023 Predictions on ChatGPT In March 2023, shortly after ChatGPT's launch, I made 20 predictions about its future. Now, in mid-2026, I've used AI agents to fact-check each one against the latest data. Overall, most major directional forecasts were correct, with only one outright error (incorrectly stating GPT-4 had 100 trillion parameters). Key successes included predicting that RAG and retrieval architectures would become the standard for handling knowledge and hallucinations, that natural language interfaces (LUI) would create a massive new industry layer beyond the models themselves, and that China would develop viable large language models, significantly closing the performance gap with Western counterparts within about three years. Predictions about the absence of mass unemployment, the rise of a new "robot network" for agent communication, and ChatGPT not possessing consciousness also held true in their core arguments. However, the "devil was in the details." Errors frequently involved specific numbers, timelines, or overlooking distributional effects. I tended to overestimate the speed of adoption (e.g., for agent networks) while underestimating the ultimate scale of capabilities or costs (e.g., AI winning IMO gold without tools, or the extreme capital required for frontier models). Other misjudgments included: underestimating how AI would reinforce, not dissolve, information filter bubbles; incorrectly assuming AI-generated content would easily circumvent copyright (it has instead triggered record-breaking settlements); and misidentifying where value would be captured (it accrued overwhelmingly to the compute layer, like Nvidia, not just the application or model layers). Key lessons from reviewing these predictions are: 1) Directional and mechanistic insights are far more reliable than precise numbers or absolute statements. 2) There's a consistent bias to overestimate short-term speed but underestimate long-term magnitude. 3) Errors often lie in missing distributional impacts within a generally correct aggregate trend. 4) Predictions phrased with nuance and caveats aged the best. 5) Some fundamental debates (e.g., on machine consciousness or the ultimate value chain) remain unresolved even after three years. This exercise is less about scoring the past and more about establishing rules for clearer thinking about the next three years of AI.

marsbit4h ago

Three Years Later: Looking Back at My Predictions About ChatGPT in 2023

marsbit4h ago

Three Years Later: Looking Back on My 2023 Predictions for ChatGPT

Looking Back After Three Years: Revisiting My 2023 Predictions on ChatGPT In March 2023, shortly after ChatGPT's debut and before GPT-4's release, I made over twenty predictions about AI's future based on limited information and intuition. Now, in May 2026, I revisited those forecasts using an AI-driven analysis with 41 Opus 4.8 agents to cross-reference them with the latest data. The assessment used symbols: ✅ Correct, 🟢 Mostly Correct, 🟡 Partially Correct, ❌ Incorrect. Overall, the directional judgments held up well, with only one major factual error regarding GPT-4's rumored parameter size (incorrectly cited as 100T). However, nuances and degrees of accuracy revealed more. **What Was Largely Correct:** Predictions about mechanisms and directions proved accurate. The rise of RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) as the standard architecture for combating AI hallucination was confirmed, as was the transformative potential of LUI (Language User Interface) in creating a new industry layer atop GUIs. The emergence of "robot networks" (agent-to-agent communication protocols) and China's rapid catch-up in developing capable large models (closing the performance gap with top models to ~2.7%) were also on point. The analysis affirmed that LLMs lack consciousness and that the Turing Test merely measures perceived intelligence. **What Was Off Target:** Errors often involved specific numbers, over-optimistic timelines, or misjudged distributions. The prediction that value would primarily accrue to the application layer was half-right but missed NVIDIA's dominance as the profitable infrastructure layer. Forecasts about AI circumventing copyright issues and fostering a "global common ground" by averaging human viewpoints were incorrect; instead, major copyright settlements occurred and AI personalization is increasing. Estimates for model training costs ("$5-10 billion cap") were significantly off, underestimating frontier costs and overestimating replication costs. The notion that LLMs could never do complex math without tools was disproven by later models winning IMO gold. **Key Patterns from the Review:** 1. **Direction over precision:** Judgments about mechanisms and trends were more reliable than specific numbers or definitive statements. 2. **Timing bias:** There was a tendency to overestimate short-term speed but underestimate long-term magnitude and transformation. 3. **The distribution blind spot:** Aggregate-level correctness often masked uneven impacts (e.g., on young professionals' employment). 4. **The value of qualifiers:** Predictions framed with caution (e.g., "reportedly," "for now," "prototype in 2-3 years") aged better. 5. **Some debates continue:** Issues like the nature of "emergent abilities" or machine consciousness remain unresolved. This three-year review highlights that while seeing the big picture is crucial, humility regarding specifics, timelines, and disparate impacts is essential for future forecasting.

链捕手6h ago

Three Years Later: Looking Back on My 2023 Predictions for ChatGPT

链捕手6h ago

AI Bubble Warning: AI Investments Are Negative Returns for Most Tech Giants

The article issues a stark warning about a potential AI investment bubble. It notes that while the AI boom shares similarities with the TMT bubble of the late 1990s, its scale is vastly larger, currently driving 93% of U.S. GDP growth. Major hyperscale cloud providers like Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and Oracle are planning to invest trillions in AI data centers over the coming years. However, calculations based on analyst projections for 2025-2030 reveal a concerning math problem: expected capital expenditure growth far outpaces projected revenue growth. Even under an extremely optimistic scenario of zero costs, the implied return on investment for most of these tech giants (except Amazon) is deeply negative. This suggests that the current trajectory could lead to one of history's largest shareholder value destruction events. The piece outlines two potential escapes: AI generating vastly more revenue than currently anticipated—a near-impossible task—or a significant cutback in the planned investment splurge. The latter scenario could trigger a domino effect, severely impacting the entire tech supply chain (from Nvidia to TSMC), potentially pushing the U.S. economy into recession, and causing a major stock market downturn. The author suggests upcoming high-profile IPOs by companies like OpenAI and Anthropic might represent a transfer of risk from early investors to public market participants. While the peak of the hype cycle might sustain investment through 2026, the fundamental financial dilemma remains unresolved, setting the stage for a potential market correction in 2027 or 2028, similar to the years following Alan Greenspan's "irrational exuberance" warning.

marsbit7h ago

AI Bubble Warning: AI Investments Are Negative Returns for Most Tech Giants

marsbit7h ago

From Tokens to Machine Labor: AI is Shifting from Tool to "Worker"

The article "From Token to Machine Labor: AI is Evolving from Tool to 'Worker'" argues that the business model for AI is shifting beyond simply selling computational resources (tokens, GPU hours) or model access. Instead, a new "machine labor market" is emerging, where the core economic transaction is the purchase of economically useful work directly performed by software. The central thesis is that AI pricing will evolve through four stages: 1) raw tokens, 2) standardized LLM capabilities (e.g., text generation), 3) industry-specific labor markets (e.g., legal review, radiology), and finally 4) a programmable results market where tasks like resolving a support ticket are bid on and priced based on outcome. In this future, buyers will care less about *which* model or GPU completes a task and more about whether the work meets specified standards for accuracy, latency, and cost. This transition reframes the impact of AI on human labor. Rather than simple replacement, it suggests a re-coordination where machines handle standardized, verifiable work, freeing humans for roles involving oversight, context management, responsibility, and final judgment. In some cases, this "last 1%" of human input becomes more valuable as it enables the other 99% to be automated. Furthermore, as AI reduces the cost of work, demand may expand, creating larger markets (e.g., 24/7 customer service) rather than just cheaper versions of existing ones. The article concludes that while infrastructure (GPUs, models, tokens) remains crucial upstream, the market is converging on a simpler, tradeable unit: machine labor that can be defined, measured, priced, and procured based on contractible specifications.

marsbit7h ago

From Tokens to Machine Labor: AI is Shifting from Tool to "Worker"

marsbit7h ago

Xiaomi MiMo's 99% Price Cut is Not Marketing! Luo Fuli Posts on X to Refute Critics

The price of Xiaomi's MiMo-V2.5 series API has been permanently reduced by up to 99%, specifically for the "Input (Cache Hit)" cost, which covers users re-reading historical context in long conversations. MiMo's head, Luo Fuli, published a detailed technical blog to clarify that this drastic price cut stems from genuine engineering breakthroughs, not a marketing stunt or a simple price war. The core of the achievement lies in six key engineering optimizations. First, the model architecture adopts a Hybrid Sliding Window Attention (SWA), reducing the memory footprint (KVCache) to 1/7th of a traditional model. Second, a dual-pool memory management system actually utilizes these savings, allowing a single GPU to handle over 5 times more concurrent users. Third, an upgraded prefix caching mechanism achieves a cache hit rate of 93-95% for repeated reads, meaning most such requests bypass GPU computation entirely. Fourth, a self-developed distributed cache (GCache) utilizes idle SSD space on existing GPU servers, eliminating additional storage costs. Fifth, an intelligent scheduling system (LLM-Router) efficiently routes requests to maximize cache reuse and performance. Sixth, Multi-Token Prediction (MTP) accelerates the model's text generation ("output") side. Together, these systemic optimizations dramatically lower the real computational cost per request, enabling the 99% price reduction for cached inputs while reportedly maintaining positive gross margins. Luo Fuli's disclosure aims to shift the narrative from "price war" to a demonstration of substantive AI engineering progress.

marsbit9h ago

Xiaomi MiMo's 99% Price Cut is Not Marketing! Luo Fuli Posts on X to Refute Critics

marsbit9h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片