South Korea probing Bithumb’s +$40 billion Bitcoin rewards mishap – Report

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-10Last updated on 2026-02-10

Abstract

South Korea has initiated a full investigation into Bithumb and the wider cryptocurrency industry following a major operational error. The exchange mistakenly distributed over $40 billion worth of Bitcoin as customer incentives—far exceeding its actual holdings of around 46,000 BTC. While most of the funds were recovered, some users withdrew the erroneous rewards. The Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) is conducting on-site inspections and has emphasized the seriousness of the incident, stating it will influence upcoming regulatory measures. Bithumb has apologized and pledged to improve internal controls. The event triggered significant Bitcoin withdrawals initially, though outflows have since stabilized.

South Korea has launched a full probe into Bithumb and the broader industry after the exchange mistakenly sent over $40 billion worth of Bitcoin to customers last Friday.

According to CryptoQuant, the exchange, the second-largest in South Korea, held about 46,000 BTC just before the incident. Based on regulatory filings, most of these were customer funds, while the exchange owned less than 200 BTC as of Q3 2025.

On Friday, however, the exchange sent 620,000 BTC by mistake as customer rewards – Nearly 13-14x more than its reported holdings.

Swift regulatory response to rein in exchanges

Needless to say, Bithumb’s ‘ghost Bitcoin’ mistake has raised more questions than answers.

For regulators, this was more than a mistake. That is why this incident turned an escalation of the Bithumb probe into an industry-wide audit.

According to the financial sector watchdog Financial Supervisory Service (FSS), on-site inspections have been initiated and formal investigations will follow if legal violations are established.

In a press conference on Monday, FSS Governor Lee Chan-jin said,

“It was nothing more than erroneously entered virtual data, yet it ended up being traded. That is the essence of the issue. The transaction was actually executed.”

Initially, the exchange was to send 2,00 won or $1.37 as rewards, totalling $423. Instead, it ended up sending over $40 billion in Bitcoin. Some users cashed out the BTC rewards, but over 90% of the funds were recovered, according to Bithumb.

The exchange apologized for the mistake and promised changes to enhance its internal control systems.

“We have reported it to all relevant authorities and are fully cooperating with the ongoing Financial Supervisory Service inspection. We will use systems and processes to prevent human error from becoming an accident.”

Meanwhile, regulators said the probe’s findings will be used to further strengthen regulation in the sector. The FSS Governor added,

“If we cannot properly resolve the ghost coin issue, how can (the virtual asset market) be incorporated into the system? The inspection results have been reflected in the tasks that need to be strongly supplemented in the second phase of legislation.”

Investors reactions to ‘ghost Bitcoin’ error

Following the incident, over 4,100 BTC were moved off the exchange on Friday – A ecord high since early 2025. Over the same period, Bithumb’s overall reserves declined sharply from 46.7K BTC to 41.7K BTC – A 10% decline.

In the past few days, however, the outflows have dropped to below 500 BTC on a daily average. This seemed illustrative of measured investor behavior, despite the ongoing probe.


Final Thoughts

  • South Korea has launched a probe into Bithumb’s ‘ghost Bitcoin’ and plans to extend the audit into the broader crypto industry.
  • According to the officials, the findings will help inform the second phase of legislation for the sector.

Related Questions

QWhat was the main reason South Korea launched a full probe into Bithumb and the broader crypto industry?

AThe probe was launched after Bithumb mistakenly sent over $40 billion worth of Bitcoin to customers as rewards, an amount nearly 13-14 times more than its reported holdings.

QHow much Bitcoin did Bithumb hold just before the incident, and how much of it was customer funds?

ABithumb held about 46,000 BTC just before the incident, and based on regulatory filings, most of these were customer funds, with the exchange owning less than 200 BTC as of Q3 2025.

QWhat did the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) Governor say was the essence of the issue with Bithumb's mistake?

AFSS Governor Lee Chan-jin stated that the essence of the issue was that erroneously entered virtual data ended up being traded and the transaction was actually executed.

QWhat percentage of the mistakenly sent Bitcoin rewards were recovered by Bithumb, according to the exchange?

AAccording to Bithumb, over 90% of the funds were recovered after some users cashed out the BTC rewards.

QHow did the incident affect Bithumb's Bitcoin reserves, and what was the initial investor reaction?

AFollowing the incident, Bithumb's overall reserves declined sharply from 46.7K BTC to 41.7K BTC, a 10% decline, with over 4,100 BTC moved off the exchange on Friday—a record high since early 2025.

Related Reads

AI Investors' 2026 Anxiety: When Models Devour Everything, What Moat Is Left for Startups?

In 2026, a wave of investor anxiety questions the defensibility of AI startups as models improve, fearing that most companies are just "thin wrappers" destined to be absorbed by foundation models or chipmakers. The author argues against this despair, positing that true moats lie not in benchmark performance but in areas models cannot easily reach. The logic of despair is that if models excel at all measurable tasks, only compute and cutting-edge model weights hold lasting value. However, the essay contends that the most valuable work is inherently "untrainable." Benchmarks measure what can be measured and thus optimized for, but real-world correctness often resides in private, complex systems. Examples include legacy codebases, intricate legal transactions, or hospital workflows. This kind of correctness is proprietary, costly to establish, and cannot be validated quickly—it requires time and trust within an organization. As models commodify visible, measurable tasks from both above (labs absorbing scaffolding) and below (saturation by cheaper models), value shifts to "untrainable ground." This encompasses work where correctness is a private truth, locked behind integration barriers, licenses, liability frameworks, and entrenched user habits. Trust and adoption are slow, human-centric processes that smarter models cannot accelerate. Successful companies defend their position by embedding deeply into client operations, owning the definition of "good" within a specific domain (e.g., Harvey in law, OpenEvidence in medicine), and pricing on outcomes rather than tokens. While labs compete fiercely, they are incentivized to keep the application layer vibrant. The future belongs not to those competing on generic benchmarks but to those navigating unscoreable terrain, doing the "unsexy work" of translation between models and messy human realities. The most cited benchmark scores are thus maps of territory about to become worthless, signaling who will lose the right to define what counts as good.

marsbit1h ago

AI Investors' 2026 Anxiety: When Models Devour Everything, What Moat Is Left for Startups?

marsbit1h ago

Trump's Crypto Empire: A $2.3 Billion Wealth Transfer Experiment

In June 2026, Reuters investigations revealed that since Donald Trump's return to the White House, his family has accumulated roughly $2.3 billion in profits from four core crypto ventures: World Liberty Financial (WLFI), the $TRUMP meme coin, American Bitcoin, and ALT5 Sigma (later renamed AI Financial). Coincidentally, overall investor losses in these projects were estimated to be a similar amount. The businesses, spanning DeFi, stablecoins, meme coins, Bitcoin mining, and digital payments, largely relied not on technological innovation but on converting the political influence and notoriety of the Trump brand into financial assets sold to the market. This marks a dramatic shift from Trump's earlier skepticism of cryptocurrencies. The ventures operated on a similar logic: leveraging the Trump name to generate market hype and trust, attracting investment through token sales or public listings, and enabling the family to capture profits upfront through equity, token allocations, and fees, while later entrants often bore the brunt of the risk as markets cooled. WLFI, the most profitable venture, generated an estimated $1.6 billion for the family, primarily through sales of its locked, illiquid governance token and its USD1 stablecoin. The $TRUMP meme coin, a direct monetization of the presidential IP, brought in over $600 million for Trump-linked entities before its price crashed nearly 97% from its peak. American Bitcoin gained a "Trump stock" premium for its mining operations, and ALT5 Sigma/AI Financial combined Trump, AI, and crypto themes for a temporary valuation surge. The episode underscores how political influence can be packaged into financial assets, creating substantial wealth for promoters while highlighting the risks for investors who base decisions on hype and brand allegiance over fundamental business models and cash flows.

marsbit1h ago

Trump's Crypto Empire: A $2.3 Billion Wealth Transfer Experiment

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

363 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片