Silicon Valley's New Darling Clawdbot: When Local AI Agents Learn to 'Go On-Chain', What Happens?

marsbitPublished on 2026-01-31Last updated on 2026-01-31

Abstract

A new open-source project called Clawdbot (now renamed Moltbot) has gained attention in Silicon Valley. It enables an AI agent to run locally on a user’s computer or server, allowing it to browse the web, click buttons, send messages, and even execute transactions automatically. Unlike cloud-based models like ChatGPT, Clawdbot is self-hosted, open-source, and operates across multiple platforms such as Telegram, WhatsApp, Discord, and Slack. It features persistent memory and can perform tasks via browser automation, command-line operations, and scripts—making it a persistent digital assistant. In the context of Web3, Clawdbot could significantly lower barriers to participation by automating complex and repetitive on-chain operations. Potential use cases include 24/7 monitoring of liquidation thresholds, automated yield reinvestment, cross-chain transactions, and strategy execution via natural language commands. However, the integration of such agents with Web3 also introduces serious risks. Recent incidents include fake token launches under Clawdbot’s name and security vulnerabilities from misconfigured servers. To mitigate risks, users are advised to grant minimal wallet permissions—preferably read-only—use dedicated small-cap wallets with strict limits, and avoid unofficial token promotions. Self-hosting does not guarantee security; improper configuration may expose sensitive data and execution privileges. The agent should serve as an assistant, not a custodian. Any perm...

In recent weeks, an open-source project called Clawdbot has suddenly become popular in Silicon Valley circles. Although it has now been renamed Moltbot, its core concept remains unchanged: to have an AI agent reside on your local computer or server, capable of browsing web pages, clicking buttons, sending messages, and even helping you automate trades.

Once such "24/7 online AI employees" integrate with Web3, the imagination space turns into a new question: Is it a productivity tool, or a machine that could potentially access your assets at any time?

Clawdbot: Executable Agents

Unlike cloud-based ChatGPT, which only supports conversations, Clawdbot has several key features:

  • Self-hosted and open-source: Pull the code and run it directly on your own machine or VPS, with data by default not leaving the local environment.
  • Multi-channel access: Can integrate with chat tools like Telegram, WhatsApp, Discord, Slack, etc. You give instructions via chat, and it helps you actually click web pages, call APIs, and run scripts in the background.
  • Persistent memory: Not "ask and answer then forget," but capable of remembering tasks, preferences, and context you've previously assigned, like a long-term virtual colleague.
  • Direct "hands-on" capability: Through browser automation, command lines, scripts, etc., it can actually execute tasks, such as clearing emails, booking flights, or running trading strategies.

This means Clawdbot can become a digital agent for long-term hosted tasks. And what Web3 needs is precisely this kind of "executable agent."

Lowering the Barrier to Web3 Participation

Current pain points in Web3 essentially revolve around complexity and continuity, typical examples being cumbersome on-chain operations, massive information noise, and high interaction frequency.

An individual's attention and operation time are objectively limited. While Web3 narrates "infinite possibilities," at the execution level, it is already very limited for individuals: you simply cannot monitor the market 24/7, nor be familiar enough with every protocol to avoid checking documentation.

If local AI agents like Clawdbot are connected to wallets, block explorers, and DeFi interfaces, they are naturally suited to handle these key scenarios:

  • 24/7 monitoring and alerts: Help you watch liquidation lines, price ranges, LP impermanent loss, and governance voting deadlines.
  • Automation of multi-chain repetitive actions: Such as periodic reinvestment of yields, cross-chain replenishment, and rebalancing positions.
  • Strategy implementation: You describe strategies in natural language, and the agent translates them into specific contract calls and trading paths.

If the past decade was about humans learning to use wallets and contracts themselves, the next decade will likely be about humans learning to use agents to help them use wallets and contracts.

Local AI agents like Clawdbot will gradually become key players in resolving the contradiction between "information explosion + execution consumption" in Web3 scenarios.

How to Mitigate Risks?

Clawdbot has recently experienced incidents of counterfeit token issuance and scams using its name, forcing the founder to publicly state "this is a scam." Meanwhile, security companies have pointed out that many people do not know how to configure servers properly, exposing the agent to the public internet, leading to risks of API abuse, chat logs, and even execution permissions.

In the context of Web3, several bottom lines must be clarified—

1. Exercise extreme restraint with wallet permissions; use read-only whenever possible.

2. If signing permissions must be granted, only grant them to "small-amount dedicated wallets" with strict limits and whitelists.

3. Do not believe in "official tokens" or "official announcements combining Web3 with Memes." Clawdbot has already been used to issue fake assets, following the classic pump-and-dump curve—first surging then plummeting 90%—completely exploiting emotions and information asymmetry.

Additionally, self-hosting does not automatically mean security. If you set up your own server without proper firewall and access controls, it is equivalent to throwing an "AI root权限" that can execute commands directly onto the public internet. This is not enhancing privacy; it is building a landmine.

Finally, while automatically executing agent assistants and their integration with Web3 are indeed full of imagination, as soon as wallets and signatures are involved, it is no longer a toy to experiment with casually but a machine that can access your assets at any time. The permissions you grant it are not technical details but life-and-death boundaries.

More realistically, if an agent used as a "notebook" or "secretary" is compromised, what is leaked is not just a few mnemonic phrases but your behavioral轨迹, asset habits, and social relationships from the past few years—equivalent to digitally packaging and handing over your entire self.

The truly safe approach is to always remember one thing: agents can be assistants, but never custodians. Use read-only whenever possible, prioritize alerts, and any permission beyond your intuitive comfort zone is worth hesitating over再三.

*This content is for reference only and does not constitute investment advice. The market carries risks, and investment requires caution.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is Clawdbot (now called Moltbot) and what are its key features?

AClawdbot, now renamed Moltbot, is an open-source AI agent designed to run locally on a user's computer or server. Its key features include being self-hosted and open-source, offering multi-channel access through platforms like Telegram and Discord, maintaining persistent memory to remember tasks and context, and being capable of executing actions such as automating web browsing, calling APIs, and running scripts.

QHow can a local AI agent like Clawdbot potentially benefit Web3 participants?

AIt can lower the barrier to entry in Web3 by automating complex and repetitive tasks. This includes providing 24/7 monitoring for alerts like liquidation lines, automating multi-chain actions such as periodic yield reinvestment, and translating natural language strategies into smart contract calls and transaction paths.

QWhat are some of the major security risks associated with using such an AI agent in a Web3 context?

AMajor risks include the potential for wallet compromise if excessive permissions are granted, the danger of servers being misconfigured and exposed to the public internet, and the threat of phishing scams or fake tokens being promoted under the agent's name. A breach could lead to loss of assets and exposure of sensitive personal data and behavioral history.

QWhat security precautions does the article recommend for using an AI agent with a cryptocurrency wallet?

AThe article recommends exercising extreme caution with wallet permissions: use read-only access whenever possible, if signing permissions are necessary, dedicate a small-cap wallet with strict limits and whitelists, and never treat the agent as a custodian of assets. The core principle is to grant minimal necessary permissions.

QAccording to the article, what is the fundamental rule for safely using an executable agent that can interact with Web3?

AThe fundamental rule is that an AI agent should always be an assistant, never a custodian. Users should remember that it is a machine capable of moving their assets, and any permission granted beyond their intuitive comfort zone should be heavily scrutinized. The mantra is:能只读就只读,能提醒就先提醒 (can read-only, read-only; can remind, remind first).

Related Reads

Ethereum Q1 2026 Report: Fees Decline, Users and Transaction Volume Hit New Highs

Ethereum Q1 2026 Report: Fees Down, Users & Transactions Hit New Highs Token Terminal's Q1 2026 report on Ethereum presents a pivotal development: the network achieved record highs in monthly active users (13.2M, +85.9% YoY), total transactions (200.4M, +81.5% YoY), and throughput (25.78 TPS), while transaction fees on the mainnet plummeted by 47.9% quarter-over-quarter. This shift is attributed to the network's strategic move into a "low fees for scale" phase, exemplified by the Fusaka upgrade which increased data capacity and lowered block space costs, releasing pent-up demand (a manifestation of Jevons's Paradox). The report highlights a core narrative shift for Ethereum: from a DeFi-centric blockchain to a global financial settlement layer. It maintains a dominant position in tokenized assets, holding majority market shares among top chains in stablecoins (61.8%), tokenized funds (73.0%), and tokenized commodities (84.0%). Growth in tokenized funds (+73.1% YoY) and commodities (+325.9% YoY) was particularly strong, driven by institutions like BlackRock and JPMorgan entering the space. Contrasting these usage gains, several USD-denominated value metrics declined in Q1: fully diluted market cap fell 30.3% QoQ, total value locked (TVL) dropped 11.0%, and ecosystem transaction volume decreased 24.0%. The report interprets this as Ethereum prioritizing long-term network expansion and cementing its role as the default settlement layer for finance over short-term fee capture. The commentary from Etherealize argues that, much like the early internet, Ethereum's open, permissionless model is poised to win over closed alternatives as institutional tokenization accelerates.

marsbit1h ago

Ethereum Q1 2026 Report: Fees Decline, Users and Transaction Volume Hit New Highs

marsbit1h ago

He Just Raised 2.7 Billion, and Li Fei-Fei Also Invested

Pete Florence, a former senior research scientist at Google DeepMind and a key contributor to the Vision-Language-Action (VLA) model architecture, is deliberately distancing his startup, Generalist AI, from the trendy "world model" label. He argues that the industry should prioritize concrete goals over buzzwords. His goal is to create robots that can perform a vast range of unseen tasks with high speed and success rates, without needing task-specific training data. Recently, his company raised $400 million (¥2.7 billion) at a $2 billion valuation. Notable investors include NVIDIA's NVentures, Bezos Expeditions, NFDG, as well as Xiaomi co-founder Lin Bin, Zoom founder Eric Yuan, and renowned AI scientist Fei-Fei Li. Florence's approach stems from his academic background at MIT under Professor Russ Tedrake, focusing on understanding the physical world. After joining DeepMind, he developed models like Transporter Network and co-created the VLA framework. He left in 2025 to found Generalist AI. The company has launched two models: GEN-0, which demonstrated that scaling laws apply to physical motion, and GEN-1. GEN-1 was trained on over 500,000 hours of physical interaction data collected via a specialized wearable device. It achieves a 99% success rate on precise mechanical tasks like folding boxes and maintains performance three times faster than its predecessor. Florence believes GEN-1 is reaching a commercial utility threshold similar to the GPT-3 inflection point. The substantial funding round, following GEN-1's release, signifies strong investor confidence in Generalist AI's practical, goal-driven path to creating versatile, useful robots, regardless of the "world model" terminology.

marsbit1h ago

He Just Raised 2.7 Billion, and Li Fei-Fei Also Invested

marsbit1h ago

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

In three days, Google lost two AI legends. On June 18, Noam Shazeer, co-author of the seminal "Attention is All You Need" paper and Gemini co-lead, left for OpenAI. Just 48 hours later, John Jumper, 2024 Nobel laureate and AlphaFold lead, departed DeepMind for Anthropic. This follows Andrej Karpathy joining Anthropic in May. These moves highlight a structural trend: top AI talent is concentrating at mission-driven, pre-IPO firms like OpenAI and Anthropic, while Google becomes a primary source. The exodus stems from a core mission mismatch. Google's ad-centric model often subordinates AI research to product and revenue goals, creating friction for pioneers like Shazeer, who returned in 2024 only to leave again. In contrast, OpenAI and Anthropic offer singular focus on pushing AI boundaries, whether towards AGI or safety-aligned models, which deeply appeals to top researchers like Jumper. Financial incentives amplify the pull. With both OpenAI and Anthropic nearing IPO, employees stand to gain immensely from equity, an upside Google's mature stock cannot match. Furthermore, the 2023 merger of Google Brain and DeepMind, intended to consolidate strength, has instead created cultural tension and slowed the path from research to product, as evidenced by Gemini's pace. This talent redistribution is reshaping the AI landscape. While Google retains vast data and compute resources, its true crisis is the quiet, continuous loss of the people who define the field's future. The real moat in AI is not infrastructure, but the concentration of brilliant minds—a battle Google is currently losing.

marsbit3h ago

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

marsbit3h ago

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

Beyond the familiar performance charts like MMLU-Pro and MMMU, which major AI models strive to ace, stands a key "examiner": Chinese-Canadian researcher Wenhu Chen. An assistant professor at the University of Waterloo and founder of TIGERLab, Chen addresses the crucial need for more rigorous AI evaluation. As models like GPT-4 began scoring near-perfect results on older benchmarks like MMLU, it became difficult to distinguish their true capabilities. In response, Chen introduced MMLU-Pro in 2024, featuring harder, more reasoning-focused questions with more answer choices, successfully reintroducing meaningful performance gaps. His work extends to multi-modal evaluation with MMMU and its enhanced version, MMMU-Pro. These benchmarks test a model's ability to understand and reason with complex information from images, charts, and text across diverse academic subjects, exposing the significant challenges even top models face in genuine comprehension. Chen's background in complex QA, table reasoning, and his experience at Google DeepMind on projects like Gemini inform his approach. He understands that effective benchmarks must anticipate how models might "cheat" by memorizing data or avoiding visual analysis. His lab also actively researches video understanding and generation models (e.g., UniVideo, Vamba), ensuring his evaluation work is grounded in practical model-building challenges. Now at Meta's Super Intelligence Lab, Chen continues his focus on multi-modal data and evaluation, representing the deep yet often unseen contributions of Chinese talent in shaping the fundamental tools of the AI industry.

marsbit3h ago

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片