Sequoia Dialogue with Jensen Huang: Computing Model Undergoes a 60-Year Transformation; You Won't Be Replaced by AI, But You Will Be Dimensionality-Reduced by 'Those Who Master AI'

marsbitPublished on 2026-06-12Last updated on 2026-06-12

Abstract

NVIDIA founder and CEO Jensen Huang, in a conversation with Sequoia Capital's Konstantine Buhler, argues that we are witnessing the most significant computing shift in 60 years—from retrieval-based to generative computing. Instead of just storing and retrieving data, future systems will generate highly personalized content (text, images, video) on demand, powered by massive "AI factories." Huang envisions a global "intelligence network" that will envelop the planet, following the historical patterns of energy and communication grids. He outlines a five-layer investment framework: 1) Energy, 2) Chips/Computers, 3) Infrastructure (data centers), 4) AI Models, and 5) Applications. He predicts this ecosystem will reach a scale of $20 trillion annually. Crucially, Huang pushes back against fears of AI-driven job loss. He distinguishes between specific "tasks" (e.g., typing, analyzing images) and overall "jobs" (e.g., CEO, radiologist). While AI automates tasks, it increases efficiency and demand for the higher-value problem-solving aspects of professions, thus creating more jobs and "up-leveling" careers. The real risk, he asserts, is not being replaced by AI, but being outperformed by someone who effectively leverages it. He urges everyone to embrace AI as a tool for augmented capability and innovation.

Source: Sequoia Capital

Compiled by: Yuliya, PANews

Editor's Note: In the past, our data centers merely stored files for human retrieval; now, computing is shifting towards generation, where every word, image, and video is produced in real-time and highly customized according to the requester's context. In this global wave of transformation, Sequoia Capital Partner Konstantin Buhler and NVIDIA founder and CEO Jensen Huang engaged in an in-depth dialogue, discussing the major shifts in computing technology. Huang believes that automation will not lead to unemployment but rather a comprehensive upgrade in labor demand and a dimensional elevation of professions themselves; people will not lose their jobs because of AI, but they may be replaced by those who are adept at leveraging AI.

AI Factories and the Generational Leap in Computing Models: From Retrieval to Generation

Konstantin: Thank you very much for being here, Jensen. We are in the midst of a massive AI revolution, whose scale and speed may even surpass the Industrial Revolution. You have stated that what is happening now is the largest infrastructure construction in human history. At the heart of this construction are AI factories, and the company powering all of this is NVIDIA. Can you tell us what an AI factory is and why it is the most worthwhile investment for all enterprises in the next decade?

Jensen Huang: There are many ways to understand AI. What the public is most familiar with might be interacting with a chatbot through a web browser: you give it a prompt, and it replies with a passage. Even if you've been using AI for a while, you'll find its capabilities have evolved remarkably over the past two to three years.

Two years ago, everyone heard about ChatGPT. It is essentially computer software that understands the information you input. It can perceive, comprehend information, and transform and generate it into other content. For example, you can give it a PDF file and ask it to summarize it—that's text-to-text. You can also have it generate an image based on a story—that's text-to-image. Or give it a photo and ask it to describe the scene—that's image-to-text. This capability was called generative AI two years ago.

But beyond understanding and generation, thinking ability is even more valuable. The foundation of generative AI endows it with the capacity for internal thought, step-by-step reasoning, and problem-solving. Moreover, it can now generate control instructions to use tools—whether digital tools like browsers, spreadsheets, Photoshop, AutoCAD, or, in the future, to control mechanical systems (which is robotics and autonomous driving).

Two years ago, people found ChatGPT interesting; it could write poems and songs but occasionally talked nonsense. Today, two years later, we have agentic systems. AI is no longer just about understanding information; it can now reason and perform useful work. Because it can do useful work, AI has created real commercial value. We don't pay for friends who only talk big, but we pay people who actually get work done. Now, people are hiring AI by the hour every day, for example, paying it $20 to $30 per hour. That's also why it has become the fastest-growing software business in human history.

Looking upstream from an industrial logic perspective, we must return to first principles. The fundamental concept of the computer industry as we know it today was established roughly 64 years ago. At that time, IBM launched the System/360, which was also the reason IBM became the world's most valuable company then.

For the past 60 years, the essence of computing has been pre-recording and retrieval: you write a story, take a photo, record a video, save it as a file into a hard drive; when you want to use it, you retrieve it from the hard drive. That's why those buildings are called data centers. They just store data and don't do much computing.

But now things have changed. In the AI era, every time you provide new context and a new request, AI performs real-time understanding, reasoning, and generates brand-new results. For instance, the speech I'm giving now is generated in real-time based on the different backgrounds of everyone present, rather than being read from a script. This is what intelligence is.

In the future, every pixel, every sound, every piece of video, even every ad and news article will be custom-made, fully generated for you, rather than pre-recorded and retrieved. This means, we will need a massive number of generators in the future, which are the large-scale computers we are building—these are AI factories.

The Intelligent Network Enveloping the Earth and the Dynamo of the Digital Age

Konstantin: How large will this generator be?

Jensen Huang: Currently, we provide information and intelligence generation for roughly 1 billion people globally. But because AI has become agents that can work on their own, one agent can even communicate and collaborate with another. Within NVIDIA, there might be hundreds or thousands of agents talking to each other and solving problems (of course, they operate within safe sandboxes and guardrails).

This means that in the future, not only will humans be using the internet, but there might also be hundreds of billions of agents working tirelessly day and night on the internet. Agents for enterprises, autonomous vehicles, robots, even systems in every building will all be talking to each other. All instructions, all thinking will be generated in real-time.

It's like a thick computational network, wrapping the entire Earth like a cocoon. This sounds exaggerated, but it has actually happened twice in history:

  • The first time was 300 years ago when Germany's Siemens made a machine. You ignite it, and it outputs a powerful invisible force—electricity. Today, the power generation network (the electrical grid) envelops the entire Earth.

  • The second time was 35 years ago with the birth of the internet in the US, which now also envelops global communications.

Now, we are welcoming the third network after energy and communication: the intelligent network. The business NVIDIA relies on for survival today is building this new era's dynamo. The dynamo 300 years ago input the physical motion of water flow, wind, or coal (atoms) and output electrons; our NVIDIA machine, on the other hand, inputs electrons (electrical energy) and outputs digits. These digits, through different combinations, become language, mathematics, or the language of proteins and human biology, the language of physical laws and climate prediction, even the language of 3D worlds, robotics, and autonomous driving.

These two machines, separated by 300 years, share a similar principle: atoms in, electrons out; electrons in, digits out. These digits are what we call Tokens, which is intelligence. We mass-produce these intelligent Tokens in factories; that's the essence of AI factories.

Konstantin: We are in the midst of a wave where multiple revolutions converge. From the energy transition, routers of global telecommunication networks, to today's GPUs and AI factories at the core of the intelligence revolution, like the H100 or the latest Vera Rubin architecture. Integrating everything needed.

Jensen Huang: Yes, our compute unit is called a "rack." A rack contains 72 chips. This year, we will produce about 8 million of these components. A rack weighs 2 tons, costs $4 million, and has 1.5 million parts. It's the most expensive piece of equipment in the world, but we're mass-producing them like smartphones, shipping them to data centers worldwide. This thing is huge; moving them is definitely heavy labor.

The Five-Layer Cake Investment Logic for Participating in the AI Era

Konstantin: This is a very exciting vision. How can both large enterprises and individuals participate in this revolution?

Jensen Huang: To invest in the AI industry, you can imagine its industrial layout as a five-layer cake. You know, a $50 billion AI factory can generate $300 to $400 billion worth of intelligence; its return on investment is quite astonishing. So, what are these five layers?

The first layer is Energy: That is, the power generators at the very bottom. This is the biggest growth opportunity for the energy industry in generations. To support computing, sustainable energy (nuclear, wind, solar, hydrogen, etc.) will receive massive investments. As long as you can generate energy, you will get investment. That's why companies like Siemens, Mitsubishi, GE Vernova are performing so well now.

The second layer is Chips/Computers: Including chips, computers, networking equipment, switches, and silicon photonics technology.

The third layer is Infrastructure: Including land, power, building shells, capital, and the day-to-day operations of data centers. These resources are currently in extreme shortage.

The fourth layer is the Model Layer: That is, the large models built on cloud infrastructure. This is the most market-driven, capital-intensive field in human history. Well-known examples include OpenAI and Anthropic. But remember, AI can learn not just natural language; it can learn anything with structure. We are learning the laws of the physical world—for example, when I sat down just now, I was very confident not because I had a 47% chance of falling through the chair, but 100% confident in the laws of physics. AI can similarly learn the meaning of proteins, the significance of genes, the function of cells. The industry scale of the physical world is $80 trillion, a crucial frontier that is currently less discussed.

The fifth layer is the Application Layer: Based on the underlying technology, countless startups are reshaping industries like financial services, law, accounting, transportation, and logistics. Last year, venture capital invested $100 billion in this top layer, the highest VC investment year in human history.

This future will be immense. We are merely at the starting line, with an estimated $1 trillion being invested into this ecosystem this year. But I estimate that AI will be a massive ecosystem worth around $20 trillion annually in the future. How important is intelligence? Who needs it? How much do you need? Figure these out, and you'll know the direction for investment.

AI Isn't Here to Take Your Job; It's Here to Help You Level Up

Konstantin: This is not only a market opportunity worth trillions of dollars but also means the explosion in hardware infrastructure and application layers will create a vast number of real jobs for humanity.

Jensen Huang: Absolutely correct, and this point we must emphasize. Right now, attitudes toward AI vary across countries and cultures. But I sincerely want to advise everyone: Beware of those Hollywood sci-fi movie plots. Stop listening to people saying things like "The Terminator is coming," "the technological singularity is here," "there's a 20% chance AI will destroy humanity." That's complete nonsense.

Some even scare others by saying, "We don't even know how AI works; it's too mysterious; maybe it will just walk away tomorrow." That's even more baseless. AI is computers and software; engineers certainly know how it works, otherwise how could they make it safer and smarter every year?

Today's AI has significantly reduced hallucinations; the knowledge it generates is accurate and contextually relevant. When it doesn't know something, it even looks it up. It might even self-reflect before answering you, compare several options, and then tell you the answer. Just as cars today are much safer than they were 100 years ago, the tech world is going all out to make AI extremely safe.

So, focus your attention on what is certain. I am very certain about one thing: You probably won't lose your job because of AI, but you will definitely lose your job to the person who uses AI.

Since this is a technology that can give humans superpowers, you should hurry up and use it! Whether you're telling your loved ones, your children, your company, or your country: you must embrace AI.

Konstantin: But when it comes to jobs, people are genuinely anxious.

Jensen Huang: I get upset every time I hear people creating panic about jobs. This year, we invested $1 trillion into this ecosystem—energy, chips, infrastructure, model layer, application layer—all creating far more jobs than ever before.

Some might ask, what about traditional positions? There's a common cognitive mistake people make here: they confuse "Job" with "Task."

Take me, for example. I'm a CEO. My daily "tasks" mainly involve typing and speaking. Now, AI is far better at typing and speaking than I am—it's superhuman level. But as a CEO, I'm actually busier now than before.

Let me give you a more profound example. About 12 years ago, a top computer scientist stood up and warned everyone, saying computer vision could read medical images tirelessly, never missing a detail, already at superhuman levels. He asserted that the first profession to be eliminated by AI would be "radiologists," advising people not to study this field anymore.

He was completely correct in his technical judgment. Now, all radiology systems integrate computer vision; all radiologists use AI to assist their work. But what was the outcome? The global demand for radiologists actually increased!

Why? Because the purpose of a radiologist is not to read images but to diagnose diseases alongside clinicians. Due to automation, their efficiency greatly increased; hospitals could take in more patients waiting in line, and radiology departments became more profitable. Hospitals found profits rising and patient numbers growing, so they hired even more radiologists! Those who heeded the warning and didn't study radiology missed the opportunity.

Similarly, recently, some said that because AI can write code, 90% of software programming is gone; we no longer need software engineers. But the fact is, we are hiring more software engineers now than ever before! Because the purpose of a software engineer is to solve problems and innovate, not to compete in typing speed. Writing code is just a task; solving problems is the core.

AI will not only not eliminate jobs; it will actually enhance the value of your work. If I were a plumber today, I might just work according to blueprints; but tomorrow, with AI's support, I might also be a kitchen designer. If I were a furniture seller or carpenter, in the past, you only expected me to nail wood together, but with AI, I can directly provide you with full interior design plans, making your home incredibly beautiful. My professional skills have been elevated to a higher dimension!

So I believe that the current narrative about AI causing human unemployment is completely wrong; it's just to scare others away so that they can profit from it. Looking at my entire career, computer technology has become increasingly complex. In the past, people who mastered the C++ programming language only accounted for 2% of the population (maybe more among you in the Silicon Valley venture capital circle). But now, because of AI, as long as you understand human language, you can program. For the first time, we are truly closing the technological gap; we must bring everyone along into this new era.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the fundamental shift in computing paradigm that Jensen Huang describes, and how does it differ from the past 60 years?

AJensen Huang describes a shift from a 'retrieval-based' computing paradigm to a 'generative' one. For the past ~60 years, computing was about pre-recording information (like files, photos) and retrieving it when needed. Now, in the AI era, computing is about real-time understanding, reasoning, and generating entirely new content (pixels, sound, video) tailored to specific contexts and requests for each user.

QAccording to the conversation, what is an 'AI factory' and why is it a critical investment?

AAn 'AI factory' is a large-scale computing facility designed for massive generation. It produces 'tokens' of intelligence in real-time. It's a critical investment because the future demands a vast amount of generated, personalized content for humans and billions of AI agents, representing a foundational shift in how computing infrastructure is built and used.

QHow does Jensen Huang frame the five-layer 'cake' of the AI industrial landscape for investment?

AHe frames it as a five-layer structure: 1) Energy (the foundational power source), 2) Chips/Computers (hardware like GPUs, networking), 3) Infrastructure (land, power, data center operations), 4) Models (large language and domain-specific models), and 5) Applications (startups reshaping industries like finance, law, logistics).

QWhat is Jensen Huang's core argument against the fear that AI will lead to massive job losses?

AHis core argument is that people confuse 'jobs' with 'tasks'. AI automates specific tasks (e.g., writing code, analyzing X-rays), but this increases efficiency and demand for the core purpose of the job (e.g., problem-solving, diagnosis). This leads to more job creation and 'upskilling,' allowing professionals (like plumbers or carpenters) to offer higher-value services (like design). He asserts you won't lose your job to AI, but to someone who uses AI effectively.

QWhat historical analogy does Huang use to describe the emerging 'intelligence network' powered by AI?

AHe uses the analogy of two previous global networks: 1) The power grid (emerging ~300 years ago with the dynamo, converting physical motion to electricity), and 2) The internet (emerging ~35 years ago for communication). He states we are now building the third such network: a global 'intelligence network' that generates smart tokens, comparing Nvidia's role to that of building the new 'dynamo' for this era.

Related Reads

STAR 50 Soars 10.73%, Why Did A-Shares Stage a "V-Shaped Reversal"?

After a prolonged decline, the Chinese A-share market staged a strong rally on July 21. The STAR 50 index surged 10.73%, its largest single-day gain in nearly a year, leading a broad-based "V-shaped" reversal. The Shanghai Composite Index rose 1.79%, the Shenzhen Component Index gained 4.81%, and the ChiNext Index jumped 7.05%. Total market turnover reached 2.97 trillion yuan, an increase of 256.1 billion yuan from the previous session, with over 3,100 stocks advancing. The semiconductor sector spearheaded the rebound, with related ETFs posting significant gains. Analysts attribute the surge to three converging factors. First, coordinated capital inflows from "national team" institutions, insurance funds, listed company buybacks, and fund house self-purchases have bolstered market liquidity and confidence. Second, supportive policy signals, including commitments from regulators to ensure stable market operations, provided a favorable backdrop. Third, a stabilization and recovery in overseas markets, notably South Korea, created a positive external environment. Institutions suggest the most severe panic selling phase for the tech sector has likely passed, following a significant digestion of crowded positions and leveraged funds. While short-term volatility may persist, the medium to long-term outlook remains underpinned by enduring trends like AI computing demand expansion and semiconductor localization. The market's focus now shifts to the sustainability of supportive fund flows, earnings reports, and upcoming catalysts from the global AI industry chain.

marsbit15m ago

STAR 50 Soars 10.73%, Why Did A-Shares Stage a "V-Shaped Reversal"?

marsbit15m ago

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

US tech momentum stocks staged a sharp rebound on Tuesday (July 21st). Morgan Stanley's TMT Momentum Factor surged over 12%, marking its largest single-day gain on record, exceeding even peaks from the 2000 dot-com bubble. Key momentum indices from Goldman Sachs also posted their strongest daily performances in years. The rally was led by semiconductors, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index jumping 4.6%. This rebound followed three consecutive down days and a cumulative 33% plunge in momentum stocks, one of the steepest drawdowns since the dot-com era. Analysts attribute the surge largely to a short squeeze. Heavy selling had pushed high-beta momentum stocks into deeply oversold territory, forcing many short sellers, particularly in Asia, to cover their positions, creating a self-reinforcing buying spiral. However, the rebound's internals appear weak. Trading volume was notably low, and advancing stocks still lagged decliners on the S&P 500, indicating a narrow, concentrated rally rather than broad market participation. Diverging views emerge on the outlook. BTIG warns the bounce has hit key resistance and recommends selling into strength, citing extreme volatility and historical parallels to past market tops. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS believe the momentum unwind is nearing its end, suggesting it may be time to gradually add exposure, as positioning has been significantly reduced. They caution, however, that high volatility warrants a measured approach, potentially using defined-risk strategies. The upcoming earnings season, particularly reports from major tech firms like Alphabet, is seen as a critical test for the rally's sustainability. Simultaneously, bond markets flashed a warning, with yields rising partly due to spiking oil prices. Analysts note that if long-term Treasury yields break decisively higher, it could pose a significant headwind for equities, especially growth stocks.

marsbit22m ago

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

marsbit22m ago

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

U.S. tech momentum stocks staged a dramatic rebound on Tuesday, July 21st. Key momentum indices like the Morgan Stanley TMT Momentum Factor and Goldman Sachs' High Beta Momentum Long Index posted historic or near-historic single-day gains, fueled largely by semiconductor stocks. This sharp rally followed a severe three-day sell-off that saw momentum stocks plunge 33%, marking one of the steepest pullbacks since the dot-com bubble. Analysts attribute the bounce primarily to a short squeeze, as forced covering from over-leveraged traders, particularly in Asia, created a buying spiral. However, the rally's health is questioned due to weak market breadth—overall trading volume was low, and decliners outnumbered advancers in the S&P 500 despite the index's gain—suggesting a narrow, concentrated surge rather than broad recovery. Opinions on the sustainability diverge. BTIG strategists warn the rebound has hit key resistance levels, citing extreme volatility and historic stock dispersion as signs of an ongoing broader correction, and recommend selling into strength. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS view the aggressive momentum unwinding as nearing its end, noting reduced positioning and a lack of new fundamental catalysts. They suggest the sell-off presents a selective opportunity to add exposure, albeit cautiously and gradually using defined-risk strategies. The immediate trajectory hinges on the ongoing earnings season, with market focus on Alphabet's capital expenditure guidance for AI investment clarity. Meanwhile, bond markets present a risk, with rising Treasury yields—potentially heading toward 5.5%—and widening credit spreads for mega-cap tech companies posing a threat to equity valuations. The combination of technical factors, earnings results, and macro conditions leaves the durability of the rebound in doubt.

链捕手25m ago

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

链捕手25m ago

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

"The Inevitable Cycle: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup – What is Ethereum's Endgame?" For years, the Ethereum community grappled with concerns that L2s were fragmenting the ecosystem and eroding L1's value. While L2s provided cheaper execution, they also splintered liquidity and the unified user experience of a single chain. This has prompted a fundamental reassessment of the relationship between L1 and L2. Ethereum's roadmap is evolving. The "Scale" initiative merges L1 and L2 expansion into a holistic framework. L1 itself is advancing with higher gas limits, statelessness, and zkEVM verification, no longer content to be just a low-throughput settlement layer. Consequently, the primary value proposition of L2s is shifting from merely providing cheap blockspace to offering L1 cannot easily provide: application-specific optimizations, privacy features, and flexible governance models. L2s are becoming a spectrum of execution environments with varying degrees of security inheritance from Ethereum. A critical challenge in this multi-chain future is interoperability. The vision is to make Ethereum "feel like one chain again." This relies on advancements in native account abstraction (like EIP-7702) and intent-based architectures (Open Intents Framework), where users declare desired outcomes, and solvers handle the complex cross-chain execution. Furthermore, shortening Ethereum's finality time from minutes to seconds is crucial, as it underpins trust between chains for bridges, stablecoins, and cross-chain applications. Perhaps the most provocative idea is that Ethereum L1 itself could become a form of "its own Rollup." As zkEVM and proof systems mature, high-performance nodes could execute transactions and generate validity proofs. Regular validators would then verify these proofs instead of re-executing all transactions. This blurs the traditional L1/L2 hierarchy, making "Rollup" more of a general execution-verification architecture. Native Rollup aims to integrate L2 validation more directly into the Ethereum protocol, allowing L2s to inherit L1's security more fully and move away from reliance on security councils. In the end, L2s are not destined to replace L1 or be made obsolete by it. The likely future is a unified system where diverse execution environments—each optimized for specific use cases like DeFi, gaming, or privacy—coexist. They will share a common foundation of security, liquidity, and verifiable state, seamlessly connected to restore a cohesive user experience. The next phase for Ethereum is not just about scaling through separation, but about intelligently reintegrating what was separated back into a coherent whole.

链捕手41m ago

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

链捕手41m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片