SemiAnalysis Report Claims Delay in Two Key Technologies, Triggers Sharp Decline in 'Optoelectronics', Sparking Online Debate Over CPO

marsbitPublished on 2026-06-10Last updated on 2026-06-10

Abstract

A report from analysis firm SemiAnalysis, claiming significant delays in two key AI data center technologies, triggered a sharp sell-off in the photonics sector and sparked intense online debate. The report, dated June 10, states that NVIDIA's 800VDC power architecture rollout is pushed to 2028 and CPO (Co-Packaged Optics) mass production is likely delayed until 2028 or even 2029. Following the news, U.S. optical communication stocks fell sharply, with AAOI dropping 17% and Lumentum down about 8%. The delays were attributed to engineering challenges like photonic engine yield and cost-effectiveness, not a disappearance of demand. Simultaneously, an interview with NVIDIA's networking SVP Gilad Shainer presented an opposing, optimistic view, stating CPO is "the most exciting thing" and shipments would begin scaling in the second half of the year. This contradiction fueled debate on social media. Bears pointed to unresolved reliability and maintenance hurdles for CPO. Bulls argued the delay simply redirects capital to interim solutions like traditional pluggable optical modules and NPO (Near-Packaged Optics), extending their revenue runway. Some users questioned the report's internal logic and timing, noting similar views had circulated earlier. Analysts highlighted potential beneficiaries, including companies in the 1.6T pluggable modules, NPO, and 400VDC power transition supply chains. The consensus suggests the market reaction reflects a recalibration of the technology ado...

Source: Wall Street News

A report from the star AI industry chain analysis firm SemiAnalysis, which directly pointed to delays in two core technological pathways for AI data centers, ignited severe volatility in the optical communication sector on June 10th, simultaneously sparking intense debate about future technology roadmaps and investment opportunities in both the investment and industrial communities.

The report suggests that NVIDIA's 800VDC power architecture shipments will be delayed until 2028, and the mass production of CPO (Co-Packaged Optics) may be postponed to 2028 or even 2029. The simultaneous downward revision of these two expectations caught the market off guard.

After the news broke, the US stock market's optical communication sector generally suffered heavy losses. Applied Optoelectronics (AAOI) plummeted by 17% in a single day, Lumentum fell by about 8%, and companies mentioned in the report as warranting caution, such as Himax Technologies (HIMX), Navitas Semiconductor Corp, and Wolfspeed, also faced significant pressure.

Concurrently with the release of the SemiAnalysis report, interview content with an NVIDIA executive was also published. According to资深半导体和科技投资记者Tae Kim, NVIDIA's Senior Vice President of Networking, Gilad Shainer, expressed a starkly optimistic stance on CPO's prospects at the 2026 Computex exhibition, stating directly that "CPO is the most exciting technology right now," and announced that volume shipments would begin in the second half of the year. This sparked a heated online debate about the CPO timeline on social platforms.

Notably, several market observers pointed out that the CPO delay does not mean the demand for optical interconnects disappears, but rather it is more likely to redirect capital flows back to traditional pluggable optical modules and the NPO (Near Package Optics) track — this logic led some investors to seek opportunities among oversold stocks during the panic selling.

SemiAnalysis Report Core: Dual Delays in Two Technological Pathways

In this research note distributed to institutional clients, SemiAnalysis presented two core judgments with profound market impact.

800VDC Power Architecture Delayed Until After 2028.

The report indicates that NVIDIA's originally planned large-scale adoption of a single-ended 800VDC power design has seen its shipment window significantly pushed back. Hyperscale cloud providers are currently more inclined to stick with mature low-voltage solutions or gradually transition to 400VDC, rather than rushing to switch to 800VDC.

The report argues that the marginal efficiency gains of 800VDC under current grid power supply conditions are insufficient to justify its system complexity. In contrast, 400VDC products are expected to start ramping in Q2 2026, with significant growth in 2027.

CPO Mass Production Timeline Lags Significantly Behind Market Expectations.

The report states that CPO shipment volumes in 2027 will be substantially lower than previous aggressive forecasts, and the timeline for mass production may be delayed until 2028 or even 2029. The main bottlenecks are concentrated at three levels:

Optical engine connection yield (optimistically around 95%, but CPO production driven by a single ASIC remains extremely limited), ASIC integration difficulty, and overall cost economics.

Scale-out CPO switch shipment volumes face downward revision risks, and shipments of Sidecar relying on new platforms like Rubin Ultra/Kyber are also postponed to a 2028 window.

At the individual stock level, SemiAnalysis maintains a relatively positive view on companies like Amphenol, Vertiv, and Legrand, while adopting a cautious stance towards Lumentum, Himax Technologies, Navitas Semiconductor, and Wolfspeed.

However, the report itself acknowledges that CPO, as an important direction for future data center network architecture, is not denied; the core reason for the delay lies in unresolved engineering challenges, not disappearing demand.

Simultaneously, the report also points out that some NPO (Near Package Optics) projects may accelerate.

NVIDIA Executive Publicly Counters, Tae Kim's Exclusive Interview Draws Attention

Just as the SemiAnalysis report was widely circulated among institutional circles,资深半导体和科技投资记者Tae Kim published an excerpt from a one-on-one interview with NVIDIA's Senior Vice President of Networking, Gilad Shainer, during Computex in his Substack column. The content starkly contrasted with SemiAnalysis's assessment.

Shainer stated in the interview, "The most exciting thing today is co-packaged optics, it's the leading edge of technology."

He further revealed that NVIDIA is ready to start shipping, that partner Lambda had published a blog confirming receipt of CPO switches, that volume shipments of CPO would accelerate in the second half of the year, extending from scale-out to scale-up scenarios. "If it were up to me, I would put CPO everywhere that we use optical networking."

Tae Kim added in his article that Shainer's overall demeanor and body language during the interview showed high enthusiasm for both near-term and long-term ramp-up of CPO. He stated that this statement "seems to directly contradict the narrative from SemiAnalysis."

This discrepancy plunged the market into an information war. User @qinbafrank on social platform X pointed out that Bernstein had already clearly stated in a mid-May report that cloud providers would not sacrifice system reliability for energy savings, and that no cloud provider currently plans large-scale CPO deployment in 2026-2027. "If you had read the Bernstein report in detail, you wouldn't be surprised by SemiAnalysis today."

Online Debate: Is CPO Delay a Negative or a Market Overreaction?

The market volatility triggered by the report quickly spread to social media, where opinions on the investment logic surrounding the CPO delay diverged significantly.

Bearish View: Yield and Reliability Are Real Bottlenecks.

SemiAnalysis emphasized in its report that in the CPO architecture, the optical engine is co-packaged with a large ASIC worth tens of thousands of dollars on the same substrate. If the optical engine fails due to laser aging or fiber damage, it often requires the entire motherboard to be disassembled and returned to the factory. The maintenance cost and downtime risk are far higher than with traditional pluggable modules. This engineering challenge is considered the core obstacle preventing large-scale CPO adoption in the short term.

Bullish View: CPO Delay Actually Benefits Pluggable Modules and NPO.

User @TomSzczypka on social platform X analyzed, "If CPO comes later, data still needs to be transmitted, AI clusters can't wait two years, hyperscalers will buy more pluggable modules and NPO for longer. The money doesn't disappear, it just changes pockets."

He also pointed out that the fact that Applied Optoelectronics' decline (17%) far exceeded Lumentum's (8%) on that day itself indicated that the market's sell-off was not based on rational analysis but was flushing out the weakest holdings.

User @michaelsikand stated that currently, revenue from CPO for any photonics company is zero, and the current high growth comes from the huge, unmet NPO opportunity. "The timeline may slip, but the TAM doesn't."

Voices questioning the report's logic also exist.

User @cherryPayment posted a lengthy article pointing out internal contradictions in the SemiAnalysis report: on one hand, it says the supply chain won't be ready in 2027; on the other hand, it predicts Celestial AI (acquired by Marvell) will reach a $1 billion revenue run rate by the end of 2028, and Amazon has already signed contracts for Trainium 4. "You can't suddenly have $1 billion by end of 2028 with the supply chain not ready for anything in 2027."

He also pointed out that SemiAnalysis's target audience is the procurement decision-makers at hyperscale cloud providers, and its conclusion is "no need to all-in yet," not an investment timing judgment for the capital market. "They are analyzing deployment pace, not investment timing."

User @Herman Jin on platform X criticized the timeliness of information from US investment research firms, arguing that delays in CPO and 800VDC were "a matter of time," and such information had long been circulating in institutional circles; the SemiAnalysis report merely formalized known information on paper.

Unexpected Beneficiaries: Copper Connections and Pluggable Modules

Against the backdrop of widespread market pressure, some analysts turned their attention to potential beneficiaries of the CPO delay.

User @qinbafrank梳理认为,梳理认为梳理认为梳理认为,梳理认为梳理认为梳理认为 the more realistic revenue opportunities in 2026 are concentrated in 1.6T pluggable modules, LPO/NPO, light sources, testing, PCB, ABF, and CCL segments. "Optics won't eliminate copper immediately, and copper won't hold onto all scenarios forever; different distances and system levels will choose different solutions."

The CEO of Lumentum also recently stated that interest in NPO from non-NVIDIA customers has increased noticeably over the past two months.

User @RealNickMugalli analyzed that at 1.6T rates and 200G per channel, copper cables, even with retimer technology, have reached their physical limits. Optical solutions become a mandatory option, not an optional one, within reasonable distances, and the potential market size for NPO might even exceed that of CPO.

SemiAnalysis also noted in its report that some NPO projects may accelerate, and 400VDC products will start ramping in Q2 2026. For companies like Amphenol and Vertiv, the report maintains a relatively positive stance, believing they benefit from sustained demand during the 400VDC transition.

User @TomSzczypka cited this week's industry chain data to support that AI infrastructure demand has not weakened:

Fujikura raised prices for data center cables because almost all US hyperscalers placed orders simultaneously; King Slide's rack rail revenue increased 47% sequentially; Google ordered 6 million TPUs from Intel; SK Hynix signed a multi-year memory supply agreement with NVIDIA, etc.

"The real bottlenecks for AI are power, memory, and GPUs. None of these three have gotten any worse today."

Meanwhile, @tuolaji2024 posted on social platform X, stating that memory (HBM/DRAM), as the real physical bottleneck, remains completely unaffected by this technology delay event.

Analysis points out that, synthesizing various viewpoints, the market volatility triggered by this SemiAnalysis report reflects more of a recalibration of the technology roadmap timeline, rather than a fundamental reversal of overall AI data center demand.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat are the two key technology delays identified in the SemiAnalysis report that impacted the stock market?

AThe SemiAnalysis report identified that the timeline for mass production of CPO (Co-packaged Optics) has been delayed to 2028 or even 2029, and the deployment of Nvidia's 800VDC power architecture has been postponed to after 2028.

QAccording to the article, what is the primary engineering challenge hindering the large-scale adoption of CPO technology?

AThe primary engineering challenge is the high maintenance cost and downtime risk. If an optical engine fails within a CPO module, it often requires replacing the entire motherboard, which is more complex and costly than simply replacing a traditional pluggable optical module.

QWhat opposing view did NVIDIA executive Gilad Shainer express regarding CPO in his interview with Tae Kim?

ANVIDIA's Senior Vice President of Networking, Gilad Shainer, expressed strong optimism about CPO, calling it 'the most exciting thing in the technology front line.' He stated that NVIDIA is ready to begin shipping and that volume production will accelerate in the second half of the year, seemingly contradicting the delayed timeline in the SemiAnalysis report.

QHow did some investors interpret the CPO delay in terms of potential investment opportunities?

ASome investors argued that a delay in CPO adoption would redirect capital flows to other areas. They saw potential opportunities in established technologies like traditional pluggable optical modules and the accelerating NPO (Near-Package Optics) market, as data transmission needs remain immediate and strong.

QAccording to the article, what are cited as the 'true bottlenecks' for AI infrastructure that remain unaffected by the CPO/800VDC delays?

AThe article cites power supply, storage (specifically HBM/DRAM), and GPUs as the 'true bottlenecks' for AI infrastructure. These areas remain in tight supply and are unaffected by the delays in optical and power delivery technologies discussed in the report.

Related Reads

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报55m ago

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报55m ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News1h ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News1h ago

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit1h ago

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片