Piggycell Secures Approximately $4 Million in Additional Funding Led by Double A Investment: "Resilience in Recovery Execution and Genuine User Base Validated Again"

marsbitPublished on 2026-01-29Last updated on 2026-01-29

Abstract

Piggycell has secured approximately $4 million in additional funding led by Double A Investment, with participation from NexStox | NXMarket. This investment is seen as recognition of the platform’s recovery execution and sustainable value based on real-world usage following a recent security incident. The company prioritized user protection and token system normalization, confirming a new token issuance and a 1:1 swap plan. The migration will align with major exchanges, including Binance, to minimize confusion and secondary losses for holders. The platform has strengthened operational and security controls, collaborating with exchanges to reduce future risks and ensure a smoother execution. The new tokens are expected to resume trading on Binance Alpha, KuCoin, Gate, and MEXC. Funding will be used to enhance security capabilities, support recovery execution, ensure operational stability, and drive product and ecosystem expansion. Piggycell stated that this round validates its resilience and execution capability post-crisis, emphasizing its focus on verifiable on-chain activity and real-world utility, including RWA expansion. Market attention is growing as trading resumes and recovery plans progress.

Piggycell announced that it has completed an additional funding round of approximately $4 million, led by Double A Investment with participation from NexStox | NXMarket. This funding round is interpreted as a reassessment and recognition by the investment market of Piggycell's recovery execution centered on "user protection" and the sustainable platform value based on genuine usage following a security incident.

After the recent security incident, Piggycell prioritized the normalization of the token system and user protection, and has confirmed a new token issuance and a 1:1 Swap (migration) plan. The project stated: "To minimize confusion and secondary losses for existing holders, we have aligned the Swap and trading resumption timing with major exchanges, including Binance, and further refined the execution plan based on this." The Swap will proceed based on the announced snapshot standards: on-chain holders will receive a 1:1 airdrop to the same wallet based on their holdings at the snapshot time; exchange holders will be processed according to the procedures announced by each exchange.

Another key aspect of this recovery plan is the strengthening of operations and security controls. Piggycell stated that it has further enhanced the permission structure and operational control mechanisms during the new token distribution process, and has restructured the architecture to reduce the risk of recurrence through operational checks with exchange partners, including Binance. The project emphasized that, particularly through this alignment and collaboration, the focus is on minimizing market confusion and price gaps at the time of execution. Notably, Piggycell's new token trading is expected to resume on Binance Alpha, KuCoin, Gate, and MEXC.

The funding will be used for:

△ Security capability upgrades (audits, monitoring, enhanced permission controls)

△ Recovery execution and operational stabilization

△ Product/ecosystem expansion, etc., to provide execution resources for the post-recovery growth phase.

Piggycell stated: "This funding round is not just a 'restart after the incident' but also a signal—after navigating the risks, the value and execution capability of the platform as a genuine usage-based infrastructure/application have been validated."

A representative from Double A Investment said: "Piggycell possesses a genuine usage-based infrastructure and platform model, and during the post-incident response process, it has consistently prioritized user protection and built a phased, execution-focused recovery system, which is highly commendable."

Piggycell added: "We are back on track, and now is the real beginning." It stated that it will continue to advance RWA expansion and further upgrade genuine usage-based utility based on "verifiable on-chain activity and long-term execution capability." As trading channels gradually resume and the recovery plan enters the implementation phase, market attention on its subsequent growth path and ecosystem expansion pace continues to heat up.

Related Questions

QWho led the $4 million additional investment in Piggycell?

ADouble A Investment led the $4 million additional investment in Piggycell.

QWhat was the main focus of Piggycell's recovery plan after the security incident?

AThe main focus was on normalizing the token system and prioritizing user protection, including a 1:1 token swap and enhanced operational and security controls.

QWhich exchanges are expected to resume trading of Piggycell's new token?

ATrading of Piggycell's new token is expected to resume on Binance Alpha, KuCoin, Gate, and MEXC.

QHow will the funds from this financing round be used by Piggycell?

AThe funds will be used for security capabilities upgrade, recovery execution and operational stabilization, and product/ecosystem expansion.

QWhat did Double A Investment highlight as commendable about Piggycell's response to the incident?

ADouble A Investment commended Piggycell for its user protection-oriented approach and the phased construction of an execution-focused recovery system.

Related Reads

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit1h ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit1h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit1h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit1h ago

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

In 2026, a historic shift occurred in AI as major cloud providers' inference spending surpassed training spending for the first time, signaling a move from "building large models" to "using large models." This shifts the core challenge from computing power to the "memory wall"—the bottleneck of data movement (model weights, activations, KV Cache) between external DRAM and processors, where energy and latency from data transfer far exceed computation itself. Companies like Nvidia face GPU idle time due to bandwidth limits. In contrast, Cerebras Systems adopts a radical "wafer-scale" approach with its Wafer-Scale Engine (WSE). Instead of cutting a silicon wafer into many chips, Cerebras uses almost the entire wafer as one massive chip (WSE-3). This design provides 44GB of on-chip SRAM, delivering memory bandwidth thousands of times higher than traditional HBM (e.g., 21 PB/s vs. Nvidia B200). For LLM inference, weights are streamed layer-by-layer from external MemoryX storage to the chip, avoiding HBM bottlenecks. This results in token generation speeds 1.5–5 times faster than Nvidia's B200 in some models and significant advantages in first-token latency and long-context tasks. Additionally, Cerebras's architecture offers much lower interconnect power consumption (0.15 pJ/bit vs. GPU's ~10 pJ/bit). However, Cerebras faces challenges: SRAM scaling has slowed with advanced nodes, limiting future capacity gains; the chip requires specialized liquid cooling and custom software stacks; and its external I/O bandwidth (150 GB/s) is low compared to NVLink, hindering multi-system scaling for very large models. Competition is intensifying. Major players are pursuing three paths: 1) Developing proprietary inference ASICs (e.g., Google TPU, Microsoft Maia), 2) Leveraging advanced packaging (e.g., TSMC's SoW) to democratize wafer-scale-like integration, potentially eroding Cerebras's process advantage within a few years, and 3) Exploring optical interconnects for ultimate bandwidth. Commercially, Cerebras is transitioning from a hardware vendor to a service provider, facing the immense challenge of building high-power, specialized data centers to meet large contracts (e.g., 250MW/year from 2026–2028). In conclusion, the AI inference era presents a fundamental architectural trade-off. Cerebras opts for extreme physical optimization for low-latency, single-task performance, while Nvidia prioritizes versatility and massive cluster throughput. The path forward remains uncertain, with technology and business models still evolving in the race toward advanced AI.

marsbit1h ago

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

marsbit1h ago

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

**Title: Has Bitcoin's Rebound Ended, Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?** **Summary:** Bitcoin's price has declined by 13% this week, signaling a potential return to late-stage bear market conditions. The price fell to around $67k, positioned between the Realized Price and Realized Cap Weighted Average. For the first time since early 2022, the Short-Term Holder cost basis has dropped below this key average, confirming a hallmark of late-cycle bear markets. Profitability metrics have collapsed sharply. The 7-day average of the Realized Profit/Loss ratio plummeted from a local high of 3.16 to 0.29, mirroring the February panic sell-off. Critically, the 90-day average never breached the threshold of 2, indicating the recent rally to $82k was a bear market bounce, not a structural shift. Realized losses surged to $1.35 billion daily, with $770 million coming from Long-Term Holders selling at a loss. This accelerating redistribution of supply from weak to strong hands is a necessary but ongoing process for a market bottom. The rally stalled almost precisely at the aggregate cost basis (~$83k) of US spot Bitcoin ETF investors, turning that level into strong resistance and leaving the average ETF holder underwater again. Spot market flows have turned decisively negative, showing sellers are dominating order books despite the price drop. While a significant futures long liquidation event cleared over $400 million in leverage, providing a potential reset, sustained spot demand is yet to materialize. Options markets continue to price in higher future volatility (Implied Volatility) than recent price action (Realized Volatility) has shown, with a persistent skew towards put options, indicating ongoing demand for downside protection. In conclusion, multiple metrics point to a fragile market structure. Resistance at the ETF cost basis, accelerating realized losses, dominant spot selling, and cautious options pricing all suggest the bear market trend persists. A sustainable recovery likely requires a resurgence of spot demand, ETF holders returning to profit, and a clear reduction in selling pressure.

marsbit1h ago

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy 4

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing 4 (4) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy 4 (4) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your 4 (4)After purchasing your 4 (4), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade 4 (4)Easily trade 4 (4) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

4.2k Total ViewsPublished 2025.10.20Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy 4

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of 4 (4) are presented below.

活动图片