Perspective: The current AI supercycle will last 15 years, but most are still buying stocks in the first FOMO stage

marsbitPublished on 2026-05-09Last updated on 2026-05-09

Abstract

This article outlines a 15-year AI supercycle, segmented into four investment stages. It argues that while most investors are still focused on the first stage, smart money is already moving to the third. **Stage 1: The Foundation (2023-2025) - Priced In** The semiconductor layer (e.g., NVIDIA, AMD) is complete. While growth continues, the historic entry opportunity is over as risk/reward has compressed. **Stage 2: The Build-Out (2025-2027) - In Progress** This phase involves building the necessary physical infrastructure: power/utilities (CEG), cooling (VRT), networking (ANET), and nuclear SMRs (OKLO, SMR). Significant upside remains, but obvious names have already moved. **Stage 3: The Asymmetric Bet (2026-2028) - Positioning Window** AI moves into the physical world. Key areas include robotics/autonomy (Tesla Optimus), space/defense/drones (Rocket Lab, LUNR), and critical materials. This stage presents the best asymmetric risk/reward and is where positioning should occur now. **Stage 4: The Endgame (2028+) - Software Dominance** The mega-cap cloud platforms (Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta), with their massive capital expenditure, will build the AI software layer and AGI infrastructure, aiming to win the entire cycle. **Core Conclusion:** The cycle is confirmed in Stage 2. Stage 3 (robotics, space, defense, nuclear SMRs) is where capital is currently rotating for maximum opportunity, while the majority of investors are expected to be 12 months behind this shift.

Author: Rand Group (@cryptorand)

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Intro: Crypto KOL Rand Group breaks down the AI supercycle into four stages, from chips to infrastructure to robots to platform software, marking the core targets and risk-reward ratios for each stage. His judgment is: Stage 1 (Semiconductors) is over, Stage 2 (Power/Cooling/Networks) is being priced, and the true asymmetric opportunity lies in Stage 3 — robotics, space, defense, nuclear energy.

The AI supercycle will last 15 years. This is year three.

Most investors are still buying Stage 1 stocks, but smart money is already rotating into Stage 3.

I've broken the entire cycle into four stages, with the most important tickers labeled for each.

The AI supercycle is the biggest investment theme of this generation. Bigger than mobile internet, bigger than cloud computing. A 15-year structural shift that will reshape every industry in the global economy. Hyperscale cloud providers just committed $725 billion in capex for 2026, nearly double last year's. Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Meta — each over $100 billion individually.

This is not speculation.

🔴 Stage 1: Over (2023-2025)

The foundation layer is complete. AMD was up 78% in 2025, NVDA up 39%, Intel just delivered a blowout Q1, pushing the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index above 10,000 for the first time. Chips still drive every stage, but the historic entry opportunity is gone; the risk-reward has compressed.

Tickers: NVDA, AMD, ARM, INTC, AVGO, MU, GLW

Sectors: Semiconductors, Memory, Photonics/Optics

Status: Foundation complete, still growing, but priced in.

🟡 Stage 2: Buildout Peak (2025-2027)

The stage most investors are just waking up to. CEG acquiring Calpine to become the largest private U.S. power producer at 55 GW. GEV up over 200% in a year. VRT co-designing cooling for NVIDIA's Rubin architecture. GLW up 74% YTD on fiber demand. Nuclear SMR is the biggest dark horse — OKLO, SMR, BWXT are laying direct power lines for data centers.

Still upside, but the most obvious names have moved.

Tickers: CEG, GEV, VRT, VST, TLN, ANET, GLW, MOD, EQIX, OKLO, SMR, BWXT, NNE

Sectors: Power/Grid, Cooling, Networking, Nuclear SMR Buildout Peak

Note: Nuclear SMR is the hidden major opportunity.

🟡 Stage 3: Positioning Window (2026-2028)

The stage where AI leaves the data center and enters the physical world. Most will be late.

Tesla is converting its Fremont factory into an Optimus robot production line — $25 billion capex, targeting mass production in H2 2026. Rocket Lab posted a record $602M revenue, backlog at $1.85B. LUNR up 47% YTD with $943M in contracts. KTOS's Valkyrie drone selected by the Marine Corps.

The positioning window is open now.

Tickers: TSLA, RKLB, LUNR, KTOS, AVAV, PATH, ISRG, MP, FCX, ALB, ASTS

Sectors: Robotics/Autonomy, Space/Defense/Drones, Rare Earths

Judgment: The asymmetric risk-reward is here.

🟢 Stage 4: Endgame (2028+)

The endgame. Microsoft capex $190B, Alphabet $190B, Amazon $200B, Meta $145B. Google Cloud backlog exceeds $460B. They are building AI software dominance and AGI infrastructure. Quantum computing is early, but IONQ and D-Wave are laying the groundwork.

The platforms controlling the software layer win the entire supercycle.

Tickers: MSFT, GOOGL, AMZN, META, ORCL, IONQ

Sectors: AI Software Dominance, AGI Infrastructure, Decade-long thesis

Strategy: Buy the dips.

Key Conclusions

  • Stage 2 is confirmed (hyperscale $725B capex)
  • Stage 3 is where smart money is positioning — robotics, space, defense, nuclear
  • SMR is the core trade from 2026 to 2028
  • Most will rotate into these names 12 months late

A 15-year supercycle. Not a single trade. Stage 1 is over, Stage 2 is being priced, Stage 3 is where you should be.

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, what is the author's view on the duration and current stage of the AI supercycle?

AThe author believes the AI supercycle will last 15 years and is currently in its third year. The first stage (2023-2025) is already over, the second stage (2025-2027) is in progress, and the third stage (2026-2028) is where the most asymmetric opportunities lie.

QWhat sectors or 'stages' does the author identify as having the best asymmetric risk/reward opportunity right now?

AThe author identifies the third stage as having the best asymmetric risk/reward opportunity. This stage includes robotics/autonomous systems, space/defense/drones, and rare earths, with specific mentions of companies like Tesla, Rocket Lab, and Intuitive Machines.

QWhich specific sector within the 'construction boom' (second stage) is highlighted as a major hidden opportunity?

AWithin the second stage (the construction boom), the author highlights nuclear energy, specifically Small Modular Reactors (SMRs), as the major hidden opportunity. Companies mentioned include Oklo, NuScale Power (SMR), and BWX Technologies.

QWhat key metric is cited as evidence confirming the transition to the second stage of the AI supercycle?

AThe author cites the $725 billion in committed capital expenditure for 2026 by hyperscale cloud providers (Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Meta) as the key metric confirming the transition to the second stage. This amount is nearly double that of the previous year.

QWhat does the author suggest is the strategy for investing in the 'Endgame' (fourth stage) companies?

AFor the 'Endgame' or fourth stage companies (like Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta), which control the AI software platform, the author's suggested strategy is to 'buy the dips,' indicating a long-term, patient accumulation approach.

Related Reads

After the Passage of the GENIUS Act and the CLARITY Act, What Is the Correct Architecture for On-Chain Yield?

The article discusses the evolution of on-chain credit, distinguishing three markets: overcollateralized crypto lending, unsecured lending (largely unsuccessful), and asset-backed credit (ABC). ABC, backed by identifiable real-world collateral with legal recourse, is identified as the fastest-growing category and the only one credibly addressing adverse selection—the core problem in credit where the riskiest borrowers self-select. Current growth in on-chain Real World Assets (RWAs), particularly tokenized private credit funds (e.g., Maple Finance, Centrifuge), is substantial but often merely "wraps" existing fund structures, inheriting their risks rather than solving adverse selection at the protocol level. The regulatory landscape is a key driver, with the US GENIUS Act (prohibiting stablecoin issuers from paying yield) and the proposed CLARITY Act (closing loopholes on indirect yield) set to redefine permissible yield-bearing products. This makes vaults (like ERC-4626) the critical architecture—they become the primary compliant vehicle for delivering yield, functioning as issuance, disclosure, distribution, and recovery mechanisms. The author's thesis is that the correct post-GENIUS/CLARITY architecture involves building ABC solutions where credit assessment, structure, and recovery are encoded directly into the smart contract vault layer, moving beyond mere tokenized fund wrappers to solve adverse selection fundamentally and ensure regulatory compliance.

Foresight News22m ago

After the Passage of the GENIUS Act and the CLARITY Act, What Is the Correct Architecture for On-Chain Yield?

Foresight News22m ago

TechFlow Intelligence Bureau: Anthropic's New Model Fable Sparks Controversy by Restricting Biosafety Research, US CPI Soars to 4.2%, a Three-Year High

**Summary of TechFlow Intelligence Report:** The newsletter covers several key tech and finance developments. In AI, Anthropic's new Fable model faced backlash for secretly limiting biomedical research capabilities and enforcing a 30-day data retention policy, prompting the company to promise more transparent adjustments. In a related story, Anthropic's founder revealed his departure from OpenAI was due to dishonesty from Sam Altman, not safety concerns. Meanwhile, OpenAI is considering significant price cuts to compete with Anthropic, potentially sparking a price war. In crypto/Web3, BlackRock filed a new amendment for a yield-generating Bitcoin ETF, while Bank of America's CEO warned that stablecoin yields could drain trillions from traditional banks. U.S. Senator Cynthia Lummis advocated for the U.S. to officially accumulate Bitcoin reserves. In hardware, Nvidia released the DiffusionGemma-2-6B image model optimized for efficient inference, and AMD promoted its unified memory architecture to challenge Nvidia's dominance. TSMC's CFO hinted at possible price increases due to soaring AI chip demand. A major legal ruling in Germany held Google legally responsible for inaccurate information generated by its AI Overviews feature. Google Chrome also moved to fully block ad-blocker workarounds like uBlock Origin. Macroeconomic headlines included U.S. CPI rising to 4.2% (a 3-year high) and Iran's complete closure of the Strait of Hormuz, raising oil price and inflation fears. South Korean markets saw continued volatility with massive foreign capital outflow. Other notable stories: Microsoft expanded its Copilot AI assistant "Mico" globally; a study found r/wallstreetbets users' stock picks outperformed Wall Street; a fully autonomous drone killed a human soldier for the first time, raising AI ethics concerns; and a Chinese hospital used brain-computer interface technology to help a blind person "see." The overarching theme connects debates over AI boundaries and responsibility (Anthropic's restrictions, Google's liability, lethal autonomous drones) with real-world economic and geopolitical turmoil (inflation, Strait of Hormuz closure, market instability), highlighting the tense interplay between technological advancement and global chaos.

marsbit35m ago

TechFlow Intelligence Bureau: Anthropic's New Model Fable Sparks Controversy by Restricting Biosafety Research, US CPI Soars to 4.2%, a Three-Year High

marsbit35m ago

Alibaba's Yet Another New Business Division: What Signal Does It Send?

Alibaba has established a new "Token Foundry" business unit, merging its Tongyi large model division and Future Life Lab. Led directly by Group CEO Wu Yongming, this marks the company's third significant AI organizational reshuffle in 2026, following the creation of the Alibaba Token Hub (ATH) and a Group Technology Committee. The move signals a strategic shift from consolidating AI resources to accelerating productization and commercialization. The "Token Foundry" name reflects Alibaba's ambition to become a foundational supplier in the AI era, focusing on model development and commercial application. Key teams, including those behind the high-performing HappyHorse video generation model, have been integrated into the new unit. Concurrently, Zhou Jingren, architect of the Qwen model series, has been appointed Group Chief Scientist to lead a new AI Future Research Institute, focusing on long-term technological breakthroughs like Agent capabilities. This restructuring creates a clear four-layer AI architecture within Alibaba: the research institute for frontier exploration, Token Foundry for core models and commercialization, MaaS for platform services, and business units like Qianwen (C端) and Wukong (B端) for end-user applications. The adjustments align with a global trend among tech giants like Google and Microsoft to centralize AI leadership under the CEO and deeply integrate research with business units. The urgency is driven by a narrowing competitive window. Alibaba has announced its AI business is now entering a commercialization phase, with AI-related revenue seeing triple-digit growth for eleven consecutive quarters. The company faces intense competition in the MaaS (Model-as-a-Service) sector from rivals like ByteDance and Tencent. The Token Foundry initiative represents Alibaba's effort to streamline execution and enhance competitiveness in this critical, fast-evolving landscape.

marsbit1h ago

Alibaba's Yet Another New Business Division: What Signal Does It Send?

marsbit1h ago

From Return to Resignation: Chen Hang's 437 Days at DingTalk

The 437-Day Return and Departure of Chen Hang at DingTalk This article chronicles the 437-day period from March 31, 2025, to June 11, 2026, when Chen Hang (also known as "No Move") returned as CEO of DingTalk, the enterprise communication platform he originally founded, only to later step down. Chen Hang, the creator of DingTalk in 2015, was brought back by Alibaba in 2025 after the company acquired his subsequent startup, HHO. His return was driven by Alibaba's renewed focus on AI and DingTalk's strategic role as its key to-B AI application. However, his aggressive management style, marked by strict work policies like mandatory clock-ins and extended hours, quickly caused internal friction and was criticized as being at odds with Alibaba's culture. Despite the internal turmoil, Chen Hang drove significant product launches. In August 2025, he unveiled "AI DingTalk 1.0," featuring new products like the AI-native entry point "DingTalk ONE." By March 2026, he announced "Wukong," touted as the world's first enterprise-grade AI-native work platform, representing a fundamental rebuild of DingTalk's architecture. The turning point came in early June 2026. A detailed internal post criticizing DingTalk's work culture went viral, followed by a public critique from a former executive. This prompted an unprecedented public rebuke from the Alibaba Partners Committee, which stated such management was not aligned with company values. One day later, on June 11, Alibaba announced Chen Hang's departure. He was succeeded by Chen Yusen, a 32-year-old technical expert known for founding cybersecurity firm Changting Technology. While Chen Hang's tenure laid the technical foundation for DingTalk's AI transformation with "Wukong," his leadership style ultimately led to his replacement as the company seeks a new direction under younger leadership.

marsbit1h ago

From Return to Resignation: Chen Hang's 437 Days at DingTalk

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片