Mining Companies' High-Stakes Bet on AI: Valuations Enter a Phase of Divergence, Uphill Battle Ahead

marsbitPublished on 2026-06-20Last updated on 2026-06-20

Abstract

Crypto miners are facing increasing pressure amid weak digital asset markets, pushing many to pivot towards AI infrastructure as a new growth avenue. Leveraging existing assets like power resources, land, and cooling systems, miners can convert facilities for AI compute at lower costs. This transition narrative has fueled significant stock rallies, with some miners' shares outperforming Bitcoin year-to-date. Market valuations have diverged, with pioneers like CoreWeave reaching a multi-billion dollar valuation, while others lag. The shift is driven by AI's explosive demand for data centers and compute, with clients willing to pay premiums for power and space. However, the transformation is capital-intensive, requiring massive funding for GPU procurement and facility upgrades, with an estimated short-term funding gap of $50 billion. Miners are raising capital through convertible bonds, Bitcoin sales, and securing long-term AI contracts to finance the build-out. While AI offers greater long-term potential than mining, success hinges on execution, timely project delivery, and securing quality tenants, moving the valuation focus from power capacity to cash flow and return metrics.

Author: Nancy, PANews

As crypto assets continue to experience weakness and decline, crypto mining companies are facing increasingly severe survival pressures. In search of new growth avenues, more and more mining companies are accelerating their shift into the AI arena. This transformation narrative has quickly gained favor in the capital markets, leading to significant stock price increases for many mining firms, with some even reaching new all-time highs.

However, while the AI business injects new growth potential into mining companies, the massive capital expenditures, ongoing funding requirements, and lengthy return cycles behind it are pushing these firms into another battle of capital consumption. At a time when the profitability of mining operations remains under pressure, this high-stakes gamble of transitioning to AI is testing the financial strength and execution capabilities of mining enterprises.

Stock Prices Outperform Bitcoin Significantly, Mining Companies' Valuations Enter a Divergence Phase

Mining companies are transforming into landlords of computing power in the AI era.

With the profit margins for Bitcoin mining continuously narrowing and some mining companies even falling into losses, the AI boom has fueled a sharp surge in global demand for data centers, power resources, and GPU computing power. An increasing number of mining companies are accelerating their pivot towards AI infrastructure, seeking new growth curves.

For mining companies, this transition offers inherent advantages. Over the years, to meet the demands of large-scale mining, they have amassed critical assets such as abundant power resources, land reserves, substation access capabilities, and mature cooling and heat dissipation systems. Compared to data center operators starting from scratch, mining companies only need to upgrade and retrofit their existing facilities to quickly enter the AI infrastructure market, catering to AI computing power demands at a lower cost and with a shorter cycle.

Since last year, the pace of mining companies transitioning to AI has noticeably accelerated. Some miners have decisively scaled back or even exited traditional mining operations, fully shifting to AI computing and data center operations; others have retained part of their mining business but are gradually reallocating resources and capital expenditure focus towards the AI sector. Today, several mining companies have grown into significant players in AI infrastructure construction.

Looking at the timing of transition, CoreWeave, Applied Digital, and Bitdeer began laying out AI computing and data center businesses as early as 2022-2023, among the earlier movers in the industry; while mining firms like Iris Energy, Terawulf, Hut 8, Riot Platforms, and Bitfarms began to fully ramp up AI infrastructure construction in 2025, coinciding with the AI industry's rapid expansion cycle.

In terms of stock performance, the market has shown considerable recognition for the AI transition narrative of mining companies. The 11 mining companies have seen an average year-to-date gain of 75.97%, significantly outperforming Bitcoin over the same period, with most hitting new highs after their transition. Among them, Bitfarms (129.62%), Hut 8 (131.87%), Terawulf (118.68%), and Riot Platforms (93.71%) have been particularly standout performers, benefiting from this wave of AI infrastructure revaluation.

In terms of market capitalization, mining companies have shown clear divergence. As a representative of successful transition, CoreWeave's market cap has reached $62.855 billion, far exceeding other miners and setting a new valuation benchmark for the industry; Iris Energy, Terawulf, Hut 8, Applied Digital, and Riot Platforms form a tier with market caps between $10 billion and $20 billion; companies like MARA Holdings, Core Scientific, Bitdeer, CleanSpark, and Bitfarms remain in the sub-$5 billion range. This divergence stems not only from first-mover advantages but also reflects the market's differentiated pricing based on each mining company's AI strategy execution capabilities, client resources, and data center deployment progress.

However, from a fundamental perspective, most mining companies are still in the heavy investment phase of their AI transition. Although the latest quarterly earnings reports of many miners show revenue growth, overall profitability remains under pressure. On one hand, volatility in the value of crypto asset portfolios weighs on profit performance; on the other hand, the construction of AI data centers requires massive capital expenditures, with costs for power expansion, infrastructure development, and procurement of equipment like GPUs continuously increasing, driving up operating costs and leaving most mining companies yet to escape a loss-making state.

It is noteworthy that despite generally pressured earnings performance, the stock prices of related mining companies have still risen significantly, indicating that the current market focus is not on short-term profitability but rather on the growth potential of mining companies as operators of next-generation computing power infrastructure.

Mining Companies' Survival Battle Escalates, AI Transition Requires Overcoming Multiple Hurdles

The downturn in the Bitcoin market is making the survival environment for mining companies increasingly severe.

Data from Capriole Investments shows that as of June 18, the average production cost for Bitcoin is approximately $63,707, with power costs around $50,965, resulting in a miner profit margin of only 17.45%. Over the past 30 days, miner profit margins have contracted by 47.8%. Meanwhile, data from the Luxor Hashrate Index also shows that as of June 18, the daily revenue per 1 TH/s of hashrate has dropped to $0.032, a significant decline from $0.053 during the same period last year.

As mining revenues continue to shrink, many mining companies have had to sell Bitcoin to maintain cash flow, further increasing survival pressure on small and medium-sized miners, and mining resources are accelerating their concentration towards top players. Currently, the three major mining pools—Foundry USA, AntPool, and F2Pool—collectively account for 59% of the global network's hashrate share. In comparison, in 2022, the top three Bitcoin mining pools collectively accounted for only 44% of the hashrate share.

Although traditional mining operations are struggling, the explosive growth in demand for AI data centers is also driving a market re-evaluation of mining companies' value. VanEck points out in its latest research report that the most valuable assets of mining companies are not their mining rigs, but rather their power resources, substation access capabilities, land reserves, and data center infrastructure—precisely the scarce core resources most needed by the current AI industry. Because AI clients are willing to pay electricity and rental rates far higher than those of traditional mining operations, AI infrastructure is expected to become the primary growth engine for mining companies over the next decade.

According to a report from research firm Bernstein, hyperscale cloud providers, AI cloud service providers, and chip companies have announced over $90 billion in AI infrastructure partnerships, involving approximately 3.7 GW of power capacity. Currently, the pursuit of power resources has become the core of AI infrastructure competition, with Bitcoin mining companies collectively controlling over 27 GW of planned power capacity. In some parts of the United States, the cycle for securing new 1 GW power connections can be as long as 50 months, making existing mining sites important landing spots for AI data center expansion.

However, the transition to AI is far from an easy path. VanEck states that the market is still in the early stages of the AI transition, with enterprise valuations primarily measured based on Gross Energized Power. Mining companies that have signed AI leases generally receive higher valuation premiums, while projects still in the planning stage struggle to gain market recognition. Future industry valuation logic will gradually shift from "power capacity" to "project delivery capability," eventually returning to core metrics such as cash flow, return on capital, and tenant quality. Currently, the industry has only delivered about 25% of its signed capacity. The ability to complete AI data center construction on time and within budget will become a key factor determining enterprise valuation.

VanEck also emphasizes that AI tenant quality will directly impact the valuation levels of mining companies. Clients like Microsoft, Amazon, and Google—hyperscale cloud providers—can bring more stable cash flows and lower financing costs, while smaller GPU cloud service providers correspond to higher operational risks and capital costs.

Meanwhile, the enormous funding required for the transition is testing the financial strength of mining companies. VanEck estimates that mining companies transitioning to AI infrastructure still face massive capital expenditure needs, with a short-term funding gap of approximately $50 billion and long-term capital requirements potentially reaching $221 billion.

Under immense financial pressure, many mining companies have begun raising funds through various methods. For instance, miners like Iris Energy, TeraWulf, Bitfarms, and CleanSpark have raised capital through issuing convertible bonds, attracting investors with low coupon rates and future conversion potential; while companies like Core Scientific, Terawulf, MARA, Bitdeer, and Riot Platforms have chosen to sell off or even liquidate part of their Bitcoin reserves to continually fuel their AI transitions.

Additionally, many mining companies are beginning to secure future revenue by signing long-term AI or high-performance computing (HPC) contracts, thereby obtaining project financing support and reducing overall operational risks. For example, CoreWeave reached a $6 billion AI cloud services cooperation agreement with Jane Street; IREN secured a $9.7 billion AI cloud computing contract with Microsoft; Hut 8 signed data center leasing agreements totaling $9.8 billion; and Bitdeer is collaborating with Norway's DCI to build the country's largest AI data center project.

For mining companies, AI currently offers a development path with far greater imagination space than traditional mining operations. However, this transition is not a simple switch from mining to selling computing power; it is essentially a long-term competition centered on capital, resources, and execution capabilities.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat are the main challenges cryptocurrency mining companies face when transitioning to the AI infrastructure sector?

AThe main challenges include significant capital expenditures, continuous financial investment, prolonged return periods, intense competition for capital, resources, and execution capabilities, and the need to transition from a valuation based on 'power capacity' to 'project delivery capability' and ultimately to core financial metrics such as cash flow and capital returns.

QWhy are cryptocurrency mining companies considered to have natural advantages in transitioning to AI infrastructure?

AMining companies possess key assets like extensive power resources, land reserves, substation access capabilities, and mature cooling systems built for large-scale mining operations. This allows them to upgrade existing facilities to enter the AI infrastructure market more quickly and at a lower cost compared to starting from scratch.

QHow has the stock market performance of mining companies transitioning to AI compared to Bitcoin's performance?

AThe stock prices of mining companies transitioning to AI have significantly outperformed Bitcoin. The average year-to-date increase for 11 such companies was 75.97%, far exceeding Bitcoin's performance during the same period. Many saw their stock prices reach new highs following their AI transition announcements.

QAccording to the article, what is the new basis for valuing mining companies that are pivoting to AI, and how might this evolve?

ACurrently, valuation is primarily based on 'Gross Energized Power.' However, it is expected to shift towards 'project delivery capability' and eventually return to core financial indicators like cash flow, return on capital, and the quality of AI tenants or clients secured by the company.

QWhat methods are mining companies using to finance their expensive transition into AI infrastructure?

AMining companies are raising funds through various methods, including issuing convertible bonds (e.g., Iris Energy, TeraWulf), selling or liquidating part of their Bitcoin reserves (e.g., Core Scientific, Riot Platforms), and securing large, long-term contracts with AI or HPC clients (e.g., CoreWeave, Hut 8) to lock in future revenue and facilitate project financing.

Related Reads

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

The cryptocurrency market has just concluded its worst-performing quarter since 2022, with total capitalization dropping 12.6% to $2.1 trillion. All core metrics indicate capital is leaving the sector, not just rotating within it. Bitcoin fell 14.2% and Ethereum dropped 25.4% in Q2, breaking their previous correlation with US tech stocks. A key driver is the reversal in US spot Bitcoin ETF flows, which saw a net outflow of approximately $4.67 billion in Q2, including a record monthly outflow near $4.5 billion in June. While recent data suggests long-term holders are accumulating again, sustained ETF outflows mean continued selling pressure. Market focus is now singularly on the Federal Reserve. The upcoming July FOMC meeting is seen as the most critical event for Q3. A dovish signal could support Bitcoin reclaiming a $68,000-$84,000 range, while a hawkish stance might establish a new trading band around $50,000-$56,000. Additionally, regulatory uncertainty persists, with the progress of the crucial *CLARITY Act* stalling in the Senate, reducing its perceived 2026 passage probability to 40-45%. Despite the broad downturn, a few sectors showed growth. Prediction markets saw nominal volume surge 48.7% year-over-year to $113.8 billion, and tokenized collectibles transaction volume rose 143% quarterly to $1.4 billion. The Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization sector also continued steady growth, now representing ~$28.1 billion in on-chain value. The market's foundation for an extreme crash appears limited, with Bitcoin price hovering near its 200-week moving average. However, the trading paradigm has shifted from narrative-driven speculation to decisions based on price action, policy developments, and interest rate expectations, making a broad sentiment-driven rally unlikely in the near term.

marsbit16m ago

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

marsbit16m ago

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

**Crypto & Stock Market Wrap: Bitcoin Tests Resistance, Stocks Retreat After AI Surge** Bitcoin consolidates around $66,000, facing key resistance near $68,000—an area seen as a major psychological and technical hurdle where previous rallies have failed. Analysts note the cryptocurrency is caught between its 200-week moving average (~$63,333) and 200-week EMA (~$68,328). A clear break above $68k is needed to signal a stronger bullish trend, while a rejection could lead to a retest of $63k support. Market sentiment remains cautious, with low futures open interest pointing to a low-liquidity rebound rather than a full bull market. Bitcoin spot ETFs saw another $203 million inflow. US stock futures pointed lower after a strong Tuesday session led by a massive rebound in semiconductors and memory stocks. The rally was fueled by renewed optimism about AI-driven hardware demand, with Micron, SanDisk, and SK Hynix surging. However, those gains reversed in pre-market trading. Super Micro Computer (SMCI) soared over 20% after hours on strong guidance and a record backlog. Other standouts included Rocket Lab and nuclear energy plays Oklo and X-Energy. Rising oil prices (Brent above $91) and climbing Treasury yields (10-year near 4.64%), however, are reigniting inflation concerns and acting as a headwind for equities. In Asia, markets were mixed. South Korea's KOSPI pared early gains to close slightly higher as semiconductor stocks like SK Hynix gave back initial surges. Japan's Nikkei edged lower as the yen hit a fresh 38-year low against the dollar, raising fears of potential market intervention. Key events to watch include the Samsung Galaxy launch, AMD's AI event, and a slew of major tech earnings from Alphabet, Tesla, and IBM after the close on Wednesday, followed by the ECB meeting and Intel's earnings on Thursday.

marsbit24m ago

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

marsbit24m ago

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

Former CFTC Chairman and Circle President Heath Tarbert has consistently advocated for a long-term vision in public, urging patience from investors as Circle’s stock price has fallen significantly from its peak. However, it has been revealed that since Circle’s IPO, Tarbert has continuously sold his CRCL shares through pre-arranged trading plans, cashing out approximately $30 million, without making any public market purchases. This contrast between his public messaging and personal actions has drawn criticism. Tarbert joined Circle in July 2023 as Chief Legal Officer, leveraging his regulatory experience to help guide the company through its IPO and expansion. Despite promoting stablecoins as long-term infrastructure, he established a 10b5-1 trading plan just before Circle went public, leading to substantial stock sales over the following year. In March 2026, he initiated another plan to sell more shares. His career trajectory highlights a pattern of moving between high-level regulatory roles and influential positions in the financial sector. After resigning as CFTC Chairman in early 2021, he joined Citadel Securities as Chief Legal Officer just 27 days later, during a period of intense regulatory scrutiny for the firm. He later joined Circle, aiding its efforts to navigate regulatory challenges for its public listing. While Tarbert's expertise in policy and compliance is valuable to companies like Circle, his actions—advocating long-term confidence while personally divesting—raise questions about the alignment between his public statements and his private financial decisions, leaving investors who followed his advice to bear the market risks.

marsbit46m ago

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

marsbit46m ago

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

The article titled "Gate Research Institute: Are Crypto Financial Products Sparking a 'Wall Street' Wave—Competition or Convergence?" explores the evolving relationship between the crypto ecosystem and traditional finance (TradFi). The piece begins by reflecting on Bitcoin's original 2009 vision of decentralization, disintermediation, and moving away from banks. It then contrasts this with the 2024 landscape, where key crypto assets like Bitcoin are increasingly held through Wall Street products like ETFs issued by giants like BlackRock. The article questions whether this signifies that TradFi is systematically taking over the rights to issue, price, custody, and distribute crypto financial assets. The core argument is that this is not a zero-sum takeover but rather a bidirectional convergence where each side addresses the other's weaknesses. Crypto offers 24/7 global markets, programmable settlement, and open access but lacks compliant channels, institutional-grade custody, deep fiat liquidity, and mainstream distribution. TradFi possesses these but is constrained by legacy systems, limited operating hours, and slow settlement. Two primary convergence paths are highlighted: * **Path A (CEX to TradFi):** Exemplified by Gate, which has progressed from offering tokenized stocks and CFDs to providing direct, real stock trading (US, Hong Kong, South Korea) within its platform, using USDT. * **Path B (TradFi to Crypto):** Exemplified by Robinhood, which has integrated crypto trading, acquired exchanges like Bitstamp, and is moving traditional assets like stocks onto the blockchain via tokenization and its own Layer 2. Both paths are ultimately competing to become the next-generation, unified financial account—a "super account" where users can seamlessly trade cryptocurrencies, stocks, ETFs, RWA (Real World Assets), and tokenized treasury products in one interface. The growth of RWA and tokenized treasuries (e.g., BlackRock's BUIDL) is presented as the asset-layer fusion, providing stable, yield-bearing assets on-chain and acting as a bridge between the two worlds. In conclusion, the "Wall Street-ization" of crypto is framed as a mutual transformation. Decentralized ideals persist in the protocol layer, while at the application layer, a more efficient, global, and accessible unified capital market is emerging from this convergence. The future competition lies not between crypto exchanges and stockbrokers, but between platforms vying to offer the most comprehensive asset coverage, liquidity, and user experience within a single account.

marsbit51m ago

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

marsbit51m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片