Mining Companies' High-Stakes Bet on AI: Valuations Enter a Phase of Divergence, Uphill Battle Ahead

marsbitPublished on 2026-06-20Last updated on 2026-06-20

Abstract

Crypto miners are facing increasing pressure amid weak digital asset markets, pushing many to pivot towards AI infrastructure as a new growth avenue. Leveraging existing assets like power resources, land, and cooling systems, miners can convert facilities for AI compute at lower costs. This transition narrative has fueled significant stock rallies, with some miners' shares outperforming Bitcoin year-to-date. Market valuations have diverged, with pioneers like CoreWeave reaching a multi-billion dollar valuation, while others lag. The shift is driven by AI's explosive demand for data centers and compute, with clients willing to pay premiums for power and space. However, the transformation is capital-intensive, requiring massive funding for GPU procurement and facility upgrades, with an estimated short-term funding gap of $50 billion. Miners are raising capital through convertible bonds, Bitcoin sales, and securing long-term AI contracts to finance the build-out. While AI offers greater long-term potential than mining, success hinges on execution, timely project delivery, and securing quality tenants, moving the valuation focus from power capacity to cash flow and return metrics.

Author: Nancy, PANews

As crypto assets continue to experience weakness and decline, crypto mining companies are facing increasingly severe survival pressures. In search of new growth avenues, more and more mining companies are accelerating their shift into the AI arena. This transformation narrative has quickly gained favor in the capital markets, leading to significant stock price increases for many mining firms, with some even reaching new all-time highs.

However, while the AI business injects new growth potential into mining companies, the massive capital expenditures, ongoing funding requirements, and lengthy return cycles behind it are pushing these firms into another battle of capital consumption. At a time when the profitability of mining operations remains under pressure, this high-stakes gamble of transitioning to AI is testing the financial strength and execution capabilities of mining enterprises.

Stock Prices Outperform Bitcoin Significantly, Mining Companies' Valuations Enter a Divergence Phase

Mining companies are transforming into landlords of computing power in the AI era.

With the profit margins for Bitcoin mining continuously narrowing and some mining companies even falling into losses, the AI boom has fueled a sharp surge in global demand for data centers, power resources, and GPU computing power. An increasing number of mining companies are accelerating their pivot towards AI infrastructure, seeking new growth curves.

For mining companies, this transition offers inherent advantages. Over the years, to meet the demands of large-scale mining, they have amassed critical assets such as abundant power resources, land reserves, substation access capabilities, and mature cooling and heat dissipation systems. Compared to data center operators starting from scratch, mining companies only need to upgrade and retrofit their existing facilities to quickly enter the AI infrastructure market, catering to AI computing power demands at a lower cost and with a shorter cycle.

Since last year, the pace of mining companies transitioning to AI has noticeably accelerated. Some miners have decisively scaled back or even exited traditional mining operations, fully shifting to AI computing and data center operations; others have retained part of their mining business but are gradually reallocating resources and capital expenditure focus towards the AI sector. Today, several mining companies have grown into significant players in AI infrastructure construction.

Looking at the timing of transition, CoreWeave, Applied Digital, and Bitdeer began laying out AI computing and data center businesses as early as 2022-2023, among the earlier movers in the industry; while mining firms like Iris Energy, Terawulf, Hut 8, Riot Platforms, and Bitfarms began to fully ramp up AI infrastructure construction in 2025, coinciding with the AI industry's rapid expansion cycle.

In terms of stock performance, the market has shown considerable recognition for the AI transition narrative of mining companies. The 11 mining companies have seen an average year-to-date gain of 75.97%, significantly outperforming Bitcoin over the same period, with most hitting new highs after their transition. Among them, Bitfarms (129.62%), Hut 8 (131.87%), Terawulf (118.68%), and Riot Platforms (93.71%) have been particularly standout performers, benefiting from this wave of AI infrastructure revaluation.

In terms of market capitalization, mining companies have shown clear divergence. As a representative of successful transition, CoreWeave's market cap has reached $62.855 billion, far exceeding other miners and setting a new valuation benchmark for the industry; Iris Energy, Terawulf, Hut 8, Applied Digital, and Riot Platforms form a tier with market caps between $10 billion and $20 billion; companies like MARA Holdings, Core Scientific, Bitdeer, CleanSpark, and Bitfarms remain in the sub-$5 billion range. This divergence stems not only from first-mover advantages but also reflects the market's differentiated pricing based on each mining company's AI strategy execution capabilities, client resources, and data center deployment progress.

However, from a fundamental perspective, most mining companies are still in the heavy investment phase of their AI transition. Although the latest quarterly earnings reports of many miners show revenue growth, overall profitability remains under pressure. On one hand, volatility in the value of crypto asset portfolios weighs on profit performance; on the other hand, the construction of AI data centers requires massive capital expenditures, with costs for power expansion, infrastructure development, and procurement of equipment like GPUs continuously increasing, driving up operating costs and leaving most mining companies yet to escape a loss-making state.

It is noteworthy that despite generally pressured earnings performance, the stock prices of related mining companies have still risen significantly, indicating that the current market focus is not on short-term profitability but rather on the growth potential of mining companies as operators of next-generation computing power infrastructure.

Mining Companies' Survival Battle Escalates, AI Transition Requires Overcoming Multiple Hurdles

The downturn in the Bitcoin market is making the survival environment for mining companies increasingly severe.

Data from Capriole Investments shows that as of June 18, the average production cost for Bitcoin is approximately $63,707, with power costs around $50,965, resulting in a miner profit margin of only 17.45%. Over the past 30 days, miner profit margins have contracted by 47.8%. Meanwhile, data from the Luxor Hashrate Index also shows that as of June 18, the daily revenue per 1 TH/s of hashrate has dropped to $0.032, a significant decline from $0.053 during the same period last year.

As mining revenues continue to shrink, many mining companies have had to sell Bitcoin to maintain cash flow, further increasing survival pressure on small and medium-sized miners, and mining resources are accelerating their concentration towards top players. Currently, the three major mining pools—Foundry USA, AntPool, and F2Pool—collectively account for 59% of the global network's hashrate share. In comparison, in 2022, the top three Bitcoin mining pools collectively accounted for only 44% of the hashrate share.

Although traditional mining operations are struggling, the explosive growth in demand for AI data centers is also driving a market re-evaluation of mining companies' value. VanEck points out in its latest research report that the most valuable assets of mining companies are not their mining rigs, but rather their power resources, substation access capabilities, land reserves, and data center infrastructure—precisely the scarce core resources most needed by the current AI industry. Because AI clients are willing to pay electricity and rental rates far higher than those of traditional mining operations, AI infrastructure is expected to become the primary growth engine for mining companies over the next decade.

According to a report from research firm Bernstein, hyperscale cloud providers, AI cloud service providers, and chip companies have announced over $90 billion in AI infrastructure partnerships, involving approximately 3.7 GW of power capacity. Currently, the pursuit of power resources has become the core of AI infrastructure competition, with Bitcoin mining companies collectively controlling over 27 GW of planned power capacity. In some parts of the United States, the cycle for securing new 1 GW power connections can be as long as 50 months, making existing mining sites important landing spots for AI data center expansion.

However, the transition to AI is far from an easy path. VanEck states that the market is still in the early stages of the AI transition, with enterprise valuations primarily measured based on Gross Energized Power. Mining companies that have signed AI leases generally receive higher valuation premiums, while projects still in the planning stage struggle to gain market recognition. Future industry valuation logic will gradually shift from "power capacity" to "project delivery capability," eventually returning to core metrics such as cash flow, return on capital, and tenant quality. Currently, the industry has only delivered about 25% of its signed capacity. The ability to complete AI data center construction on time and within budget will become a key factor determining enterprise valuation.

VanEck also emphasizes that AI tenant quality will directly impact the valuation levels of mining companies. Clients like Microsoft, Amazon, and Google—hyperscale cloud providers—can bring more stable cash flows and lower financing costs, while smaller GPU cloud service providers correspond to higher operational risks and capital costs.

Meanwhile, the enormous funding required for the transition is testing the financial strength of mining companies. VanEck estimates that mining companies transitioning to AI infrastructure still face massive capital expenditure needs, with a short-term funding gap of approximately $50 billion and long-term capital requirements potentially reaching $221 billion.

Under immense financial pressure, many mining companies have begun raising funds through various methods. For instance, miners like Iris Energy, TeraWulf, Bitfarms, and CleanSpark have raised capital through issuing convertible bonds, attracting investors with low coupon rates and future conversion potential; while companies like Core Scientific, Terawulf, MARA, Bitdeer, and Riot Platforms have chosen to sell off or even liquidate part of their Bitcoin reserves to continually fuel their AI transitions.

Additionally, many mining companies are beginning to secure future revenue by signing long-term AI or high-performance computing (HPC) contracts, thereby obtaining project financing support and reducing overall operational risks. For example, CoreWeave reached a $6 billion AI cloud services cooperation agreement with Jane Street; IREN secured a $9.7 billion AI cloud computing contract with Microsoft; Hut 8 signed data center leasing agreements totaling $9.8 billion; and Bitdeer is collaborating with Norway's DCI to build the country's largest AI data center project.

For mining companies, AI currently offers a development path with far greater imagination space than traditional mining operations. However, this transition is not a simple switch from mining to selling computing power; it is essentially a long-term competition centered on capital, resources, and execution capabilities.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat are the main challenges cryptocurrency mining companies face when transitioning to the AI infrastructure sector?

AThe main challenges include significant capital expenditures, continuous financial investment, prolonged return periods, intense competition for capital, resources, and execution capabilities, and the need to transition from a valuation based on 'power capacity' to 'project delivery capability' and ultimately to core financial metrics such as cash flow and capital returns.

QWhy are cryptocurrency mining companies considered to have natural advantages in transitioning to AI infrastructure?

AMining companies possess key assets like extensive power resources, land reserves, substation access capabilities, and mature cooling systems built for large-scale mining operations. This allows them to upgrade existing facilities to enter the AI infrastructure market more quickly and at a lower cost compared to starting from scratch.

QHow has the stock market performance of mining companies transitioning to AI compared to Bitcoin's performance?

AThe stock prices of mining companies transitioning to AI have significantly outperformed Bitcoin. The average year-to-date increase for 11 such companies was 75.97%, far exceeding Bitcoin's performance during the same period. Many saw their stock prices reach new highs following their AI transition announcements.

QAccording to the article, what is the new basis for valuing mining companies that are pivoting to AI, and how might this evolve?

ACurrently, valuation is primarily based on 'Gross Energized Power.' However, it is expected to shift towards 'project delivery capability' and eventually return to core financial indicators like cash flow, return on capital, and the quality of AI tenants or clients secured by the company.

QWhat methods are mining companies using to finance their expensive transition into AI infrastructure?

AMining companies are raising funds through various methods, including issuing convertible bonds (e.g., Iris Energy, TeraWulf), selling or liquidating part of their Bitcoin reserves (e.g., Core Scientific, Riot Platforms), and securing large, long-term contracts with AI or HPC clients (e.g., CoreWeave, Hut 8) to lock in future revenue and facilitate project financing.

Related Reads

Base Under Pressure

**Title: The Pressure Mounts for Base** Base, the Ethereum Layer 2 scaling solution backed by Coinbase, is facing significant pressure and public scrutiny from its leadership following the launch of Robinhood Chain. Base co-founder Jesse Pollak recently acknowledged strategic missteps, admitting that the chain's past focus on social and creator tokens (e.g., through Farcaster, Zora) failed to deliver sustainable adoption. He has refocused on core infrastructure, handing leadership of the Base App back to Coinbase's Cobie. While Base remains a top L2 contender alongside OP Mainnet and Arbitrum, and boasts the highest TVL (nearly $12B), its weaknesses are being highlighted by the new competitor. Key criticisms include its slow progress on decentralization. Base has faced issues with its single sequencer causing block production halts, and L2BEAT is reportedly considering downgrading its decentralization rating from Stage 1 to Stage 0. This contrasts sharply with the rapid initial success of Robinhood Chain, whose DEX quickly entered the top five by volume. The leadership styles of the parent companies are also being compared: Robinhood's CEO actively engages with new projects, while a recent incident where Coinbase's Brian Armstrong briefly changed his profile picture—sparking and then crashing a related meme token—drew community ire and mockery. Pollak stated Base is working with Coinbase on tokenized stocks backed 1:1 by real equity, differentiating it from Robinhood's derivatives model. However, the article argues that Base's most urgent task is to address its long-standing technical and trust issues. With more traditional finance players likely to emulate Robinhood's path, Base must use this competitive pressure to solidify its position as long-term financial infrastructure.

Foresight News10m ago

Base Under Pressure

Foresight News10m ago

White House Concession Removes Ethical Hurdle, Clarity Act Races Against Final Window Before Recess?

On July 21st, industry sources reported that the Trump administration has agreed to include an ethics provision in the "Clarity Act" (Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025). This concession addresses the long-standing conflict-of-interest concerns regarding government officials and the crypto industry, potentially removing the final major obstacle to the bill's progress. Additionally, Patrick Witt, the executive director of the White House's Digital Asset Advisory Committee, confirmed he will remain in his role to help finalize the bill, alleviating previous concerns about his potential departure. The Clarity Act aims to establish a unified federal regulatory framework for the U.S. digital asset market. Its core objective is to resolve regulatory ambiguity by defining different types of digital assets (digital commodities, investment contract assets, and permitted payment stablecoins) and clarifying the respective oversight roles of the SEC and CFTC. This would end the long-running jurisdictional dispute between the two agencies and provide clearer compliance paths for the industry. With the ethics issue moving toward resolution, the most urgent challenge now is time. The U.S. Congress is set to begin its August recess in mid-August, leaving only a few working weeks to finalize the text and advance the bill through the Senate. Industry advocates, like the Blockchain Association's Kristin Smith, stress that this is a critical moment. If negotiations conclude successfully in the coming weeks, the Clarity Act could pass a key hurdle before the recess; otherwise, it may face significant delays. If enacted, the Clarity Act could mark a historic turning point in crypto regulation. By providing a clearer and more predictable legal framework, it aims to reduce uncertainty for businesses, developers, and traditional financial institutions looking to enter the digital asset space, potentially setting a global benchmark for market structure regulation.

Odaily星球日报16m ago

White House Concession Removes Ethical Hurdle, Clarity Act Races Against Final Window Before Recess?

Odaily星球日报16m ago

AI Era, Industrial Revolution, and Future Civilization Interview — Zhang Dingwen: The Future Does Not Belong to Chasers

"AI Era, Industrial Revolution and Future Civilization: An Interview with Zhang Dingwen – The Future Does Not Belong to Those Who Chase" In this interview, entrepreneur Zhang Dingwen reflects on his entrepreneurial journey and philosophy, moving beyond discussions of financing or success to emphasize understanding the "era" itself. He argues that true entrepreneurs should not chase short-term trends ("winds"), but position themselves in the direction of long-term technological and societal evolution. Zhang shares key lessons from his early days, including the realization that user value does not automatically translate to commercial value. For him, the core of entrepreneurship is not building a company but constantly upgrading one's own "cognition" – the ability to interpret information, ask the right questions, and understand the underlying "causes" behind business outcomes, not just the effects. His thinking has evolved from a focus on creating good products to a strategic focus on building "entrances" – platforms that naturally connect users to digital services. He sees smart wearables, like watches, not merely as hardware but as potential future gateways combining technological, financial, social, and even fashion attributes to create sustained user relationships and ecosystems. Ultimately, Zhang's vision transcends individual products or companies. He discusses business competition in three stages: product, platform, and finally, "civilization" – where the greatest companies influence how society operates by defining new rules and ways of life. He believes the mission of a truly great enterprise is to solve problems of its time, build enduring trust, and contribute lasting value, leaving behind not just wealth but a positive impact on how the world works. The future, he concludes, belongs not to the fastest, but to those with the correct long-term direction and a commitment to continuous learning and evolution.

marsbit27m ago

AI Era, Industrial Revolution, and Future Civilization Interview — Zhang Dingwen: The Future Does Not Belong to Chasers

marsbit27m ago

Cryptocurrency & Stock Market Barometer丨Strategy Cash Reserves Increase to $3.23 Billion, Halting BTC Purchases; Vanguard and Other Asset Managers Increase Holdings in Strategy Stock (July 21)

Market Overview & Warnings: The article warns of high volatility in South Korean stocks and continued dependence on U.S. stocks on geopolitics. Chinese A-shares remain under pressure. It advises against using leverage in current equity markets. For crypto-linked stocks, most have limited growth except Robinhood, with caution advised. U.S. Stock Market: Bearish bets on U.S. stocks, particularly targeting AI-related companies, have reached record highs since 2010, signaling deep skepticism about the sustainability of the AI-driven rally. Tech and chip stocks led a market decline, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index potentially entering a bear market. Increased expectations for Federal Reserve interest rate hikes and geopolitical tensions contributed to the negative sentiment. Bitcoin Treasury Company Updates: * Strategy: Increased its cash reserves to $3.23 billion and paused Bitcoin purchases. Several major asset managers, including Vanguard Group and Capital Group, increased their holdings of Strategy (MSTR) stock. * Global corporate Bitcoin buying slowed significantly to just $1.33 million last week. * Other notable activity: Strive purchased 21 BTC; ORANGE JUICE raised $40 million for Bitcoin acquisitions; Bitcoin Japan Corp. raised $60 million, allocating $4.08 million for its first BTC purchase. Other Crypto Treasury Holdings: * Ethereum: BitMine increased its ETH holdings to 5.78 million, nearing its 5% of supply goal. Its total crypto assets, cash, and securities are valued at $11.5 billion. * Solana: No significant corporate treasury activity reported. * Altcoins: HypeStrat made no adjustments to its treasury; its mNAV ratio fell to a long-term low. (Note: This summary is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.)

marsbit27m ago

Cryptocurrency & Stock Market Barometer丨Strategy Cash Reserves Increase to $3.23 Billion, Halting BTC Purchases; Vanguard and Other Asset Managers Increase Holdings in Strategy Stock (July 21)

marsbit27m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片