Jensen Huang Joins Tsinghua, But Did Musk Actually Arrive Ten Years Ago?

marsbitPublished on 2026-05-29Last updated on 2026-05-29

Abstract

Jensen Huang, founder of NVIDIA, is set to join the Advisory Board of Tsinghua University's School of Economics and Management. This marks his first appointment to an advisory body at a mainland Chinese university, following similar roles at institutions like National Taiwan University, Stanford, and Harvard. The article explores why his entry comes now, a decade after Elon Musk joined the same prestigious committee in 2015. The Tsinghua advisory board, established in 2000, is a high-level strategic body comprising global business elites like Apple's Tim Cook (Chair), Tesla's Elon Musk, Microsoft's Satya Nadella, and Meta's Mark Zuckerberg, alongside financial giants and leading Chinese entrepreneurs. The timing is attributed to a confluence of factors: Huang's current eligibility driven by NVIDIA's dominant role in AI, a recent vacancy on the board, the rising challenge from domestic Chinese chips necessitating stronger local ties, and a recent thaw in U.S.-China relations following high-level diplomatic visits. In contrast, Musk's 2015 entry occurred during a period of warmer bilateral ties, where his disruptive innovation profile aligned well with the board's needs without significant political friction. Huang is noted for his active engagement with academia, holding several honorary doctorates and advisory roles at other universities. His appointment is framed as a reflection of shifting geopolitics, market dynamics, and strategic recalculations over the past decade, u...

Author: Think AI, Aaron

Recently, NVIDIA founder Jensen Huang has been stealing the spotlight. Just after dominating the trending charts for treating a whole night market in Taipei to supper, he is again reported by the Financial Times today:

Jensen Huang will join the Advisory Committee of the School of Economics and Management at Tsinghua University, welcoming a new "teacher" to Tsinghua.

This also marks Huang's first appointment to an advisory body at a mainland Chinese university. Previously, he has served in similar institutions at National Taiwan University, Stanford University, and Harvard University in the US, but entry into mainland China had been delayed until now.

What are the "unspoken difficulties" in between?

It's important to know that this committee currently has 65 members, including major figures from the US financial and tech sectors. Our familiar friend Elon Musk joined as early as ten years ago. Why has Jensen Huang been unable to join until now?

Firstly, of course, is the exceptionally high caliber of Tsinghua's SEM Advisory Committee.

The "Weight" of "Joining"

The Tsinghua SEM Advisory Committee was established in 2000, with then Dean Premier Zhu Rongji actively promoting the formation of this top-tier think tank.

The committee's core mission is to provide high-level guidance on the school's development strategy, international cooperation, faculty building, etc., while also building a dialogue bridge between China and global business elites.

Not only are the members top-tier talents from various industries, but during the annual meetings, state leaders also cordially meet with the attending members. President Xi Jinping has met with them in person twice and delivered a video address once.

The current committee chairman is former Apple CEO Tim Cook, who currently serves as chairman.

With Huang's addition, the five major US tech giants are now formally assembled. The other three are Tesla's Elon Musk, Microsoft's Satya Nadella, and Meta's Mark Zuckerberg.

The finance sector is represented by Wall Street's top giants: Jamie Dimon of JPMorgan Chase, Stephen Schwarzman of Blackstone, Larry Fink of BlackRock, and Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates.

There are also leaders from other globally renowned leading companies, such as BMW, Siemens, Coca-Cola, and so on.

Domestic heavyweights include Jack Ma, Pony Ma (Ma Huateng), Robin Li (Li Yanhong), Terry Gou (Guo Taiming), and others.

As can be seen from the list above, this is not an ordinary academic advisory panel but one of the highest-caliber and most influential circles of global business elites.

Why Now?

Both are tech giant CEOs. Why could Musk join in 2015, while Huang had to wait until now?

There were indeed many twists and turns in between, but now Huang's entry feels like a natural progression.

Looking back to 2015, US-China relations were relatively relaxed, and technological cooperation was in a honeymoon phase. Musk's entry had the right timing, location, and conditions.

At that time, the committee's tech sector already had Cook and Ballmer (former Microsoft CEO), but it lacked leaders in new energy and aerospace. Musk's Tesla and SpaceX正好 filled that gap;

Furthermore, in 2015, Tesla had not yet built a factory in China, but Musk was actively optimistic about the Chinese market, frequently expressing goodwill publicly, with no policy friction;

Coinciding with the committee's 2015-2016 academic year membership renewal, two new seats were added, and Musk became the sole new addition from the tech field;

Musk's "innovative disruptor" persona highly aligned with Tsinghua's goal of cultivating top talent, posing no political risk.

However, NVIDIA's strategic importance was not as pivotal as it is today, and the AI field had not yet demonstrated disruptive potential. In other words, Huang simply did not have the qualifications at that time.

Following 2018, US-China relations gradually became tense. Even as NVIDIA developed rapidly and Huang's wealth surged, it became more difficult to find a good opportunity amidst the climate.

US sanctions against China targeted NVIDIA as a core entity, forcing both Tsinghua and NVIDIA to be swayed by the broader environment.

Additionally, spots on the Tsinghua SEM Committee are highly limited. The tech circle has long been full, with only minor adjustments made annually. A vacancy恰好opened up earlier this year.

Market-wise, even without exporting high-end chips previously, NVIDIA maintained a monopoly position in China's AI chip sector until domestic chips强势崛起 in recent years, prompting Huang to seek new connections and circles to reopen the Chinese market.

Shortly after Trump's recent visit to China, US-China relations saw an easing. Huang accompanied the visit, partially mitigating political risks, allowing him to send more friendly signals towards China.

Huang's "Academic" Moves

It must be said that within the current tech circle, Jensen Huang is one of the tech founders most keen on joining university academic circles, which also makes his committee appointment feel一点也不违和.

It should be noted that while Huang本人已经确认 this news about joining Tsinghua, NVIDIA and Tsinghua have not officially announced it yet. Further official updates can be followed.

Huang himself holds a Master's degree in Electrical Engineering from Stanford University.

He has also received a total of 7 honorary doctorates to date, from universities across the globe including Taiwan, the US, Hong Kong, and Sweden, awarded in recognition of his industry achievements.

Regarding university advisory roles similar to Tsinghua's SEM Committee, Huang has also joined the Harvard Business School Dean's Advisory Board, the Stanford University Advisory Council, and the National Taiwan University College of Management Advisory Board, among others.

Huang's university speeches in recent years have also been full of quotable lines.

He pointed out, "You are not replaced by AI, but by those who use AI." He also strongly驳斥 the notion that AI leads to job cuts.

He stated, "AI only started to have an impact six months ago, yet they were laying people off because of AI two years ago? How is that possible? It makes no sense."

Overall, Huang's加入委员会 is a microcosm of a decade of geopolitical博弈, market变迁, and利益重构.

The Chinese market remains the重中之重 that Jensen Huang is迫切想要打开.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhy has Huang Renxun joined Tsinghua University's School of Economics and Management Advisory Committee now, compared to Elon Musk who joined a decade ago?

AHuang Renxun's recent entry is a result of evolving circumstances. In 2015, when Musk joined, US-China relations were warmer, and his innovative profile in new energy and aerospace filled a gap in the committee. Nvidia's strategic importance in AI was not as dominant then. Post-2018, US-China tensions and US sanctions on Nvidia, a key target, made the timing unfavorable. Recently, a committee seat opened up, US-China relations showed signs of easing after Trump's visit, and with the rise of domestic chips in China, Huang seeks to strengthen his network and access to the Chinese market.

QWhat is the significance and mission of the Tsinghua School of Economics and Management Advisory Committee?

AThe Tsinghua School of Economics and Management Advisory Committee, established in 2000 under then-Dean Premier Zhu Rongji, is a top-tier advisory body. Its core mission is to provide high-level strategic guidance on the school's development, international cooperation, and faculty development. It also serves as a bridge for dialogue between China and global business leaders. The committee is notable for its high-profile members, including top CEOs, and its annual meetings are sometimes attended by Chinese national leaders, including President Xi Jinping.

QWhich other prominent global business leaders are members of this Tsinghua committee alongside Huang Renxun?

AThe committee features a 'who's who' of global business elites. In tech, it includes Apple's Tim Cook (Chair), Tesla's Elon Musk, Microsoft's Satya Nadella, and Meta's Mark Zuckerberg. The finance sector is represented by figures like Jamie Dimon (JPMorgan Chase), Stephen Schwarzman (Blackstone), Larry Fink (BlackRock), and Ray Dalio (Bridgewater). Other members lead major corporations like BMW, Siemens, and Coca-Cola, alongside Chinese leaders such as Jack Ma, Pony Ma, Robin Li, and Terry Gou.

QAccording to the article, what was Huang Renxun's main motivation for seeking to join this committee at this time?

AHuang Renxun's primary motivation is to strengthen his ties and network within the Chinese market. The article states that despite Nvidia's previous dominance in China's AI chip sector, domestic chips have recently seen a strong rise. Therefore, joining this prestigious committee provides Huang with a crucial platform to build new relationships and 'open the Chinese market,' which remains a 'top priority' for him.

QWhat are some of Huang Renxun's views on AI and employment, as mentioned in his university speeches?

AIn his recent university speeches, Huang Renxun emphasized that 'You are not replaced by AI, but by people who use AI.' He also strongly refuted claims that AI leads to job losses, arguing it's illogical: 'AI only started to work six months ago, and they were laying off people because of AI two years ago? How is that possible? That doesn't make any sense at all.'

Related Reads

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

Podcast Summary: Dialogue with GSR's Head of Asset Management: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Check Lending Rates on Aave Andy Baehr, Managing Director of Asset Management at GSR, discusses the current crypto market, characterizing it as stuck in a state of "ambivalence" with short-lived, unsustainable rallies. He outlines a simple framework: the market moves between "ambivalence" and "conviction" (sustained upward momentum). Currently, every rally resembles a single-stage rocket booster that quickly fizzles out. Baehr identifies three key signals to watch: 1) DeFi lending rates, 2) the potential passage of the CLARITY Act, and 3) the market forming a consensus on the "Fed hawkish peak." He emphasizes that the most immediate indicator for the sustainability of the recent CPI-triggered rally is the USDC borrowing rate on Aave, currently around 3.75%—close to U.S. Treasury yields. The absence of a credit spread indicates low leverage demand and a lack of market energy. He explains that a healthy, sustained rally requires layered buying pressure. Last year's rally progressed from an ETH short squeeze to crypto-native trader influx and finally to ETF inflows. Currently, this structure is missing. Other potential structural buyers like Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) companies are absent, and ETF flows have proven transient. Baehr notes that while small-cap crypto tokens outperformed large caps in Q2—a potential sign of capitation in major assets—capital is also flowing to more exciting opportunities like AI stocks and tech IPOs, leaving crypto sidelined. Regarding DeFi, he highlights that platforms like Aave provide a clear, real-time signal of leverage demand through their supply/demand-driven interest rates. A significant, sustained rate increase would signal genuine market conviction. He also observes the quiet emergence of fixed-income-like products and vaults in DeFi. On regulation, the probability of the CLARITY Act passing before the August 7th deadline has dropped linearly from 75% to below 40% on Polymarket. Baehr suggests its passage would be treated as a bullish surprise, a potent driver for price movement. However, political hurdles, including ethical clause debates and disclosures about the First Family's crypto profits, remain significant obstacles. Ultimately, the market awaits clarity on the Fed's terminal rate under Chair Warsh. Until the "Fed Solstice"—the point where the market collectively understands the peak of hawkish policy—sustained conviction will be difficult to achieve.

marsbit8m ago

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

marsbit8m ago

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报1h ago

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报1h ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News1h ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片