Jensen Huang Joins Tsinghua, But Did Musk Actually Arrive Ten Years Ago?

marsbitPublished on 2026-05-29Last updated on 2026-05-29

Abstract

Jensen Huang, founder of NVIDIA, is set to join the Advisory Board of Tsinghua University's School of Economics and Management. This marks his first appointment to an advisory body at a mainland Chinese university, following similar roles at institutions like National Taiwan University, Stanford, and Harvard. The article explores why his entry comes now, a decade after Elon Musk joined the same prestigious committee in 2015. The Tsinghua advisory board, established in 2000, is a high-level strategic body comprising global business elites like Apple's Tim Cook (Chair), Tesla's Elon Musk, Microsoft's Satya Nadella, and Meta's Mark Zuckerberg, alongside financial giants and leading Chinese entrepreneurs. The timing is attributed to a confluence of factors: Huang's current eligibility driven by NVIDIA's dominant role in AI, a recent vacancy on the board, the rising challenge from domestic Chinese chips necessitating stronger local ties, and a recent thaw in U.S.-China relations following high-level diplomatic visits. In contrast, Musk's 2015 entry occurred during a period of warmer bilateral ties, where his disruptive innovation profile aligned well with the board's needs without significant political friction. Huang is noted for his active engagement with academia, holding several honorary doctorates and advisory roles at other universities. His appointment is framed as a reflection of shifting geopolitics, market dynamics, and strategic recalculations over the past decade, u...

Author: Think AI, Aaron

Recently, NVIDIA founder Jensen Huang has been stealing the spotlight. Just after dominating the trending charts for treating a whole night market in Taipei to supper, he is again reported by the Financial Times today:

Jensen Huang will join the Advisory Committee of the School of Economics and Management at Tsinghua University, welcoming a new "teacher" to Tsinghua.

This also marks Huang's first appointment to an advisory body at a mainland Chinese university. Previously, he has served in similar institutions at National Taiwan University, Stanford University, and Harvard University in the US, but entry into mainland China had been delayed until now.

What are the "unspoken difficulties" in between?

It's important to know that this committee currently has 65 members, including major figures from the US financial and tech sectors. Our familiar friend Elon Musk joined as early as ten years ago. Why has Jensen Huang been unable to join until now?

Firstly, of course, is the exceptionally high caliber of Tsinghua's SEM Advisory Committee.

The "Weight" of "Joining"

The Tsinghua SEM Advisory Committee was established in 2000, with then Dean Premier Zhu Rongji actively promoting the formation of this top-tier think tank.

The committee's core mission is to provide high-level guidance on the school's development strategy, international cooperation, faculty building, etc., while also building a dialogue bridge between China and global business elites.

Not only are the members top-tier talents from various industries, but during the annual meetings, state leaders also cordially meet with the attending members. President Xi Jinping has met with them in person twice and delivered a video address once.

The current committee chairman is former Apple CEO Tim Cook, who currently serves as chairman.

With Huang's addition, the five major US tech giants are now formally assembled. The other three are Tesla's Elon Musk, Microsoft's Satya Nadella, and Meta's Mark Zuckerberg.

The finance sector is represented by Wall Street's top giants: Jamie Dimon of JPMorgan Chase, Stephen Schwarzman of Blackstone, Larry Fink of BlackRock, and Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates.

There are also leaders from other globally renowned leading companies, such as BMW, Siemens, Coca-Cola, and so on.

Domestic heavyweights include Jack Ma, Pony Ma (Ma Huateng), Robin Li (Li Yanhong), Terry Gou (Guo Taiming), and others.

As can be seen from the list above, this is not an ordinary academic advisory panel but one of the highest-caliber and most influential circles of global business elites.

Why Now?

Both are tech giant CEOs. Why could Musk join in 2015, while Huang had to wait until now?

There were indeed many twists and turns in between, but now Huang's entry feels like a natural progression.

Looking back to 2015, US-China relations were relatively relaxed, and technological cooperation was in a honeymoon phase. Musk's entry had the right timing, location, and conditions.

At that time, the committee's tech sector already had Cook and Ballmer (former Microsoft CEO), but it lacked leaders in new energy and aerospace. Musk's Tesla and SpaceX正好 filled that gap;

Furthermore, in 2015, Tesla had not yet built a factory in China, but Musk was actively optimistic about the Chinese market, frequently expressing goodwill publicly, with no policy friction;

Coinciding with the committee's 2015-2016 academic year membership renewal, two new seats were added, and Musk became the sole new addition from the tech field;

Musk's "innovative disruptor" persona highly aligned with Tsinghua's goal of cultivating top talent, posing no political risk.

However, NVIDIA's strategic importance was not as pivotal as it is today, and the AI field had not yet demonstrated disruptive potential. In other words, Huang simply did not have the qualifications at that time.

Following 2018, US-China relations gradually became tense. Even as NVIDIA developed rapidly and Huang's wealth surged, it became more difficult to find a good opportunity amidst the climate.

US sanctions against China targeted NVIDIA as a core entity, forcing both Tsinghua and NVIDIA to be swayed by the broader environment.

Additionally, spots on the Tsinghua SEM Committee are highly limited. The tech circle has long been full, with only minor adjustments made annually. A vacancy恰好opened up earlier this year.

Market-wise, even without exporting high-end chips previously, NVIDIA maintained a monopoly position in China's AI chip sector until domestic chips强势崛起 in recent years, prompting Huang to seek new connections and circles to reopen the Chinese market.

Shortly after Trump's recent visit to China, US-China relations saw an easing. Huang accompanied the visit, partially mitigating political risks, allowing him to send more friendly signals towards China.

Huang's "Academic" Moves

It must be said that within the current tech circle, Jensen Huang is one of the tech founders most keen on joining university academic circles, which also makes his committee appointment feel一点也不违和.

It should be noted that while Huang本人已经确认 this news about joining Tsinghua, NVIDIA and Tsinghua have not officially announced it yet. Further official updates can be followed.

Huang himself holds a Master's degree in Electrical Engineering from Stanford University.

He has also received a total of 7 honorary doctorates to date, from universities across the globe including Taiwan, the US, Hong Kong, and Sweden, awarded in recognition of his industry achievements.

Regarding university advisory roles similar to Tsinghua's SEM Committee, Huang has also joined the Harvard Business School Dean's Advisory Board, the Stanford University Advisory Council, and the National Taiwan University College of Management Advisory Board, among others.

Huang's university speeches in recent years have also been full of quotable lines.

He pointed out, "You are not replaced by AI, but by those who use AI." He also strongly驳斥 the notion that AI leads to job cuts.

He stated, "AI only started to have an impact six months ago, yet they were laying people off because of AI two years ago? How is that possible? It makes no sense."

Overall, Huang's加入委员会 is a microcosm of a decade of geopolitical博弈, market变迁, and利益重构.

The Chinese market remains the重中之重 that Jensen Huang is迫切想要打开.

Related Questions

QWhy has Huang Renxun joined Tsinghua University's School of Economics and Management Advisory Committee now, compared to Elon Musk who joined a decade ago?

AHuang Renxun's recent entry is a result of evolving circumstances. In 2015, when Musk joined, US-China relations were warmer, and his innovative profile in new energy and aerospace filled a gap in the committee. Nvidia's strategic importance in AI was not as dominant then. Post-2018, US-China tensions and US sanctions on Nvidia, a key target, made the timing unfavorable. Recently, a committee seat opened up, US-China relations showed signs of easing after Trump's visit, and with the rise of domestic chips in China, Huang seeks to strengthen his network and access to the Chinese market.

QWhat is the significance and mission of the Tsinghua School of Economics and Management Advisory Committee?

AThe Tsinghua School of Economics and Management Advisory Committee, established in 2000 under then-Dean Premier Zhu Rongji, is a top-tier advisory body. Its core mission is to provide high-level strategic guidance on the school's development, international cooperation, and faculty development. It also serves as a bridge for dialogue between China and global business leaders. The committee is notable for its high-profile members, including top CEOs, and its annual meetings are sometimes attended by Chinese national leaders, including President Xi Jinping.

QWhich other prominent global business leaders are members of this Tsinghua committee alongside Huang Renxun?

AThe committee features a 'who's who' of global business elites. In tech, it includes Apple's Tim Cook (Chair), Tesla's Elon Musk, Microsoft's Satya Nadella, and Meta's Mark Zuckerberg. The finance sector is represented by figures like Jamie Dimon (JPMorgan Chase), Stephen Schwarzman (Blackstone), Larry Fink (BlackRock), and Ray Dalio (Bridgewater). Other members lead major corporations like BMW, Siemens, and Coca-Cola, alongside Chinese leaders such as Jack Ma, Pony Ma, Robin Li, and Terry Gou.

QAccording to the article, what was Huang Renxun's main motivation for seeking to join this committee at this time?

AHuang Renxun's primary motivation is to strengthen his ties and network within the Chinese market. The article states that despite Nvidia's previous dominance in China's AI chip sector, domestic chips have recently seen a strong rise. Therefore, joining this prestigious committee provides Huang with a crucial platform to build new relationships and 'open the Chinese market,' which remains a 'top priority' for him.

QWhat are some of Huang Renxun's views on AI and employment, as mentioned in his university speeches?

AIn his recent university speeches, Huang Renxun emphasized that 'You are not replaced by AI, but by people who use AI.' He also strongly refuted claims that AI leads to job losses, arguing it's illogical: 'AI only started to work six months ago, and they were laying off people because of AI two years ago? How is that possible? That doesn't make any sense at all.'

Related Reads

AI Trading Cools, South Korean Stocks Plunge 1.8%, Spot Gold Rises 1%, Bitcoin Dives

A sell-off in AI-related stocks, triggered by Broadcom's disappointing earnings forecast, sent shockwaves through global markets. South Korea's KOSPI led Asia's decline, plunging 1.8% as the risks from concentrated chip stock gains and surging leveraged investments came to the fore. The tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 futures fell 0.5% following Broadcom's 14% after-hours plunge, which signaled a slower-than-expected transition to AI clients. This pullback extended Wall Street's weakness, halting the S&P 500's nine-day rally amid hawkish Fed signals and renewed Middle East tensions. South Korean authorities convened an emergency meeting, pledging "immediate measures" against market volatility and warning of record-high stock margin debt. The adjustment rippled across assets: Bitcoin fell to around $64,000, its lowest since February, while safe-haven gold rose 1% on bargain hunting. Oil prices dipped on Middle East ceasefire news. Market analysts noted the sell-off was driven by profit-taking after massive gains, particularly in chip stocks like Samsung and SK Hynix, which now dominate the KOSPI. Wall Street banks are divided on Korea's outlook, with Goldman Sachs raising its target while Citigroup and others warn of overvaluation and a potential bubble. Bridgewater's Ray Dalio noted that great technological shifts often create bubbles. Meanwhile, Fed officials' hints at potential future rate hikes added to the cautious mood ahead of key U.S. jobs data.

华尔街日报17m ago

AI Trading Cools, South Korean Stocks Plunge 1.8%, Spot Gold Rises 1%, Bitcoin Dives

华尔街日报17m ago

Seeking Alpha's Hot Article: Why Might the U.S. Stock Market Crash in June?

In a recent Seeking Alpha article, financial professor and analyst Damir Tokic argues that the US stock market may be poised for a significant crash in June 2026. The core thesis centers on a "mega-bubble" in equities, particularly within the technology sector, which has driven the S&P 500 to near-record valuations, with a Shiller P/E ratio exceeding 40—a level comparable to the 2000 dot-com bubble. Tokic identifies two primary catalysts for a potential collapse. First, he points to unsustainable market exuberance fueled by what he terms the "Trump Stimulus"—massive AI capital expenditure by tech giants, which he believes is politically driven and cannot last. Second, and more urgently, he highlights the escalating Iran war as a critical threat. The ongoing closure of the Strait of Hormuz has created a severe global energy supply crunch. Strategic petroleum reserves are projected to hit critically low operational levels by June, potentially causing oil prices to spike above $200 per barrel and triggering a severe, supply-driven inflationary shock. This scenario, Tokic warns, would force the Federal Reserve's hand. Despite currently maintaining a dovish bias, the Fed would likely be compelled to officially pivot to a hawkish stance at its June FOMC meeting to combat soaring inflation and bond yields. He contends that such a shift—or even a failure to act, which would destroy Fed credibility—could be the trigger that punctures the market bubble. The resulting downturn, he concludes, could rival the bear markets of 2000 and 2008, advising investors to prepare for a major correction.

marsbit39m ago

Seeking Alpha's Hot Article: Why Might the U.S. Stock Market Crash in June?

marsbit39m ago

AI PC Battle: Bet on the Toll Booth, Not the Camp

**Title:** The AI PC Battle: Don't Bet on Sides, Bet on the Tollbooth **Summary:** The AI PC competition is moving beyond simple "x86 vs. Arm" narratives. The core investment thesis should focus on identifying which players can sustain margins, cash flow, and pricing power throughout the upgrade cycle, rather than backing a particular architecture. The opportunity is analyzed in three layers: 1. **The Advanced Foundry Tollbooth:** TSMC is positioned to collect "tolls" regardless of which chip designer wins, due to its dominant ~70% share in advanced semiconductor manufacturing, which is essential for high-end AI PC chips. 2. **Compute & Platform Spillover:** AMD represents an offensive in the x86 CPU+GPU space, while NVIDIA leverages its GPU and CUDA software stack dominance. Both benefit from the demand for increased local AI compute. 3. **Architecture Diffusion & Turnaround Plays:** ARM and Intel offer potential for significant upside (elasticity), but investments here require stricter discipline due to higher execution risks and competitive challenges. The industry is transitioning from concept to shipment validation. While short-term forecasts for AI PC adoption have been revised down slightly due to tariffs and procurement delays, the long-term trend towards AI becoming a standard PC feature remains intact. The key driver for upgrade cycles will be whether compelling enterprise applications (e.g., privacy-sensitive computing, low-latency inference) emerge beyond consumer-focused features like meeting summarization. Investment strategy should prioritize companies with platform-level advantages and recurring revenue streams. TSMC offers high certainty as the foundational tollbooth. AMD presents a strong offensive play within the established ecosystem. ARM and Intel are higher-risk, higher-potential-reward turnaround bets. The report cautions against chasing short-term hype and emphasizes a disciplined, long-term approach focused on buying ecosystem strength and cash-flow certainty after market enthusiasm subsides. **Key Risks:** Underwhelming AI PC applications slowing upgrade cycles; slow improvement in Windows on Arm compatibility; macro/tariff impacts on PC demand; potential advanced node supply-demand mismatches affecting TSMC; high overall AI sector valuations making stocks vulnerable to a risk-off shift in markets.

marsbit54m ago

AI PC Battle: Bet on the Toll Booth, Not the Camp

marsbit54m ago

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

Marvell Technology's stock price surged from under $10 in 2016 to a record $290 in June 2026, fueled not by making GPUs, but by dominating AI infrastructure connectivity. This analysis argues the market misvalues MRVL as merely a smaller Broadcom in custom AI chips, overlooking its true, unique position. Marvell's core strength lies in enabling high-speed data flow for AI clusters through three interconnected businesses. First, it holds a commanding ~70% market share in high-speed optical DSPs (essential for data center light modules), a deep-moat business with accelerating growth. Second, its custom AI chip design business serves hyperscalers like AWS, Microsoft, and Google, with a significant revenue pipeline despite lower margins. Third, stable cash flows come from Ethernet switch chips and enterprise storage controllers. Together, they form a full-stack "AI data movement" platform. CEO Matt Murphy's transformative leadership since 2016, involving strategic divestments, key acquisitions (like Inphi for optical DSPs), and securing long-term agreements with major cloud providers, repositioned the company. A pivotal $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA in 2026 underscored Marvell's critical role in the AI ecosystem, particularly through collaborations like NVLink Fusion. While Marvell faces risks—including client concentration (losing the Amazon Trainium3 design), lower-margin business mix, competitive threats, insider selling, and complex supply chains—its fundamentals remain strong. The optical interconnect moat is widening with the acquisition of Celestial AI (photonics fabric), and financial metrics show accelerating revenue growth and operating leverage. With a PEG ratio suggesting undervaluation relative to its growth, the thesis is that the market undervalues Marvell's monopolistic position in AI "plumbing" while overemphasizing its competitive custom chip segment. The story transcends investing, symbolizing how in any complex system—from the internet to AI—the value of "connection" ultimately surpasses that of individual "nodes."

marsbit1h ago

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片