Is ‘bailing out Bitcoin’ possible? U.S. Treasury Secretary says…

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-05Last updated on 2026-02-05

Abstract

U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, testifying before the House Financial Services Committee, firmly stated he lacks the authority to instruct banks to buy Bitcoin or use taxpayer money to bail out the crypto market. He defended the government's strategy of retaining seized Bitcoin as a national security asset, not a financial burden, highlighting that an initial $500 million in seized Bitcoin is now worth over $15 billion. The hearing revealed a sharp partisan divide: Republicans support lighter regulations to foster innovation, while Democrats warn of market risks and accuse the administration of favoring Wall Street.

At press time, Bitcoin [BTC] was hovering near the key $70,000 level, drawing significant attention in the U.S. Congress.

During a review of the FSOC’s 2025 report, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent faced sharp questioning on crypto and its impact on financial stability.

While testifying before the House Financial Services Committee, Secretary Bessent came under pressure from Representative Brad Sherman, a well‐known critic of crypto. Sherman pressed him on whether the government could, or would, intervene to “bail out” Bitcoin if its price collapsed.

This tense exchange underscored a broader debate: should Bitcoin be left entirely to the free market, or should it be treated as a strategic asset that the U.S. government may need to safeguard?

What was said?

Rep. Sherman asked,

“Could you instruct the banks of this country to buy more Bitcoin or change banking regulations so that they’re encouraged to do so in terms of the reserves that they’re otherwise required to have?”

To which Bessent replied,

“I am secretary of the treasury. I do not have the authority to do that and as chair of FSOC I do not have that authority.”

Tensions escalated when Sherman pressed for a direct yes‐or‐no answer on whether taxpayer money would ever be used to support a declining crypto market.

Rather than responding directly, Secretary Bessent redirected the discussion to the administration’s broader strategy.

He defended the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, emphasizing that it is not a financial burden but a national security asset designed to strengthen America’s role in the digital economy.

Bessent replied,

“We are retaining seized Bitcoin. That’s not exactly taxpayer money. That is an asset of the US. It’s an asset of the US.”

By doing so, Bessent made it clear that the Treasury sees Bitcoin as an important part of the U.S. financial system, one it plans to support through policy, not bailouts.

Bessent confirmed during the hearing that the seized Bitcoin had gone up in value.

He said,

“Of that $1 billion in Bitcoin that was seized, $500 million was retained, and that $500 million has become over $15 billion,”

Trump’s pro-crypto stance takes centre stage

For the administration and its supporters, including Chairman French Hill and Representative Andy Barr, the growth in crypto-related assets shows that their pro-growth policies are working. However, Democrats ended the session with strong criticism.

Ranking Member Maxine Waters said the administration’s policies favor Wall Street over ordinary Americans. Overall, Democrats accused Treasury Secretary Bessent of dismissing serious warnings about possible market risks.

In contrast, Republicans defended the administration.

Chairman French Hill praised deregulation and strong economic data, while Bessent said lighter rules would support innovation and small banks.

Overall, Republicans supported “tailored” regulations, arguing that smaller banks should not be treated the same as large global institutions and stressing the need to strengthen the commercial banking sector.


Final thoughts

  • Treasury Secretary Bessent’s defense of seized Bitcoin signals a shift toward treating digital assets as strategic reserves.
  • Democrats’ warnings reflect lingering fears of repeating past financial crises.

Related Questions

QWhat was the main question posed by Representative Brad Sherman to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent regarding Bitcoin?

AHe asked whether the government could or would intervene to 'bail out' Bitcoin if its price collapsed, and if he could instruct banks to buy more Bitcoin or change regulations to encourage them to do so.

QHow did Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent respond to the question about using taxpayer money to support the crypto market?

AHe did not directly answer but redirected the discussion, emphasizing that the seized Bitcoin is an asset of the U.S. and not taxpayer money, and that it is held as a strategic national security asset.

QWhat was the value appreciation of the seized Bitcoin that Bessent mentioned during the hearing?

AHe stated that $500 million of seized Bitcoin had grown to over $15 billion in value.

QHow did Democrats, such as Ranking Member Maxine Waters, criticize the administration's policies during the hearing?

AThey accused the administration of favoring Wall Street over ordinary Americans and dismissed serious warnings about potential market risks.

QWhat was the Treasury Secretary's stance on the authority to instruct banks to buy Bitcoin or change banking regulations?

AHe stated that he did not have the authority as Secretary of the Treasury or as chair of the FSOC to instruct banks to buy more Bitcoin or change regulations for that purpose.

Related Reads

From Return to Resignation: Chen Hang's 437 Days at DingTalk

The 437-Day Return and Departure of Chen Hang at DingTalk This article chronicles the 437-day period from March 31, 2025, to June 11, 2026, when Chen Hang (also known as "No Move") returned as CEO of DingTalk, the enterprise communication platform he originally founded, only to later step down. Chen Hang, the creator of DingTalk in 2015, was brought back by Alibaba in 2025 after the company acquired his subsequent startup, HHO. His return was driven by Alibaba's renewed focus on AI and DingTalk's strategic role as its key to-B AI application. However, his aggressive management style, marked by strict work policies like mandatory clock-ins and extended hours, quickly caused internal friction and was criticized as being at odds with Alibaba's culture. Despite the internal turmoil, Chen Hang drove significant product launches. In August 2025, he unveiled "AI DingTalk 1.0," featuring new products like the AI-native entry point "DingTalk ONE." By March 2026, he announced "Wukong," touted as the world's first enterprise-grade AI-native work platform, representing a fundamental rebuild of DingTalk's architecture. The turning point came in early June 2026. A detailed internal post criticizing DingTalk's work culture went viral, followed by a public critique from a former executive. This prompted an unprecedented public rebuke from the Alibaba Partners Committee, which stated such management was not aligned with company values. One day later, on June 11, Alibaba announced Chen Hang's departure. He was succeeded by Chen Yusen, a 32-year-old technical expert known for founding cybersecurity firm Changting Technology. While Chen Hang's tenure laid the technical foundation for DingTalk's AI transformation with "Wukong," his leadership style ultimately led to his replacement as the company seeks a new direction under younger leadership.

marsbit11m ago

From Return to Resignation: Chen Hang's 437 Days at DingTalk

marsbit11m ago

The 2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why Blockchain is the Inevitable 'Antidote' for AI?

Decentralized AI 2026 Landscape: Why Blockchain is AI's Essential "Antidote" Centralized AI faces structural bottlenecks—expensive compute, concentrated control, unverifiable outputs, and difficult data access—that cannot be solved by capital or code alone. Blockchain offers a path to make intelligence open, verifiable, and economically accessible. The decentralized AI stack comprises: * **Infrastructure:** The foundation with compute, verifiable inference, distributed training, data/storage, and privacy/verification layers. Projects like Akash, Render, and Filecoin provide cheaper, decentralized alternatives for raw resources. * **Middleware:** The coordination layer for agent discovery, identity, and commerce. Key players include Bittensor (a network of specialized AI subnets), Virtuals (an agent economy OS), and frameworks providing agent identity and tooling. * **Applications & Services:** Dominated by Agentic Finance (AI agents executing on-chain actions based on natural language) and Agentic Payments (machine-to-machine transactions using blockchain as a settlement layer). Projects like Giza, Infinit Labs, and x402 are enabling these use cases. Key trends for 2026-2027 show AI demand outgrowing infrastructure, compute becoming an asset class, and tokenomics emerging as a structural advantage for coordinating capital, compute, and data. While still early—with adoption uneven and revenue often trailing token incentives—projects like Bittensor, NEAR, and Venice demonstrate decentralized AI is evolving from a narrative into a new model for coordinating intelligence.

Foresight News31m ago

The 2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why Blockchain is the Inevitable 'Antidote' for AI?

Foresight News31m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

363 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片