Is ‘bailing out Bitcoin’ possible? U.S. Treasury Secretary says…

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-05Last updated on 2026-02-05

Abstract

U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, testifying before the House Financial Services Committee, firmly stated he lacks the authority to instruct banks to buy Bitcoin or use taxpayer money to bail out the crypto market. He defended the government's strategy of retaining seized Bitcoin as a national security asset, not a financial burden, highlighting that an initial $500 million in seized Bitcoin is now worth over $15 billion. The hearing revealed a sharp partisan divide: Republicans support lighter regulations to foster innovation, while Democrats warn of market risks and accuse the administration of favoring Wall Street.

At press time, Bitcoin [BTC] was hovering near the key $70,000 level, drawing significant attention in the U.S. Congress.

During a review of the FSOC’s 2025 report, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent faced sharp questioning on crypto and its impact on financial stability.

While testifying before the House Financial Services Committee, Secretary Bessent came under pressure from Representative Brad Sherman, a well‐known critic of crypto. Sherman pressed him on whether the government could, or would, intervene to “bail out” Bitcoin if its price collapsed.

This tense exchange underscored a broader debate: should Bitcoin be left entirely to the free market, or should it be treated as a strategic asset that the U.S. government may need to safeguard?

What was said?

Rep. Sherman asked,

“Could you instruct the banks of this country to buy more Bitcoin or change banking regulations so that they’re encouraged to do so in terms of the reserves that they’re otherwise required to have?”

To which Bessent replied,

“I am secretary of the treasury. I do not have the authority to do that and as chair of FSOC I do not have that authority.”

Tensions escalated when Sherman pressed for a direct yes‐or‐no answer on whether taxpayer money would ever be used to support a declining crypto market.

Rather than responding directly, Secretary Bessent redirected the discussion to the administration’s broader strategy.

He defended the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, emphasizing that it is not a financial burden but a national security asset designed to strengthen America’s role in the digital economy.

Bessent replied,

“We are retaining seized Bitcoin. That’s not exactly taxpayer money. That is an asset of the US. It’s an asset of the US.”

By doing so, Bessent made it clear that the Treasury sees Bitcoin as an important part of the U.S. financial system, one it plans to support through policy, not bailouts.

Bessent confirmed during the hearing that the seized Bitcoin had gone up in value.

He said,

“Of that $1 billion in Bitcoin that was seized, $500 million was retained, and that $500 million has become over $15 billion,”

Trump’s pro-crypto stance takes centre stage

For the administration and its supporters, including Chairman French Hill and Representative Andy Barr, the growth in crypto-related assets shows that their pro-growth policies are working. However, Democrats ended the session with strong criticism.

Ranking Member Maxine Waters said the administration’s policies favor Wall Street over ordinary Americans. Overall, Democrats accused Treasury Secretary Bessent of dismissing serious warnings about possible market risks.

In contrast, Republicans defended the administration.

Chairman French Hill praised deregulation and strong economic data, while Bessent said lighter rules would support innovation and small banks.

Overall, Republicans supported “tailored” regulations, arguing that smaller banks should not be treated the same as large global institutions and stressing the need to strengthen the commercial banking sector.


Final thoughts

  • Treasury Secretary Bessent’s defense of seized Bitcoin signals a shift toward treating digital assets as strategic reserves.
  • Democrats’ warnings reflect lingering fears of repeating past financial crises.

Related Questions

QWhat was the main question posed by Representative Brad Sherman to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent regarding Bitcoin?

AHe asked whether the government could or would intervene to 'bail out' Bitcoin if its price collapsed, and if he could instruct banks to buy more Bitcoin or change regulations to encourage them to do so.

QHow did Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent respond to the question about using taxpayer money to support the crypto market?

AHe did not directly answer but redirected the discussion, emphasizing that the seized Bitcoin is an asset of the U.S. and not taxpayer money, and that it is held as a strategic national security asset.

QWhat was the value appreciation of the seized Bitcoin that Bessent mentioned during the hearing?

AHe stated that $500 million of seized Bitcoin had grown to over $15 billion in value.

QHow did Democrats, such as Ranking Member Maxine Waters, criticize the administration's policies during the hearing?

AThey accused the administration of favoring Wall Street over ordinary Americans and dismissed serious warnings about potential market risks.

QWhat was the Treasury Secretary's stance on the authority to instruct banks to buy Bitcoin or change banking regulations?

AHe stated that he did not have the authority as Secretary of the Treasury or as chair of the FSOC to instruct banks to buy more Bitcoin or change regulations for that purpose.

Related Reads

Raising Interest Rates Is Not a Tech Killer, EPS Is: A Strategy for Discarding the Weak and Retaining the Strong After the AI Theme's Sharp Decline

**Summary: Rising Interest Rates Are Not the Killer of Tech; EPS Is: The "Keep the Strong, Ditch the Weak" Strategy After the AI Theme Plunge** The author argues that the sharp sell-off in tech and AI-related stocks, triggered by a strong US jobs report that heightened Fed rate hike fears, represents a "pullback to pick up passengers" rather than a "car crash." The true end of a tech bull market is not determined by an extra 25 basis point hike, but by industry overcapacity and the disproval of earnings per share (EPS) expectations. Historical analysis shows that during past rate hike cycles, the Nasdaq-100 often outperformed, provided EPS growth remained strong. The current phase is seen as a shift from a "broad narrative-driven rally" to a "focused verification stage" for AI. The investment strategy should be to "keep the strong, ditch the weak." * **Retain exposure** to high-conviction AI infrastructure leaders with clear order visibility, stable margins, strong cash flow, and upward EPS revisions (e.g., AI servers, advanced packaging, optical modules, key cloud suppliers). * **Reduce exposure** to high-beta, narrative-driven stocks with unclear profit paths (e.g., some quantum computing, space, or speculative chip stocks), especially on rebounds. Valuation concerns should focus on whether earnings can catch up to high multiples, not on high P/E alone. Crowded positioning signals a concentration into quality assets, not necessarily a market top. The upcoming Q2 earnings season will be a key validation point. The core principle is to hold stocks with proven EPS, while using macro events (CPI data, central bank meetings) to manage timing and risk.

marsbit35m ago

Raising Interest Rates Is Not a Tech Killer, EPS Is: A Strategy for Discarding the Weak and Retaining the Strong After the AI Theme's Sharp Decline

marsbit35m ago

The Largest IPO in History Ignites Heated Debate: Is SpaceX Worth $1.77 Trillion?

SpaceX's potential IPO is priced at $135 per share, aiming to raise $75 billion and valuing the company at approximately $1.77 trillion, which would make it the largest IPO in history. This valuation has sparked intense debate among investors. Bullish analysts, including major underwriters Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, argue the valuation is justified by SpaceX's long-term potential. They see it not just as a rocket company but as a future leader in space infrastructure, with key growth drivers being Starlink satellite internet, low-cost rocket launches, and future AI-related ventures. They project revenues reaching hundreds of billions to trillions of dollars by 2030-2040. ARK Invest's model suggests a 2030 enterprise value could reach $2.5 trillion. Bearish analysts from independent research firms like Morningstar, PitchBook, and New Constructs contend the IPO price is excessively high, already pricing in unrealistic future growth. Using DCF and sum-of-the-parts models, they estimate fair value between $780 billion and $1.7 trillion, significantly below the IPO target. They highlight risks such as the speculative nature of AI projections, over-dependence on Elon Musk, high growth expectations, and corporate governance concerns. Trefis set a target price of just $79 per share. While both sides acknowledge SpaceX's unique position in commercial space, the core disagreement centers on whether the $135 share price offers a reasonable margin of safety or is overly optimistic. Despite the valuation controversy, reported strong demand for the IPO indicates significant market interest.

marsbit2h ago

The Largest IPO in History Ignites Heated Debate: Is SpaceX Worth $1.77 Trillion?

marsbit2h ago

After the Passage of the GENIUS Act and the CLARITY Act, What Is the Correct Architecture for On-Chain Yield?

The article discusses the evolution of on-chain credit, distinguishing three markets: overcollateralized crypto lending, unsecured lending (largely unsuccessful), and asset-backed credit (ABC). ABC, backed by identifiable real-world collateral with legal recourse, is identified as the fastest-growing category and the only one credibly addressing adverse selection—the core problem in credit where the riskiest borrowers self-select. Current growth in on-chain Real World Assets (RWAs), particularly tokenized private credit funds (e.g., Maple Finance, Centrifuge), is substantial but often merely "wraps" existing fund structures, inheriting their risks rather than solving adverse selection at the protocol level. The regulatory landscape is a key driver, with the US GENIUS Act (prohibiting stablecoin issuers from paying yield) and the proposed CLARITY Act (closing loopholes on indirect yield) set to redefine permissible yield-bearing products. This makes vaults (like ERC-4626) the critical architecture—they become the primary compliant vehicle for delivering yield, functioning as issuance, disclosure, distribution, and recovery mechanisms. The author's thesis is that the correct post-GENIUS/CLARITY architecture involves building ABC solutions where credit assessment, structure, and recovery are encoded directly into the smart contract vault layer, moving beyond mere tokenized fund wrappers to solve adverse selection fundamentally and ensure regulatory compliance.

Foresight News3h ago

After the Passage of the GENIUS Act and the CLARITY Act, What Is the Correct Architecture for On-Chain Yield?

Foresight News3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

363 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片