Did The Cardano Founder Help To Derail XRP’s Growth? Ripple Community Draws Out Hoskinson

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-05-18Last updated on 2026-05-18

Abstract

A Ripple community member accused Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson of being involved in the "ETHgate" saga, alleging it helped derail XRP's growth. The ETHgate refers to claims that the U.S. SEC favored Ethereum by not classifying it as a security, while suing Ripple over XRP's status. The member suggested this hampered XRP's price performance. Hoskinson defended himself, noting he left Ethereum in 2014 due to disagreements and has since been critical of the network. He questioned how he could later conspire with Ethereum against XRP. The accuser later admitted the claim was based on hearsay and expressed hope for the truth to emerge. The discussion originated from a debate about the CLARITY Act, a crypto market structure bill that recently advanced in the Senate. Hoskinson warned the bill is imperfect and could allow the SEC to classify new projects as securities. The accuser stated support for the bill, hoping it would enable both ADA and XRP to rally. Ripple's CEO commented that XRP's status is already clarified by a prior court ruling, regardless of the bill's passage.

A member of the Ripple community has called out Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson for helping derail XRP’s growth through the ETHgate saga. In response, Hoskinson has defended himself, arguing that it is impossible he was involved in the XRP lawsuit.

Cardano Founder Accused Of Derailing XRP’s Growth

In an X post, Ripple community member Wino opined that the Cardano founder was involved in the ETHgate, which negatively impacted XRP’s growth. The ETHgate involves allegations that the U.S. SEC favored Ethereum over XRP by declaring that the former wasn’t a security. The Commission also eventually sued Ripple, arguing that XRP was a security.

This notably impacted XRP’s growth as the altcoin stagnated for most of the lawsuit and failed to record any significant gains even during the 2021 bull run. XRP and Ethereum were notably ranked as the largest altcoins by market cap at the time, making them direct competitors and fueling speculation that the ETHgate was aimed at bringing XRP down.

Meanwhile, in response to claims that he was involved in the ETHgate, the Cardano founder noted that he was “pushed” out of Ethereum in June 2014. He added that since then, they have spent 12 years attacking him. As such, he questioned how it was possible that he decided, years later, to coordinate with them to help Ethereum attack XRP.

It is worth noting that the Cardano founder was one of Ethereum’s co-founders but left in June 2014 over differences with Vitalik Buterin and the other co-founders. Since then, Hoskinson has criticized Ethereum on several occasions, including once predicting that the network wouldn’t survive the next ten to fifteen years.

Wino, who had accused the Cardano founder of being part of ETHgate, later revealed that his accusation was based on hearsay and that he was hoping the truth would come out someday. He added that he was rooting for the CLARITY Act to pass, so that ADA and XRP could both record parabolic rallies.

Focus Is On The CLARITY Act

Wino’s accusations stemmed from a discussion of the CLARITY Act, in which the Cardano founder had warned that the crypto bill was far from perfect. He further remarked that, under the bill, there was a risk that the SEC would classify new crypto projects as securities. However, pro-XRP lawyer John Deaton had before now mentioned that failure to pass the crypto bill risks a ‘Gensler 2.0.’

The CLARITY Act advanced to the full Senate last week as the Senate Banking Committee voted in favor of the bill. The crypto market structure bill will provide regulatory clarity for crypto assets such as XRP and Cardano, classifying them as commodities. However, Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse opined that XRP will be okay whether or not the crypto bill passes, as Judge Analisa Torres already ruled that the crypto isn’t a security.

ADA trading at $0.25 on the 1D chart | Source: ADAUSDT on Tradingview.com

Related Questions

QWhat is the 'ETHgate' saga mentioned in the article?

AThe 'ETHgate' saga refers to allegations that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) favored Ethereum over XRP by declaring Ethereum was not a security, while later suing Ripple, arguing that XRP was a security.

QHow did Charles Hoskinson defend himself against accusations of being involved in ETHgate?

ACharles Hoskinson defended himself by noting he was 'pushed' out of Ethereum in June 2014, has been attacked by its proponents for 12 years since, and questioned how it would be possible for him to later coordinate with them to attack XRP.

QWhat potential impact does the CLARITY Act have on cryptocurrencies like XRP and Cardano (ADA)?

AThe CLARITY Act aims to provide regulatory clarity by classifying cryptocurrencies like XRP and Cardano (ADA) as commodities, rather than securities, which could positively impact their regulatory standing and market performance.

QAccording to the article, why did the Ripple community member, Wino, later reveal about his accusation?

AWino later revealed that his accusation against Charles Hoskinson was based on hearsay, and he expressed hope that the truth would eventually come out. He also stated he was rooting for the CLARITY Act to pass.

QWhat was Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse's opinion on XRP's status regardless of the CLARITY Act's outcome?

ARipple CEO Brad Garlinghouse opined that XRP will be okay whether or not the CLARITY Act passes, as Judge Analisa Torres had already ruled that XRP is not a security.

Related Reads

Who Funds the Agents?

**Summary: Who Funds AI Agents?** OpenAI recently shut down a feature allowing AI agents to shop for users, highlighting the challenge of creating a secure and regulated environment for agent-driven transactions. While payment infrastructure exists, a crucial governance layer—defining spending limits, fraud detection, tax handling, and return policies—is largely missing. The potential is enormous: AI agents already processed $73M across 176M transactions last year, with McKinsey forecasting this could grow to $3-5T in global consumer commerce by 2030. The core competition isn't just about processing payments, which can be very cheap (especially with crypto-based settlement), but about controlling the rules that govern agent spending. Key players like Stripe and Coinbase are racing to dominate this governance layer. Stripe's acquisition of wallet provider Privy allows it to set spending policies, identity checks, and human-in-the-loop approvals directly at the wallet level. Similarly, Coinbase's stack, including its x402 protocol and AgentKit, embeds governance rules. This vertical integration across settlement, wallet, and governance layers is becoming the dominant strategy. Control over the governance layer is where significant future value lies. If agents handle trillions in transactions, even a small fee for managing compliance, fraud prevention, and policy enforcement could generate billions in annual revenue. The companies that successfully integrate across the payment stack will capture value from idle agent balances, transaction fees, and governance services, positioning themselves as the foundational banks of the AI agent economy.

marsbit11m ago

Who Funds the Agents?

marsbit11m ago

A Nation Blocks Chips, a Giant Buys a Nuclear Power Plant: Why It's Time to Seriously Consider DeAI

**Title: Great Powers Blockade Chips, Giants Buy Nuclear Plants: Why It's Time to Seriously Consider DeAI** In May 2026, the US closed loopholes for Chinese firms to acquire advanced NVIDIA chips via overseas subsidiaries. That same month, Kenya halted a $1B geothermal data center project involving Microsoft, fearing its immense energy consumption. Meanwhile, Huawei announced mass production of its Ascend AI chip. These disparate events underscore a new reality: the competition for computing power ("compute") has escalated beyond the tech industry, becoming a geopolitical and infrastructural battleground. A new era of oligopoly is forming, with control over the AI stack—from GPU chips (NVIDIA) and cloud platforms (AWS, Azure, Google Cloud) to foundational models (OpenAI, Anthropic)—concentrating in a few Western "AI Octopus" corporations. This centralization creates systemic risks: pricing power and platform lock-in for users, infrastructure fragility, and a widening "compute divide" that threatens to marginalize nations without independent AI capacity. An "AI Iron Curtain" is deepening through export controls. In response, some nations like Saudi Arabia and the UAE are investing heavily to buy compute power, aiming to transition from oil to AI economies. The EU seeks to triple its compute capacity by 2030 to reduce dependency. However, the spending gap is vast, with four US tech giants alone planning ~$750B in AI capex for 2026. The race is increasingly constrained by energy, with AI tasks consuming up to 1000x more power than web searches, pushing firms to even acquire nuclear plants. This landscape is fueling interest in Decentralized AI (DeAI). It proposes a third way: using open protocols to coordinate a global network of idle GPUs, independent developers, and data centers, creating an AI infrastructure without a single controlling entity. Leveraging blockchain and cryptographic verification, DeAI aims to break market concentration, disperse energy demands, reduce geopolitical dependencies, and enhance transparency. While still nascent in performance and stability, DeAI's core promise is not immediate superiority but providing a crucial alternative architecture to resist monopoly, censorship, and centralized power. As specialized AI hardware costs fall and open-source models flourish, the window to build this foundation is open. The very existence of such competition serves as a vital check against the inevitable abuse of concentrated power.

marsbit1h ago

A Nation Blocks Chips, a Giant Buys a Nuclear Power Plant: Why It's Time to Seriously Consider DeAI

marsbit1h ago

Outpoll Review: A Prediction Market Platform Built for Active Traders

Outpoll Review: A Prediction Market Platform Built for Active Traders In recent years, prediction markets have grown from a niche sector to a mainstream arena, attracting billions in trading volume and institutional capital. However, the user experience and tools for traders have not kept pace. Outpoll, a new global prediction market platform, aims to fill this gap by providing enhanced trading infrastructure for active and professional traders. Built on standard prediction market principles, Outpoll allows users to trade on the outcome of specific events. It uses fully collateralized contracts with USDC settlement, charges a competitive 0.1% fee per trade, and provides clear settlement rules upfront to minimize disputes. A key focus for Outpoll is its professional-grade trading tools. The platform supports limit and market orders, as well as take-profit and stop-loss orders for open positions—features uncommon in prediction markets. For automated trading, Outpoll offers comprehensive REST and WebSocket APIs, enabling portfolio management, price arbitrage, and integration with existing tools. The platform also features a creator-led market model, where approved experts and community leaders can create and manage markets for niche topics under platform supervision. Its integrated interface combines news feeds directly with trading functions, allowing users to monitor events and manage positions seamlessly. Outpoll launched with a native Android app (available on Google Play) and plans an iOS version later this year. In summary, Outpoll distinguishes itself with trader-focused tools, practical APIs, transparent and collateralized markets, integrated news, and an expanding creator program. For active traders, its advanced order types and API access alone make it a platform worth watching. Outpoll is now globally accessible via outpoll.com and Google Play.

marsbit1h ago

Outpoll Review: A Prediction Market Platform Built for Active Traders

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ADA (ADA) are presented below.

活动图片