‘Crypto Mining Queen’ Lyu Yongshuang: Once Controlled 9% of Global Bitcoin Hashrate, Swindled Out of 60 Million by ‘Middle Eastern Royal Son-in-Law’ in the US

marsbitPublished on 2026-06-11Last updated on 2026-06-11

Abstract

Summary: "Mining Queen" Lyu Yongshuang (Fiona Lyu), an 80s-born Chinese entrepreneur, once controlled approximately 9% of the global Bitcoin mining hashrate through her company Valarhash and its pools, 1THash and Bytepool. Her fortunes shifted dramatically in 2021 following China's crackdown on crypto mining. Relocating to the US, she fell victim to an elaborate fraud by two American brothers, Zubair and Muzammil Al Zubair. Posing as an "Arab royal" and a hedge fund manager, they used bribery and a fake romantic relationship to trick Lyu into signing a mining facility contract in Ohio. The scam resulted in losses exceeding $9.4 million, including the theft and resale of 1,067 mining rigs. In 2026, the brothers received lengthy prison sentences. Concurrently, Lyu faced legal battles in China, where a court invalidated a mining contract with a listed company, ordering a refund of nearly $2.8 million. These events marked a severe downturn for the once-powerful industry figure.

Original Author: Nicky, Foresight News

Caixin published an article on June 11th titled "Female Crypto Boss Defrauded of 60 Million in the US: How Did the ‘Middle Eastern Royal’ Brothers Set the Trap?". Following the clues in the article, we investigated the remarkable story of this "female crypto boss," Lyu, within the crypto world.

According to Caixin, a domestic female crypto tycoon was the victim of an investment fraud in the United States, suffering losses exceeding $9.4 million (approximately 60 million RMB). This individual is Lyu, the CEO of a computing power technology company in Southwest China. At its peak, the mining pool under her company reportedly accounted for about 9% of the global Bitcoin network hashrate.

The report indicated that two brothers named Zubair, who claimed to have "Middle Eastern royal" backgrounds, carried out the fraud by forging identities. One claimed to be a "Middle Eastern royal son-in-law," asserting control over Middle Eastern family funds, international business connections, and US local government resources. The other impersonated a character from the TV series "Billions," presenting himself as a hedge fund manager. The pair also successfully contacted and influenced Michael Smedley, the Chief of Staff to the Mayor of East Cleveland, Ohio, ultimately inducing Lyu to sign a contract for developing a crypto mining farm.

The Lyu mentioned in the report is an 80s-born female entrepreneur named Lyu Yongshuang (Fiona Lyu). The Chengdu Valarhash Technology Co., Ltd. she founded operates two mining pools: 1THash and Bytepool.

According to Caixin, Lyu Yongshuang was born in Ningbo in the 1980s. Before entering the cryptocurrency industry, her career path had no connection to finance or technology. She initially worked in international trade and later started a custom tour group business. She is an avid enthusiast of outdoor travel, diving, and sailing. In a 2020 interview, she mentioned that from 2008 to 2018, she spent more than half of each year traveling, covering destinations all over the world.

According to a previous report by TokenInsight, she first encountered Bitcoin in 2013 and immediately plunged into this emerging industry. At that time, China's cryptocurrency mining was still in its early stages, and miners needed to venture deep into the mountainous regions of Southwest China in search of cheap hydropower resources. Lyu recalled being among the earliest groups to "find electricity" in Sichuan. "The conditions were tough back then, but the electricity was cheap, the returns were high, and everyone was very excited."

In 2016, she began formally building her own mining farm. Between 2017 and 2018, she transitioned to mining machine distribution. In July 2019, she established Chengdu Valarhash Technology Co., Ltd., serving as CEO, integrating the business into a comprehensive platform encompassing mining pool operation, mining farm construction, mining machine hosting, and hashrate trading. In December of the same year, the company held a product launch event in Chengdu, officially introducing the 1THash and Bytepool mining pool brands and the 1TMine hashrate contract trading platform.

At its peak in the first half of 2020, 1THash ranked 7th globally among Bitcoin mining pools, and Bytepool ranked 11th. Together, the two pools controlled approximately 9% of the global Bitcoin hashrate. This was a staggering figure at the time, meaning that for every 100 Bitcoins generated globally, about 9 went to her pools.

A Sweeping Ban and a Turn of Fate

On May 21, 2021, the Financial Stability and Development Committee of the State Council held its 51st meeting, explicitly proposing to "crack down on Bitcoin mining and trading behavior."

In mid-June, the Sichuan Provincial Development and Reform Commission and the Sichuan Provincial Energy Bureau jointly issued a notice requiring power generation enterprises to conduct self-inspection and self-correction, immediately stopping electricity supply to virtual currency "mining" companies. For miners in Sichuan, this was the most devastating blow. Sichuan was the largest mining hub in China, with wet season hydropower prices as low as 0.2-0.3 RMB per kilowatt-hour, making it one of the cheapest power resources globally.

According to Caixin, Lyu Yongshuang later told friends that it was a period of "extreme anxiety." Her company had nine data centers distributed in China, the US, Canada, Russia, Sweden, and other locations, but the major domestic mining farms were the core source of hashrate. "Overnight, thousands of mining machines were forced to shut down, hundreds of shipping containers waited to be transported out, and money was burning every single day."

Image source: Caixin

She ultimately chose the United States as her first stop for venturing overseas. However, when she traveled across the ocean with hundreds of containers of mining machines to find a new foothold in Ohio, USA, what awaited her was an elaborately orchestrated scam.

According to Caixin, in July 2021, through an intermediary, she met Zubair Al Zubair, a man who claimed to be an "UAE royal son-in-law" and asserted control over Middle Eastern family funds and US local government resources. Zubair recommended an industrial property located in East Cleveland, Ohio, known as the Nela Park campus, claiming it could provide electricity at a low price of $0.04 per kilowatt-hour.

On August 11, 2021, inside the East Cleveland City Hall in Ohio, a seemingly formal signing ceremony took place. Witnessed by then-Mayor Brandon King and other municipal officials, Lyu Yongshuang signed her name on a cryptocurrency mining farm development contract, filled with hope. She paid $3 million to Zubair's company, "Dubai Bridge," and wired an initial $1 million from a Hong Kong account.

Image source: Caixin

However, this was just the beginning of an elaborately planned fraud. In reality, Zubair and his brother Muzamir were native-born Americans with no relation to any Middle Eastern royalty. The elder brother's claim of being a "son-in-law" was entirely fabricated; the younger brother's so-called "hedge fund manager" title was "self-taught" by watching YouTube videos and the TV series "Billions."

During their subsequent interactions, Zubair and Lyu Yongshuang established a "close personal relationship." In Lyu's view, this relationship was romantic in nature. Prosecutors later pointed out that such personal relationships were part of Zubair's fraud pattern, aimed at reducing the likelihood of victims questioning his claims.

The scam ultimately cost Lyu Yongshuang over $9.4 million (approximately 60 million RMB), including contract payments and later, 1,067 mining machines (sold for $6.17 million) that were defrauded by Zubair's brother and resold to Canada. That signing ceremony in the mayor's office was merely a false endorsement arranged by Zubair through bribing the mayor's chief of staff, Michael Smedley.

In May 2026, the US Department of Justice announced the sentences: Zubair was sentenced to 24 years in prison, Muzamir to 23 years, and Smedley to 8 years. Lyu Yongshuang appeared in the case under the code name "Victim 2."

Another Legal Battle Back Home

Around the same time Lyu Yongshuang was entangled in the US scam, she was also facing another legal dispute back in China, involving a lawsuit with Shanghai Jincai Network Technology Co., Ltd., a subsidiary of the A-share listed company ST Zhongchang (600242.SH).

Image source: Shanghai Securities News

According to previous reports by Economic Observer and Jiemian News, the trigger for the incident was ST Zhongchang's then-chairman, Li Qunnan. Between January and September 2021, Li was suspected of misappropriating listed company funds to purchase Bitcoin mining machines and pay related hosting fees, totaling over 53.5472 million RMB. Among these, the company spent 30 million RMB purchasing servers (Bitcoin mining machines) from Chengdu Valarhash. These purchases were disclosed in the 2021 interim report as "company fixed assets used for actual operations," but audits found the related funds did not substantively form assets on the company's books.

Against this backdrop, ST Zhongchang's new management, seeking to recover losses, sued Chengdu Valarhash in the name of Shanghai Jincai in April 2022. They demanded the termination of the "Computing Power Service Contract" signed between the two parties on April 1, 2021, and the return of the contract price of 19.2965 million RMB.

In October 2022, the Chengdu High-Tech Industrial Development Zone People's Court issued a first-instance judgment: the contract was invalid because it involved Bitcoin "mining" activities, and Chengdu Valarhash was ordered to refund 19.2965 million RMB within ten days. The company appealed, but the second-instance ruling upheld the original judgment.

This lawsuit, from filing to final judgment, unfolded almost concurrently with Lyu Yongshuang's ordeal of being defrauded in the US. On one side, 9.4 million USD was lost overseas; on the other, nearly 20 million RMB in contract payments was ordered to be refunded domestically. Under this double blow, the "Crypto Mining Queen" who once controlled 9% of the global Bitcoin hashrate faced the darkest moment of her life.

Related Questions

QWho is the subject of the article, and what was her former title and major business achievement in the cryptocurrency mining industry?

AThe subject of the article is Lu Yongshuang (Fiona Lyu). She was known as the "Mining Queen" and was the CEO of Chengdu Wanyou Hashrate Technology Co., Ltd. (Valarhash). At its peak, her mining pools, 1THash and Bytepool, jointly controlled about 9% of the global Bitcoin hashrate.

QWhat was the major regulatory change in China that significantly impacted Lu Yongshuang's business, and what was her subsequent business decision?

AIn May 2021, the Chinese government explicitly called for a crackdown on Bitcoin mining and trading. This was followed by a formal notice in Sichuan province ordering power companies to stop supplying electricity to crypto mining firms. This forced Lu Yongshuang's domestic mining operations to shut down. In response, she decided to relocate her mining operations overseas, with the United States as her first choice for expansion.

QDescribe the fraud scheme that Lu Yongshuang fell victim to in the United States. Who were the perpetrators and what was their method?

ALu Yongshuang was defrauded by two American brothers, Zubair Al Zubair and Muzamir. They fabricated identities: Zubair posed as a son-in-law of a Middle Eastern royal family with access to funds and government resources, while Muzamir impersonated a hedge fund manager. Through a bribed mayoral aide, they staged a fake contract signing ceremony for a crypto mining facility in Ohio. They swindled Lu out of over $9.4 million, including contract payments and proceeds from the subsequent sale of her mining machines.

QWhat was the outcome of the legal case against the fraudsters in the United States?

AIn May 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice announced the sentences for the perpetrators. Zubair Al Zubair was sentenced to 24 years in prison, his brother Muzamir received a 23-year sentence, and the corrupted mayoral aide, Michael Smedley, was sentenced to 8 years in prison.

QApart from the U.S. fraud case, what other major legal dispute was Lu Yongshuang involved in domestically in China, and what was the ruling?

ASimultaneously, in China, Lu's company, Chengdu Wanyou Hashrate, was sued by Shanghai Jincai Network Technology, a subsidiary of the listed company ST Zhongchang. The lawsuit sought to cancel a service contract and reclaim 19.3 million RMB paid for Bitcoin mining services. The court ruled that the contract was invalid because it involved Bitcoin "mining" activities, which were deemed illegal, and ordered Lu's company to return the 19.3 million RMB. This ruling was upheld on appeal.

Related Reads

The Largest IPO in History Ignites Heated Debate: Is SpaceX Worth $1.77 Trillion?

SpaceX's potential IPO is priced at $135 per share, aiming to raise $75 billion and valuing the company at approximately $1.77 trillion, which would make it the largest IPO in history. This valuation has sparked intense debate among investors. Bullish analysts, including major underwriters Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, argue the valuation is justified by SpaceX's long-term potential. They see it not just as a rocket company but as a future leader in space infrastructure, with key growth drivers being Starlink satellite internet, low-cost rocket launches, and future AI-related ventures. They project revenues reaching hundreds of billions to trillions of dollars by 2030-2040. ARK Invest's model suggests a 2030 enterprise value could reach $2.5 trillion. Bearish analysts from independent research firms like Morningstar, PitchBook, and New Constructs contend the IPO price is excessively high, already pricing in unrealistic future growth. Using DCF and sum-of-the-parts models, they estimate fair value between $780 billion and $1.7 trillion, significantly below the IPO target. They highlight risks such as the speculative nature of AI projections, over-dependence on Elon Musk, high growth expectations, and corporate governance concerns. Trefis set a target price of just $79 per share. While both sides acknowledge SpaceX's unique position in commercial space, the core disagreement centers on whether the $135 share price offers a reasonable margin of safety or is overly optimistic. Despite the valuation controversy, reported strong demand for the IPO indicates significant market interest.

marsbit43m ago

The Largest IPO in History Ignites Heated Debate: Is SpaceX Worth $1.77 Trillion?

marsbit43m ago

After the Passage of the GENIUS Act and the CLARITY Act, What Is the Correct Architecture for On-Chain Yield?

The article discusses the evolution of on-chain credit, distinguishing three markets: overcollateralized crypto lending, unsecured lending (largely unsuccessful), and asset-backed credit (ABC). ABC, backed by identifiable real-world collateral with legal recourse, is identified as the fastest-growing category and the only one credibly addressing adverse selection—the core problem in credit where the riskiest borrowers self-select. Current growth in on-chain Real World Assets (RWAs), particularly tokenized private credit funds (e.g., Maple Finance, Centrifuge), is substantial but often merely "wraps" existing fund structures, inheriting their risks rather than solving adverse selection at the protocol level. The regulatory landscape is a key driver, with the US GENIUS Act (prohibiting stablecoin issuers from paying yield) and the proposed CLARITY Act (closing loopholes on indirect yield) set to redefine permissible yield-bearing products. This makes vaults (like ERC-4626) the critical architecture—they become the primary compliant vehicle for delivering yield, functioning as issuance, disclosure, distribution, and recovery mechanisms. The author's thesis is that the correct post-GENIUS/CLARITY architecture involves building ABC solutions where credit assessment, structure, and recovery are encoded directly into the smart contract vault layer, moving beyond mere tokenized fund wrappers to solve adverse selection fundamentally and ensure regulatory compliance.

Foresight News1h ago

After the Passage of the GENIUS Act and the CLARITY Act, What Is the Correct Architecture for On-Chain Yield?

Foresight News1h ago

TechFlow Intelligence Bureau: Anthropic's New Model Fable Sparks Controversy by Restricting Biosafety Research, US CPI Soars to 4.2%, a Three-Year High

**Summary of TechFlow Intelligence Report:** The newsletter covers several key tech and finance developments. In AI, Anthropic's new Fable model faced backlash for secretly limiting biomedical research capabilities and enforcing a 30-day data retention policy, prompting the company to promise more transparent adjustments. In a related story, Anthropic's founder revealed his departure from OpenAI was due to dishonesty from Sam Altman, not safety concerns. Meanwhile, OpenAI is considering significant price cuts to compete with Anthropic, potentially sparking a price war. In crypto/Web3, BlackRock filed a new amendment for a yield-generating Bitcoin ETF, while Bank of America's CEO warned that stablecoin yields could drain trillions from traditional banks. U.S. Senator Cynthia Lummis advocated for the U.S. to officially accumulate Bitcoin reserves. In hardware, Nvidia released the DiffusionGemma-2-6B image model optimized for efficient inference, and AMD promoted its unified memory architecture to challenge Nvidia's dominance. TSMC's CFO hinted at possible price increases due to soaring AI chip demand. A major legal ruling in Germany held Google legally responsible for inaccurate information generated by its AI Overviews feature. Google Chrome also moved to fully block ad-blocker workarounds like uBlock Origin. Macroeconomic headlines included U.S. CPI rising to 4.2% (a 3-year high) and Iran's complete closure of the Strait of Hormuz, raising oil price and inflation fears. South Korean markets saw continued volatility with massive foreign capital outflow. Other notable stories: Microsoft expanded its Copilot AI assistant "Mico" globally; a study found r/wallstreetbets users' stock picks outperformed Wall Street; a fully autonomous drone killed a human soldier for the first time, raising AI ethics concerns; and a Chinese hospital used brain-computer interface technology to help a blind person "see." The overarching theme connects debates over AI boundaries and responsibility (Anthropic's restrictions, Google's liability, lethal autonomous drones) with real-world economic and geopolitical turmoil (inflation, Strait of Hormuz closure, market instability), highlighting the tense interplay between technological advancement and global chaos.

marsbit1h ago

TechFlow Intelligence Bureau: Anthropic's New Model Fable Sparks Controversy by Restricting Biosafety Research, US CPI Soars to 4.2%, a Three-Year High

marsbit1h ago

Alibaba's Yet Another New Business Division: What Signal Does It Send?

Alibaba has established a new "Token Foundry" business unit, merging its Tongyi large model division and Future Life Lab. Led directly by Group CEO Wu Yongming, this marks the company's third significant AI organizational reshuffle in 2026, following the creation of the Alibaba Token Hub (ATH) and a Group Technology Committee. The move signals a strategic shift from consolidating AI resources to accelerating productization and commercialization. The "Token Foundry" name reflects Alibaba's ambition to become a foundational supplier in the AI era, focusing on model development and commercial application. Key teams, including those behind the high-performing HappyHorse video generation model, have been integrated into the new unit. Concurrently, Zhou Jingren, architect of the Qwen model series, has been appointed Group Chief Scientist to lead a new AI Future Research Institute, focusing on long-term technological breakthroughs like Agent capabilities. This restructuring creates a clear four-layer AI architecture within Alibaba: the research institute for frontier exploration, Token Foundry for core models and commercialization, MaaS for platform services, and business units like Qianwen (C端) and Wukong (B端) for end-user applications. The adjustments align with a global trend among tech giants like Google and Microsoft to centralize AI leadership under the CEO and deeply integrate research with business units. The urgency is driven by a narrowing competitive window. Alibaba has announced its AI business is now entering a commercialization phase, with AI-related revenue seeing triple-digit growth for eleven consecutive quarters. The company faces intense competition in the MaaS (Model-as-a-Service) sector from rivals like ByteDance and Tencent. The Token Foundry initiative represents Alibaba's effort to streamline execution and enhance competitiveness in this critical, fast-evolving landscape.

marsbit2h ago

Alibaba's Yet Another New Business Division: What Signal Does It Send?

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

363 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片