Crypto Miners' Big AI Gamble: Valuations Enter Differentiation Stage, Comeback Fight Proves Tough

链捕手Published on 2026-06-20Last updated on 2026-06-20

Abstract

Crypto Mining Firms' AI Bet: Valuation Divergence and a Challenging Transformation Facing declining profitability in crypto mining, mining companies are pivoting to AI infrastructure, capitalizing on their existing power resources, land, and data center expertise to offer GPU compute power. This transition narrative has boosted their stock prices significantly, with firms like Hut 8 and Bitfarms seeing gains over 100% year-to-date, far outpacing Bitcoin. This has led to a market valuation split, with pioneers like CoreWeave reaching a $62.8B market cap, while others remain below $5B. The market currently prioritizes growth potential over short-term profits, which remain under pressure due to heavy capital expenditures for AI build-outs and crypto asset volatility. However, the transformation is a high-stakes gamble. Bitcoin mining profitability is shrinking, with the average production cost around $63,707 and miner margins contracting. While AI offers a more lucrative long-term path, it requires massive investment—estimated at a $500B near-term funding gap. Success now hinges on execution: delivering on contracted power capacity, securing quality tenants like major cloud providers, and managing the immense financial burden. The valuation focus is shifting from mere power capacity to project delivery, future cash flows, and tenant quality, making this a difficult but critical turnaround attempt.

Author: Nancy, PANews

As crypto assets continue to slump, crypto mining companies are facing increasing pressure to survive. To find new growth curves, more and more miners are accelerating their shift into the AI track. This transformation narrative quickly gained favor in the capital markets, with many miners' stock prices surging significantly, even hitting record highs.

However, while the AI business injects new growth potential into miners, the massive capital expenditures, continuous funding requirements, and long return cycles behind it are pushing miners into another war of financial attrition. At a time when the profitability of their core mining business remains under pressure, this high-stakes gamble of transitioning to AI is testing miners' financial strength and execution capabilities.

Stock Prices Outperform Bitcoin Significantly, Miner Valuations Enter a Phase of Differentiation

Mining companies are transforming into the landlords of computing power in the AI era.

As Bitcoin mining profit margins continue to shrink, with some miners even falling into losses, the AI boom has driven a sharp increase in global demand for data centers, power resources, and GPU computing power. More miners are accelerating their transformation into AI infrastructure, seeking new growth curves.

For miners, this transition offers natural advantages. Over the long term, to meet large-scale mining demands, miners have amassed key assets such as abundant power resources, land reserves, substation access capabilities, and mature cooling systems. Compared to data center operators starting from scratch, miners can quickly enter the AI infrastructure market by upgrading existing facilities, meeting AI computing power demands at lower costs and in shorter timeframes.

Since last year, the pace of miners' transformation to AI has noticeably accelerated. Some miners decisively downplay or even exit traditional mining to fully pivot to AI computing and data center operations; others retain part of their mining business but gradually shift the focus of resource allocation and capital expenditure to the AI field. Today, several miners have become key players in AI infrastructure construction.

Looking at the timing of transformation, CoreWeave, Applied Digital, and Bitdeer began deploying AI computing and data center businesses as early as 2022-2023, among the industry's early movers; while miners like Iris Energy, Terawulf, Hut 8, Riot Platforms, and Bitfarms started fully ramping up AI infrastructure construction in 2025, coinciding with the AI industry's rapid expansion cycle.

In terms of stock performance, the market has shown high recognition for the AI transformation narrative. The 11 miners have achieved an average year-to-date gain of 75.97%, significantly outperforming Bitcoin over the same period, with most hitting new highs post-transition. Among them, Bitfarms (129.62%), Hut 8 (131.87%), Terawulf (118.68%), and Riot Platforms (93.71%) have stood out, benefiting from this round of AI infrastructure revaluation.

In terms of market capitalization, miners have clearly differentiated. As a successful transformation representative, CoreWeave's market cap has reached $62.855 billion, far exceeding other miners and becoming the industry's new valuation benchmark; Iris Energy, Terawulf, Hut 8, Applied Digital, and Riot Platforms form a tier with market caps between $10 billion and $20 billion; companies like MARA Holdings, Core Scientific, Bitdeer, CleanSpark, and Bitfarms remain in the sub-$5 billion range. This differentiation stems not only from first-mover advantage but also reflects the market's differentiated pricing of each miner's AI strategy execution capability, customer resources, and data center deployment progress.

However, from a fundamental perspective, most miners remain in the heavy-investment phase of AI transformation. Although many miners' latest quarterly reports show revenue growth, overall profitability remains under pressure. On one hand, fluctuations in the value of crypto asset portfolios drag down profit performance; on the other hand, AI data center construction requires massive capital expenditures, with increasing investments in power expansion, infrastructure, and GPU procurement driving continuous operational cost increases, keeping most miners in a loss-making state.

Notably, despite generally pressured earnings, these miners' stock prices have surged significantly, indicating that the current market focus is not on short-term profitability but on the growth potential of miners as new-generation computing power infrastructure operators.

Miners' Survival Battle Escalates, AI Transformation Must Overcome Multiple Hurdles

The downturn in the Bitcoin market is making the survival environment for miners increasingly severe.

According to Capriole Investments data, as of June 18th, the average Bitcoin production cost was approximately $63,707, with electricity costs around $50,965, resulting in a miner profit margin of just 17.45%. Over the past 30 days, miner profit margins have contracted by 47.8%. Meanwhile, Luxor Hashrate Index data shows that as of June 18th, the daily revenue per 1 TH/s of hashrate has dropped to $0.032, a significant decline from $0.053 a year ago.

With mining revenues continuously shrinking, many miners have had to sell Bitcoin to maintain cash flow, further intensifying survival pressure for small and medium-sized miners, and accelerating the concentration of mining resources towards leading players. Currently, the three largest mining pools—Foundry USA, AntPool, and F2Pool—collectively hold 59% of the network's total hashrate share. In comparison, in 2022, the top three Bitcoin mining pools held only 44% of the hashrate market share.

Although the traditional mining business is struggling, the explosive growth in AI data center demand is also prompting a market revaluation of miners. VanEck's latest research report points out that miners' most valuable assets are not mining rigs, but power resources, substation access capabilities, land reserves, and data center infrastructure—precisely the scarce core resources the AI industry needs most today. Because AI customers are willing to pay electricity rates and rents far higher than those in traditional mining, AI infrastructure is expected to become miners' primary growth engine for the next decade.

A Bernstein report reveals that hyperscale cloud providers, AI cloud service providers, and chip companies have already announced over $90 billion in AI infrastructure collaborations, involving about 3.7 GW of power capacity. Currently, chasing power resources has become the core of AI infrastructure competition, with Bitcoin miners collectively controlling over 27 GW of planned power capacity. In some parts of the US, the timeline for new 1 GW power connections can be as long as 50 months, making existing mining sites key locations for AI data center expansion.

However, the AI transformation is far from an easy path. VanEck notes that the market is still in the early stages of AI transformation, with company valuations primarily based on Gross Energized Power. Miners with signed AI leases generally receive higher valuation premiums, while projects still in the planning stage struggle to gain market recognition. Future industry valuation logic will gradually shift from "power capacity" to "project delivery capability," ultimately returning to core metrics like cash flow, return on capital, and tenant quality. Currently, the industry has only delivered about 25% of its signed capacity. The ability to complete AI data center construction on time and on budget will become a key factor determining company valuations.

VanEck also emphasizes that AI tenant quality will directly impact miner valuation levels. Clients like Microsoft, Amazon, and Google (hyperscale cloud providers) bring more stable cash flows and lower financing costs, while smaller GPU cloud service providers correspond to higher operational risks and capital costs.

The enormous funding required for transformation is also testing miners' financial strength. VanEck estimates that miners' transition to AI infrastructure still faces massive capital expenditure needs, with a short-term funding gap of about $50 billion and long-term capital requirements potentially reaching $221 billion.

Under immense financial pressure, many miners have already started raising funds through various means. For example, miners like Iris Energy, TeraWulf, Bitfarms, and CleanSpark have raised funds by issuing convertible bonds, attracting investors with lower coupon rates and future equity conversion potential; while companies like Core Scientific, Terawulf, MARA, Bitdeer, and Riot Platforms have chosen to sell or even liquidate part of their Bitcoin reserves to continuously fund the AI transition.

Additionally, many miners are beginning to lock in future revenue by signing long-term AI or High-Performance Computing (HPC) contracts, using them to secure project financing and reduce overall operational risk. For instance, CoreWeave signed a $6 billion AI cloud service cooperation agreement with Jane Street; IREN secured a $9.7 billion AI cloud computing contract with Microsoft; Hut 8 signed data center leasing agreements totaling $9.8 billion; and Bitdeer partnered with Norway's DCI to build the country's largest AI data center project, among others.

For miners, AI undoubtedly offers a far more imaginative development path than traditional mining at this stage. However, this transformation is not simply a switch from mining to selling computing power; it is, in essence, a long-term competition centered on capital, resources, and execution capability.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhy are cryptocurrency mining companies accelerating their shift towards the AI infrastructure sector?

ACryptocurrency mining companies are accelerating their shift to AI infrastructure due to declining profitability in Bitcoin mining and the explosive growth in global demand for data centers, power resources, and GPU computing power. The AI boom offers a new potential growth curve. Miners also possess natural advantages for this transition, such as existing access to power resources, land, substation connections, and mature cooling systems, allowing them to enter the AI infrastructure market at a lower cost and shorter timeline.

QHow has the market valuation of mining companies changed following their AI transformation narrative?

AThe market valuation of mining companies has entered a differentiated stage following their AI transformation. Their stock prices have significantly outperformed Bitcoin, with many hitting new highs. Companies are now valued based on their progress in AI infrastructure. Leaders like CoreWeave have achieved multi-billion dollar valuations, forming distinct market cap tiers. Valuation is shifting from a focus on short-term mining profitability to the future growth potential as next-generation computing infrastructure operators, with differentiation based on execution capability, customer base, and project delivery.

QWhat are the major challenges mining companies face in their transition to AI businesses?

AThe major challenges include immense capital expenditures, sustained funding needs, and long payback periods for AI data center construction. Companies face a funding gap estimated at $500 billion short-term and up to $2.21 trillion long-term. Other hurdles involve escalating operational costs, the need to secure high-quality AI tenants (like major cloud providers), the ability to deliver projects on time and on budget, and managing the financial pressure while their core mining business remains under profitability strain.

QAccording to the article, what are the key assets of a mining company that are valuable for AI infrastructure development?

AAccording to the article, the most valuable assets of a mining company for AI development are not the mining rigs, but the underlying infrastructure: power resources, substation interconnection capacity, land reserves, and data center facilities. These are scarce core resources crucial for the AI industry. Miners' existing access to significant planned power capacity (over 27 GW collectively) and their ability to repurpose sites give them a strategic advantage in the race for AI infrastructure.

QHow are mining companies financing their expensive transition into AI infrastructure?

AMining companies are employing several methods to finance their AI transition: 1) Issuing convertible notes (e.g., Iris Energy, TeraWulf). 2) Selling or liquidating portions of their Bitcoin reserves (e.g., Core Scientific, Riot Platforms). 3) Securing project financing by signing long-term AI or High-Performance Computing (HPC) contracts with major clients, which lock in future revenue and reduce operational risk. Examples include multi-billion dollar deals with companies like Microsoft, Jane Street, and others.

Related Reads

Base Under Pressure

**Title: The Pressure Mounts for Base** Base, the Ethereum Layer 2 scaling solution backed by Coinbase, is facing significant pressure and public scrutiny from its leadership following the launch of Robinhood Chain. Base co-founder Jesse Pollak recently acknowledged strategic missteps, admitting that the chain's past focus on social and creator tokens (e.g., through Farcaster, Zora) failed to deliver sustainable adoption. He has refocused on core infrastructure, handing leadership of the Base App back to Coinbase's Cobie. While Base remains a top L2 contender alongside OP Mainnet and Arbitrum, and boasts the highest TVL (nearly $12B), its weaknesses are being highlighted by the new competitor. Key criticisms include its slow progress on decentralization. Base has faced issues with its single sequencer causing block production halts, and L2BEAT is reportedly considering downgrading its decentralization rating from Stage 1 to Stage 0. This contrasts sharply with the rapid initial success of Robinhood Chain, whose DEX quickly entered the top five by volume. The leadership styles of the parent companies are also being compared: Robinhood's CEO actively engages with new projects, while a recent incident where Coinbase's Brian Armstrong briefly changed his profile picture—sparking and then crashing a related meme token—drew community ire and mockery. Pollak stated Base is working with Coinbase on tokenized stocks backed 1:1 by real equity, differentiating it from Robinhood's derivatives model. However, the article argues that Base's most urgent task is to address its long-standing technical and trust issues. With more traditional finance players likely to emulate Robinhood's path, Base must use this competitive pressure to solidify its position as long-term financial infrastructure.

Foresight News10m ago

Base Under Pressure

Foresight News10m ago

White House Concession Removes Ethical Hurdle, Clarity Act Races Against Final Window Before Recess?

On July 21st, industry sources reported that the Trump administration has agreed to include an ethics provision in the "Clarity Act" (Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025). This concession addresses the long-standing conflict-of-interest concerns regarding government officials and the crypto industry, potentially removing the final major obstacle to the bill's progress. Additionally, Patrick Witt, the executive director of the White House's Digital Asset Advisory Committee, confirmed he will remain in his role to help finalize the bill, alleviating previous concerns about his potential departure. The Clarity Act aims to establish a unified federal regulatory framework for the U.S. digital asset market. Its core objective is to resolve regulatory ambiguity by defining different types of digital assets (digital commodities, investment contract assets, and permitted payment stablecoins) and clarifying the respective oversight roles of the SEC and CFTC. This would end the long-running jurisdictional dispute between the two agencies and provide clearer compliance paths for the industry. With the ethics issue moving toward resolution, the most urgent challenge now is time. The U.S. Congress is set to begin its August recess in mid-August, leaving only a few working weeks to finalize the text and advance the bill through the Senate. Industry advocates, like the Blockchain Association's Kristin Smith, stress that this is a critical moment. If negotiations conclude successfully in the coming weeks, the Clarity Act could pass a key hurdle before the recess; otherwise, it may face significant delays. If enacted, the Clarity Act could mark a historic turning point in crypto regulation. By providing a clearer and more predictable legal framework, it aims to reduce uncertainty for businesses, developers, and traditional financial institutions looking to enter the digital asset space, potentially setting a global benchmark for market structure regulation.

Odaily星球日报16m ago

White House Concession Removes Ethical Hurdle, Clarity Act Races Against Final Window Before Recess?

Odaily星球日报16m ago

AI Era, Industrial Revolution, and Future Civilization Interview — Zhang Dingwen: The Future Does Not Belong to Chasers

"AI Era, Industrial Revolution and Future Civilization: An Interview with Zhang Dingwen – The Future Does Not Belong to Those Who Chase" In this interview, entrepreneur Zhang Dingwen reflects on his entrepreneurial journey and philosophy, moving beyond discussions of financing or success to emphasize understanding the "era" itself. He argues that true entrepreneurs should not chase short-term trends ("winds"), but position themselves in the direction of long-term technological and societal evolution. Zhang shares key lessons from his early days, including the realization that user value does not automatically translate to commercial value. For him, the core of entrepreneurship is not building a company but constantly upgrading one's own "cognition" – the ability to interpret information, ask the right questions, and understand the underlying "causes" behind business outcomes, not just the effects. His thinking has evolved from a focus on creating good products to a strategic focus on building "entrances" – platforms that naturally connect users to digital services. He sees smart wearables, like watches, not merely as hardware but as potential future gateways combining technological, financial, social, and even fashion attributes to create sustained user relationships and ecosystems. Ultimately, Zhang's vision transcends individual products or companies. He discusses business competition in three stages: product, platform, and finally, "civilization" – where the greatest companies influence how society operates by defining new rules and ways of life. He believes the mission of a truly great enterprise is to solve problems of its time, build enduring trust, and contribute lasting value, leaving behind not just wealth but a positive impact on how the world works. The future, he concludes, belongs not to the fastest, but to those with the correct long-term direction and a commitment to continuous learning and evolution.

marsbit27m ago

AI Era, Industrial Revolution, and Future Civilization Interview — Zhang Dingwen: The Future Does Not Belong to Chasers

marsbit27m ago

Cryptocurrency & Stock Market Barometer丨Strategy Cash Reserves Increase to $3.23 Billion, Halting BTC Purchases; Vanguard and Other Asset Managers Increase Holdings in Strategy Stock (July 21)

Market Overview & Warnings: The article warns of high volatility in South Korean stocks and continued dependence on U.S. stocks on geopolitics. Chinese A-shares remain under pressure. It advises against using leverage in current equity markets. For crypto-linked stocks, most have limited growth except Robinhood, with caution advised. U.S. Stock Market: Bearish bets on U.S. stocks, particularly targeting AI-related companies, have reached record highs since 2010, signaling deep skepticism about the sustainability of the AI-driven rally. Tech and chip stocks led a market decline, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index potentially entering a bear market. Increased expectations for Federal Reserve interest rate hikes and geopolitical tensions contributed to the negative sentiment. Bitcoin Treasury Company Updates: * Strategy: Increased its cash reserves to $3.23 billion and paused Bitcoin purchases. Several major asset managers, including Vanguard Group and Capital Group, increased their holdings of Strategy (MSTR) stock. * Global corporate Bitcoin buying slowed significantly to just $1.33 million last week. * Other notable activity: Strive purchased 21 BTC; ORANGE JUICE raised $40 million for Bitcoin acquisitions; Bitcoin Japan Corp. raised $60 million, allocating $4.08 million for its first BTC purchase. Other Crypto Treasury Holdings: * Ethereum: BitMine increased its ETH holdings to 5.78 million, nearing its 5% of supply goal. Its total crypto assets, cash, and securities are valued at $11.5 billion. * Solana: No significant corporate treasury activity reported. * Altcoins: HypeStrat made no adjustments to its treasury; its mNAV ratio fell to a long-term low. (Note: This summary is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.)

marsbit28m ago

Cryptocurrency & Stock Market Barometer丨Strategy Cash Reserves Increase to $3.23 Billion, Halting BTC Purchases; Vanguard and Other Asset Managers Increase Holdings in Strategy Stock (July 21)

marsbit28m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片