Competitors Going Public, Kimi Can't Sit Still

marsbitPublished on 2026-05-28Last updated on 2026-05-28

Abstract

Competitors Go Public, Kimi Feels the Pressure Yue Zhi An Mian (Moonshot AI), the company behind the AI assistant Kimi, has begun dismantling its VIE and red-chip structure, clearing a key obstacle for a potential Hong Kong IPO. This marks a significant shift from six months ago when founder Yang Zhilin stated the company was in "no hurry" to list. The move comes as rivals like Zhipu AI and MiniMax have successfully listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange in early 2026, experiencing massive surges in market value. This has reset valuation logic for AI companies, turning "going public" from an end goal into a competitive necessity. Analysts suggest Kimi is both seizing a favorable market window and responding to competitive pressure. Kimi's valuation has skyrocketed from around $3 billion at its 2023 founding to over $20 billion by May 2026. Capital is betting on its potential as a future AI platform and gateway, though some caution this "emotional valuation" depends on sustained technological leadership and successful commercialization. Traditionally focused on core model R&D over user growth, Kimi has recently pivoted strategy. While its monthly active users declined through 2025, it shifted focus to Agent development and reducing marketing spend. The release of its K2.5 model in early 2026 reportedly generated substantial revenue, with annual recurring revenue reaching $200 million by April, driven by subscriptions and API services. A $2 billion D-round financing in May ...

Recent reports indicate that Moonshot AI has notified its shareholders, officially initiating the dismantling of its VIE and red chip structure to clear obstacles for a Hong Kong IPO.

Just half a year ago, Moonshot AI founder Yang Zhilin reiterated in an internal letter that the company was "in no hurry to go public in the short term."

"This step is more like clearing structural hurdles before an IPO, meaning the company has seriously entered the IPO preparation phase. But several hurdles remain: equity structure, regulatory communication, domestic filing, security review, HKEX materials, financial audits, and market timing," said Huang Lichong, President of Huisheng International Capital. Dismantling VIE and red chip structures essentially clarifies the positions of control rights, responsible entities, and regulatory boundaries. If smooth, the window could be six months to a year; if complex due to regulations, shareholders, tax, or foreign capital arrangements, it might take longer.

Phoenix WEEKLY Finance inquired with Moonshot AI regarding the IPO, but received no reply by the time of publication.

Regarding expectations, the capital market has already given its answer in advance. When founded in 2023, Moonshot AI's valuation was approximately $3 billion; by May 2026, this figure had surpassed $20 billion.

In reality, with the successive listings of Zhipu AI and MiniMax on the Hong Kong stock market, the valuation logic of the secondary market for large model companies has suddenly been unlocked. The long-term reliance on narratives to support valuations in the primary market has become a thing of the past. "Going public" itself is also shifting from an outcome to a competitive method.

"Moonshot AI's move considers both seizing the golden window for a Hong Kong listing and is forced by industry competition prompting proactive layout," said Zhang Yi, CEO of iiMedia Consulting Group.

Perhaps for Moonshot AI, the real question is no longer "whether to go public," but rather, when other competitors have already entered the next round, Moonshot AI cannot afford to stand still.

$20 Billion Valuation May Be Tinged with Capital Market Sentiment

Since the beginning of 2026, the capital "atmosphere" in the large model industry has rapidly heated up.

Over the past three years, Chinese AI startups have undergone a transformation from being neglected to becoming darlings of capital. However, what truly turned the industry sentiment around was the successive Hong Kong listings of Zhipu AI and MiniMax earlier this year.

On January 8, 2026, Zhipu AI took the lead in listing on the HKEX with an issue price of HK$116. On its first trading day, the stock closed at HK$131.5 per share, up 13.17%, with a total market capitalization reaching HK$57.89 billion. In the following months, Zhipu AI's stock price continued to rise. As of the close on May 26, its total market capitalization had exceeded HK$599.6 billion, nearly a tenfold increase from its initial listing.

On January 9, MiniMax followed suit, listing on the HKEX with an issue price of HK$165. On its first trading day, the stock closed at HK$345 per share, a surge of 109% from the issue price, with a total market capitalization surpassing HK$106.7 billion. Currently, its total market capitalization exceeds HK$241.1 billion.

This provided the entire industry with pricing benchmarks. Since then, AI is no longer seen as just a technological story but as the next platform-level opportunity.

With such precedents, Moonshot AI's valuation also rapidly climbed.

In November 2025, Moonshot AI's valuation was $4.3 billion; by May 2026, it had exceeded $20 billion. In just half a year, its valuation nearly quadrupled, with cumulative financing exceeding $3.2 billion. Moonshot AI has also completed a rare capital leap for a domestic large model startup.

"Revenue is the foundation. Capital pricing mainly focuses on three things: first, foundational model capabilities; second, user access and developer ecosystem; third, the imaginative space for future platformization," Huang Lichong believes. For companies like Moonshot AI, capital is buying not today's profit statement, but a scarce ticket in the Chinese large model race. Whoever can become the next-generation AI gateway may gain access to new profit pools like search, office work, developer tools, enterprise services, and Agent execution.

This year, information about unofficial financing shares not from Kimi has even frequently appeared in the market.

In April, Kimi publicly refuted rumors, stating, "Recently, false financing information purporting to be from 'Moonshot AI' has appeared in the market. We hereby remind investors that all financing activities are directly handled by Moonshot AI. Any so-called 'investment shares' circulated through unofficial channels carry significant risks."

Screenshot of Kimi's response.

When capital frantically searches for the "next Zhipu AI" or "next MiniMax," it's difficult for Moonshot AI to keep capital at bay.

"A $20 billion valuation seems more like an advance payment on the future," Zhang Yi believes, attributing it to the capital market pricing in growth dividends ahead of time.

Huang Lichong stated, "This valuation only holds up if three things materialize: continued model leadership, sustained commercialization scaling, and declining unit inference costs. Otherwise, it's just sentiment-driven valuation."

R&D Pace May Be Constrained, Commercialization Moves to the Forefront

Among domestic large model startups, Moonshot AI is an "outlier."

For a long time, Yang Zhilin has been one of the most typical "tech-focused" representatives among domestic AI entrepreneurs. Compared to traffic competition and commercial expansion, he emphasizes foundational model capabilities, organizational efficiency, and long-term R&D investment. This has long positioned Moonshot AI as one of the domestic teams closest to the routes of OpenAI and Anthropic.

QuestMobile data shows that the monthly active user (MAU) count for the Kimi App dropped from 21.653 million in Q1 2025 to 9.027 million in Q4 2025.

In his year-end all-staff letter in 2025, Yang Zhilin clarified the direction of this round of adjustment: focus on Agents, not targeting absolute user numbers, persistently pursuing intelligence limits and productivity value, and significantly cutting annual advertising spending, shifting to technology-driven commercialization.

In January 2026, Kimi released its flagship model K2.5. According to multiple media reports, less than a month after the model's release, the company's revenue over nearly 20 days had already exceeded its total revenue for the entire year of 2025; as of April 2026, the company's Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) exceeded $200 million, with paid subscriptions and API revenue gradually becoming new growth engines.

Moonshot AI is attempting to prove to the outside world that despite reduced MAU, Kimi's commercial capabilities remain intact.

Qichacha shows that in May this year, Moonshot AI completed another $2 billion Series D financing round, led by Meituan Longzhu, with participation from institutions like China Mobile and CPE, which may indicate capital's approval of Kimi's adjustments in its business model.

Screenshot of Moonshot AI's $2 billion Series D financing.

However, post-financing, AI companies cannot avoid the continuous investment race. Training compute, inference costs, data resources, and talent reserves all imply massive capital consumption.

If entering the secondary market, the rules begin to change. Beyond investment, investors will also demand corresponding returns.

Huang Lichong predicts significant changes for Moonshot AI post-IPO. First, the organization will become heavier. Financial disclosure, internal controls, compliance, model safety, and data governance will become institutionalized. Second, the R&D pace will be more constrained. In the past, it could focus solely on model breakthroughs; post-IPO, it must explain input-output ratios, compute expenses, loss boundaries, and commercialization paths. Third, commercialization will be brought to the forefront. Investors won't pay for "model leadership" indefinitely; they will look at subscriptions, APIs, enterprise clients, Agent revenue, and gross margins.

"Only raising funds without model leadership will eventually be disproven. Only making models without capital and commercialization won't survive to the end," in Huang Lichong's view. The real test for Moonshot AI post-IPO is whether it can transform "technological scarcity" into "sustainable revenue" and "explainable valuation."

(Image source: Moonshot AI official)

This article is from the WeChat public account "Phoenix WEEKLY Finance", author: Wang Han

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, what is the primary purpose of Kimi's parent company, Moonshot AI, dismantling its VIE and red-chip structure?

ATo clear structural obstacles for its planned IPO in Hong Kong, officially entering the IPO preparation phase.

QWhat significant change in valuation logic for large model companies does the article mention after the IPOs of Zhipu AI and MiniMax?

AThe IPOs have shifted the valuation logic from a primary market reliance on narrative to a secondary market focus on concrete financial performance, turning 'listing' itself from an end result into a competitive method.

QHow does the article characterize the $20 billion valuation of Moonshot AI as of May 2026?

AAnalysts in the article suggest the $20 billion valuation may be inflated by capital market sentiment, representing a premium paid for a 'scarce ticket' in the Chinese large model race and a pricing that anticipates future growth. Its sustainability depends on continued model leadership, commercialization scale-up, and reduced unit inference costs.

QWhat key strategic shift in Kimi's focus did founder Yang Zhilin outline in late 2025, according to the article?

AYang Zhilin outlined a shift in focus towards Agent (intelligent agent) development, prioritizing intelligence limits and productivity value over absolute user numbers. The company also significantly reduced annual advertising spending to rely more on technology-driven commercialization.

QWhat are the three major changes that capital market expert Huang Lichong predicts for Moonshot AI after its potential IPO?

AHuang Lichong predicts post-IPO changes will include: 1) A heavier organization with more formalized financial disclosure, internal controls, and compliance. 2) More constrained R&D节奏 (rhythm/pace), requiring justification for inputs, outputs, and commercialization paths. 3) Commercialization being brought to the forefront, with investors demanding to see revenue from subscriptions, APIs, enterprise clients, and agent services, along with gross margins.

Related Reads

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

The cryptocurrency market has just concluded its worst-performing quarter since 2022, with total capitalization dropping 12.6% to $2.1 trillion. All core metrics indicate capital is leaving the sector, not just rotating within it. Bitcoin fell 14.2% and Ethereum dropped 25.4% in Q2, breaking their previous correlation with US tech stocks. A key driver is the reversal in US spot Bitcoin ETF flows, which saw a net outflow of approximately $4.67 billion in Q2, including a record monthly outflow near $4.5 billion in June. While recent data suggests long-term holders are accumulating again, sustained ETF outflows mean continued selling pressure. Market focus is now singularly on the Federal Reserve. The upcoming July FOMC meeting is seen as the most critical event for Q3. A dovish signal could support Bitcoin reclaiming a $68,000-$84,000 range, while a hawkish stance might establish a new trading band around $50,000-$56,000. Additionally, regulatory uncertainty persists, with the progress of the crucial *CLARITY Act* stalling in the Senate, reducing its perceived 2026 passage probability to 40-45%. Despite the broad downturn, a few sectors showed growth. Prediction markets saw nominal volume surge 48.7% year-over-year to $113.8 billion, and tokenized collectibles transaction volume rose 143% quarterly to $1.4 billion. The Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization sector also continued steady growth, now representing ~$28.1 billion in on-chain value. The market's foundation for an extreme crash appears limited, with Bitcoin price hovering near its 200-week moving average. However, the trading paradigm has shifted from narrative-driven speculation to decisions based on price action, policy developments, and interest rate expectations, making a broad sentiment-driven rally unlikely in the near term.

marsbit4h ago

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

marsbit4h ago

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

**Crypto & Stock Market Wrap: Bitcoin Tests Resistance, Stocks Retreat After AI Surge** Bitcoin consolidates around $66,000, facing key resistance near $68,000—an area seen as a major psychological and technical hurdle where previous rallies have failed. Analysts note the cryptocurrency is caught between its 200-week moving average (~$63,333) and 200-week EMA (~$68,328). A clear break above $68k is needed to signal a stronger bullish trend, while a rejection could lead to a retest of $63k support. Market sentiment remains cautious, with low futures open interest pointing to a low-liquidity rebound rather than a full bull market. Bitcoin spot ETFs saw another $203 million inflow. US stock futures pointed lower after a strong Tuesday session led by a massive rebound in semiconductors and memory stocks. The rally was fueled by renewed optimism about AI-driven hardware demand, with Micron, SanDisk, and SK Hynix surging. However, those gains reversed in pre-market trading. Super Micro Computer (SMCI) soared over 20% after hours on strong guidance and a record backlog. Other standouts included Rocket Lab and nuclear energy plays Oklo and X-Energy. Rising oil prices (Brent above $91) and climbing Treasury yields (10-year near 4.64%), however, are reigniting inflation concerns and acting as a headwind for equities. In Asia, markets were mixed. South Korea's KOSPI pared early gains to close slightly higher as semiconductor stocks like SK Hynix gave back initial surges. Japan's Nikkei edged lower as the yen hit a fresh 38-year low against the dollar, raising fears of potential market intervention. Key events to watch include the Samsung Galaxy launch, AMD's AI event, and a slew of major tech earnings from Alphabet, Tesla, and IBM after the close on Wednesday, followed by the ECB meeting and Intel's earnings on Thursday.

marsbit4h ago

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

marsbit4h ago

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

Former CFTC Chairman and Circle President Heath Tarbert has consistently advocated for a long-term vision in public, urging patience from investors as Circle’s stock price has fallen significantly from its peak. However, it has been revealed that since Circle’s IPO, Tarbert has continuously sold his CRCL shares through pre-arranged trading plans, cashing out approximately $30 million, without making any public market purchases. This contrast between his public messaging and personal actions has drawn criticism. Tarbert joined Circle in July 2023 as Chief Legal Officer, leveraging his regulatory experience to help guide the company through its IPO and expansion. Despite promoting stablecoins as long-term infrastructure, he established a 10b5-1 trading plan just before Circle went public, leading to substantial stock sales over the following year. In March 2026, he initiated another plan to sell more shares. His career trajectory highlights a pattern of moving between high-level regulatory roles and influential positions in the financial sector. After resigning as CFTC Chairman in early 2021, he joined Citadel Securities as Chief Legal Officer just 27 days later, during a period of intense regulatory scrutiny for the firm. He later joined Circle, aiding its efforts to navigate regulatory challenges for its public listing. While Tarbert's expertise in policy and compliance is valuable to companies like Circle, his actions—advocating long-term confidence while personally divesting—raise questions about the alignment between his public statements and his private financial decisions, leaving investors who followed his advice to bear the market risks.

marsbit4h ago

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

marsbit4h ago

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

The article titled "Gate Research Institute: Are Crypto Financial Products Sparking a 'Wall Street' Wave—Competition or Convergence?" explores the evolving relationship between the crypto ecosystem and traditional finance (TradFi). The piece begins by reflecting on Bitcoin's original 2009 vision of decentralization, disintermediation, and moving away from banks. It then contrasts this with the 2024 landscape, where key crypto assets like Bitcoin are increasingly held through Wall Street products like ETFs issued by giants like BlackRock. The article questions whether this signifies that TradFi is systematically taking over the rights to issue, price, custody, and distribute crypto financial assets. The core argument is that this is not a zero-sum takeover but rather a bidirectional convergence where each side addresses the other's weaknesses. Crypto offers 24/7 global markets, programmable settlement, and open access but lacks compliant channels, institutional-grade custody, deep fiat liquidity, and mainstream distribution. TradFi possesses these but is constrained by legacy systems, limited operating hours, and slow settlement. Two primary convergence paths are highlighted: * **Path A (CEX to TradFi):** Exemplified by Gate, which has progressed from offering tokenized stocks and CFDs to providing direct, real stock trading (US, Hong Kong, South Korea) within its platform, using USDT. * **Path B (TradFi to Crypto):** Exemplified by Robinhood, which has integrated crypto trading, acquired exchanges like Bitstamp, and is moving traditional assets like stocks onto the blockchain via tokenization and its own Layer 2. Both paths are ultimately competing to become the next-generation, unified financial account—a "super account" where users can seamlessly trade cryptocurrencies, stocks, ETFs, RWA (Real World Assets), and tokenized treasury products in one interface. The growth of RWA and tokenized treasuries (e.g., BlackRock's BUIDL) is presented as the asset-layer fusion, providing stable, yield-bearing assets on-chain and acting as a bridge between the two worlds. In conclusion, the "Wall Street-ization" of crypto is framed as a mutual transformation. Decentralized ideals persist in the protocol layer, while at the application layer, a more efficient, global, and accessible unified capital market is emerging from this convergence. The future competition lies not between crypto exchanges and stockbrokers, but between platforms vying to offer the most comprehensive asset coverage, liquidity, and user experience within a single account.

marsbit4h ago

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

marsbit4h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片